Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 3. Cucumis thulinianus. A. Flowering stem with leaves, x 3 in Biosystematic monograph of the genus Cucumus (Cucurbitaceae). Botanical identification of cucumbers and melons

Fig. 3. Cucumis thulinianus. A. Flowering stem with leaves, x 3/4. B. Male flower, x 7. C. Male flower, opened to show stamens and disc, x 11. D. Fruit, x 'A. E. Fruit aculeus with retrorse strigose pubescence, x 2. F. Seed, face and side views, x 5. (Bally & Melville 16028 (K), D, E, F; Hemming 2011 (K), A, B, C.)

Fig. 1. Cucumis carolinus. A. Flowering stem with leaves, x V2. B. Male flower, x 1. C in Biosystematic monograph of the genus Cucumus (Cucurbitaceae). Botanical identification of cucumbers and melons

Fig. 1. Cucumis carolinus. A. Flowering stem with leaves, x V2. B. Male flower, x 1. C. Male flower, opened to show stamens and disc, x 5. D. Female flower, x 1. E. Female flower, opened to show disc, style, stigma, and staminodes, x 2*A. F. Fruit, x V2. G. Seed, face and side views, x 5. (Carter & Stannard 697 (K), B, C; Gilbert & Thulin 1116 (K), A, D, E, F, G.)

Fig. 4. Cucumis rostratus. A. Flowering stem with leaves, x Vi. B. Male flower, x 5. C in Biosystematic monograph of the genus Cucumus (Cucurbitaceae). Botanical identification of cucumbers and melons

Fig. 4. Cucumis rostratus. A. Flowering stem with leaves, x Vi. B. Male flower, x 5. C. Male flower, opened to show stamens and disc, x 10. D. Female flower, x 2. E. Fruit, x Vi. F. Seed, face and side views, x 4Vi. (Aké-Assi 5495 (K), E; Brenan 8875 (K), A, B, C, D, F.)

Fig. 2. Cucumis prolatior. A. Flowering stem with leaves, x 16. B. Male flower, x 5. C in Biosystematic monograph of the genus Cucumus (Cucurbitaceae). Botanical identification of cucumbers and melons

Fig. 2. Cucumis prolatior. A. Flowering stem with leaves, x 16. B. Male flower, x 5. C. Male flower, opened to show stamens and disc, x 716. D. Fruit, x 16. E. Seed, face and side views, x 5. {Bally B3645 (K), D, E; Gillett & Gachathi 20478 (K), A, B, C.)

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2022View details →

Spanish melon landraces: revealing useful diversity by genomic, morphologic, and metabolomic analysis. Supplementary data.

Original data linked to the publication Spanish melon landraces: revealing useful diversity by genomic, morphologic, and metabolomic analysis. It includes, Supp. Table 1: Genomic data; Supp. Table 2: Characterization data; Supp. Table 3: sugar and acids data; Supp Table Supp. Table 4: Voaltile organic compounds data; Supp Table 5: Germplasm details; Supp. table 6: Cromatographic parameters

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2022View details →

Identification and fine mapping of gummy stem blight resistance gene Gsb-7(t) in Melon

Gummy stem blight (GSB), caused by the Didymella bryoniae (Auersw.) Rehm, is a devastating fungal disease of melon worldwide. Breeding GSB-resistant cultivars with host resistance genes is considered to be the most economic and effective strategy to control this disease. In this study, 260 melon germplasm resources were screened for resistance to GSB, and an inbred line H55R exhibited immunity to GSB was identified. To further understand the resistance mechanism of H55R against GSB, an F2 population was obtained from a cross between the GSB-susceptible line A15 and H55R, and genetic analysis indicated that the resistance in H55R was controlled by a single dominant gene, tentatively named Gsb-7(t). The Gsb-7(t) gene was finally delimited to a 140 kb interval on chromosome 7 using bulked-segregant analysis and chromosome walking strategies. Ten putative genes were annotated in this region that contains a wall-associated receptor kinase (WAK) gene MELO3C010403. The MELO3C010403 gene contains two alternative transcripts, T1 and T2, with five and seven non-synonymous mutation sites, respectively. Gene expression analysis showed that expression of T1 but not the T2 was significantly induced by the D. bryoniae at 24 hours post-inoculation (hpi), indicating that the T2 transcript of MELO3C010403 was the most likely candidate gene of Gsb-7(t). Our results offer new genetic resources and will be helpful for the development of GSB-resistant melon cultivars in the future.

Figure 2 in Weathering of Torula Yeast Borax Food Bait and Capture of Oriental, Mediterranean, and Melon Fruit Flies in Hawaii (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Figure 2. Captures of Mediterranean fruit flies (males and females combined) in Multilure traps baited with torula yeast borax weathered 3, 6, 9, or 12 d. Traps operated for 2 d at weekly intervals over 5 consecutive weeks. Symbols represent means + 1 SE (N = 10 traps/treatment/sampling period).

