Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
204
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
204 results for “Global simulations”
Model simulation data used in "The global impact of the transport sectors on atmospheric aerosol in 2030 – Part 2: Aviation" (Righi et al., Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2016)
<p>This dataset contains the output of the EMAC global model simulations analysed and discussed in Righi et al. (<i>Atmos. Chem. Phys.</i>, 2016). For details see the README.md file.</p>
Model simulation data used in "The global impact of the transport sectors on atmospheric aerosol in 2030 – Part 1: Land transport and shipping" (Righi et al., Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2015)
<p>This dataset contains the output of the EMAC global model simulations analysed and discussed in Righi et al. (<i>Atmos. Chem. Phys.</i>, 2015). For details see the README.md file.</p>
Global atmospheric simulation using the Super-Parameterized Community Atmosphere Model
<p>A 1-month subset from a global atmospheric simulation using the Super-Parameterized Community Atmosphere Model (SP-CAM), which implements the Multi-scale Modeling Framework (MMF) described in Khairoutdinov and Randall (2001) and Khairoutdinov et al. (2005). The version of the SP-CAM used here is described in Marchand et al. (2009) and Ovtchinnikov et al (2006), and was run at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory with DOE support. It is based on CAM 3.0 for the global atmospheric component, and uses the System for Atmospheric Modeling (SAM; Khairoutdinov and Randall 2003). This simulation is configured with CAM running the finite volume dynamical core on a 2x2.5 degree latitude-longitude grid with 26 vertical levels. The embedded CRM (SAM) is configured with 64 horizontal columns at 4 km grid spacing with 24 vertical levels (sharing the bottom 24 levels with the CAM grid), and single-moment microphysics. The simulation was initialized on 1 September 1997 and runs through June 2002, forced with observed monthly-mean sea surface temperatures. Only the month of July 2000 is uploaded here, which is what is required to reproduce the results in Hillman et al. (2018).</p>
Data for the 'Evaluation of global simulations of aerosol particle and cloud condensation nuclei number, with implications for cloud droplet formation'
<p>All numerical data used in the manuscript <strong>“Evaluation of global simulations of aerosol particle number and cloud condensation nuclei, and implications for cloud droplet formation” </strong>by G. S. Fanourgakis et al. ACP (2019) are categorized and provided in a number of files. All files are in the hdf format. A readme file is also provided.</p> <p>These data files have been created by G. S. Fanourgakis (fanourg@uoc.gr)</p> <p>Details on the data are provided in Fanourgakis et al. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2019 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-1340 (e-mail to <a href="mailto:mariak@uoc.gr">mariak@uoc.gr</a> ; <a href="mailto:athanasios.nenes@epfl.ch">athanasios.nenes@epfl.ch</a> )</p> <p>For an in-depth understanding of the description below, a study of the above mentioned manuscript is required.</p> <p>(A) Station model results</p> <p>The station results can be found in files with filenames of the form:</p> <p>station $MODEL.nc</p> <p>The “$MODEL” (as well as all names starting with “$”) indicates a variable, and more specifically one of the models participated in the present study. The values of this variable are tabulated in Table 1 in the readme file.</p> <p>In each file a number of computational results are provided by the specified model for all nine (9) stations that provided observational data. The name of the variable is formed as:</p> <p>st $STATION $FIELDhour st $STATION $FIELD month</p> <p>where all possible values of the variables $STATION and $FIELD are tabulated in Tables 2 and 3 in the readme file, respectively. The extension _hour denotes that hourly values for the field are provided, while the extension _month the monthly average of this quantity. For example, the variable</p> <p>st Finokalia CCN02 hour</p> <p>found in the file station_TM4-ECPL.nc, contains the hourly values of the CCN<sub>0<em>.