Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 1 in Out of the Neotropics: newly discovered relictual species sheds light on the biogeographical history of spider ants (Leptomyrmex, Dolichoderinae, Formicidae)

Fig. 1. Representative workers of each Leptomyrmex clade. A, E, L. relictus sp.n.; B, F, macro- clade, L. cnemidatus (CASENT0012219); C, G, microclade, L. aitchisoni (CASENT0012033); D, †L. neotropicus (PSWC). A–D, Profile view; E–G, full-face (dorsal) view. Scale bars: A–D = 1.0 mm, E–G = 0.25 mm. (B and F imaged by A. Lucky, C and G by Estella Ortega; these images from AntWeb.org.)

Fig. 2 in Out of the Neotropics: newly discovered relictual species sheds light on the biogeographical history of spider ants (Leptomyrmex, Dolichoderinae, Formicidae)

Fig. 2. Distribution maps of extant Leptomyrmex. A, South America, part; B Australasia, part. Georeferenced specimen records: red dots, L. relictus sp.n. holotype; black dots, L. relictus sp.n. nontype collections; violet dots, macro-Leptomyrmex clade; pink dots, micro-Leptomyrmex clade. Australasian records from the AntWeb (2015) and CSIRO (2015) databases, and Lucky & Ward (2010). Basemaps ('Natural Earth 1') from Natural Earth (2015). [Colour figure available on the online version on Wiley Online Library.]

Fig. 4 in Out of the Neotropics: newly discovered relictual species sheds light on the biogeographical history of spider ants (Leptomyrmex, Dolichoderinae, Formicidae)

Fig. 4. Maximum-likelihood (ML) phylogeny of the Dolichoderinae, based on partitioned analysis of a 59-taxon 10-gene data matrix (−lnL = −53297.7). Tribes indicated by branch colour: orange, Tapinomini; blue, Bothriomyrmecini; green, Dolichoderini; purple, Leptomyrmecini. Support values (ML bootstrap percentages) indicated at nodes with coloured dots: red = 100, orange = 90–99, blue = 70–89, purple = 50–69, no dot = <50. [Colour figure available on the online version on Wiley Online Library.]

Fig. 3 in Out of the Neotropics: newly discovered relictual species sheds light on the biogeographical history of spider ants (Leptomyrmex, Dolichoderinae, Formicidae)

Fig. 3. Leptomyrmex relictus sp.n. male; head and body A, B, genitalia C–K. A, body, profile view; B, head, full-face (dorsal) view; C, genital capsule, dorsal view; D, genital capsule, ventral view; E, genital capsule, lateral view; F, right half of genital capsule, mesal (medial) view; G, right paramere and attached volsella, mesal view; H, left penisvalva with fragment of basimere attached to sclerotized penisvalvar membrane, ectal (lateral) view; I, abdominal sternum IX (note: broken along sagittal plane), mesal (dorsal) view; J, genital capsule, viewed anterior to posterior; K, left half of genital capsule, viewed posterior to anterior. Scale bars: A, B = 0.5 mm, C–K = 0.2 mm.

Fig. 5 in Out of the Neotropics: newly discovered relictual species sheds light on the biogeographical history of spider ants (Leptomyrmex, Dolichoderinae, Formicidae)

Fig. 5. Results of BEAST and LAGRANGE analyses, and comparative morphology of dolichoderine wing venation. A, Chronogram of the Dolichoderinae, Leptomyrmex relictus sp.n. bolded; B, L. burwelli: complete (unreduced) wing venation; C, Chronoxenus javanus: loss of crossvein 2rs-m with retention of other veins; D, Dorymyrmex insanus (male): loss of Rsf2-3 in addition to loss of other abscissae; E, L. relictus sp.n.: loss of Mf2-3; F, L. fragilis: loss of Mf2-3, 2r-rs (note: pterostigmal appendage not illustrated); G, †L. neotropicus: loss of Rs + M, Mf2-3, 2rs-m, Mf4+, 2r-rs; H, †Leptomyrmula maravignae: loss of Mf2+, 2rs-m, 2r-rs; I, †Usomyrma mirabilis: loss of Rs + M with retention of 1m-cu and loss of Mf2-3. In part A blue bars are 95% confidence intervals; coloured circles near nodes are inferred inherited ranges, with the top half corresponding to the upper branch and bottom half with the lower branch; coloured circles next to terminals represent biogeographical coding; asterisks indicate calibrated nodes; bracketed letters to the right of terminal names indicate wing venation reduction pattern occurrence, with letters corresponding to the wing patterns B–F. Note that 1m-cu presence is variable for most taxa displaying loss pattern E, and some Linepithema species have lost Mf2-3. Figures H and I redrawn from Emery (1891) and Dlussky et al. (2014), respectively. Palaeo., Palaeocene; Oligo., Oligocene; Pl., Pliocene; Q, Quaternary.

FIGURES 12–16 in Taxonomic revision of the ant genus Leptomyrmex Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) 2688

FIGURES 12–16. Macro-Leptomyrmex workers in head, profile and dorsal view. Fig. 12: L. nigriventris. Fig. 13: L. pallens. Fig. 14: L. puberulus. Fig. 15: L. rothneyi. Fig. 16: L. ruficeps.

FIGURES 17–22 in Taxonomic revision of the ant genus Leptomyrmex Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) 2688

FIGURES 17–22. Macro-Leptomyrmex workers in head, profile and dorsal view. Fig. 17: L. rufipes. Fig. 18: L. rufithorax. Fig. 19: L. tibialis. Fig. 20: L.unicolor. Fig. 21: L. varians, Fig. 22: L. wiburdi.

