Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
187
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
187 results for “Insectivore”
Landscape composition drives the impacts of artificial light at night on insectivorous bats
<p>Abstract of the related publication :</p> <p>Among the most prevalent sources of biodiversity declines, Artificial Light At Night (ALAN) is an emerging threat<br> to global biodiversity. Much knowledge has already been gained to reduce impacts. However, the spatial variation<br> of ALAN effects on biodiversity in interaction with landscape composition remains little studied, though it is<br> of the utmost importance to identify lightscapes most in need of action. Several studies have shown that, at local<br> scale, tree cover can intensify positive or negative effects of ALAN on biodiversity, but none have – at landscape<br> scale – studied a wider range of landscape compositions around lit sites. We hypothesized that the magnitude of<br> ALAN effects will depend on landscape composition and species’ tolerance to light. Taking the case of insectivorous<br> bats because of their varying sensitivity to ALAN, we investigated the species-specific activity response to<br> ALAN. Bat activity was recorded along a gradient of light radiance. We ensured a large variability in landscape<br> composition around 253 sampling sites. Among the 13 bat taxa studied, radiance decreased the activity of two<br> groups of the slow-flying gleaner guild (Myotis and Plecotus spp.) and one species of the aerial-hawking guild<br> (Pipistrellus pipistrellus), and increased the activity of two species of the aerial-hawking guild (Pipistrellus kuhlii<br> and Pipistrellus pygmaeus). Among these five effects, the magnitude of four of them was driven by landscape composition.<br> For five other species, ALAN effects were only detectable in particular landscape compositions, making<br> the main effect of radiance undetectable without account for interactions with landscape. Specifically, effects<br> were strongest in non-urban habitats, for both guilds. Results highlight the importance to prioritize ALAN reduction<br> efforts in non-urban habitats, and how important is to account for landscape composition when studying<br> ALAN effects on bats to avoid missing effects.</p>
Data from: Insectivorous birds reduce herbivory but do not increase mangrove growth across productivity zones
<p>Top-down effects of predators and bottom-up effects of resources are important drivers of community structure and function in a wide array of ecosystems. Fertilization experiments impose variation in resource availability that can mediate the strength of predator impacts, but the prevalence of such interactions across natural productivity gradients is less clear. We studied the joint impacts of top-down and bottom-up factors in a tropical mangrove forest system, leveraging fine-grained patchiness in resource availability and primary productivity on coastal cays of Belize. We excluded birds from canopies of red mangrove (Rhizophoraceae: <em>Rhizophora mangle</em>) for 13 months in zones of phosphorus-limited, stunted dwarf mangroves, and in adjacent zones of vigorous mangroves that receive detrital subsidies. Birds decreased total arthropod densities by 62%, herbivore densities more than fivefold, and reduced rates of leaf and bud herbivory by 45% and 52%, respectively. Despite similar arthropod densities across both zones of productivity, leaf and bud damage were 2 and 4.3 times greater in productive stands. Detrital subsidies strongly impacted a suite of plant traits in productive stands, potentially making leaves more nutritious and vulnerable to damage. Despite consistently strong impacts on herbivory, we did not detect top-down forcing that impacted mangrove growth, which was similar with and without birds. Our results indicated that both top-down and bottom-up forces drive arthropod community dynamics, but attenuation at the plant-herbivore interface weakens top-down control by avian insectivores.</p>
Edge effects and vertical stratification of aerial insectivorous bats across the interface of primary-secondary Amazonian rainforest