</em>2 </sub>at the Finokalia station as computed by the TM4-ECPL model. In a similar way, in the file station_EMAC.nc, the variable below gives the monthly values of dust at Vavihill as computed with the EMAC model.</p> <p>st Vavihill DU month</p> <p>Notice also that in all files hourly and monthly data are provided for the time period from 1-1-2011 up to 31-12-2015 (60 months and 43,824 hours)</p> <p>(B) Station observational results</p> <p>There is one file that contains all observational data from Schmale et al., SCIENTIFIC DATA | 4:170003 | DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2017.3, 2017 (<a href="mailto:julia.schmale@psi.ch">julia.schmale@psi.ch</a>) and the data that were computed based on the observations (i.e. number of cloud droplets) (contact person: athanasios.nenes@epfl.ch). The file is</p> <p>station observations.nc</p> <p>while the following fields are contained in there:</p> <p>st $STATION $FIELDhour</p> <p>st $STATION $FIELD month</p> <p>The values of variables are given in the Tables 2 and 3 in the readme file. The time period covered is from 1-1-2011 up to 31-12-2015. Notice that due to the lack of observations a lot of data are missing. For missing observational data the value -9999.999 is given. Contact person for the observational data is Julia Schmale (julia.schmale@psi.ch).</p> <p>(C) Station Multi-model Median</p> <p>Monthly averages of the models can be found in the file</p> <p>station MMM.nc</p> <p>The following fields can be found in the file</p> <p>st $STATION $FIELD month median</p> <p>st $STATION$FIELD month quart25</p> <p>st $STATION$FIELD month quart75</p> <p>where the values of the variables $STATION and $FIELD can be found in Tables 2 and 3, respectively. The extension median corresponds to the multi-model median, while the quart25 and quart75 to the 25 % and 75 % quartiles, respectively.</p> <p>(D) Global model results</p> <p>In the following single file can be found for each of the models the surface distribution of various fields.</p> <p>results global models year2011.nc</p> <p>They correspond to the annual mean of the year 2011. The resolution of the grid is 1<sup>◦ </sup>× 1<sup>◦</sup>. The file contains the following variables:</p> <p>$FIELD $MODEL</p> <p>The $FIELD and $MODEL can be found in Tables 3 and 1, respectively.</p> <p>(E) Global average results</p> <p>In the file</p> <p>surface_ global_average_year2011.nc</p> <p>can be found in 5<sup>◦</sup>×5<sup>◦ </sup>resolution, the Multi-model median of surface distribution of the various fields denoted in Table 3 and their corresponding diversity. The names of the variables are formed as:</p> <p>med $FIELD</p> <p>div $FIELD</p> <p>where, ‘med’ stands for median and ‘div’ for diversity calculated as standard deviation divided by the mean of the model results.</p> <p>Tables and details on the fields provided are given in the readme file.</p>
Simulations from the LPJmL3.5 dynamic global vegetation model for the Vegetation Carbon Turnover Intercomparison
<p>Outputs from the LPJmL3.5 dynamic global vegetation model are provided for two global simulations. One forced by CRU-NCEP v5 climate data for the period 1901-2014 and one forced by bias-corrected IPSL-CM5A-LR RCP 8.5 climate data for the period 1901-2099. Only potential natural vegetation was simulated, i.e. no human land-use. Both simulations are at 0.5 x 0.5 degree spatial resolution. Carbon turnover fluxes for live vegetation for each individual turnover-causing process in the model were outputted individually. For a full description of the simulations, please refer to the accompanying paper.</p>
Simulations from the ORCHIDEE dynamic global vegetation model for the Vegetation Carbon Turnover Intercomparison
<p>Outputs from the ORCHIDEE dynamic global vegetation model are provided for two global simulations. One forced by CRU-NCEP v5 climate data for the period 1901-2014 and one forced by bias-corrected IPSL-CM5A-LR RCP 8.5 climate data for the period 1901-2099. Only potential natural vegetation was simulated, i.e. no human land-use. Both simulations are at 0.5 x 0.5 degree spatial resolution. Carbon turnover fluxes for live vegetation for mortality, leaf phenological turnover and fine root phenological turnover were outputted individually. For a full description of the simulations, please refer to the accompanying paper.</p>
