Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
10
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
10 results for “Long-term Time Series”
Long-term MODIS LST day-time and night-time temperatures, sd and differences at 1 km based on the 2000–2020 time series
<p>Layers include: Land Surface Temperature daytime monthly median value 2000–2017, Land Surface Temperature daytime monthly sd value 2000–2017, Land Surface Temperature daytime monthly day-night difference 2000–2017. Derived using the <a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/global-layers/-/tree/master/input_layers/MOD11A2">data.table package and quantile function in R</a>. We derived four standard statistics: (1) lower 2.5% probability (l.025), median (m), upper 97.5% probability (u.975) and standard deviation (sd). Updated long-term values for 2000–2022+ are pending.</p> <p>Includes also long-term trends (trend.logit.ols) which was produced by fitting regression models to de-seasonalized time-series as explained in this <strong><a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/global-layers/-/blob/master/input_layers/MOD13Q1/03-data-access.ipynb">python tutorial</a></strong>. Basically models are fitted for <strong>each pixel</strong> and the model parameters are saved as images.</p> <p>For more info about the MODIS LST product see: <a href="https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/products/mod11a2v006/"><strong>https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/products/mod11a2v006/</strong></a>. Antarctica is not included.</p> <p>To access and visualize maps use: <a href="http://www.openlandmap.org/">OpenLandMap.org</a></p> <p>If you discover a bug, artifact or inconsistency, or if you have a question please use some of the following channels:</p> <ul> <li>Technical issues and questions about the code: <a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/global-layers/-/issues">https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/global-layers/-/issues</a> </li> <li>General questions and comments: <a href="https://disqus.com/home/forums/landgis/">https://disqus.com/home/forums/landgis/</a></li> </ul> <p>All files internally compressed using "COMPRESS=DEFLATE" creation option in GDAL. File naming convention:</p> <ul> <li>clm = theme: climate,</li> <li>lst = variable: land surface temperature,</li> <li>mod11a2.oct.day = determination method: MOD11A2 product, day time values for October,</li> <li>d = median value / sd = standard deviation / u.975 = aggregation/statistics method: 97.5% probability upper quantile,</li> <li>1km = spatial resolution / block support: 1 km,</li> <li>s0..0cm = vertical reference: land surface,</li> <li>2000..2017 = time reference: from 2000 to 2017,</li> <li>v1.0 = version number: 1.0,</li> </ul>
FAPAR monthly time-series (250 m): Long-term trend (2000-2021)
<p><strong>List of Subdatasets:</strong></p> <ul> <li>Long-term data: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8381409">2000-2021</a></li> <li>5th percentile (p05) monthly time-series: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8408654">2000</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8411611">2001</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8412712">2002</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8413021">2003</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8413689">2004</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8414639">2005</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8411609">2006</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8414085">2007</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8414960">2008</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415476">2009</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415686">2010</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8412154">2011</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8414082">2012</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8411364">2013</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8414933">2014</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415414">2015</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8412246">2016</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8414083">2017</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8411366">2018</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415203">2019</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415549">2020</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8387608">2021</a></li> <li>50th percentile (p50) monthly