Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 1 in New data on distribution and biology of the invasive species Hydrotaea aenescens (Wiedemann, 1830) (Diptera, Muscidae)

Fig. 1. Map showing the records of H. aenescens: 1 – Turkey, Antalya, near Side; 2 – Russia, Sochi region, near Veseloe; 3 – Russia, 60 km North of Narjan-Mar, 68.15N 53.65E. Countries where H.aenescens was previously recorded (Pont et al. 2007) are marked in green.

Figs. 2–5. 2 — H in Review of the Hydrotaea meteorica group (Diptera, Muscidae)

Figs. 2–5. 2 — H. spinigena, male head, lateral; 3 — H. spinigena, male mid leg (modified from Xue & Chao 1998: 905, figs 2097Fe and 2097Fp); 4 — H. nigribasis, male fore leg (as H. australis, from Emden 1965: 313, fig. 83b); 5 — H. affinis, male hind tibia (as H. affinoides, from Fan 2008: 484, fig. 153c) Рис. 2–5. 2 — H. spinigena, гоΛова самца сбоку; 3 — H. spinigena, среΑняя нога самца (с изменениями по Xue & Chao 1998: 905, figs 2097Fe и 2097Fp); 4 — H. nigribasis, переΑняя нога самца (как H. australis, по Emden 1965: 313, fig. 83b); 5 — H. affinis, заΑняя гоΛень самца (как H. affinoides, по Fan 2008: 484, fig. 153c)

Figure 4 in The predatory behavior of Hydrotaea albuquerquei (Lopes) larvae on the larvae of Musca domestica Linnaeus under laboratory conditions

Figure 4. Functional Response. The predatory capacity of H. albuquerquei larvae (predator) on Musca domestica larvae (prey) at different proportional prey densities to the total number of larvae (200 individuals) of predators and prey in other encounters. The statistical model (Poisson distribution with correction of the distribution for Quasipoisson) of the predatory capacity is in the upper portion of the graph. H1M1, H. albuquerquei first-instar larvae versus M. domestica first-instar larvae. H2M1, H. albuquerquei second-instar larvae versus M. domestica first-instar larvae. H3M1, third-instar larvae of H. albuquerquei versus first-instar larvae of M. domestica. H3M2, third-instar larvae of H. albuquerquei versus second-instar larvae of M. domestica.

Figure 3 in The predatory behavior of Hydrotaea albuquerquei (Lopes) larvae on the larvae of Musca domestica Linnaeus under laboratory conditions

Figure 3. Survival of predator (%) of Hydrotaea albuquerquei larvae (predator) at different proportional densities of prey with the total number of larvae (200 individuals) of predators and prey in other encounters. The statistical model (Binomial distribution with correction of the distribution for Quasibinomial) of the predator's survival is in the upper portion of the graph to the H1M1, H2M1 and H3M1 encounters. H1M1, H. albuquerquei first-instar larvae versus M. domestica first-instar larvae. H2M1, H. albuquerquei second-instar larvae versus M. domestica first-instar larvae. H3M1, third-instar larvae of H. albuquerquei versus first-instar larvae of M. domestica. H3M2, third-instar larvae of H. albuquerquei versus second-instar larvae of M. domestica.

Figure 2 in The predatory behavior of Hydrotaea albuquerquei (Lopes) larvae on the larvae of Musca domestica Linnaeus under laboratory conditions

Figure 2. Survival of prey (%) of Musca domestica larvae (prey) at different proportional prey densities to the total number of larvae (200 individuals) of predators and prey in other encounters. The statistical model (Binomial distribution with correction of the distribution for Quasibinomial) of the prey survival is in the upper portion of each graph. H1M1, H. albuquerquei first-instar larvae versus M. domestica first-instar larvae. H2M1, H. albuquerquei second-instar larvae versus M. domestica first-instar larvae. H3M1, third-instar larvae of H. albuquerquei versus first-instar larvae of M. domestica. H3M2, third-instar larvae of H. albuquerquei versus second-instar larvae of M. domestica.

Figure 1 in The predatory behavior of Hydrotaea albuquerquei (Lopes) larvae on the larvae of Musca domestica Linnaeus under laboratory conditions

Figure 1. Diagram showing the sampling design of the interaction of larvae of different instars (1, 2 and 3) between the predator Hydrotaea albuquerquei (H) and the prey Musca domestica (M). The other encounters (HM) considered the differences in size between the larvae of the species. In each encounter (HM) of the different instars, 200 larvae of the species were placed together in different proportions considering the ratio of M. domestica larvae (M) to eachH.albuquerquei larva (H), establishing proportional densities between predators (H) and preys (M) in agreement with Table 1. For each encounter and density, triplicates were performed.

zenodo36/100

Fig. 2 in New data on distribution and biology of the invasive species Hydrotaea aenescens (Wiedemann, 1830) (Diptera, Muscidae)

Fig. 2. Copulating pair of H. aenescens attacked by another male.

zenodo36/100

Fig. 5 in New data on distribution and biology of the invasive species Hydrotaea aenescens (Wiedemann, 1830) (Diptera, Muscidae)

Fig. 5. Copulating pair of H. aenescens

zenodo28/100

Fig. 4. A in New data on distribution and biology of the invasive species Hydrotaea aenescens (Wiedemann, 1830) (Diptera, Muscidae)

Fig. 4. A copulating pair of C. albiceps attacked by males of H. aenescens and C. albiceps at the same time.

zenodo24/100

Fig. 3 in New data on distribution and biology of the invasive species Hydrotaea aenescens (Wiedemann, 1830) (Diptera, Muscidae)

Fig. 3. Males of H.aenescens attempting to copulate with L.sericata (left) and C.vomitoria (right)