Simulations from the JULES dynamic global vegetation model for the Vegetation Carbon Turnover Intercomparison
<p>Outputs from the JULES dynamic global vegetation model are provided for two global simulations. One forced by CRU-NCEP v5 climate data for the period 1901-2014 and one forced by bias-corrected IPSL-CM5A-LR RCP 8.5 climate data for the period 1901-2099. Only potential natural vegetation was simulated, i.e. no human land-use. Both simulations are at 1.875 x 1.25 degree spatial resolution. Carbon turnover fluxes for live vegetation for each individual turnover-causing process in the model were outputted individually. For a full description of the simulations, please refer to the accompanying paper.</p>
Simulations from the LPJ-GUESS dynamic global vegetation model v3.0 for the Vegetation Carbon Turnover Intercomparison
<p>Outputs from the LPJ-GUESS dynamic global vegetation model v3.0 are provided for two global simulations. One forced by CRU-NCEP v5 climate data for the period 1901-2014 and one forced by bias-corrected IPSL-CM5A-LR RCP 8.5 climate data for the period 1901-2099. Only potential natural vegetation was simulated, i.e. no human land-use. Both simulations are at 0.5 x 0.5 degree spatial resolution. Carbon turnover fluxes for live vegetation for mortality, leaf phenological turnover and fine root phenological turnover were outputted individually. For a full description of the simulations, please refer to the accompanying paper.</p>
Eddy Kinetic Energy in the Arctic Ocean from a High-resolution Global Simulation with 1-km Arctic (data).
<p>Data for the "Eddy Kinetic Energy in the Arctic Ocean from a High-resolution Global Simulation with 1-km Arctic".</p>
AgMIP-Wheat multi-model ensemble simulations on climate change impact and adaptation for 60 representative global locations
<p>This is model output from the Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project for wheat (AgMIP-Wheat) dataset of multi-model ensemble simulations for 60 representative global locations under different climate scenarios.</p> <p>The data have been generated following the modeling protocol of Asseng et al. (2019) and Liu et al. (2019).</p> <p>References</p> <p>Asseng, S. et al. (2019). Climate change impact and adaptation for wheat protein. Glob Chang Biol 25, 155-173, doi:10.1111/gcb.14481</p> <p>Liu, B. et al. (2019). Global wheat production with 1.5 and 2.0°C above pre-industrial warming. Global Change Biol 25, 1428-1444, doi:10.1111/gcb.14542</p> <p> </p>
AgMIP's global gridded crop model intercomparison (GGCMI) phase II CTWN-A archive: priority 1 outputs from LPJmL soybean simulations
<p>This data set contains output data from simulations with the model LPJmL for soybean as part of AgMIP's Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) phase II output data set. Output variables included are: crop yield, above-ground biomass, plant day, maturity day, potential irrigation water withdrawal, actual growing season evapotranspiration . Simulations are based on 31-year simulations using the AgMERRA data set with 4 atmospheric CO2 mixing ratios (C=360, 510, 660, 810 ppm) uniform offsets for temperature (T= -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 K), water (W= -50, -30, -20, -10, 0, 10, 20, 30 %, and infinite/irrigated), and 3 nitrogen input levels (N= 10, 60, 200 kgN/ha) using 2 assumptions on adaptation (A= 'none', 'regain original growing season').</p> <p>Version 2 of these files has been corrected with respect to the temporal sequence of results, which is not important if looking at 30-year averages as in Franke et al. 2020, but becomes relevant if looking at individual years.</p>
AgMIP's global gridded crop model intercomparison (GGCMI) phase II CTWN-A archive: priority 1 outputs from LPJmL rice simulations