time-series: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8408710">2000</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8408798">2001</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8408866">2002</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415319">2003</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415619">2004</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415878">2005</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416080">2006</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416619">2007</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417164">2008</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417513">2009</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417708">2010</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415669">2011</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416000">2012</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416542">2013</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417055">2014</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417467">2015</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415747">2016</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416333">2017</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416835">2018</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417326">2019</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417589">2020</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8388078">2021</a></li> <li>95th percentile (p95) monthly time-series: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8408949">2000</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8409059">2001</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8409154">2002</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8409362">2003</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416487">2004</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417029">2005</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417833">2006</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417996">2007</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418308">2008</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418669">2009</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418986">2010</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417649">2011</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417816">2012</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417959">2013</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418253">2014</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418625">2015</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417759">2016</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417898">2017</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418076">2018</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418442">2019</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418751">2020</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8392976">2021</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>General Description</strong></p> <p>The <i>monthly aggregated Fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FAPAR)</i> dataset is derived from <abbr title="glass.umd.edu/FAPAR/MODIS/250m/">250m 8d GLASS V6 FAPAR</abbr>. The data set is derived from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) reflectance and LAI data using several other FAPAR products (MODIS Collection 6, GLASS FAPAR V5, and PROBA-V1 FAPAR) to generate a bidirectional long-short-term memory (Bi-LSTM) model to estimate FAPAR. The dataset time spans from March 2000 to December 2021 and provides data that covers the entire globe. The dataset can be used in many applications like land degradation modeling, land productivity mapping, and land potential mapping. The dataset includes:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Long-term:</strong></li> </ul> <p>Derived from monthly time-series. This dataset provides linear trend model for the p95 variable: (1) slope beta mean (p95.beta_m), p-value for beta (p95.beta_pv), intercept alpha mean (p95.alpha_m), p-value for alpha (p95.alpha_pv), and coefficient of determination R<sup>2</sup> (p95.r2_m).</p> <ul> <li><strong>Monthly time-series:</strong></li> </ul> <p>Monthly aggregation with three standard statistics: (1) 5th percentile (p05), median (p50), and 95th percentile (p95). For each month, we aggregate all composites within that month plus one composite each before and after, ending up with 5 to 6 composites for a single month depending on the number of images within that month.</p> <p><strong>Data Details</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>Time period</strong>: March 2000–December 2021</li> <li><strong>Type of data:</strong> Fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FAPAR)</li> <li><strong>How the data was collected or derived:</strong> Derived from 250m 8 d GLASS V6 FAPAR using Python running in a local HPC.The time-series analysis were computed using the <a href="https://github.com/scikit-map/scikit-map">Scikit-map</a> Python package.</li> <li><strong>Statistical methods used:</strong> for the long-term, Ordinary Least Square (OLS) of p95 monthly variable; for the monthly time-series, percentiles 05, 50, and 95.</li> <li><strong>Limitations or exclusions in the data:</strong> The dataset does not include data for Antarctica.</li> <li><strong>Coordinate reference system:</strong> EPSG:4326</li> <li><strong>Bounding box (Xmin, Ymin, Xmax, Ymax):</strong> (-180.00000, -62.0008094, 179.9999424, 87.37000)</li> <li><strong>Spatial resolution:</strong> 1/480 d.d. = 0.00208333 (250m)</li> <li><strong>Image size:</strong> 172,800 x 71,698</li> <li><strong>File format:</strong> Cloud Optimized Geotiff (COG) format.