Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

120

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

120 results for “Meloidogyne”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo40/100

Comparative genomics of Meloidogyne haplanaria

<p>Data&nbsp;related to the MSC thesis &#39;Comparative genomics of Meloidogyne haplanaria&#39;.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2020View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 2 in A Seinhorst Model Determined the Host-Parasite Relationships of Meloidogyne javanica Infecting Fenugreek cv. UM202

Figure 2: Effect of increasing nematode population densities (from 0.125 on the left to 128 J2s g-1 soil on the right) of M. javanica on the growth of fenugreek cv. UM-202, showing a reduction in plant growth. Symptoms of nematode attack (a marked reduction of plant growth) were evident at the P level of 8 J2s g-1 soil. However, the tolerance limits (T) of fenugreek plant shoot length i were 1.3 J2s g-1 soil.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2023View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 3 in A Seinhorst Model Determined the Host-Parasite Relationships of Meloidogyne javanica Infecting Fenugreek cv. UM202

Figure 3: Relationship between initial population densities (Pi) of M. javanica and relative shoot length (A) and relative shoot dry weights (B) of fenugreek cv. UM-202, grown in pots under glasshouse conditions for 90 days. Each point represents the average of four replicated plants. Lines represent the predicted function calculated by fitting the Seinhorst model to data using the SeinFit program. Statistics for fitted models of shoot length and shoot dry weight were R2 = 0.90, sum of squares (SS) = 0.12; and R2 = 0.92, SS = 0.072, respectively.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2023View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 1 in A Seinhorst Model Determined the Host-Parasite Relationships of Meloidogyne javanica Infecting Fenugreek cv. UM202

Figure 1: Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the perineal pattern of M. javanica, which show a rounded to flattened dorsal arch and conspicuous lateral lines that separate the dorsal and ventral regions of the patterns. (A) A close view of the distinct lateral line in a perineal pattern distinguishes this species from other Meloidogyne spp. (B) An inner area was marked by coarsely broken striae and contained the vulva and anus.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2023View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 6 in Evaluation of Meloidogyne incognita and Rotylenchulus reniformis nematode-resistant cotton cultivars with supplemental Corteva Agriscience nematicides

Figure 6: Field trial R. reniformis eggs per gram of root collected from four root systems. LS means for PHY 332 W3FE (R) and PHY 340 W3FE (S) cotton and nematicide combination at 40 DAP in 2021. P-value for Type III fixed effects for the Variety x Nematicide interaction was 0.0441. Nematicide treatments included no-nematicide control, Reklemel (0.28 L/ha) + Vydate C-LV (1.24 L/ha), C-LV (0.28 +1.24 L/ha), Reklemel (0.56 L/ha) + Vydate C-LV (2.5 L/ha), Reklemel (1.13 L/ha) + Vydate C-LV (5.0 L/ha), BIOST Nematicide 100 (0.026 mg ai/seed), BIOST Nematicide 100, Reklemel (0.28 L/ha) + Vydate C-LV (1.24 L/ha), BIOST Nematicide 100 (0.026 mg ai/seed), Reklemel (0.56 L/ha) + Vydate C-LV (2.5 L/ha), BIOST Nematicide 100 (0.026 mg ai/seed), Reklemel (1.13 L/ha) + Vydate C-LV (5.0 L/ha).

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2023View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 1 in Evaluation of Meloidogyne incognita and Rotylenchulus reniformis nematode-resistant cotton cultivars with supplemental Corteva Agriscience nematicides

Figure 1: M. incognita PHY 340 W3FE susceptible variety on the left and the resistant PHY 360 W3FE on the right at 106 DAP.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2023View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 1 in Evaluation of perennial Glycine species for response to Meloidogyne incognita, Rotylenchulus reniformis, and Pratylenchus penetrans

Figure 1: Representative images of soybean and perennial Glycine species roots at 8 weeks post-inoculation of Meloidogyne incognita. Gall index rating is given in parentheses A, susceptible check G. max cv. Pickett 71. B, resistant check G. max cv. Forrest. C, G. tomentella PI 339655. D, G. latifolia PI 559298. E, G. latifolia PI 559300. F, G. tabacina PI 373990.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2021View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 2 in First report of northern root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne hapla (Chitwood, 1949) on strawberry in Turkey

