Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
62
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
62 results for “Literature analysis”
Sample Records: Disinformation as a strategy of obstructionism on climate action: analysis of the limitations of the scientific literature for a systemic understanding of the phenomenon
<p>The project contains several underlying datasets essential for replicating the study's findings. The dataset <strong>01.1_PRIMERPRISMA_IDENTIFICATION.xlsx</strong> includes the initial selection of 6 general terms related to environment and sustainability and 11 specific terms related to disinformation, summarizing the selected keywords, generated Boolean operators, and initial search results, yielding 783 records. The <strong>01.2_PRIMER PRIMA-SCREENING.xlsx</strong> file details the screening process, eliminating duplicates and non-English documents, resulting in 271 retained records. The <strong>01.3_PRIMER PRISMA_INCLUDED.xlsx</strong> file contains results after further screening, retaining 82 documents with expanded bibliometric details. The <strong>02.1_SEGUNDOPRISMA_IDENTIFICATION.xlsx</strong> file documents the second phase of identification using new terms related to climate and disinformation, retrieving 174 records. The <strong>02.2_SEGUNDOPRISMA_SCREENING.xlsx</strong> file includes the screening process for the second phase, reducing records to 75, with an abstract review retaining 2 documents. The <strong>02.3_SEGUNDOPRISMA_INCLUDED.xlsx</strong> file integrates documents from both search phases and other sources, culminating in a final review of 86 documents. The <strong>3.1_Other sources.xlsx</strong> file includes additional relevant sources identified during the review process. Finally, the <strong>4-Final included.xlsx</strong> file contains the final set of 75 publications subjected to the DESLOCIS analysis model.</p>
Sample Records (Analytical procedure): Disinformation as a strategy of obstructionism on climate action: analysis of the limitations of the scientific literature for a systemic understanding of the phenomenon
<p>This dataset includes t<span>he online form and the results from the quantitative phase of the study: Disinformation as an obstructionist strategy in climate change mitigation: A review of the scientific literature for a systemic understanding of the phenomenon</span></p> <p>To duplicate the form you can use: https://forms.office.com/Pages/ShareFormPage.aspx?id=6sSEXw03nkuDDHVvi_G1Hw0s3dVrMb1NsO12gDNTB9BUREo4WENRMFFDN1lOSlRSU0xJNkVHWURWUS4u&sharetoken=rg4Qfg19O4UgYzUB084C </p>
Sample Records (PRISMA Checklist and Flow diagram): Disinformation as a strategy of obstructionism on climate action: analysis of the limitations of the scientific literature for a systemic understanding of the phenomenon
<p>This dataset includes: the PRISMA Checklist and the <span>PRISMA Flow diagram of the study titled: Disinformation as an obstructionist strategy in climate change mitigation: A review of the scientific literature for a systemic understanding of the phenomenon.</span></p>
RDF version of the data from Hagar I. Labouta et al. Meta-Analysis of Nanoparticle Cytotoxicity via Data-Mining the Literature. NanoImpact (2019)
<p>This is an RDFied version of the dataset published by Hagar I. Labouta et al. Meta-Analysis of Nanoparticle Cytotoxicity via Data-Mining the Literature. NanoImpact (2019).</p> <p>The original dataset publication DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b07562">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b07562</a></p> <p>The Original publication authors: Hagar I. Labouta, Nasimeh Asgarian, Kristina Rinker, and David T. Cramb</p>
Literature search for publication: A meta-analysis on the role older adults with cancer favour in treatment decision making
<p>Dataset belonging to 10.5281/zenodo.7308287 including data of literature search regardign outcome preference scale in geriatric oncology</p>
Dataset from the study "Analysis of the accuracy of scientific literature references provided by ChatGPT"
<p>This dataset corresponds to the study carried out to analyse 10 bibliographic references of 10 Spanish authors in the field of Information Sciences requested to the ChatGPT chatbot.</p> <p>The file "Bibliographic_references_ analysis" contains the 10 references returned by ChatGPT for each of the 10 authors (a total of 100 references), together with the variables analysed to check their authenticity.</p> <p>The "Keywords_analysis" file contains the normalisation carried out on the words considered to be key words extracted from the titles of the works, according to which a word cloud showing the frequency of occurrence could be drawn up.</p>
Mapping literature reviews on coral health: A review map, critical appraisal, and bibliometric analysis - Data and Code
<p>Data, code, and supplementary materials for "Mapping literature reviews on coral health: A review map, critical appraisal, and bibliometric analysis" by Burke et al., published in Ecological Solutions and Evidence.</p>
Domain-Specific Language domain analysis and evaluation: a systematic literature review