FIGURE 43 in Taxonomic revision of the ant genus Leptomyrmex Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) 2688

FIGURE 43. Simplified cladogram depicting relationships within the genus Leptomyrmex. Triangles represent species complexes not fully resolved by molecular phylogenetic analyses; AU = Australia, NC = New Caledonia, NG = New Guinea (modified from Lucky, in press).

FIGURE 25 in Taxonomic revision of the ant genus Leptomyrmex Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) 2688

FIGURE 25. Distinctive genital appendages of macro-Leptomyrmex males, with paramere pictured above left and volsella below right: a–b) L. mjobergi; c–d) L. fragilis, L. niger, L. melanoticus; e–f) L.puberulus, L. flavitarsus; g–h) L.geniculatus, L. nigriceps, L.pallens; i–j) L. erythrocephalus, L. cnemidatus; k–l) L. wiburdi; m–n) L. tibialis; o–p) L. nigriventris; q–r) L. unicolor; s–t) L. darlingtoni; u–v) L. rufithorax; w–x) L. rothneyi, L. ruficeps, L. rufipes; y–z) L. varians.

FIGURE24 in Taxonomic revision of the ant genus Leptomyrmex Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) 2688

FIGURE24. Macro-Leptomyrmex males: a) L. cnemidatus, b) L. darlingtoni, c) L. erythrocephalus, d) L. flavitarsus, e) L. fragilis, f) L. melanoticus, g) L. mjobergi, h) L. nigriventris, i) L. pallens, j) L. puberulus, k) L. rothneyi, l) L. ruficeps, m) L. rufipes, n) L. rufithorax, o) L. tibialis, p) L. unicolor, q) L. varians, r) L. wiburdi.

FIGURES 23 in Taxonomic revision of the ant genus Leptomyrmex Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) 2688

FIGURES 23. Known macro-Leptomyrmex queens: a) L. cnemidatus, b) L. fragilis, c) L. mjobergi, d) L. rufipes, e) L. rufithorax, f) L. tibialis, g) L. wiburdi.

FIGURES 2–6 in Taxonomic revision of the ant genus Leptomyrmex Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) 2688

FIGURES 2–6. Macro-Leptomyrmex workers in head, profile and dorsal view. Fig. 2: L. cnemidatus. Fig. 3: L. darlingtoni. Fig. 4: L. erythrocephalus. Fig. 5: L. flavitarsus. Fig. 6: L. fragilis.

FIGURES 7–11 in Taxonomic revision of the ant genus Leptomyrmex Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) 2688

FIGURES 7–11. Macro-Leptomyrmex workers in head, profile and dorsal view. Fig. 7: L. geniculatus. Fig. 8: L. melanoticus. Fig. 9: L. mjobergi. Fig. 10: L. niger. Fig. 11: L. nigriceps.

FIGURE 1 in Taxonomic revision of the ant genus Leptomyrmex Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) 2688

FIGURE 1. Morphometric measurements used in this study: a) head characters. HW = head width; HL = head length; EL = eye length; IOD = interocular distance; MFC = minimum frontal carinal distance. b) Male: LA 2+3 = length of antennal segments 2+3; SL = scape length. c) EW = eye width. d) WL = Weber's length; HTL = hind tibial length. e) HTW = hind tibial width. f) PW = pronotal width; DPW = dorsal petiolar width.

FIGURES 23–24. Fig. 23 in Six new, unusually small ants of the genus Leptomyrmex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

FIGURES 23–24. Fig. 23, hind tibial spur of L. burwelli. Fig. 24, hind tibial spur of L. ramorniensis.

FIGURES 19–20. Fig. 19 in Six new, unusually small ants of the genus Leptomyrmex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

FIGURES 19–20. Fig. 19, graph of head length versus head width. Fig. 20, graph of scape length versus head width.

FIGURES 13–18 in Six new, unusually small ants of the genus Leptomyrmex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

FIGURES 13–18. Leptomyrmex pilosus sp. n. holotype worker. Fig. 13, front of head; Fig. 14, lateral view of body; Fig. 15, dorsal view of body. Leptomyrmex ramorniensis sp. n. worker. Fig. 16, front of head; Fig. 17, lateral view of body; Fig. 18, dorsal view of body.

FIGURES 1–6 in Six new, unusually small ants of the genus Leptomyrmex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

FIGURES 1–6. Leptomyrmex aitchisoni sp. n. worker. Fig. 1, front of head; Fig. 2, lateral view of body; Fig. 3, dorsal view of body. Leptomyrmex burwelli sp. n. paratype worker. Fig. 4, front of head; Fig. 5, lateral view of body; Fig. 6, dorsal view of body.

FIGURES 21–22 in Six new, unusually small ants of the genus Leptomyrmex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

FIGURES 21–22. Distribution of material examined during this study. Fig. 21, L. aitchisoni (triangle), L. burwelli (circle) and L. ramorniensis (square). Fig. 22, L. dolichoscapus (circle), L. garretti (triangle) and L. pilosus (square). Note the restricted range of most species, especially the set in Fig. 22, where all species are essentially sympatric.

FIGURES 7–12 in Six new, unusually small ants of the genus Leptomyrmex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

FIGURES 7–12. Leptomyrmex dolichoscapus sp. n. holotype worker. Fig. 7, front of head; Fig. 8, lateral view of body; Fig. 9, dorsal view of body. Leptomyrmex garretti sp. n. holotype worker. Fig. 10, front of head; Fig. 11, lateral view of body; Fig. 12, dorsal view of body.