Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2012View details →

Supplementary material 1 from: Gruber S, Haddad C, Kasahara S (2012) Karyotype analysis of seven species of the tribe Lophiohylini (Hylinae, Hylidae, Anura), with conventional and molecular cytogenetic techniques. Comparative Cytogenetics 6(4): 409-423. https://doi.org/10.3897/compcytogen.v6i4.3945

Giemsa-stained metaphases I. a. Aparasphenodon bokermanni, 2n = 24; b. Itapotihyla langsdorffii, 2n = 24; c. Trachycephalus sp., 2n = 24; d. T. mesophaeus, 2n = 24; e. T. typhonius, 2n = 24; f. Phyllodytes edelmoi, 2n = 22. g. P. luteolus, 2n = 22. Bar = 10 m.

Fig. 11. A in Systematic Review Of The Frog Family Hylidae, With Special Reference To Hylinae: Phylogenetic Analysis And Taxonomic Revision

Fig. 11. A partial view of the strict consensus, updated with the new taxonomy for the tribe Dendropsophini.

Fig. 14. A in Systematic Review Of The Frog Family Hylidae, With Special Reference To Hylinae: Phylogenetic Analysis And Taxonomic Revision

Fig. 14. A partial view of the strict consensus showing the geographic distribution of the components of Cophomantini. Distributions, in general, are taken from Duellman (1999). Only collective groups referred in ''Biogeographic Commentary'' are shown. An asterisk (*) indicates the distribution of Hypsiboas punctatus that ranges from the Chaco/Cerrado through the Amazon Basin and Guayana lowlands up to the Caribbean lowlands. Two asterisks (**) indicate the geographic distribution of Hypsiboas cordobae that is restricted to the Sierras of Central Argentina.

Fig. 3. A in Systematic Review Of The Frog Family Hylidae, With Special Reference To Hylinae: Phylogenetic Analysis And Taxonomic Revision

Fig. 3. A partial view of the strict consensus showing the relationships of the South American I clade and its correspondence with the currently recognized species groups. Numbers above nodes are Bremer support values. Numbers below nodes are Parsimony Jackknife absolute frequencies; those with an asterisk (*) have a 100% frequency. Black circles denote nodes that are present in the quick consensus estimation.

Fig. 15 in Systematic Review Of The Frog Family Hylidae, With Special Reference To Hylinae: Phylogenetic Analysis And Taxonomic Revision

Fig. 15. Partial view of the strict consensus showing the geographic distribution of the components of Dendropsophini. Distributions, in general, are taken from Duellman (1999). Only collective groups referred in ''Biogeographic Commentary'' are shown. An asterisk (*) indicates the geographic distribution of Scinax squalirostris that includes the Atlantic forest, Cerrado, Chaco, and Pampean grasslands. Two asterisks (**) indicate the geographic distribution of Scinax ruber that includes the Amazonian and Guayana lowlands, Caribbean lowlands, and Llanos. Three asterisks (***) indicate the geographic distribution of Pseudis paradoxa that extends from the Chaco region to the Amazonian and Guayana lowlands, the Llanos, and the Caribbean lowlands.

Fig. 6 in Systematic Review Of The Frog Family Hylidae, With Special Reference To Hylinae: Phylogenetic Analysis And Taxonomic Revision

Fig. 6. Current state of phylogenetic knowledge of the 30chromosome Hyla. Redrawn from Duellman (2001: 857) with the addition of Kaplan's (2000) suggestion regarding the relationships of Hyla praestans with the H. garagoensis group. Numbered synapomorphies, as textually described by these authors, are: 1, 30 chromosomes; 2, reduced quadratojugal; 3, 1/2 labial tooth rows; 4, nuptial excrescences absent; 5, tadpole tail xiphicercal; 6, tadpole mouth terminal; 7, 0/1 labial tooth rows; 8, 0/0 labial tooth rows; 9, one ventral row of small labial papillae in tadpoles; 10, extensive axillary membrane; 11, longitudinal stripes on hindlimbs of tadpoles; 12, one ventral row of large labial papillae in tadpoles; 13, tadpole body violinshaped in dorsal view; 14, body of tadpole depressed; 15, labial papillae absent in tadpoles; 16, internal surface of the arytenoids with a small medial depression.

Fig. 12. A in Systematic Review Of The Frog Family Hylidae, With Special Reference To Hylinae: Phylogenetic Analysis And Taxonomic Revision

Fig. 12. A partial view of the strict consensus, updated with the new taxonomy for the tribes Hylini

Fig. 4. A in Systematic Review Of The Frog Family Hylidae, With Special Reference To Hylinae: Phylogenetic Analysis And Taxonomic Revision

Fig. 4. A partial view of the strict consensus showing the relationships of the South American II clade and its correspondence with the currently recognized species groups. Numbers above nodes are Bremer support values. Numbers below nodes are Parsimony Jackknife absolute frequencies; those with an asterisk (*) have a 100% frequency. Numbers in boldfaced italic are node numbers for the list of morphological synapomorphies (see appendix 3). Black circles denote nodes that are present in the quick consensus estimation. The arrow shows alternative placement of the (Scarthyla 1 (Lysapsus 1 Pseudis)) clade when using the 3:1:2 weighting scheme (see text).