<p>This data set contains output data from simulations with the model LPJmL for rice as part of AgMIP's Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) phase II output data set. Output variables included are: crop yield, above-ground biomass, plant day, maturity day, potential irrigation water withdrawal, actual growing season evapotranspiration . Simulations are based on 31-year simulations using the AgMERRA data set with 4 atmospheric CO2 mixing ratios (C=360, 510, 660, 810 ppm) uniform offsets for temperature (T= -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 K), water (W= -50, -30, -20, -10, 0, 10, 20, 30 %, and infinite/irrigated), and 3 nitrogen input levels (N= 10, 60, 200 kgN/ha) using 2 assumptions on adaptation (A= 'none', 'regain original growing season').</p> <p>Version 2 of these files has been corrected with respect to the temporal sequence of results, which is not important if looking at 30-year averages as in Franke et al. 2020, but becomes relevant if looking at individual years.</p>
AgMIP's global gridded crop model intercomparison (GGCMI) phase II CTWN-A archive: priority 1 outputs from LPJmL maize simulations
<p>This data set contains output data from simulations with the model LPJmL for maize as part of AgMIP's Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) phase II output data set. Output variables included are: crop yield, above-ground biomass, plant day, maturity day, potential irrigation water withdrawal, actual growing season evapotranspiration . Simulations are based on 31-year simulations using the AgMERRA data set with 4 atmospheric CO2 mixing ratios (C=360, 510, 660, 810 ppm) uniform offsets for temperature (T= -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 K), water (W= -50, -30, -20, -10, 0, 10, 20, 30 %, and infinite/irrigated), and 3 nitrogen input levels (N= 10, 60, 200 kgN/ha) using 2 assumptions on adaptation (A= 'none', 'regain original growing season').</p> <p>Version 2 of these files has been corrected with respect to the temporal sequence of results, which is not important if looking at 30-year averages as in Franke et al. 2020, but becomes relevant if looking at individual years.</p>
Future monthly discharge and water temperature simulations under global change (CMIP6)
<p>Monthly discharge (m3 s-1) and water temperature (K) simulated by a global hydrological model coupled to a surface water quality model (<i>PCR-GLOBWB2-DynQual)</i> for the time period 2005 - 2100, for an ensemble of 15 projections based on three combined climate and socio-economic scenarios (SSP1-RCP2.6; SSP3-RCP7.0 and SSP5-RCP8.5) and five general circulation models (GFDL-ESM4; UKESM1-0-LL; MPI-ESM1-2-hr; IPSL-CM6A-LR and MRI-ESM2-0)</p><p>Output data are provided at 10km resolution and are averaged at monthly temporal resolution.</p><p>These datasets were generated as part of the work presented in: Jones, E.R., Bierkens, M.F.P., van Puijenbroek, P.J.T.M. <i>et al.</i> Sub-Saharan Africa will increasingly become the dominant hotspot of surface water pollution. <i>Nat Water</i> <strong>1</strong>, 602–613 (2023). <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s44221-023-00105-5#citeas">https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-023-00105-5</a></p><p>Relevant model description papers can be found at the following links:</p><ul><li><i>PCR-GLOBWB2</i>: Sutanudjaja, E. H., van Beek, R., Wanders, N., Wada, Y., Bosmans, J. H. C., Drost, N., van der Ent, R. J., de Graaf, I. E. M., Hoch, J. M., de Jong, K., Karssenberg, D., López López, P., Peßenteiner, S., Schmitz, O., Straatsma, M. W., Vannametee, E., Wisser, D., and Bierkens, M. F. P.: PCR-GLOBWB 2: a 5 arcmin global hydrological and water resources model, <i>Geoscientific Model Development</i>, 11, 2429–2453, <a href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/11/2429/2018/gmd-11-2429-2018.html">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2429-2018</a>, 2018.</li><li><i>DynQual</i>: Jones, E. R., Bierkens, M. F. P., Wanders, N., Sutanudjaja, E. H., van Beek, L. P. H., and van Vliet, M. T. H.: DynQual v1.0: a high-resolution global surface water quality model, <i>Geoscientific Model Development</i>, 16, 4481–4500, <a href="https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/16/4481/2023/gmd-16-4481-2023.html">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4481-2023</a>, 2023.