</li> </ul> <p><strong>Support</strong></p> <p>If you discover a bug, artifact, or inconsistency, or if you have a question please raise a GitHub issue: <a href="https://github.com/Open-Earth-Monitor/Global_FAPAR_250m/issues">https://github.com/Open-Earth-Monitor/Global_FAPAR_250m/issues</a></p> <p><strong>Reference</strong></p> <p>Hackländer, J., Parente, L., Ho, Y.-F., Hengl, T., Simoes, R., Consoli, D., Şahin, M., Tian, X., Herold, M., Jung, M., Duveiller, G., Weynants, M., Wheeler, I., (2023?) "Land potential assessment and trend-analysis using 2000–2021 FAPAR monthly time-series at 250 m spatial resolution", submitted to PeerJ, preprint available at: <a href="https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3415685/v1">https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3415685/v1</a></p> <p><strong>Name convention</strong></p> <p>To ensure consistency and ease of use across and within the projects, we follow the standard Open-Earth-Monitor file-naming convention. The convention works with 10 fields that describes important properties of the data. In this way users can search files, prepare data analysis etc, without needing to open files. The fields are:</p> <ol> <li>generic variable name: fapar = Fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation</li> <li>variable procedure combination: essd.lstm = Earth System Science Data with bidirectional long short-term memory (Bi–LSTM)</li> <li>Position in the probability distribution / variable type: p05/p50/p95 = 5th/50th/95th percentile</li> <li>Spatial support: 250m</li> <li>Depth reference: s = surface</li> <li>Time reference begin time: 20000301 = 2000-03-01</li> <li>Time reference end time: 20211231 = 2022-12-31</li> <li>Bounding box: go = global (without Antarctica)</li> <li>EPSG code: epsg.4326 = EPSG:4326</li> <li>Version code: v20230628 = 2023-06-28 (creation date)</li> </ol>
Global GFED-based monthly burned area time series (1996-2016) at 1 km and ESA CCI MODIS-based long-term monthly P90 burned area occurrence at 500 m
<p>Contains two separate datasets:</p> <ol> <li>Global <a href="https://www.globalfiredata.org/data.html">GFED-based monthly burned area</a> (in ha) <a href="https://youtu.be/kBJcP8mL2Qs">time series (1996-2016)</a> at 1 km (downscaled using cubic-splines from 25 km);</li> <li>Global burned area long term (2000-2012) P90 (quantile probability = 0.9) based on the <a href="http://maps.elie.ucl.ac.be/CCI/viewer/index.php">ESA CCI burned area accumulated weekly product</a>;</li> </ol> <p>Original GFED monthly data is provided as HDF4 files (ftp.fuoco.geog.umd.edu/data/GFED/GFED4). Dataset is described in detail in <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrg.20042">Giglio et al. (2013)</a>. Processing steps are available <a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/global-layers/tree/master/input_layers/GFED"><strong>here</strong></a>. Antarctica is not included.</p> <p>To access and visualize global datasets use: <a href="https://openlandmap.org"><strong>https://openlandmap.org</strong></a> or watch <a href="https://youtu.be/kBJcP8mL2Qs"><strong>this video</strong></a>.</p> <p>If you discover a bug, artifact or inconsistency in the maps, or if you have a question please use some of the following channels:</p> <ul> <li>Technical issues and questions about the code: <a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/global-layers/issues">https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/global-layers/issues</a> </li> </ul> <p>All files provided as Cloud-Optimized GeoTIFFs / internally compressed using "COMPRESS=DEFLATE" creation option in GDAL. File naming convention:</p> <ul> <li>nhz = theme: natural hazards,</li> <li>monthly.burned.ha = variable: estimated monthly burned area in ha,</li> <li>gfed = data source GFED data,</li> <li>m = mean value,</li> <li>1km = spatial resolution / block support: 1 km,</li> <li>s0..0cm = vertical reference: land surface,</li> <li>2000.02 = time reference aggregated: month Feb of year 2000,</li> <li>v4 = version number: GFEDv4,</li> </ul>
Ensemble Machine Learning Prediction of Potential FAPAR: Monthly time-series 2021 and Long-Term Comparison with Actual FAPAR