<p><span>Edge effects - abiotic and biotic changes associated with habitat boundaries - are key drivers of community change in fragmented landscapes. Their influence is heavily modulated by matrix composition. With over half of the world's tropical forests predicted to become forest edge by the end of the </span><span>century, it is paramount that conservationists gain a better understanding of how tropical biota is impacted by edge gradients. Bats comprise a large fraction of tropical mammalian fauna and are demonstrably sensitive to habitat modification. Yet, </span><span>knowledge about how bat assemblages are affected by edge effects remains scarce</span><span>. Capitalizing on a whole-ecosystem manipulation in the Central Amazon, the aims of this study were to i) assess the consequences of edge effects for twelve aerial insectivorous bat species across the interface of primary and secondary forest and ii) investigate if the activity levels of these species differed between the understory and canopy and if they were modulated by distance from the edge</span><span>. Acoustic surveys were conducted along four 2-km transects each traversing equal parts of primary and ca. 30-year-old secondary forest. Five models were used to assess the changes in the relative activity of forest specialists (three species), flexible forest foragers (three species), and edge foragers (six species). Modelling results revealed no evidence of edge effects, except for forest specialists in the understory. No significant differences in activity were found between the secondary or primary forest but most species exhibited pronounced vertical stratification. Our study highlights that forest specialist bats are more edge-sensitive than both flexible forest and edge foraging bats and suggests that the influence of edge effects on aerial insectivorous bats may exceed 2 km. The absence of pronounced edge effects and the comparable activity levels between primary and old secondary forests indicates that old secondary forest can help ameliorate the consequences of fragmentation on tropical aerial insectivorous bats. </span></p>
Seasonal and ontological variation in diet and age-related differences in prey choice, by an insectivorous songbird
<p>The diet of an individual animal is subject to change over time, both in response to short-term food fluctuations and over longer time scales as an individual ages and meets different challenges over its life cycle. A metabarcoding approach was used to elucidate the diet of different life stages of a migratory songbird, the Eurasian reed warbler (<em>Acrocephalus scirpaceus</em>) over the 2017 summer breeding season in Somerset, UK. The faeces of adult, juvenile and nestling warblers were screened for invertebrate DNA, enabling the identification of prey species. Dietary analysis was coupled with monitoring of Diptera in the field using yellow sticky traps. Seasonal changes in warbler diet were subtle whereas age class had a greater influence on overall diet composition. Age classes showed high dietary overlap, but significant dietary differences were mediated through the selection of prey; i) from different taxonomic groups, ii) with different habitat origins (aquatic versus terrestrial) and iii) of different average approximate sizes. Our results highlight the value of metabarcoding data for enhancing ecological studies of insectivores in dynamic environments. </p>
Impacts of rainforest degradation on the diets of the insectivorous bats of Sabah
<b>Description: </b><p>The work was carried out within Sabah, at the SAFE project, Danum Valley and Maliau basin. Bats were captured by deploying 6 harp traps per night, during field seasons taking place in 2015, 2016 and 2017. Bat guano samples were collected by placing individual bats into cloth bags, and then releasing them after 12 hours. Any guano in the bottom of the bag was then transferred into 95% ethanol and stored at -20. DNA was extracted from the faecal samples using a Qiagen Stool Mini kit, and then amplified using the ZBJ-ArtF1c ZBJ-ArtR2c primers, and sequencing the DNA on an Illumina MiSeq.</p><p><b>Project: </b>This dataset was collected as part of the following SAFE research project: <a href="https://www.safeproject.net/projects/project_view/182"><b>Impacts of rainforest degradation on the diets of the insectivorous bats of Sabah</b></a></p><p><b>Funding: </b>These data were collected as part of research funded by: </p><ul><li>NERC (Standard grant, NE/K016407/1)</li><li>Royal Society (Standard grant, RG130793)</li><li>Bat Conservation International (Standard grant)</li></ul><p>This dataset is released under the CC-BY 4.0 licence, requiring that you cite the dataset in any outputs, but has the additional condition that you acknowledge the contribution of these funders in any outputs.