Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 14 in Revision of the genus complex Gibbula: an integrative approach to delineating the Eastern Mediterranean genera Gibbula Risso, 1826, Steromphala Gray, 1847, and Phorcus Risso, 1826 using DNA-barcoding and geometric morphometrics (Vetigastropoda, Trochoidea)

Fig. 14 Phorcus turbinatus (Born, 1778). a PCA plot of PC1 vs. PC2 for genus Phorcus. Phorcus turbinatus (petrol) separates from all other species. b Representative specimen of Ph. turbinatus from this study. c One syntype of Ph. turbinatus (NHMW 14002). Scale bars 5 mm

Fig. 12 in Revision of the genus complex Gibbula: an integrative approach to delineating the Eastern Mediterranean genera Gibbula Risso, 1826, Steromphala Gray, 1847, and Phorcus Risso, 1826 using DNA-barcoding and geometric morphometrics (Vetigastropoda, Trochoidea)

Fig. 12 Phorcus richardi (Payraudeau 1826). a PCA plot of PC1 vs. PC2 of genus Phorcus. Phorcus richardi (maroon) is the most abundant species in the current sample. It separates well from Ph. articulatus and Ph. turbinatus. One group of Ph. mutabilis is not distinguishable from Ph.

Fig. 11 in Revision of the genus complex Gibbula: an integrative approach to delineating the Eastern Mediterranean genera Gibbula Risso, 1826, Steromphala Gray, 1847, and Phorcus Risso, 1826 using DNA-barcoding and geometric morphometrics (Vetigastropoda, Trochoidea)

Fig. 11 Steromphala divaricata (Linnaeus, 1758). a PCA plot of PC1 vs. PC2 from genus Steromphala. Steromphala divaricata (pink) cannot be recovered as a completely separated group as it shows a small overlap with St. varia. Type material and material from this study do not overlap. Three individuals (Linné 41–43) of the type material (pink group on the

Fig. 10 in Revision of the genus complex Gibbula: an integrative approach to delineating the Eastern Mediterranean genera Gibbula Risso, 1826, Steromphala Gray, 1847, and Phorcus Risso, 1826 using DNA-barcoding and geometric morphometrics (Vetigastropoda, Trochoidea)

Fig. 10 Steromphala varia (Linnaeus, 1758). a PCA plot of PC1 vs. PC3 of genus Steromphala. Steromphala varia (blue) separates from all other species. Specimens from this study overlap with the type material. b

Fig. 4 in Revision of the genus complex Gibbula: an integrative approach to delineating the Eastern Mediterranean genera Gibbula Risso, 1826, Steromphala Gray, 1847, and Phorcus Risso, 1826 using DNA-barcoding and geometric morphometrics (Vetigastropoda, Trochoidea)

Fig. 4 Plot of first and third principal component of combined lateral and ventral landmark data from Phorcus and Steromphala individuals. A morphological separation of the two genera becomes apparent

Fig. 5 in Revision of the genus complex Gibbula: an integrative approach to delineating the Eastern Mediterranean genera Gibbula Risso, 1826, Steromphala Gray, 1847, and Phorcus Risso, 1826 using DNA-barcoding and geometric morphometrics (Vetigastropoda, Trochoidea)

Fig. 5 Lectotype of Steromphala cineraria (Linnaeus, 1758). Located at LSL (LSL.502). Scale bar 5 mm

Fig. 2 Landmark templates for representative a lateral and b in Revision of the genus complex Gibbula: an integrative approach to delineating the Eastern Mediterranean genera Gibbula Risso, 1826, Steromphala Gray, 1847, and Phorcus Risso, 1826 using DNA-barcoding and geometric morphometrics (Vetigastropoda, Trochoidea)

Fig. 2 Landmark templates for representative a lateral and b ventral standardised views. Filled circles show fixed landmarks. Empty circles show semilandmarks, processed as sliding landmarks

FIGURE 5. A, B. Gibbula isseli Monterosato, 1889 in Catalogue of the primary types of marine molluscan taxa described by Tommaso Allery Di Maria, Marquis of Monterosato, deposited in the Museo Civico di Zoologia, Roma

FIGURE 5. A, B. Gibbula isseli Monterosato, 1889, Costantinopoli (Turkey), H. 4.9 mm, with original label (MCZR–M– 11304); C–E. Trochus latior Monterosato, 1880, Sfax (Tunisia), H. 17.5 mm, with original labels (MCZR–M–11306); F, G. Zizyphinus linnaei Monterosato, 1884, Palermo (Sicily), H. 23.2 mm, with original label (MCZR–M–11543); H, I. Zizyphinus lissus Monterosato, 1889, Yorkshire (U. K.), H. 22.2 mm, with original label (MCZR–M–11578).

