Find research datasets worth reusing

FIG. 9 in Monstrosities from the Sea. Taxonomy and tradition in Conrad Gessner's (1516-1565) discussion of cetaceans and sea-monsters

FIG. 9. — Monachus marinus, sea-monk. Conrad Gessner (1558: 519). Bayerische Staatsbibliothek München, Rar. 2234.

FIG. 4 in Monstrosities from the Sea. Taxonomy and tradition in Conrad Gessner's (1516-1565) discussion of cetaceans and sea-monsters

FIG. 4. — Anglicus cetus, Atlantic spotted dolphin.Conrad Gessner (1558: 256). Bayerische Staatsbibliothek München, Rar. 2234.

FIG. 1 in Monstrosities from the Sea. Taxonomy and tradition in Conrad Gessner's (1516-1565) discussion of cetaceans and sea-monsters

FIG. 1. — Leo Marinus, sea lion. Conrad Gessner (1558: 558). Bayerische Staatsbibliothek München, Rar. 2234.

FIG. 6 in Monstrosities from the Sea. Taxonomy and tradition in Conrad Gessner's (1516-1565) discussion of cetaceans and sea-monsters

FIG. 6. — Cetus oceani Germanici, North Sea whale. Conrad Gessner (1558: 255). Bayerische Staatsbibliothek München, Rar. 2234.

FIG. 3 in Monstrosities from the Sea. Taxonomy and tradition in Conrad Gessner's (1516-1565) discussion of cetaceans and sea-monsters

FIG. 3. — Balaena vulgo, bowhead whale. Conrad Gessner (1558: 132). Bayerische Staatsbibliothek München, Rar. 2234.

FIG. 11 in Monstrosities from the Sea. Taxonomy and tradition in Conrad Gessner's (1516-1565) discussion of cetaceans and sea-monsters

FIG. 11. — Monstrum marinus, sea-monster. Conrad Gessner (1558: 522). Bayerische Staatsbibliothek München, Rar. 2234.

Fig. 3. Anthomyza neglecta Collin, 1944 in A peculiar male genitalia monstrosity in Anthomyza neglecta (Diptera: Anthomyzidae)

Fig. 3. Anthomyza neglecta Collin, 1944, male postabdomen with malformed genitalia (in situ), ventrally. Scale = 0.1 mm. For abbreviations see Material and methods.

Figs. 8–13. Anthomyza neglecta Collin, 1944 in A peculiar male genitalia monstrosity in Anthomyza neglecta (Diptera: Anthomyzidae)

Figs. 8–13. Anthomyza neglecta Collin, 1944, gonostylus and internal genitalia. 8 – left gonostylus of malformed genitalia, posterolateroventrally (widest extension); 9 – right gonostylus of the same, subventrally (widest extension); 10 – ejacapodeme of malformed specimen (widest extension); 11 – hypandrial complex of normal genitalia, laterally; 12 – left gonostylus of normal genitalia, posteroventrally (widest extension); 13 – aedeagal complex of normal genitalia, laterally. Scales = 0.05 mm (Figs. 8–10, 12) and 0.1 mm (Figs. 11, 13). For abbreviations see Material and methods.

Figs. 1–2 in A peculiar male genitalia monstrosity in Anthomyza neglecta (Diptera: Anthomyzidae)

Figs. 1–2. Anthomyza gracilis (Fallén, 1823), morphology of male abdomen and genitalia. 1 – abdomen, ventrally; 2 – postabdomen with erected genitalia (in situ), laterally. Scales: = 0.2 mm (Fig. 1) and 0.1 mm (Fig. 2). For abbreviations see Material and methods.

Figs. 4–7. Anthomyza neglecta Collin, 1944, male external genitalia. 4 in A peculiar male genitalia monstrosity in Anthomyza neglecta (Diptera: Anthomyzidae)

Figs. 4–7. Anthomyza neglecta Collin, 1944, male external genitalia. 4 – malformed genitalia, caudally; 5 – ditto, frontally with medandrium separate (arrow); 6 – normal genitalia, caudally; 7 – ditto, frontally. Scale = 0.1 mm. For abbreviations see Material and methods.

FIGURE 22 in Accidental monstrosities: Taxonomic chimeras in Ostracoda (Crustacea)

FIGURE 22. Comparison of female LV outline shapes of forms identified as F. balatonica in the literature. A, F. balatonica redrawn from Kovalenko (1976, pl. 12) (Table 1, A8a); B, F. balatonica from Kovalenko (1976) (black line-1) superimposed on F. balatonica from Meisch (2000) (grey line-0; type, A1b, Fig 9B); C, F. balatonica redrawn from Dykan (2006, pl. 14, fig. 8) (Table 1, A9), internal view, reversed for ease of comparison; D, F. balatonica from Dykan (2006) (black line-1) superimposed on F. balatonica from Meisch (2000) (grey line-0; type, A1b, Fig 9B); B and D redrawn from Morphomatica output, outlines standardised for equal surface area; not to scale.

FIGURE 23 in Accidental monstrosities: Taxonomic chimeras in Ostracoda (Crustacea)

FIGURE 23. Comparison of outlines of valves from Bashkiria (identified in literature as F. balatonica), with F. balatonica from Lake Balaton as illustrated by Meisch (2000) (Table 1, A1b) and by Petkovski and Karanovic (2000) (Table 1, A1c). A, female RV lateral view (Table 1, A10) redrawn from Popova-Lvova (1965, pl. 2, fig. 9a); B, female RV lateral view (Table 1, A11) redrawn from Popova-Lvova (1972, pl. 5, fig. 1a); C, female RV dorsal view (Table 1, A11) redrawn from Popova-Lvova (1972, pl. 5, fig. 1b); D, female RV from Popova-Lvova (1972) (black line-1) superimposed on female RV from Lake Balaton (Table 1, A1c; grey line-0); E, female LV (Table 1, A12) from Popova-Lvova (1977, pl. 25, fig. 2a); F, female LV from Popova-Lvova (1977) (black line-1) superimposed on female LV from Lake Balaton (Table 1, A1b; grey line-0); D and F redrawn from Morphomatica output, outlines standardised for equal surface area; not to scale.