<p><strong>General Description</strong></p> <p>The dataset contains composites at 250 m spatial resolution of (1) monthly potential FAPAR for the year 2021 from ensemble ML model predictions, (2) the model deviance for each prediction, (3) the yearly average of potential FAPAR, (4) the yearly average of actual FAPAR and (5) the yearly average of the difference between actual and potential (actual minus potential) FAPAR. The dataset is based on the <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/8392976">95th percentile of the monthly aggregated FAPAR</a> derived from <a href="http://glass.umd.edu/Overview.html">250 m 8 d GLASS V6 FAPAR</a>. Potential FAPAR was predicted by fitting an ensemble ML model using globally distributed training points (cca 3 Mio) and a set of 52 biophysical covariates including several layers related to human pressure. The code for modeling potential FAPAR is openly available at <a href="http://github.com/Open-Earth-Monitor/Global_FAPAR_250m">https://github.com/Open-Earth-Monitor/Global_FAPAR_250m</a>. The dataset can be used in many applications like land degradation modeling, land productivity mapping, and land potential mapping. </p> <p><strong>Data Details</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>Time period:</strong> January 2021 - December 2021</li> <li><strong>Type of data: </strong>Fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FAPAR)</li> <li><strong>How the data was collected or derived:</strong> Derived from 250m 8 d GLASS V6 FAPAR</li> <li><strong>Statistical methods used: </strong>Ensemble machine learning</li> <li><strong>Limitations or exclusions in the data: </strong>The dataset does not include data for Antarctica.</li> <li><strong>Coordinate reference system:</strong> EPSG:4326</li> <li><strong>Bounding box (Xmin, Ymin, Xmax, Ymax):</strong> (-180.00000, -62.0008094, 179.9999424, 87.37000)</li> <li><strong>Spatial resolution:</strong> 1/480 d.d. = 0.00208333 (250m)</li> <li><strong>Image size: </strong>172,800 x 71,698</li> <li><strong>File format: </strong>Cloud Optimized Geotiff (COG) format.</li> </ul> <p><strong>Support</strong></p> <p>If you discover a bug, artifact, or inconsistency, or if you have a question please raise a GitHub issue: <a href="https://github.com/Open-Earth-Monitor/Global_FAPAR_250m/issues">https://github.com/Open-Earth-Monitor/Global_FAPAR_250m/issues</a></p> <p><strong>Reference</strong></p> <p>Hackländer, J., Parente, L., Ho, Y.-F., Hengl, T., Simoes, R., Consoli, D., Şahin, M., Tian, X., Herold, M., Jung, M., Duveiller, G., Weynants, M., Wheeler, I., (2023?) "Land potential assessment and trend-analysis using 2000–2021 FAPAR monthly time-series at 250 m spatial resolution", submitted to PeerJ, preprint available at: <a href="https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3415685/v1">https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3415685/v1</a></p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Name convention</strong></p> <p>To ensure consistency and ease of use across and within the projects, we follow the standard Open-Earth-Monitor file-naming convention. The convention works with 10 fields that describes important properties of the data. In this way users can search files, prepare data analysis etc, without needing to open files. The fields are:</p> <ol> <li><strong>generic variable name:</strong> pot.fapar = Potential Fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation</li> <li><strong>variable procedure combination: </strong>eml = ensemble machine learning</li> <li><strong>Position in the probability distribution / variable type:</strong> m = mean</li> <li><strong>Spatial support:</strong> 250m</li> <li><strong>Depth reference: </strong>s = surface</li> <li><strong>Time reference begin time:</strong> 20210101 = 2021-01-01</li> <li><strong>Time reference end time:</strong> 20211231 = 2021-12-31</li> <li><strong>Bounding box: </strong>go = global (without Antarctica)</li> <li><strong>EPSG code:</strong> epsg.4326 = EPSG:4326</li> <li><strong>Version code:</strong> v20230924 = 2023-09-24 (creation date)</li> </ol>
Long-term abundance time-series of the High Arctic terrestrial vertebrate community of Bylot Island, Nunavut
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Long-term time series of mussel and scallop abundances in the Bay of Seine (Normandy, France).
<p>In Normandy (France), and particularly in the Bay of Seine, the great scallop Pecten maximus and the blue mussel Mytilus edulis are the main bivalve molluscs species harvested by the local fishing fleet. In this area, the scallop stock is one of the most important in Europe and appears to be growing since a few years. Its exploitation actually sustains an important economic activity (with a landed volume of 15.000 tons per year). However, population growth is not monotonous and yearly recruitment of young scallops seems to be very variable. For mussels, a fleet of nearly 40 boats exploited the natural banks in the subtidal area, with a landed volume ranging between 1.000 and 5.000 tons, exceptionally reaching 30.000 tons per year depending of the yearly fluctuations of the juvenile mussels’ settlement. Since 2014, however, the yearly prospective campaigns have pointed a dramatic decline of the recruitment throughout the area.