FIGURE 4. A, B. Gibbula cyrenaica Monterosato, 1923 in Catalogue of the primary types of marine molluscan taxa described by Tommaso Allery Di Maria, Marquis of Monterosato, deposited in the Museo Civico di Zoologia, Roma

FIGURE 4. A, B. Gibbula cyrenaica Monterosato, 1923, Benghazi (Libya), H. 8.1 mm, with original label (MCZR–M– 11267); C, D. Zizyphinus demissus Monterosato, 1889, Algiers (Algeria), H. 20.6 mm, with original label (MCZR–M–11617); E, F. Trochocochlea denudata Monterosato, 1888, Tangier (Morocco), H. 24 mm, with original labels (MCZR–M–11133); G, H. Trochus fraterculus Monterosato, 1880, Sfax (Tunisia), H. 7.36 mm, with original label (MCZR–M–11705); I, J. Clanculopsis granolirata Monterosato, 1889, Casablanca (Morocco), H. 8.8 mm, with original label (MCZR–M–10935).

FIGURE 3. A, B. Gibbula barbara Monterosato, 1884 in Catalogue of the primary types of marine molluscan taxa described by Tommaso Allery Di Maria, Marquis of Monterosato, deposited in the Museo Civico di Zoologia, Roma

FIGURE 3. A, B. Gibbula barbara Monterosato, 1884, Sfax (Tunisia), H. 13.9 mm, with original label (MCZR–M–11312); C, D. Trochus baudoni Monterosato, 1891, lectotype, Paulilles (France), H. 6.5 mm, with original label (MCZR–M–11725); E–G. Ampullotrochus brugnonei Monterosato, 1890, fossil of Ficarazzi (Sicily), H. 33.4 mm, and H. 30 mm, with original label (MCZR–M–11493 and MCZR–M–11494); H, I. Gibbula conemenosi Monterosato, 1888, Missolungi (Greece), H. 12.8 mm, with original labels (MCZR–M–11320).

FIGURE 7. A, B. Gibbula sulliottii Monterosato, 1888 in Catalogue of the primary types of marine molluscan taxa described by Tommaso Allery Di Maria, Marquis of Monterosato, deposited in the Museo Civico di Zoologia, Roma

FIGURE 7. A, B. Gibbula sulliottii Monterosato, 1888, Messina (Sicily), H. 8.0 mm, with original label (MCZR–M–11363); C, D. Gibbula tantilla Monterosato, 1890, paralectotype, Palermo (Sicily) H. 3.3 mm, with original label (MCZR–M–11269); E, F. Trochocochlea trivialis Monterosato, 1888, Livorno (Italy), H. 18.4 mm, with original label (MCZR–M–11064); G–I. Gibbula vimontiae Monterosato, 1884, lectotype, coasts of Provence (France), H. 2.4 mm, with original labels (MCZR–M– 11282).

Fig. 15 in Revision of the genus complex Gibbula: an integrative approach to delineating the Eastern Mediterranean genera Gibbula Risso, 1826, Steromphala Gray, 1847, and Phorcus Risso, 1826 using DNA-barcoding and geometric morphometrics (Vetigastropoda, Trochoidea)

Fig. 15 Phorcus articulatus (Lamarck 1822). a PCA plot of PC1 vs. PC2 for genus Phorcus. Single specimen of Phorcus articulatus separates from all other species. b Representative specimen of Ph. articulatus from this study. c One syntype of Ph. articulatus (INVE 51532). Scale bars 5 mm

Fig. 13 in Revision of the genus complex Gibbula: an integrative approach to delineating the Eastern Mediterranean genera Gibbula Risso, 1826, Steromphala Gray, 1847, and Phorcus Risso, 1826 using DNA-barcoding and geometric morphometrics (Vetigastropoda, Trochoidea)