</p><p></p><p><b>Permits: </b>These data were collected under permit from the following authorities:</p><ul><li>Sabah Biodiversity Centre (Research licence JKM/MBS.1000-2/2 JLD.4 (46))</li></ul><p></p><p><b>XML metadata: </b>GEMINI compliant metadata for this dataset is available <a href="https://www.safeproject.net/datasets/xml_metadata?id=3247465">here</a></p><p><b>Files: </b>This dataset consists of 3 files: Bat_SAFE_data_metadata.xlsx, interaction_network.csv, sequences_95.fasta</p><p><b>Bat_SAFE_data_metadata.xlsx</b></p><p>This file contains dataset metadata and 1 data tables:</p><ol><li><p><b>data</b> (described in worksheet Data)</p><p>Description: measurements collected</p><p>Number of fields: 21</p><p>Number of data rows: 3292</p><p>Fields: </p><ul><li><b>TrapName</b>: The trap ID which the bats were captured in (Field type: ID)</li><li><b>Lat</b>: Latitude of trap (Field type: Latitude)</li><li><b>Long</b>: Longitude of trap (Field type: Longitude)</li><li><b>Elevation</b>: Elevation of trap (Field type: Numeric)</li><li><b>Bat_no</b>: Bat ID (Field type: ID)</li><li><b>Date</b>: Date of capture (Field type: Date)</li><li><b>Faeces_no1</b>: Tube number used to store faecal sample. Pairs up with column names of interaction matrix (Field type: ID)</li><li><b>Faeces_no2</b>: Number of any additional faeces (Field type: ID)</li><li><b>Biopsy_Dave</b>: Tube used to store wing biopsy (Field type: ID)</li><li><b>Block</b>: If sampling occurred within the SAFE landscape, this is the block it occurred within (Field type: ID)</li><li><b>Fragment</b>: If sampling occurred within the SAFE landscape, this is the fragment size it occurred within (Field type: ID)</li><li><b>Site</b>: The site within Sabah sampling occurred at (Field type: ID)</li><li><b>Species</b>: The bat species ID (Field type: Taxa)</li><li><b>Sex</b>: Male or Female (Field type: Categorical trait)</li><li><b>Age</b>: Was the bat an adult or juvenile (Field type: Categorical trait)</li><li><b>Forearm</b>: The forearm length of the bat (Field type: Numeric trait)</li><li><b>Weight</b>: The weight of the bat (Field type: Numeric Trait)</li><li><b>Reproductive_condition</b>: If a female bat, if the bat was Non-Reproductive, PRegnant, LActating or Post-Lactating (Field type: Categorical trait)</li><li><b>Parasite</b>: Tube used to store any ectoparasites obtained (Field type: ID)</li><li><b>Time</b>: If the bat was captured in evening or morning (Field type: Categorical)</li><li><b>Tag</b>: Band ID, if used (Field type: ID)</li></ul></li></ol><p><b>interaction_network.csv</b></p><p>Description: A network of operational taxonomic units found within the guano of bats captured in Sabah. The column names refer to the bat guano id, as found in the columns 'Faeces_no1' and 'Faeces_no2' in the fieldwork data, and the rownames refer to the OTU of the prey, which is paired to the names of the OTUs in the fasta file.</p><p><b>sequences_95.fasta</b></p><p>Description: A fasta file of prey OTUs found in bat guano, generated using 95% similarity for clustering. The sequence names correspond with the rownames of the file interaction_network.csv</p><p><b>Date range: </b>2015-02-16 to 2017-07-21</p><p><b>Latitudinal extent: </b>4.5000 to 5.0933</p><p><b>Longitudinal extent: </b>116.7500 to 117.8380</p><p><b>Taxonomic coverage: </b><br> All taxon names are validated against the GBIF backbone taxonomy. If a dataset uses a synonym, the accepted usage is shown followed by the dataset usage in brackets. Taxa that cannot be validated, including new species and other unknown taxa, morphospecies, functional groups and taxonomic levels not used in the GBIF backbone are shown in square brackets.</p><div>Animalia<br> - Chordata<br> -  - Mammalia<br> -  -  - Chiroptera<br> -  -  -  - Emballonuridae<br> -  -  -  -  - <i>Emballonura</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Emballonura alecto</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Emballonura monticola</i><br> -  -  -  - Hipposideridae<br> -  -  -  -  - <i>Hipposideros</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Hipposideros ater</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Hipposideros bicolor</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Hipposideros cervinus</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Hipposideros diadema</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Hipposideros doriae</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Hipposideros dyacorum</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Hipposideros galeritus</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Hipposideros ridleyi</i><br> -  -  -  - Megadermatidae<br> -  -  -  -  - <i>Megaderma</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Megaderma