<p>In order to successfully implement Domain-Specific Languages (DSLs), it is needed to systematically define and to support its development process; namely its Evaluation and the Domain Analysis phase. For that purpose, the studies were systematically selected from the most relevant venues that focus on the implementation of DSLs, in order to get insight if and how these development phases were performed. The special focus was given to the human-machine DSLs (excluding the machine-machine languages), the involvement of its end-users in the development process and the evaluation of DSLs usability, i.e. quality in use of DSLs. </p> <p>Preliminary results give us a notion that there is increased the state of practice of performing the evaluation of the DSLs, mostly including usability concerns, at least after its implementation. Generally, the quality of the reviewed studies was high. On another hand, rarely the assessments are done during domain analysis, which in general is not reporting inclusion of end-users or consideration of different use-cases, although the majority of studies refer to target non-programmers and to contribute easy in use. </p> <p>We did collect the valuable body of primary studies that are giving us answers to our research questions, however, to raise the credibility of the conclusions we should extend the analysis to other venues. Also, as we get insights into the categorization of practices we could specify more concretely answers that would give us means to perform more detailed meta-analysis. </p>
Data-Driven Identification and Analysis of Waiting Times in Business Processes: A Systematic Literature Review
<p>Supplementary Material for Systematic Literature Review titled "Data-Driven Identification and Analysis of Waiting Times in<br> Business Processes: A Systematic Literature Review"</p>
BEYOND_WP1_T1.1_Literature review_overview of literature list and Analysis.
<p>Data sets for D1.1. The first part of this deliverable is a scoping review of the literature examining 147 articles published <br>in peer review academic journals over the past ten years (2013-2023) on the promotion of research <br>ethics and integrity (REI), and breaches of these standards including research misconduct (RM) and <br>questionable research practices (QRPs). It also identifies current challenges, gaps in knowledge and <br>practice, and opportunities for both further research, and policy and educational interventions to <br>promote REI and mitigate RM and QRPs. Findings on state-of-the-art knowledge in REI research <br>suggest some areas of consensus, including on the greater risks for early career researchers to commit <br>RM and the value of responsible conduct of research (RCR) training, particularly approaches that <br>emphasize ethical problem-solving skills. However, the study also identified a lack of consensus in <br>other areas, including the rehabilitation and reintegration of researchers who committed RM. Key <br>findings extracted from the review contribute to the understanding that the environment in which <br>researchers operate and other contextual factors significantly influence RCR, rather than primarily the <br>individual behavior of researchers. As such, these environmental and contextual factors require further <br>research and policy attention.</p>
Expert-based literature review on RRI indicators for science education assessment: PERFORM analysis matrix
<p>The document contains the main variables and categories of analysis of the expert-based literature review conducted as part of the assessment impact developed in the PERFORM project. This literature review globally aimed to identify and characterize assessment frameworks used in the context of science learning and engagement with young people. Specifically, it examined the operationalization of: i) RRI values and process requirements, ii) transversal competences, iii) experiential aspects, and iv) cognitive aspects. In doing that assessment gaps and challenges where identified relevant to the context of PERFORM and, more broadly, to the development of science education assessments incorporating the RRI dimension. By assessment framework we refer to a set of interlinked criteria, practices and concepts providing a systematic way of data collection, analysis and interpretation to the study of science learning and engagement. The template for data collection was organised in different sections approaching the following specific review questions and sub-questions:</p> <ol> <li><em>What assessment frameworks can be identified in the selected sample?</em> <ol> <li>On which disciplines are they based?</li> <li>What is being assessed in these frameworks?</li> <li>How it is the evaluation conducted?</li> <li>What are the challenges of each approach for assessing science learning and engagement?</li> </ol> </li> <li><em>How are transversal competences, RRI and emotional factors included in these frameworks?</em> <ol> <li>How are these notions operationalised?</li> <li>What kinds of evaluation indicators are applied for data collection, if any?</li> </ol> </li> </ol>
Domain-Driven Design in Microservices-Based Systems Development: A Systematic Literature Review and Thematic Analysis [Dataset]
<p>This repository contains all artifacts related to the study: Domain-Driven Design in Microservices-Based Systems Development: A Systematic Literature Review and Thematic Analysis</p>
Dataset Literature Review digital forensic AND discriminant analysis
<p>data ini digunakan untuk membuat penelitian berdasarkan tinjauan literatur dengan kata kunci "digital forensic" dan discriminant analysis"</p>
Digital Twins: A Systematic Literature Review Based on Data Analysis and Topic Modeling