Figure 2: PCR product at 440 bp using species-specific SCAR primers (JMV1, JMV2 and JMVhapla). M: 100 bp molecular size marker, 1,2 and 3: larvae from field infected samples. +k: positive control and –k: negative control.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2020View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 5 in Evaluation of Meloidogyne incognita and Rotylenchulus reniformis nematode-resistant cotton cultivars with supplemental Corteva Agriscience nematicides

Figure 5: Field trial R. reniformis eggs per gram of root collected from four root systems LS means for PHY 332 W3FE (R) and PHY 340 W3FE (S) cotton and nematicide combination at 40 DAP in 2020. P-value for Type III fixed effects for the Variety x Nematicide interaction was 0.0178. Nematicide treatments included no-nematicide control, Reklemel (0.28 L/ha) + Vydate C-LV (1.24 L/ha), C-LV (0.28 +1.24 L/ha), Reklemel (0.56 L/ha) + Vydate C-LV (2.5 L/ha), Reklemel (1.13 L/ha) + Vydate C-LV (5.0 L/ha), BIOST Nematicide 100 (0.026 mg ai/seed), BIOST Nematicide 100, Reklemel (0.28 L/ha) + Vydate C-LV (1.24 L/ha), BIOST Nematicide 100 (0.026 mg ai/seed), Reklemel (0.56 L/ha) + Vydate C-LV (2.5 L/ha), BIOST Nematicide 100 (0.026 mg ai/seed), Reklemel (1.13 L/ha) + Vydate C-LV (5.0 L/ha).

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2023View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 5 in Silver nanoparticles as a potential nematicide against Meloidogyne graminicola

Figure 5: (A) Scanning electron microscope (SEM) micrographs of rice roots without silver nanoparticles (AgNP) treatment, (B) energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopic elemental analysis of rice roots without AgNP, (C) SEM micrographs of rice roots with AgNP, and (D) energydispersive X-ray spectroscopic elemental analysis of rice roots with AgNP.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2020View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 4 in Silver nanoparticles as a potential nematicide against Meloidogyne graminicola

Figure 4: (A) Rice seedlings grown in soilless medium, (B) root mats of different treatments showing galls, and (C-F) magnified view of root mats showing galls.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2020View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 1 in Silver nanoparticles as a potential nematicide against Meloidogyne graminicola

Figure 1: Silver nanoparticles (AgNP) characterization (A) ultra violet-visible (UV–Vis) absorption spectra exhibiting 417 nm absorbance related to surface plasmon resonance of AgNP, (B) X-ray diffractogram showing the different reflections from crystalline planes of AgNP, indicating the formation of face-centered cubic (FCC) structure of AgNP, (C) transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image showing the formation of poly-dispersed spherical AgNP with average size of 20 nm, and (D) high resolution TEM image of single AgNP of 25 nm showing characteristic inter-planar spacing of silver (Ag).

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2020View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 3 in Silver nanoparticles as a potential nematicide against Meloidogyne graminicola

Figure 3: Effect of silver nanoparticles (AgNP) on root galling by MelOidOgyne graminiCOla on rice seedlings in soilless system. The experiment was repeated, the Trial×Treatment interaction was not significant (P&gt;0.05). Data are means of two trials. All treatments had 10 replications randomized completely.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2020View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 2 in Evaluation of Meloidogyne incognita and Rotylenchulus reniformis nematode-resistant cotton cultivars with supplemental Corteva Agriscience nematicides

Figure 2: Field trial M. incognita eggs per gram of root collected from four root systems LS means for PHY 360 W3FE (R) and PHY 340 W3FE (S) cotton and nematicide combination at 40 DAP in 2020. P-value for Type III fixed effects for the Variety x Nematicide interaction was 0.0368. Nematicide treatments included no-nematicide control, Reklemel (0.28 L/ha) + Vydate C-LV (1.24 L/ha), C-LV (0.28 +1.24 L/ha), Reklemel (0.56 L/ha) + Vydate C-LV (2.5 L/ha), Reklemel (1.13 L/ha) + Vydate C-LV (5.0 L/ha), BIOST Nematicide 100 (0.026 mg ai/seed), BIOST Nematicide 100, Reklemel (0.28 L/ha) + Vydate C-LV (1.24 L/ha), BIOST Nematicide 100 (0.026 mg ai/seed), Reklemel (0.56 L/ha) + Vydate C-LV (2.5 L/ha), BIOST Nematicide 100 (0.026 mg ai/seed), Reklemel (1.13 L/ha) + Vydate C-LV (5.0 L/ha).