spasma</i><br> -  -  -  - Nycteridae<br> -  -  -  -  - <i>Nycteris</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Nycteris tragata</i><br> -  -  -  - Pteropodidae<br> -  -  -  -  - <i>Balionycteris</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Balionycteris maculata</i><br> -  -  -  -  - <i>Macroglossus</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Macroglossus minimus</i><br> -  -  -  -  - <i>Megaerops</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Megaerops wetmorei</i><br> -  -  -  - Rhinolophidae<br> -  -  -  -  - <i>Rhinolophus</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Rhinolophus acuminatus</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Rhinolophus affinis</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Rhinolophus borneensis</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Rhinolophus creaghi</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Rhinolophus luctus</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Rhinolophus sedulus</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Rhinolophus trifoliatus</i><br> -  -  -  - Vespertilionidae<br> -  -  -  -  - <i>Harpiocephalus</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Harpiocephalus harpia</i><br> -  -  -  -  - <i>Hesperoptenus</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Hesperoptenus blanfordi</i><br> -  -  -  -  - <i>Kerivoula</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Kerivoula hardwickii</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Kerivoula intermedia</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Kerivoula lenis</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Kerivoula minuta</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Kerivoula papillosa</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Kerivoula pellucida</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Kerivoula whiteheadi</i><br> -  -  -  -  - <i>Murina</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Murina aenea</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Murina cyclotis</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Murina rozendaali</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Murina suilla</i><br> -  -  -  -  - <i>Myotis</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Myotis muricola</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Myotis ridleyi</i><br> -  -  -  -  - <i>Phoniscus</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Phoniscus atrox</i><br> -  -  -  -  - <i>Pipistrellus</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Pipistrellus javanicus</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Pipistrellus tenuis</i><br> -  -  -  -  - <i>Scotophilus</i><br> -  -  -  -  -  - <i>Scotophilus kuhlii</i><br></div><p></p>
Figure 3. The 95 in Effects of agroecosystems on insect and insectivorous bat activity: a preliminary finding based on light trap and mist net captures
Figure 3. The 95% family-wise confidence level for multiple comparisons test based on insectivorous bat species analyses. Left: H. aff. ruber; right: H. jonesi.
Figure 2. The 95 in Effects of agroecosystems on insect and insectivorous bat activity: a preliminary finding based on light trap and mist net captures
Figure 2. The 95% family-wise confidence level for multiple comparisons test based on insect order analyses. Left: Lepidoptera; right: Diptera.
Fig. 2. Leptictid insectivore mandibles. A. Leptictis dakotensis Leidy, 1868 in New large leptictid insectivore from the Late Paleogene of South Dakota, USA
Fig. 2. Leptictid insectivore mandibles. A. Leptictis dakotensis Leidy, 1868 (F:AM 108194) from the earliest Oligocene of North Dakota's White River Group, left lateral mandibular drawing (modified from Novacek 1986: fig. 1). B. Megaleptictis altidens gen. et sp. nov., holotype (KUVP 2568), from the latest Eocene or earliest Oligocene of South Dakota's White River Group. B1. Left dentary in lateral view; i2–m2 are well preserved, except for the fractured crown of p3; the base of i1 and posterior talonid of m3 are present; the posterior ramus is broken away, except for a portion of the condyloid region shown in its approximate position. Note the highercrowned teeth of M. altidens and the flat wear of the p4–m2 trigonids. In contrast to the hook−like process of L. dakotensis, the coronoid process of M. altidens is triangular with a straight coronary ridge. B2. Occlusal view of mandibles placed in articulation. B3. Right dentary in lateral view; complete p3–m2 and the fractured bases of i2–p2 and m3 are present.