Fig. 10. A in Systematic Review Of The Frog Family Hylidae, With Special Reference To Hylinae: Phylogenetic Analysis And Taxonomic Revision

Fig. 10. A partial view of the strict consensus, updated with the new taxonomy for the tribe Cophomantini.

Fig. 9. A in Systematic Review Of The Frog Family Hylidae, With Special Reference To Hylinae: Phylogenetic Analysis And Taxonomic Revision

Fig. 9. A partial view of the strict consensus, updated with the new taxonomy for Phyllomedusinae proposed here.

opencc-zeroDec 2023View details →

dryad36/100

Morphological, ecological and territorial traits for 525 Hylinae frog species

<p>This dataset includes data on 15 morphological, ecological and territorial variables (columns) for 525 Hylinae frog species (rows), as well as cites of the references from which data were retrieved, complete references and description of variables</p>

zenodo36/100

Fig. 7 in Systematic Review Of The Frog Family Hylidae, With Special Reference To Hylinae: Phylogenetic Analysis And Taxonomic Revision

Fig. 7. Relationships of Middle American and North American Hylinae as envisioned by Duellman

publicDec 2023View details →

dryad36/100

Morphological, ecological and territorial traits for 525 Hylinae frog species

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

Figure 5 in The Amapá treefrog Boana dentei (Bokermann, 1967): diagnosis and redescription (Hylinae: Cophomantini)

Figure 5. Typical habitat of Boana dentei at Parque Natural Municipal do Cancão (Serra do Navio, Amapá, Brazil): a slow-moving body of water on muddy bottom associated with a temporary pond, flowing through a forest clearing next to a brook (not shown in the photograph).

Figure 3 in The Amapá treefrog Boana dentei (Bokermann, 1967): diagnosis and redescription (Hylinae: Cophomantini)

Figure 3. Tadpole of Boana dentei (lot UFMG 2444) at Gosner stage 29: (a) lateral, (b) dorsal, (c) ventral views (scale bar = 5 mm), and (d) oral disc (scale bar = 0.5 mm).

Figure 4 in The Amapá treefrog Boana dentei (Bokermann, 1967): diagnosis and redescription (Hylinae: Cophomantini)

Figure 4. Vocal repertoire of Boana dentei. (a) A four-note call (ca. 1.1 s; each tick along the x-axis corresponds to 0.2 s) composed of three note types (a, b, and c) in the following sequence: C/A/A/B. Oscillogram and spectrogram of (b) the three first notes in the four-note call (a note C followed by two notes A); and of (c) the last note in the four-note call (a note B). Call voucher CECC 2494, recorded from the type locality (Serra do Navio, state of Amapá, Brazil). Sound recording: Boana_dentei_CECC4.

Figure 2 in The Amapá treefrog Boana dentei (Bokermann, 1967): diagnosis and redescription (Hylinae: Cophomantini)

Figure 2. Life colours in adult topotypes of Boana dentei. (a–c) Male, CFBH 43260: SVL = 35.5 mm; (d–f) Female, CFBH 43261: SVL = 45.9 mm.

Figure 1 in The Amapá treefrog Boana dentei (Bokermann, 1967): diagnosis and redescription (Hylinae: Cophomantini)

Figure 1. Dorsal and ventral views of topotypes of Boana dentei. (a–b) Male CFBH 43260: SVL = 35.5 mm; (c–d) Female, CFBH 43261: SVL = 45.9 mm; (e) Detail on the heels (right heel with a conical tubercle, which is absent on left heel) of the male AAG-UFU 6416: SVL = 35.1 mm. Scale bars = 10 mm.

opennotspecifiedJun 2022View details →

Figure 3 in Prepollex diversity and evolution in Cophomantini (Anura: Hylidae: Hylinae)

Figure 3. Dorsal view of hands showing sexual dimorphism of the spine-shaped distal prepollex (A–F) and m. abductor pollicis longus (G–J; highlighted in brown; tendons of insertion in white; m. extensor digitorum and m. extensor carpi ulnaris removed). A, B, cleared and stained; C–F, X-ray images (taken from the website Anfíbios del Ecuador; Ron et al., 2019). (A) male (CFBH 11545) and (B) female (CFBH 3620) of Bokermannohyla hylax; (C) male (QCAZ 72533) and (D) female (QCAZ 72549) of Hyloscirtus hillisi; (E) male (QCAZ 15085) and (F) female (QCAZ 16705) of H. tapichalaca. Males of all species with ossified prepollex. Females of Bokermannohyla hylax and H. hillisi with cartilaginous prepollex, and from H. tapichalaca with ossified prepollex. (G) Male (UFMG 19338) and (H) female (UFMG 10680) of Bokermannohyla martinsi, showing an evident difference in relative size of m. abductor pollicis longus between sexes; (I) male (MZUSP 140287) and (J) female (MZUSP 140289) of Boana faber, with no evident difference in muscle relative size. (A, B, D, F–H) right hand; (C, E, I–J) left hand (reflected for easier comparison with the remaining figures). Scale bar 1 mm (A and B); 5 mm (C–F); 3 mm (G–J).