Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

16

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

16 results for “Medical education & training”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
dryad36/100

Pediatric standardized residency training faculty's perceptions of medical education research

<p><strong>Background:</strong> Rigorous medical education research (MER) conducted by faculty in pediatric standardized residency training (SRT) can contribute to the promotion of child health care.  </p> <p><strong>Aim:</strong> This study aimed to assess the perceptions of pediatric SRT faculty regarding MER in Guangdong Province, China.     </p> <p><strong>Methods:</strong> A questionnaire survey was conducted involving 40 pediatric SRT clinical teachers from 10 hospitals in Guangdong Province.</p> <p><strong>Results:</strong> Among the 40 teachers, 16 (40.00%) stated that they did not participate any MER activities. The main challenges they encountered in conducting MER were the lack of training (72.50%), limited time (80.00%), and lack of grants funding (60.00%). Only 10 (25.00%)teachers were reported to have received grants for MER projects.   </p> <p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings highlight the importance of providing support and training to pediatric SRT faculty in Guangdong Province, China, to enhance their engagement in MER. Addressing these challenges can lead to significant improvements in child heal care promotion through evidence-based educational practices. </p>

opencc-zeroOct 2023View details →
dryad36/100

Pediatric standardized residency training faculty’s perceptions of medical education research

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicOct 2023View details →
dryad32/100

Evaluating the educational effectiveness of a structured, simulator-assisted, peer-led training on cardiovascular physical examination in third-year medical students: A randomized, controlled trial

<p class="AbstractCxSpFirst"><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><b>Background:</b> Previous research suggests that cardiac examination skills in undergraduate medical students frequently need improvement. There are different ways to enhance physical examination (PE) skills such as simulator-based training or peer-assisted learning (PAL). </span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p> <p class="AbstractCxSpMiddle"><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><b>Aim:</b> The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a structured, simulator-assisted, peer-led training on cardiovascular PE.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p> <p class="AbstractCxSpMiddle"><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><b>Methods:</b> Participants were third-year medical students at Leipzig University Faculty of Medicine. Students were randomly assigned to an intervention group (IG) and a control group (CG). In addition to standard curricular training, IG received a peer-led, simulator-based training in cardiac PE. Participant performance in cardiac PE was assessed using a standardized checklist with a maximum of 25 points. Primary outcome was assessed via checklist point distribution.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p> <p class="AbstractCxSpMiddle"><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><b>Results:</b> 89 students were randomised to either CG (<i>n</i> = 43) or IG (<i>n</i> = 46) with 70 completing the study. Overall, IG students performed significantly better than CG students did (max. points: 25, IG M ± SD in IG was 17 ± 3, in CG 12 ± 4, p &lt; .0001). Simple mistakes such as not using the stethoscope correctly were more frequent in CG students. Prior experience did not lead to a significant difference in performance. </span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p> <p class="Abstract"><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><span><b>Conclusions:</b> Structured, peer-led and simulator-assisted teaching sessions improve cardiac PE skills in this setting compared to control students that did not receive this training.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>

opencc-zeroSep 2021View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

The Effect of a Checklist on the Quality of Education During Insulin Initiation by Trained Medical Students

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02313805. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 5.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Effect of a Competence Based Medical Education Programme on Training Quality in Intensive Care Medicine.

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04278976. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 24.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

APP-based Medical Device for Education and Training of Inhalation Technique

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07145632. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 16.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

New Information and Communication Technologies (ICT´s) in Basic Life Support Training for Non-medical Students: Educational Trial

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04286204. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 13.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Evaluation of Nutrition Training Augmented With Digital Technology in Graduate Medical Education

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06088251. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 4.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
dryad32/100

Evaluating the educational effectiveness of a structured, simulator-assisted, peer-led training on cardiovascular physical examination in third-year medical students: A randomized, controlled trial

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMay 2022View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: Handover training for medical students – a controlled educational trial of a pilot curriculum

Background: Handovers are a critical point of patient care and a significant source of adverse events. The WHO patient safety curriculum provides some structure for handover teaching; in Europe, there is no standardized curriculum for undergraduate handover training. To address this, the Aachen Interdisciplinary Training Centre for Medical Education, developed and established a pilot curriculum for handover training in the context of the EU-funded PATIENT-project Objective: To develop and implement a handover curriculum for medical students and to assess its effect on students' awareness, confidence and knowledge regarding patient safety and handover in multiple settings. Methods: The pilot handover training curriculum was designed following Kern´s principles of curriculum development and was integrated into a curricular course led by departments for anesthesiology and intensive care (AI) at the University Hospital. A controlled educational research study was conducted with 4th year medical students (n=147) who either received the standard existing curriculum (no teaching of handover, n=78) or the pilot handover training (n=69). Paper-based questionnaires regarding attitude, confidence and knowledge towards handover and patient safety were used for pre- and post-assessment. The pilot curriculum consisted of 3 units (1-2 hours each) integrated into a 4-week course of AI. Multiple types of handover (end-of-shift, operating room/post anesthesia recovery unit/ICU, telephone, discharge) were addressed. Results: Students showed a significant increase in knowledge (p&lt;0.01) and self-confidence for the use of standardized handover tools (p&lt;0.01) and accurate handover performance (p&lt;0.01) among the pilot group. Discussion/Conclusion: We developed and implemented a pilot curriculum for undergraduate handover training. Students displayed a significant increase in knowledge and self-confidence for the use of standardized handover tools and accurate handover performance. An evaluation of the curriculum by other faculties is needed. Further studies should evaluate whether the observed effect of a specific handover strategy is associated with a patient benefit.

opencc-zeroDec 2017View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov28/100

Educational Efficacy of VR vs. Simulator in Emergency Medical Training

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06295887. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: Handover training for medical students – a controlled educational trial of a pilot curriculum

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJul 2018View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov24/100

Patient Education With or Without Physical Training or Mindfulness and Medical Yoga in Established Spinal Osteoporosis

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05227976. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov24/100

Paradigm Shift in Medical Education: Applications of High-Fidelity Simulation, Teamwork Model Development, and Concept of Flipped Classroom in Innovation and Revolution of Resuscitation Training

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02149693. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov24/100

Use of Stress Inoculation Training in Medical Education

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04199221. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov24/100

STEPuP: Prenatal Provider Education and Training to Improve Medication-assisted Treatment Use During Pregnancy

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04527926. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record