Fig. 5 in New large leptictid insectivore from the Late Paleogene of South Dakota, USA
Fig. 5. Nasofrontal sutures of leptictid insectivores. A. Megaleptictis altidens gen. et sp. nov., holotype (KUVP 2568), from the latest Eocene or earliest Oligocene of South Dakota's White River Group compared to the common species of this time; rostrum in oblique dorsal view, showing the W−shaped nasofrontal sutures. B. Leptictis dakotensis Leidy, 1868 (F:AM 108194) from the earliest Oligocene of North Dakota's White River Group; rostrum in dorsal view, showing the U−shaped nasofrontal sutures (modified from Novacek 1986: fig. 2). White and black lines just posterior to the sutures outline their shape.
Fig. 1. Leptictid insectivore skulls. A in New large leptictid insectivore from the Late Paleogene of South Dakota, USA
Fig. 1. Leptictid insectivore skulls. A. Megaleptictis altidens gen. et sp. nov., holotype (KUVP 2568), from the latest Eocene or earliest Oligocene of South Dakota's White River Group, compared to the common species of this time; A1, skull in dorsal view, note the postorbital constriction of the parasagittal crests; A2, lateral view, the teeth and rostrum are taller than in L. dakotensis; A3, stereo pair, ventral view, palate shape, middle ear region, and general tooth features are similar to L. dakotensis; A4, occipital view, the occipital region is blockier than in L. dakotensis. A portion of the supraoccipital region is broken away. B. Leptictis dakotensis Leidy, 1868 (F:AM 108194) from the earliest Oligocene of North Dakota's White River Group; B1, dorsal view, the parasagittal crests are nearly straight and parallel; B2, lateral view; B3, stereo pair, ventral view; B4, occipital view. Photographs (B1, B2, and B4) from Novacek (1986: fig. 2). Scale bars 10 mm.
Fig. 4 in New large leptictid insectivore from the Late Paleogene of South Dakota, USA
Fig. 4. Left squamosal regions of leptictid insectivores. A. Megaleptictis altidens gen. et sp. nov., holotype (KUVP 2568), from the latest Eocene or Early Oligocene of South Dakota's White River Group in oblique lateral view. The suprameatal fossa of M. altidens is larger than in L. dakotensis, as is the anterior venous foramen from the squamosal sinus. The dorsal ridge of the fossa extends posteriorly all the way to the nuchal crest, unlike in L. dakotensis. B. Leptictis dakotensis Leidy, 1868 (F:AM 108194) from the earliest Oligocene of North Dakota's White River Group in lateral view (modified from Novacek 1986: fig. 2).
Figure 1 in Molecular classification and comparative phylogeographic study of insectivorous bat species (Pipisitrellus coromandra) from Punjab, Pakistan
Figure 1. Mutation analysis of representative sequence of specimen collected from (Kahna/District Lahore KA-III) with first top BLAST search result of species Pipistrellus coromandra from India (Accession No: MG821188).
Figure 3 in Molecular classification and comparative phylogeographic study of insectivorous bat species (Pipisitrellus coromandra) from Punjab, Pakistan
Figure 3. Neighbour-joining tree of genetic similarity based on COI gene. Data consisted of sequences from this study (n=20) and sequence data of closely related and similar species from other countries (n=59). Numbers at nodes are bootstrap support percentages of 70 or greater. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Kimura 2-parameter method (Kimura, 1980) in MEGA7.
Figure 2 in Molecular classification and comparative phylogeographic study of insectivorous bat species (Pipisitrellus coromandra) from Punjab, Pakistan
Figure 2. Mutation analysis of representative sequence of specimen collected from (Kahna/District Lahore KA-III) with top second BLAST search result of species Pipistrellus tenuis from Vietnam (Accession No: HM541298).