Figure 1 in Weathering of Torula Yeast Borax Food Bait and Capture of Oriental, Mediterranean, and Melon Fruit Flies in Hawaii (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Figure 1. Captures of oriental fruit flies (males and females combined) in Multilure traps baited with torula yeast borax weathered 3, 6, 9, or 12 d. Traps operated for 2 d at weekly intervals over 8 consecutive weeks. Symbols represent means + 1 SE (N = 10 traps/treatment/sampling period).

Figure 3 in Weathering of Torula Yeast Borax Food Bait and Capture of Oriental, Mediterranean, and Melon Fruit Flies in Hawaii (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Figure 3. Captures of melon flies (males and females combined) in Multilure traps baited with torula yeast borax weathered 3, 6, 9, or 12 d. Traps operated for 2 d at weekly intervals over 4 consecutive weeks. Symbols represent means + 1 SE (N = 10 traps/treatment/sampling period).

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2018View details →

Figure 1 in Does Male Sexual Experience Influence Female Mate Choice and Reproduction in the Melon Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae)?

Figure 1. (A) Number of eggs laid per female per week and (B) proportion of hatched eggs per week for Zeugodacus cucurbitae females mated to virgin or non-virgin (thrice-mated) males. Symbols represent averages (+ 1 SE) over 8 cages per male type.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2012View details →

Figure 2 in Field Capture of Male Melon Flies, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett), in Jackson Traps Baited with Cue-Lure Versus Raspberry Ketone Formate in Hawaii

Figure 2. Number of B. cucurbitae males captured in Jackson traps baited with cue-lure (CL) liquid (●) versus raspberry ketone formate (RKF) liquid (○) at four study sites on Oahu, Hawaii. At each site, 15 traps of each treatment were operated 1 day per week over 6 consecutive weeks. Symbols represent means (+ 1 SE, n = 15).

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2012View details →

Figure 1 in Field Capture of Male Melon Flies, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett), in Jackson Traps Baited with Cue-Lure Versus Raspberry Ketone Formate in Hawaii

Figure 1. Number of B. cucurbitae males captured in Jackson traps baited with cue-lure (CL) liquid (●) versus raspberry ketone formate (RKF) plugs (○) at four study sites on Oahu, Hawaii. At each site, 15 traps of each treatment were operated 1 day per week over 6 consecutive weeks. Symbols represent means (+ 1 SE, n = 15).

Figure 6 in Salicylic acid does not mitigate salt stress on the morphophysiology and production of hydroponic melon

Figure 6. Equatorial diameter - ED (A) and polar diameter - PD (B) of fruits of 'Gaúcho' melon cultivated in a hydroponic system with different levels of electrical conductivity of the nutrient solution - ECns and exogenous application of salicylic acid. ** represents significance at 0.01 probability level.

Figure 5 in Salicylic acid does not mitigate salt stress on the morphophysiology and production of hydroponic melon

Figure 5. Fresh fruit weight - FFW (A) and soluble solids content - SS (B) of 'Gaúcho' melon fruits, as a function of the interaction between the levels of electrical conductivity of the nutrient solution - ECns and foliar application of salicylic acid. X and Y correspond to ECns and salicylic acid concentrations, respectively. * and ** represent significance at 0.05 and 0.01 probability levels, respectively.

Figure 3 in Salicylic acid does not mitigate salt stress on the morphophysiology and production of hydroponic melon

Figure 3. Internal CO 2 concentration - Ci (A) and CO2 assimilation rate - A (B) of 'Gaúcho' melon, as a function of the interaction between the levels of electrical conductivity of the nutrient solution - ECns and foliar application of salicylic acid, 56 days after transplanting. X and Y correspond to ECns and salicylic acid concentrations, respectively. * and ** represent significance at 0.05 and 0.01 probability levels, respectively.

Figure 4 in Salicylic acid does not mitigate salt stress on the morphophysiology and production of hydroponic melon

Figure 4. Intercellular electrolyte leakage - IEL (A), shoot dry biomass - SDB (B), and total dry biomass - TDB (C) of 'Gaúcho' melon as a function of the levels of electrical conductivity of the nutrient solution - ECns, 74 days after transplanting. X and Y correspond to ECns and salicylic acid concentrations, respectively. ** represent significance at 0.01 probability levels.

Figure 1 in Salicylic acid does not mitigate salt stress on the morphophysiology and production of hydroponic melon

Figure 1. Air temperature (maximum and minimum) and mean relative air humidity inside the greenhouse during the experimental period.

Figure 2 in Salicylic acid does not mitigate salt stress on the morphophysiology and production of hydroponic melon

Figure 2. Stomatal conductance - gs (A) and transpiration - E (B) of 'Gaúcho' melon, as a function of the interaction between the levels of electrical conductivity of the nutrient solution - ECns and foliar application of salicylic acid, 56 days after transplanting. X and Y correspond to ECns and salicylic acid concentrations, respectively. * and ** represent significance at 0.05 and 0.01 probability levels, respectively.