</p> <p>Long-term data series on bivalve settlement usually show strongly fluctuating patterns, due to the environmental sensitivity of mollusk-recruitment process. While scallop and mussel stocks historically presented strong fluctuations of abundance, yearly monitoring programs were required to estimate annual abundance, and to adjust the fishing effort in line with the available resources. In accordance with stakeholders and fishermen, Ifremer (the French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea) and the Regional Fisheries Committee conducted these campaigns since 1992 for scallops and 1982 for mussels. Here, we present the dataset synthetizing the results of these campaigns in order to extend the reuse potential of these data. Particularly, database may help to quantify the effects of environmental variations on recruitment of two marine bivalve species and forecast simulations of recruitment under climate change scenario</p> <p>For scallops, a various number of one nautical mile squares were sampled each year in the southern part of the Bay of Seine (approximately south of 49°35 north latitude). This number was determined following the results of the campaigns conducted in the previous years, to ensure the representativeness of the abundance estimators. In each sampling unit, the fisher boat hauled 2 survey dredges with a 2 meters wide aperture. Harvested individuals were then classified by age-class, and numbered. Later, we calculated back an abundance index per age-class and per surface unit covered by the dredges.</p> <p>For mussels, 5 small banks located in the south-western part of the Bay of Seine were prospected each year. Grandcamp bank is approximately located between 1°07’ W and 0°56’ W, and 49°26’ N. and 49°23’ N. Ravenoville bank boundaries are 1°16’ W-1°07’ W, and 49°32’ N-49°25’N. Réville bank boundaries are 1°15’ W and 1°10’ W, and 49°37’ N and 49°34’ N. Moulard bank boundaries are 1°15’ W and 1°10’ W, and 49°41’ N and 49°38’ N. Barfleur bank boundaries are 1°21’ W and 1°10’ W, and 49°48’ N and 49°40’ N. During the annual campaigns, chartered fishermen vessels prospected the different banks by dredging, following a sampling design adapted to the mussel distribution and divided by a various number of one mile squares. Each year and for each bank, they realized one haul in the sampling squares located in the periphery of the bank to determine the mussel coverage. Once the boundaries of the bank delimited, the sampling effort was uniformly distributed within the area. In any one haul, the mussels were weighted and a subsample of the harvested individuals were numbered, measured and weighted individually. Later, we estimated the mean individual mass per size-class, and deduced the number of mussel per size-class and per sampling unit. In this case, the abundance index consists in an index of dredging-yield, expressed in kilograms per minute of hauling one dredge. This index was calculated for the commercial-sized mussels (> 40 mm) only, because of the reduced catchability of smaller mussels.</p> <p>The dataset contains 4 columns and 186 rows. The columns are ‘year’, ‘species’, ‘area’, ‘index’. </p>
Data from: Biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships in long-term time series and palaeoecological records: deep sea as a test bed
The link between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning (BEF) over long temporal scales is poorly understood. Here, we investigate biological monitoring and palaeoecological records on decadal, centennial and millennial time scales from a BEF framework, by using deep-sea, soft-sediment environments as a test bed. Results generally show positive BEF relationships, in agreement with BEF studies based on present-day spatial analyses and short-term manipulative experiments. However, the deep-sea BEF relationship is much noisier across longer time scales compared with modern observational studies. We also demonstrate with palaeoecological time-series data that a larger species pool does not enhance ecosystem stability through time, whereas abundance, as an indicator of higher ecosystem functioning, may enhance ecosystem stability. These results suggest that BEF relationships are potentially timescale-dependent. Environmental impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning may be much stronger than biodiversity impacts on ecosystem functioning at long, decadal–millennial, time scales. Longer time-scale perspectives, including palaeoecological and ecosystem monitoring data, are critical for predicting future BEF relationships on a rapidly changing planet.
Data from: Biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships in long-term time series and palaeoecological records: deep sea as a test bed
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
An effective low-cost remote sensing approach to reconstruct the long-term and dense time series of area and storage variations for super-large lakes
<p>Supplementary File</p>
Long-term prediction of nonlinear time series
This paper is about applying recurrent least squares support vector machines (LS-SVM) on three ESTSP08 competition datasets. Least squares support vector machines are used as nonlinear models in order to avoid local minima problems. Then prediction task is re-formulated as function approximation task. Recurrent LS-SVM uses nonlinear autoregressive exogenous (NARX) model to build nonlinear regressor, by estimating in each iteration the next output value, given the past output and input measurements.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.