Fig 3 in A new Paleocene nyctitheriid insectivore from Inner Mongolia (China) and the origin of Asian nyctitheriids
Fig 3. Strict consensus tree of six maximum−parsimony trees, based on the data matrix in Appendix 2. The shaded area indicates the position of the Asian nyctitheriids, grouped in the new subfamily Asionyctiinae. Characters have been mapped on the consensus tree, using the Acctran optimization for the maximum parsimony tree that corresponded completely to the consensus tree.
Fig 1 in A new Paleocene nyctitheriid insectivore from Inner Mongolia (China) and the origin of Asian nyctitheriids
Fig 1. SEM micrographs of Asionyctia guoi, Gashatan ALMA (late Paleocene) from Subeng (Inner Mongolia, China). A. IMM 2001−SB−9, left dentary fragment with p4 and alveoli of i1–p3, in occlusal (A1), labial (A2) and lingual views (A3). B. IMM 2004−SB−2, right dentary fragment with p3–4 and alveoli of c–p2, in occlusal (B1), labial (B2), and lingual (B3) views.
FIG. 7 in Rodents, lagomorphs and insectivores
FIG. 7. — Insectivores from Küçükçekmece West, Crusafontina cf. endemica Gibert, 1975: A, right m1 (MNHN.F.TRQ963) in occlusal view; B, C, right mandible with m1 (TRQ962) in lateral (B) and medial (C) views. Schizogalerix sp.: D, right m2 (TRQ961) in occlusal view. Scale bar: 1 mm.
FIG. 6 in Rodents, lagomorphs and insectivores
FIG. 6. — Ochotona ozansoyi Sen, 2003 from Küçükçekmece West: A, B, P2 sin; C, P4 or M1 sin; D, P4 or M1 dext; E, M2 sin; F, p3 dext; G, mandible dext in lateral view; H, m1, m2 and alveoli of m3 of the same mandible. Cheek teeth in occlusal view. Black areas, enamel; dotted areas, cement infill.
FIG. 5 in Rodents, lagomorphs and insectivores
FIG. 5. — Chalicomys jaegeri Kaup, 1832 from Küçükçekmece East and an astragalus of Castor fiber for comparison: A, right mandible with p4-m3 in occlusal view, as illustrated by Malik & Nafiz 1933, pl. XII, fig. 8; B, left astragalus (KÇ 118) in dorsal (B1) and plantar (B2) views; C, right astragalus (KÇ 117) in dorsal (C1) and plantar (C2) views; D, right astragalus of extant C. fiber in dorsal (D1) and plantar (D2) views (MNHN.F, no number). Scale bar: 10 mm.
FIG. 4 in Rodents, lagomorphs and insectivores
FIG. 4. — Chalicomys jaegeri Kaup, 1832 from Küçükçekmece West. Lower incisors and cheek teeth. A, left lower incisor fragment in lateral view (MNHN.F.TRQ790); B, right lower incisor fragment in lateral view (TRQ797); C left mandible fragment with p4-m1 (TRQ846) in occlusal (C) and labial (C') views; D, right p4 (TRQ845) in occlusal (D), labial (D') and lingual (D") views; E, left p4 (TRQ813) in occlusal (E), labial (E') and lingual (E") views; F, right p4 (TRQ843) in occlusal (F), labial (F') and lingual (F") views; G, right mandible fragment with p4 (TRQ864) in occlusal (G), labial (G') and lingual (G") views; H, right m1 or m2 (TRQ857) in occlusal (H) and labial (H') views; I, right m1 or m2 (TRQ855) in occlusal (I), labial (I') and lingual (I") views; J, right m3 (TRQ860) in occlusal (J), labial (J') and lingual (J") views; K, right m3 (TRQ837) in occlusal (K), labial (K') and lingual (K") views. Scale bar: occlusal view of cheek teeth, 10 mm; lingual and labial views of cheek teeth and incisors, 5 mm.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.