Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 4 in Molecular identification of a new myxozoan, Myxobolus dermiscalis n. sp. (Myxosporea) infecting scales of Labeo rohita Hamilton in Harike Wetland, Punjab (India)

Fig. 4. Neighbour-Joining analysis of small subunit ribosomal DNA sequence of M. dermiscalis n.sp.in relation to 23 other sequenced members of the genus.

Fig. 1 in Molecular identification of a new myxozoan, Myxobolus dermiscalis n. sp. (Myxosporea) infecting scales of Labeo rohita Hamilton in Harike Wetland, Punjab (India)

Fig. 1. Agarose gel (1.8%) showing amplified 18S rDNA gene of M. dermiscalis n. sp. infecting scales of Labeo rohita. Lane 1: 1kb DNA Ladder Lane 2, 3: M. dermiscalis n. sp. (1597bp)

Fig. 3 in Molecular identification of a new myxozoan, Myxobolus dermiscalis n. sp. (Myxosporea) infecting scales of Labeo rohita Hamilton in Harike Wetland, Punjab (India)

Fig. 3. Photomicrographs of myxospores of M. dermiscalis n. sp. a) fresh under phase contrast microscope b) stained with Ziehl‾Neelson c) Line drawing d) stained with Ironhaematoxylin Scale bar = 10 Mm.

Fig. 5 in Molecular identification of a new myxozoan, Myxobolus dermiscalis n. sp. (Myxosporea) infecting scales of Labeo rohita Hamilton in Harike Wetland, Punjab (India)

Fig. 5. Estimates of evolutionary divergence between the sequences of M. dermiscalis and other Myxosporea available in GenBank.

Fig. 2 in Molecular identification of a new myxozoan, Myxobolus dermiscalis n. sp. (Myxosporea) infecting scales of Labeo rohita Hamilton in Harike Wetland, Punjab (India)

Fig. 2. Infected scales of L. rohita showing creamish white pseudocysts of M. dermiscalis n. sp scale bar = 1 cm.

Figure 4 in Induction of histopathological lesions in renal tissue of the fish Labeo rohita upon exposure to municipal wastewater of Tung Dhab Drain, Amritsar, India

Figure 4. Light micrographs of histological sections of kidney taken from fish L. rohita exposed to municipal wastewater concentrations for exposure durations of 15 (A; 35.4%), 30 (B; 17.7%, C; 26.6%), 60 (D; 26.6%, E; 35.4%) days, and recovery experiments of 60 days (F; 35.4%). The histopathological alterations were marked by () occlusion of tubular lumen; () hyaline droplet degeneration; () dilation of glomerular capillaries; () reduction of Bowman's space; () melanomacrophage centers; () nuclear hypertrophy; () cellular hypertrophy; () cytoplasmic vacuolation in the interrenal cells; () necrosis. Magnification 100×.

Figure 3 in Induction of histopathological lesions in renal tissue of the fish Labeo rohita upon exposure to municipal wastewater of Tung Dhab Drain, Amritsar, India

Figure 3. Kidney mean DTC values in fish L. rohita exposed to municipal wastewater for durations of 15 days (a), 30 days (b), 60 days (c) when compared to control, and (d) subjected to recovery experiments for 60 days and compared with treated group. Values are mean ± SE (vertical bars); means followed by different letters are significantly different from each other (Tukey's post-hoc test, P ≤ 0.01).

Figure 2 in Induction of histopathological lesions in renal tissue of the fish Labeo rohita upon exposure to municipal wastewater of Tung Dhab Drain, Amritsar, India

Figure 2. Histological sections of kidney of fish L. rohita taken as control. A. Posterior kidney showing renal corpuscle formed by Bowman's capsule (BC), Bowman's space (BS), and Glomerulus (G). PT: proximal tubule; distal tubule. B. Anterior kidney showing chromaffin cells (CC) and interrenal cells (IC). Magnification 100×.

Figure 1 in Induction of histopathological lesions in renal tissue of the fish Labeo rohita upon exposure to municipal wastewater of Tung Dhab Drain, Amritsar, India

Figure 1. Map showing Tung Dhab Drain and Hudiara Drain. (a) The sampling site is marked by a star (); origin of drains is shown by (); confluence of Tung Dhab Drain and Hudiara Drain is marked by (). (b) Map showing main industries and sewer outfalls along Tung Dhab Drain. () indicates sewer outfalls; () metal foundries; () paper mill; () food; () leather; () chemical industries. Source: Adapted from Google Earth Maps, accessed August 2014.

Fig 4 in Evaluation of Gardi Bangana dero and Sahar Tor putitora with Rohu Labeo rohita and Naini Cirrhinus mrigala in polyculture at different stocking combinations

Fig 4: Growth of Sahar at different polyculture treatments

Fig 3 in Evaluation of Gardi Bangana dero and Sahar Tor putitora with Rohu Labeo rohita and Naini Cirrhinus mrigala in polyculture at different stocking combinations

Fig 3: Growth of Gardi at different polyculture treatments

Fig 2 in Evaluation of Gardi Bangana dero and Sahar Tor putitora with Rohu Labeo rohita and Naini Cirrhinus mrigala in polyculture at different stocking combinations

Fig 2: Growth of Naini at different polyculture treatments

Fig 1 in Evaluation of Gardi Bangana dero and Sahar Tor putitora with Rohu Labeo rohita and Naini Cirrhinus mrigala in polyculture at different stocking combinations

Fig 1: Growth of Rohu at different polyculture treatments

Fig 6 in Evaluation of Gardi Bangana dero and Sahar Tor putitora with Rohu Labeo rohita and Naini Cirrhinus mrigala in polyculture at different stocking combinations

Fig 6: Dissolved oxygen (mg/l) variation at different polyculture treatments

Fig 5 in Evaluation of Gardi Bangana dero and Sahar Tor putitora with Rohu Labeo rohita and Naini Cirrhinus mrigala in polyculture at different stocking combinations

Fig 5: Transparency (cm) variation at different polyculture treatments

Fig 8 in Evaluation of Gardi Bangana dero and Sahar Tor putitora with Rohu Labeo rohita and Naini Cirrhinus mrigala in polyculture at different stocking combinations

Fig 8: pH variation at different polyculture

Fig 7 in Evaluation of Gardi Bangana dero and Sahar Tor putitora with Rohu Labeo rohita and Naini Cirrhinus mrigala in polyculture at different stocking combinations

Fig 7: Temperature (0C) variation at different polyculture