</li></ul><p>Additional information on the water temperature modelling can also be found at:</p><ul><li>Wanders, N., van Vliet, M. T. H., Wada, Y., Bierkens, M. F. P., & van Beek, L. P. H. (Rens): High-resolution global water temperature modeling. <i>Water Resources Research</i>, 55, 2760–2778, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023250">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023250</a>, 2019</li><li>van Beek, L. P. H., Eikelboom, T., van Vliet, M. T. H., and Bierkens, M. F. P.: A physically based model of global freshwater surface temperature, <i>Water Resources. Research</i>, 48, W09530, <a href="https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2012WR011819">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR011819</a> , 2012.</li></ul>
Attribution of 2022 August Heavy Precipitation Event in South Korea Using High-resolution Pseudo Global Warming Simulations: Sensitivity to Vertical Temperature Changes
<p>Post-processed CPM simulation datasets used for the paper "Attribution of 2022 August Heavy Precipitation Event in South Korea Using High-resolution Pseudo Global Warming Simulations: Sensitivity to Vertical Temperature Changes".</p>
M2 internal tide modal energy terms from a global HYCOM simulation
<p>This data set contains modal energy terms from a forward global HYCOM simulation (22.1) with realistic tide and atmospheric forcing as discussed in <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2020.101656">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2020.101656</a> (On the interplay between horizontal resolution and wave drag and their effect on tidal baroclinic mode waves in realistic global ocean simulations, 2020, MC Buijsman, GR Stephenson, JK Ansong, BK Arbic, JAM Green, ... Ocean Modelling 152, 101656). <strong>Please cite this article when using these data. </strong></p> <p>This is a 4-km simulation with 41 layers. All data is on the native tripole grid. Data is stored as netcdf4 classic. The 2D data sets are 7055 x 9000 (lat x lon).</p> <p>The data set contains</p> <ol> <li>The time-mean and depth-integrated M2 mode 1-5 energy terms: x (eastward) and y (northward) fluxes, KE, APE, conversion, flux divergence, and the intermodal energy conversion (topographic mode coupling) term. The terms are computed for a two-week time series starting on GMT 01-Sep-2016 01:00:00. For details see the paper.</li> <li>Positive seafloor depth, and latitude and longitude coordinates</li> </ol> <p>The M2 mode-1 SSH of the same simulation can be found here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5514226</p> <p><a href="https://sites.google.com/site/maartenbuijsman/">https://sites.google.com/site/maartenbuijsman/</a></p>
Global agricultural ammonia emissions simulated with the ORCHIDEE land surface model : Model Ouput Data
<p>This upload includes data associated with the manuscript "Global agricultural ammonia emissions simulated with the ORCHIDEE land surface model : )" submitted to Geoscientific Model Development. The dataset includes an output file with the simulated ammonia emissions for the agricultural sector.</p> <p>The emissions (manure management and soil), manure production and soil ammonium concentrations are monthly fields from the simulation for 2007-2015.</p> <p>Additional information is given in the readme file</p>
LMDZOR-INCA global model simulations diagnostics for mineral dust direct radiative effet calculations
<p>This dataset contains the diagnostic variable used to estimate the mineral dust aerosol direct radiative effect from LMDZOR-INCA global simulations using different refractive index data and different size modes and a multimodal size distribution.</p> <p>The NetCDF files provide the radiation fields shortwave all sky (solswad, topswad) and clear sky (solswad0, topswad0) (sol is for the surface and top for the top of the atmosphere) and the longwave all sky (sollwad, toplwad) and clear sky (sollwad0, toplwad0), as monthly means over global grids.