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2023View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 3 in Evaluation of Meloidogyne incognita and Rotylenchulus reniformis nematode-resistant cotton cultivars with supplemental Corteva Agriscience nematicides

Figure 3: Field trial M. incognita eggs per gram of root collected from four root systems LS means for PHY 360 W3FE (R) and PHY 340 W3FE (S) cotton and nematicide combination at 40 DAP in 2021. P-value for Type III fixed effects for the Variety x Nematicide interaction was 0.0272. Nematicide treatments included no-nematicide control, Reklemel (0.21 L/ha) + Vydate C-LV (0.88 L/ha) Reklemel (0.28 L/ha) + Vydate C-LV (1.24 L/ha, Reklemel (0.56 L/ha) + Vydate C-LV (2.5 L/ha), BIOST Nematicide 100 (0.026 mg ai/seed), BIOST Nematicide 100, Reklemel (0.21 L/ ha) + Vydate C-LV (0.88 L/ha), BIOST Nematicide 100 (0.026 mg ai/seed), Reklemel (0.28 L/ha) + Vydate C-LV (1.24 L/ha), BIOST Nematicide 100 (0.026 mg ai/seed), Reklemel (0.56 L/ha) + Vydate C-LV (2.50 L/ha).

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2023View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 4 in Evaluation of Meloidogyne incognita and Rotylenchulus reniformis nematode-resistant cotton cultivars with supplemental Corteva Agriscience nematicides

Figure 4: Auburn University's Tennessee Valley Research Extension Center showing the nematode susceptible PHY 340 W3FE on the left and the R. reniformis-resistant PHY 332 W3FE on the right 102 DAP.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2023View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 2 in New Hosts and Records in Portugal for the Root-Knot Nematode Meloidogyne luci

Figure 2: Phylogenetic relationship of MelOidOgyne spp. sequences based on the alignment of sequences of cytochrome oxidase subunit I (A) and cytochrome oxidase subunit II (B) of mitochondrial DNA with available sequences of other MelOidOgyne species. The phylogenetic tree was generated in MEGA7 using the Neighbour-Joining method. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated MelOidOgyne spp. clustered together in the bootstrap test (500 replicates) is shown next to the branches. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Jukes-Cantor method. All positions with less than 95% site coverage were eliminated. That is, fewer than 5% alignment gaps, missing data, and ambiguous bases were allowed at any position. *Recently, reclassified as M. lUCi, according to Stare et al. (2017).

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2019View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 7 in Influence of Temperature on Susceptibility of Cvs. Tifguard and Georgia-06G Peanut to Meloidogyne arenaria

Figure 7: Number of Meloidogyne arenaria eggs per egg mass from roots of the peanut cultivars Tifguard (resistant) and Georgia-06G (susceptible) at 34°C at 40 days after inoculation. Different letters over bars indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05.

opencc-by-4.0May 2018View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 1 in New Hosts and Records in Portugal for the Root-Knot Nematode Meloidogyne luci

Figure 1: Esterase phenotypes of protein homogenates from five egglaying females of MelOidOgyne species isolates. C – M. lUCi (positive control); 1 – M. ethiOpiCa isolate from Brazil; J3 – M. jaVaniCa (reference isolate); 2 – M. lUCi (COrdyline aUStraliS); 3 – M. lUCi (SOlanUM lyCOperSiCUM) and 4 – M. lUCi (OXaliS COrniCUlata).

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2019View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 6 in Influence of Temperature on Susceptibility of Cvs. Tifguard and Georgia-06G Peanut to Meloidogyne arenaria

Figure 6: Mature egg-laying females and necrotic lesions formed around Meloidogyne arenaria infection sites in Tifguard roots. A. Mature females at 35 days after inoculation (DAI) at 34°C; B. Egg-laying female at 40 DAI at 34°C (arrow points to egg mass); C. Arrow points to necrotic lesion at 5 DAI; D. Arrow points to necrotic lesion at 40 DAI.

opencc-by-4.0May 2018View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record