FIGURE 17 in Accidental monstrosities: Taxonomic chimeras in Ostracoda (Crustacea)

FIGURE 17. Fabaeformiscandona levanderi (Hirschmann), comparison of RV shapes in lateral view, all from Lake Serwy, Poland, transmitted light images by T. Namiotko. A–F, female (RB3b–RB3g); G, mean outline of digitised outlines of A–F; H–I, male.

FIGURE 20 in Accidental monstrosities: Taxonomic chimeras in Ostracoda (Crustacea)

FIGURE 20. Fabaeformiscandona levanderi (Hirschmann), SEM images (by Martin Gross, UMJGP) of male valves from Lake Serwy, Poland. A–D, LV (220208-07): A, internal lateral view, bulbous flange arrowed; B, detail of posterior of A; C, detail of antero-ventral part of A, showing bulbous flange overhanging ventral margin; D, external lateral view, bulbous flange arrowed; E– F, RV (220208-08): E, external lateral view, bulbous flange arrowed; F, internal lateral view, bulbous flange arrowed. Although both from the same sample, the two valves were separate and should not be assumed to belong to the same individual.

FIGURE 12 in Accidental monstrosities: Taxonomic chimeras in Ostracoda (Crustacea)

FIGURE 12. Comparison of male sexual limbs. A–C, Fabaeformiscandona balatonica (Daday), type specimen, Lake Balaton, Hungary, from Meisch (2000) (B and C reversed for ease of comparison). D–F, Fabaeformiscandona levanderi (Hirschmann), D, from Crapina Jijila lake, Romania, from Danielopol (1969); E–F, from Lake Serwy, Poland, original images by T. Namiotko. A, D, hemipenis; B, E, right 5th limb endopodite (clasper); C, F, left 5th limb endopodite (clasper). L-Lo, lateral lobe of the peniferum; M, inner medial process. Distal part of M-process arrowed (a), lateral hook of bursa copulatrix arrowed (b).

FIGURE 26 in Accidental monstrosities: Taxonomic chimeras in Ostracoda (Crustacea)

FIGURE 26. Comparison of valve outlines of Candoniella suzini Schneider and Fabaeformiscandona caudata (Kaufmann). A, B, external and internal lateral views of RV of C. suzini (redrawn from Suzin 1956, plate 13, figs 19 and 20); C, juvenile (A-2) LV external lateral view of F. caudata from Lake Geneva (image provided by Laurent Decrouy); D, reversed RV outline of C. suzini (grey line-0; Fig. 26A) superimposed on A-2 LV outline of F. caudata (black line-1; Fig. 26C), standardised for equal surface area (redrawn from Morphomatica output); not to scale, arrows indicate anterior direction.

FIGURE 9 in Accidental monstrosities: Taxonomic chimeras in Ostracoda (Crustacea)

FIGURE 9. Fabaeformiscandona balatonica (Daday), comparative morphology of male and female valves from Lake Balaton: A, male LV internal; B, female LV internal; C, male RV internal; D, female RV internal. A and B from Meisch (2000, figs 41A and 42A), with permission; C and D redrawn from Petkovski & Karanovic (2000, fig. 4).

FIGURE 11 in Accidental monstrosities: Taxonomic chimeras in Ostracoda (Crustacea)

FIGURE 11. Fabaeformiscandona levanderi (Hirschmann). A–G from the Baltic Sea coast of Finland (from Hirschmann 1912, plate 1, figs 1–4, plate 2, figs 17–19); H–L from Mindelsee, Germany (from Petkovski 1977, figs 7, 10–12, with Permission). A, female LV external, convex break in slope of posterior margin arrowed (a); B, female RV external; C, male LV external, elongate bulbous flange arrowed (b); D, male RV external; E, male left 5th limb endopodite (clasper), lanceolate distal part arrowed (c); F, male right 5th limb endopodite (clasper); G, male hemipenis, bilobate lateral lobe arrowed (d); H, female LV external, convex break in slope of posterior margin arrowed (a); I, male LV external, elongate bulbous flange arrowed (b); J, male left 5th limb endopodite (clasper), lanceolate distal part arrowed (c); K, male right 5th limb endopodite (clasper); L, male hemipenis, bilobate lateral lobe arrowed (d). Female LVs illustrated in A and H were used in the comparative morphological analysis as B1 and B5, respectively (see Table 2). Not to scale.

FIGURE 7 in Accidental monstrosities: Taxonomic chimeras in Ostracoda (Crustacea)

FIGURE 7. Eucandona balatonica (Daday) from Daday (1900; figs. 48a, 49f–h). A, female LV external view; B, C, male left and right 5th limb endopodite claspers; D, hemipenis, with added arrows indicating (a) lateral triangular process and (b) the distal part of the M-process. Not to scale.

FIGURE 14 in Accidental monstrosities: Taxonomic chimeras in Ostracoda (Crustacea)

FIGURE 14. Fabaeformiscandona levanderi (Hirschmann), SEM images (by Martin Gross, UMJGP) of female LVs from Lake Serwy, Poland. A–C (220207-04): A, external lateral view; B, internal lateral view, posterior margin denticulated lobe arrowed; C, detail of B showing denticulated lobe, broken denticles arrowed; D–F (220207-05): D, external lateral view; E, internal lateral view, denticulated lobe arrowed; F, detail of E showing denticulated lobe, broken denticles arrowed.