</p> <p>Data are provided for the mean, minimum and maximum of the complex refractive index from Di Biagio et al. (2017) ( https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1901-2017 ) and the refractive index by Volz et al. (1973) ( <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.12.000564">https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.12.000564</a> ) in the longwave spectral range and for the refractive index by Balkanski et al. (2007) ( https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-81-2007) corresponding to 1.5% hematite by volume in the shortwave range.</p> <p>Simulations are performed for four lognormal size distributions with mass median diameters (sigma) of 1 µm (1.8), 2.5 µm (2), 7 µm (1.9), 22 µm (2). The multimodal run is performed on the size distribution obtained as the sum of the four modes combined follwing the mass fractions of 0.6%, 4.3%, 31.5%, and 63.6% for the four modes, respectively.</p> <p>Variables for the dust atmospheric load and optical depth at 550 nm for each mode are in the mean run for each mode.</p> <p>Input mass extinction efficiency (Ext, m2/g), absorption exitinction efficiency (Abs, m2/g), single scattering albedo (w) and asymmetry factor (g) for the different radiative bands at at some wavelengths used in the MODIS sensor are provided in the 1MODE_xxum_dust_optical_data_1.5dielectric_mixture.</p>
Leaf water and stem cellulose oxygen isotope ratios simulated with global dynamic vegetation model LPX-Bern
<p>Description of leaf water and stem cellulose oxygen isotope ratios simulated with LPX-Bern</p> <p>Citation of describing paper:</p> <p>Keel SG, Joos F, Spahni R, Saurer M, Weigt RB, Klesse S. 2016. Simulating oxygen isotope ratios in tree ring cellulose using a dynamic global vegetation model, Biogeosciences, 13, 3869–3886, 2016 doi:10.5194/bg-13-3869-2016</p> <p>download: www.biogeosciences.net/13/3869/2016/</p> <p>General Information: Format: NetCDF, gridded</p> <p>Model: Dynamic global vegetation model LPX-Bern Version 1.0 (Land surface Processes and eXchanges, Bern) (Spahni et al., 2013; Stocker et al., 2013)</p> <p>Resolution: 3.75° x 2.5° lat/lon global Time: Monthly from Jan 1960 to Dec 2012</p> <p>Variables:</p> <p>cellu18: monthly stem cellulose δ18O (per mil) lw18: monthly leaf water δ18O (per mil) -2 NPP: monthly net primary production (g C m ) FPC: monthly fractional plant cover</p> <p>Dimensions: i=longitude, j=latitude, l=time, k=plant functional type Codes for plant functional types (k):</p> <ol> <li> <p>1 tropical broad-leaved evergreen</p> </li> <li> <p>2 tropical broad-leaved deciduous (raingreen)</p> </li> <li> <p>3 temperate needle-leaved evergreen</p> </li> <li> <p>4 temperate broad-leaved evergreen</p> </li> <li> <p>5 temperate broad-leaved deciduous (summergreen)</p> </li> <li> <p>6 boreal needle-leaved evergreen</p> </li> <li> <p>7 boreal needle-leaved deciduous (summergreen)</p> </li> <li> <p>8 boreal broad-leaved deciduous (summergreen)</p> </li> <li> <p>9 temperate herbaceous</p> </li> <li> <p>10 tropical herbaceous</p> </li> </ol>
Population-adjusted pseudo global warming simulations over the Great Lakes Region
<p>Summaries of pseudo global warming simulations over the Great Lakes Region. Specifics below:</p> <p> </p> <p>Each CSV file provides regional summaries from PGW simulations, either over land, for urban grids, or rural grids. This includes cumulative hours above critical heat stress threholds as well as their population-adjusted values.</p> <p>The 'Future_sensitivities_land.csv' file calculates heat stress in the future by keeping all variables except one the same value as the historical run.</p> <p>Among the geotiffs, _perc_land files include percentage of hours in summer above the National Weather Service heat index and wet bulb globe temperature thresholds, _pop_land incorporate population adjusted heat stress above those thresholds, the TEMP_contribution files estimate changes in heat stress if only air temperature changed and all variables remained the same as historical values and the HI_ and WBGT_pop rasters include summer average heat stress and their corresponding populations. </p> <p>See Chakraborty et al. Under Review (will be updated on paper publication) for more details.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.