Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 8 in Betaphycus gelatinus and B. philippinensis (Gigartinales, Rhodophyta) are conspecific

FIGURE 8. rbcL-based phylogenetic tree of B. gelatinus with other eucheumatoid species. Values at nodes correspond to ML bootstrap/ BI posterior probability. The right bars indicate species delimited per MSD test. GenBank accession numbers are indicated for each node.

FIGURE 10. cox2-3 in Betaphycus gelatinus and B. philippinensis (Gigartinales, Rhodophyta) are conspecific

FIGURE 10. cox2-3-based phylogenetic tree of B. gelatinus with other eucheumatoid species. Values at nodes correspond to ML bootstrap/ BI posterior probability. The right bars indicate species delimited per MSD test. Sample codes indicate previously assigned haplotype names with corresponding GenBank accession numbers.

FIGURES 1–7 in Betaphycus gelatinus and B. philippinensis (Gigartinales, Rhodophyta) are conspecific

FIGURES 1–7. Morphology of Betaphycus gelatinus from the Philippines. 1. Gross vegetative habit of B. gelatinus, FEUH03023. Scale = 2 cm. 2. Ventral portion of a flattened thallus of B. gelatinus showing numerous protuberances, FEUH03023. Scale =1 cm. 3. Cross section of a branch of B. gelatinus showing flattened central rhizoidal filaments (boxed), FEUH03023. Scale = 200 μm. 4. A close image of B. gelatinus rhizoidal filaments, FEUH03023. Scale = 40 μm 5. Gross habit of a female B. gelatinus, FEUH03025. Scale = 2 cm. 6. A branch portion of a female B. gelatinus showing stalked carpospores developed ventrally, FEUH03025. Scale = 1 cm. 7. A cross section of a B. gelatinus cystocarp revealing central fusion cells (F) and carpospores (C), which together surrounded by a pericarp (P), FEUH03025. Scale = 250 μm.

FIGURE 9. COI-5P in Betaphycus gelatinus and B. philippinensis (Gigartinales, Rhodophyta) are conspecific

FIGURE 9. COI-5P-based phylogenetic tree of B. gelatinus with other eucheumatoid species. Values at nodes correspond to ML bootstrap/ BI posterior probability. The right bars indicate species delimited per MSD test. Sample codes indicate previously assigned haplotype names with corresponding GenBank accession numbers.

FIGURE 3 in Molecular assessment of flat Cystocloniaceae (Gigartinales, Rhodophyta) from Brazil with reinstatement of Calliblepharis jolyi and a new record of C. saidana for the Atlantic Ocean

FIGURE 3. Reproductive morphology of Calliblepharis jolyi. A. Surface view of a male thallus with scattered spermatangia. B. Transverse section of a spermatangial branch showing spermatia in chains, cut off from elongated spermatangial primordial cells (arrows). C. Ultimate branchlets with marginal cystocarps. D. Gonimoblast initial (gi) cut off inwardly from the auxiliary cell (a). E. Transverse section of a young cystocarp showing the basal inner nutritive tissue (nt), large columnar cells in the center of carposporophyte (c) and branched gonimoblast filaments (gf) bearing chains of carposporangia (ca). F. Transverse sterile filaments joined with the pericarp. G. Chains of ovoid carposporangia. H. Nonostiolate, mature cystocarp. I. Surface view of tetrasporangia scattered over the upper branchlets. J. Transverse section of tetrasporangial branch. K. Detail of a mature tetrasporangium zonately divided.

FIGURE 1 in Molecular assessment of flat Cystocloniaceae (Gigartinales, Rhodophyta) from Brazil with reinstatement of Calliblepharis jolyi and a new record of C. saidana for the Atlantic Ocean

FIGURE 1. Maximum Likelihood tree of Calliblepharis sensu lato and related genera in Cystocloniaceae inferred from rbcL sequences. Bootstrap values ≥70% are shown above branches. Boldface corresponds to new sequences generated in this study. Shaded rectangles indicate the morphological groups (I–IV) recognized in Calliblepharis sensu lato.

FIGURE 2 in Molecular assessment of flat Cystocloniaceae (Gigartinales, Rhodophyta) from Brazil with reinstatement of Calliblepharis jolyi and a new record of C. saidana for the Atlantic Ocean

FIGURE 2. Vegetative morphology of Calliblepharis jolyi. A. Holotype (SPF2601). B. Newly collected topotype specimen (SP470439, MK614687), epiphyte of Cryptonemia seminervis. C. Discoid holdfast. D. Detail showing branches with anastomosis (arrow). E. Detail of branching pattern, with ultimate branchlets terete and tapered to the ends. F. Surface view of a branch apex showing the apical cell. G. Surface view showing weakly developed rosette cells (arrows) surrounding the cortical cells. H. Longitudinal section showing an axial filament (a) surrounded by medullary cells, linked by secondary pit-connection (arrowhead). I. Transverse section of a middle portion of the thallus, with lenticular thickenings throughout. J. Detail of a transverse section showing a rosette cell (arrow), and lenticular thickenings in the medullary and cortical cells (arrowheads).