<p>The digital twin has recently become a popular topic in research related to manufacturing, such as Industry 4.0, the industrial internet of things, and cyber-physical systems. In addition, digital twins are the focus of several research areas: construction, urban management, digital transformation of the economy, medicine, virtual reality, software testing, and others. The concept is not yet fully defined, its scope seems unlimited, and the topic is relatively new; all this can present a barrier to research. The main goal of this paper is to develop a proper methodology for visualizing the digital-twin science landscape using modern bibliometric tools, text-mining and topic-modelling, based on machine learning models—Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) and BERTopic (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers). The scope of the study includes 8693 publications on the topic selected from the Scopus database, published between January 1993 and September 2022. Keyword co-occurrence analysis and topic-modelling indicate that studies on digital twins are still in the early stage of development. At the same time, the core of the topic is growing, and some topic clusters are emerging. More than 100 topics can be identified; the most popular and fastest-growing topic is ‘digital twins of industrial robots, production lines and objects.’ Further efforts are needed to verify the proposed methodology, which can be achieved by analyzing other research fields.</p>
Data and Python script for article "A text mining analysis of the climate change literature in industrial ecology'
<p>The data and Python script are part of the forum article "A text mining analysis of the climate change literature in industrial ecology" authored by Dayeen, F.R., Sharma, A.S., and Derrible, S., and published in the <em>Journal of Industrial Ecology</em> in 2020.</p> <p>The Python script and instructions are included in the LiTCoF_v1.00-py.zip file. The original data is available in two formats: .csv and .pkl.</p> <p>Updates of the script will be posted at https://github.com/csunlab/LiTCoF and at https://csun.uic.edu/codes/LiTCoF.html. The data is also available at https://csun.uic.edu/datasets.html#AbstractsIE.</p> <p>Feel free to contact any of the authors for information and questions about the data and code.</p>
The growth of COVID-19 scientific literature: A forecast analysis of different daily time series in specific settings
<p>Submitted to The ISSI 2021 Conference. The conference is organised by KU Leuven in close collaboration with the university of Antwerp under the auspices of ISSI – the International Society for Informetrics and Scientometrics (<a href="http://www.issi-society.org/">http://www.issi-society.org/</a>). </p> <p>We present a forecasting analysis on the growth of scientific literature related to COVID-19 expected for 2021. Considering the paramount scientific and financial efforts made by the research community to find solutions to end the COVID-19 pandemic, an unprecedented volume of scientific outputs is being produced. This questions the capacity of scientists, politicians and citizens to maintain infrastructure, digest content and take scientifically informed decisions. A crucial aspect is to make predictions to prepare for such a large corpus of scientific literature. Here we base our predictions on the ARIMA model and use two different data sources: the Dimensions and World Health Organization COVID-19 databases. These two sources have the particularity of including in the metadata information on the date in which papers were indexed. We present global predictions, plus predictions in three specific settings: by type of access (Open Access), by NLM source (PubMed and PMC), and by domain-specific repository (SSRN and MedRxiv). We conclude by discussing our findings.</p>
Supplementary material for "Patient portal adoption rates: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis"
<p>The attached file contains the searches used to review the literature and identify papers evaluating usage, usability and influence on decision making of patient portals (Supplementary Table 1).</p> <p>Supplementary Table 2 and Supplementary Table 3 contains references and individual studies characteristics of included studies.</p>
Supplementary material for "Patient portal adoption rates: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis"
<p>The attached file contains the searches used to review the literature and identify papers evaluating usage, usability and influence on decision making of patient portals (Supplementary Table 1).</p> <p>Supplementary Table 2 and Supplementary Table 3 contains references and individual study characteristics of included studies.</p>
Framing the cross-border commuting literature: a systematic review and bibliographic analysis
<p>The dataset consist of the 134 publications selected for the systematic literature review on cross-border commuting. </p>
The effect of wheelchair users on the egress time of pedestrian crowds: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis
<p>This dataset provides supplementary input data for a systematic literature review and meta-analysis, examining the effects of mobility-impaired individuals, specifically wheelchair users, on pedestrian egress times. It includes the following variables:</p> <ul> <li><strong>short_trial_name</strong>: A unique identifier for each trial.</li> <li><strong>independent variables</strong>: Factors such as the number of attendees, bottleneck width, and mobility profiles (e.g., individuals with or without wheelchair usage).</li> <li><strong>left_shifted_time</strong>: Standardized start time for egress, adjusted for comparability across trials.</li> <li><strong>lower_left_no_of_people</strong>: The number of individuals who passed through the bottleneck at the standardized start time.</li> <li><strong>right_shifted_time</strong>: Standardized end time for egress.</li> <li><strong>right_left_no_of_people</strong>: The number of individuals who passed through the bottleneck by the standardized end time.</li> </ul>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.