Fig. 13 Phorcus mutabilis (Philippi, 1846). a PCA plot of PC1 vs. PC3 from genus Phorcus. Phorcus mutabilis (olive) splits into two morphotypes: one from Croatia and one from Crete. b Representative specimen of Ph. mutabilis (Croatia) from this study. c Representative specimen of Ph. mutabilis (Crete) from this study. d Specimen (black arrow) showing Ph. richardi morphology, but Ph. mutabilis COI barcode. From this study. Scale bars 5 mm

Fig. 9 in Revision of the genus complex Gibbula: an integrative approach to delineating the Eastern Mediterranean genera Gibbula Risso, 1826, Steromphala Gray, 1847, and Phorcus Risso, 1826 using DNA-barcoding and geometric morphometrics (Vetigastropoda, Trochoidea)

Fig. 9 Steromphala rarilineata (Michaud, 1829). a PCA plot of PC1 vs. PC3 from genus Steromphala. Steromphala rarilineata (violet) is separated but very near St. adriatica and St. divaricata. b Representative specimen of St. rarilineata from this study. Scale bar 5 mm

Fig. 7 in Revision of the genus complex Gibbula: an integrative approach to delineating the Eastern Mediterranean genera Gibbula Risso, 1826, Steromphala Gray, 1847, and Phorcus Risso, 1826 using DNA-barcoding and geometric morphometrics (Vetigastropoda, Trochoidea)

Fig. 7 Steromphala adansonii (Payraudeau 1826). a PCA plot of PC1 vs. PC2 of genus Steromphala. Single specimen of Steromphala adansonii (black) clusters near St. umbilicaris. b Representative specimen of St. adansonii from this study. Scale bar 5 mm

Fig. 6 in Revision of the genus complex Gibbula: an integrative approach to delineating the Eastern Mediterranean genera Gibbula Risso, 1826, Steromphala Gray, 1847, and Phorcus Risso, 1826 using DNA-barcoding and geometric morphometrics (Vetigastropoda, Trochoidea)

Fig. 6 Steromphala umbilicaris (Linnaeus, 1758) and Steromphala nebulosa (Philippi, 1848). a PCA plot of PC1 vs. PC2 of genus Steromphala. Steromphala umbilicaris (green) separates well from all other species. There is no overlap between specimens from this study and the type material. One individual (Linné 24) nests within St. adriatica. Steromphala nebulosa (grey) nests at the edge of St. umbilicaris. b Representative specimen of St. umbilicaris from this study. c Representative specimen of St. nebulosa from this study. d: Designated lectotype for St. umbilicaris located at LSL (LSL.504). Scale bars 5 mm

Fig. 8 in Revision of the genus complex Gibbula: an integrative approach to delineating the Eastern Mediterranean genera Gibbula Risso, 1826, Steromphala Gray, 1847, and Phorcus Risso, 1826 using DNA-barcoding and geometric morphometrics (Vetigastropoda, Trochoidea)

Fig. 8 Steromphala adriatica (Philippi, 1844). a PCA plot of PC1 vs PC2 of genus Steromphala. Steromphala adriatica (red) is separated from all but St. divaricata. One individual of Steromphala umbilicaris (Linné

Fig. 3 in Revision of the genus complex Gibbula: an integrative approach to delineating the Eastern Mediterranean genera Gibbula Risso, 1826, Steromphala Gray, 1847, and Phorcus Risso, 1826 using DNA-barcoding and geometric morphometrics (Vetigastropoda, Trochoidea)

Fig. 3 RAxML based phylogenetic reconstruction (GTRGAMMA model and 1000 rapid bootstrap replicates). COI barcodes were used to identify species and reconstruct relationships between species and genera.

zenodo24/100

Fig. 1 in Revision of the genus complex Gibbula: an integrative approach to delineating the Eastern Mediterranean genera Gibbula Risso, 1826, Steromphala Gray, 1847, and Phorcus Risso, 1826 using DNA-barcoding and geometric morphometrics (Vetigastropoda, Trochoidea)

Fig. 1 Sampling sites for Mediterranean specimens of Steromphala and Phorcus species