FIGURE 5 in Molecular assessment of flat Cystocloniaceae (Gigartinales, Rhodophyta) from Brazil with reinstatement of Calliblepharis jolyi and a new record of C. saidana for the Atlantic Ocean

FIGURE 5. Reproductive morphology of Calliblepharis saidana. A. Female thallus (SP470445) with marginal cystocarps. B. Transverse section of an immature cystocarp showing the basal inner nutritive tissue (nt) and gonimoblast filaments (gf) bearing chains of carposporangia (ca). C. Transverse section of a mature cystocarp showing gonimoblast filaments (gf) outwardly producing carposporangia (ca), a reticulum of interconnected filaments (r) and the basal inner nutritive tissue (nt). D. Detail of the pericarp, with sterile transverse filaments (arrows). E. Chains of carposporangia. F. Nonostiolate, mature cystocarp. G. Surface view of a tetrasporangial sorus. H. Transverse section of a tetrasporangial sorus showing two mature tetrasporangia zonately divided.

FIGURE 4 in Molecular assessment of flat Cystocloniaceae (Gigartinales, Rhodophyta) from Brazil with reinstatement of Calliblepharis jolyi and a new record of C. saidana for the Atlantic Ocean

FIGURE 4. Vegetative morphology of Calliblepharis saidana. A. Two specimens epiphytic on Ceratodictyon repens (SP470446, MK614694). B. Detail of the opposite branching. C. Small discoid holdfast. D. Detail showing branches with anastomosis (arrow). E. Surface view of a branch apex showing the apical cell. F. Surface view showing rosette cells (arrows) surrounding the cortical cells. G. Longitudinal section showing an axial filament (a) surrounded by filaments of elongated cells, linked by secondary pit-connections (arrowheads). H. Transverse section of a middle portion of the thallus. I. Detail of a transverse section showing rosette cells (arrows) surrounding the cortical cells.

FIGURE 8 in Resolving the phylogenetic affinities of Kappaphycus inermis within the genus Kappaphycus (Gigartinales, Solieriaceae) using mitochondrial and plastid markers

FIGURE 8. Phylogenetic tree hypothesized from ML analysis of the genus Kappaphycus based on RuBisCo spacer gene sequences. Numbers above branches correspond to BI probability values and ML bootsrap percent values.

FIGURE 7 in Resolving the phylogenetic affinities of Kappaphycus inermis within the genus Kappaphycus (Gigartinales, Solieriaceae) using mitochondrial and plastid markers

FIGURE 7. Phylogenetic tree hypothesized from ML analysis of the genus Kappaphycus based rbcL gene sequences. Numbers above branches correspond to BI probability values and ML bootsrap percent values.

FIGURE 6 in Resolving the phylogenetic affinities of Kappaphycus inermis within the genus Kappaphycus (Gigartinales, Solieriaceae) using mitochondrial and plastid markers

FIGURE 6. Phylogenetic tree hypothesized from ML analysis of the genus Kappaphycus based on cox2–3 spacer gene sequences. Numbers above branches correspond to BI probability values and ML bootsrap percent values.

FIGURE 5 in Resolving the phylogenetic affinities of Kappaphycus inermis within the genus Kappaphycus (Gigartinales, Solieriaceae) using mitochondrial and plastid markers

FIGURE 5. Phylogenetic tree hypothesized from ML analysis of the genus Kappaphycus based on cox1 gene sequences. Numbers above branches correspond to BI probability values and ML bootsrap percent values.

FIGURES 1–4 in Resolving the phylogenetic affinities of Kappaphycus inermis within the genus Kappaphycus (Gigartinales, Solieriaceae) using mitochondrial and plastid markers

FIGURES 1–4. Morphology of K. inermis. 1. Gross habit of K. inermis specimen, AOL616. Scale = 1 cm. The arrow indicates the presence of crustose holdfast. 2. Cross section of near apical tip showing medium and uniformly sized central medullary cells (arrow), AOL616. Scale = 125 µm. 3. Gross habit of a female K. inermis specimen, AOL538. Scale = 3 cm. 4. A portion of an inflated apical branch tip showing the location of cystocarps (arrows), AOL538. Scale= 1 cm.