Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2019View details →

Hydrodynamic and morphological information, and the absolute variations of the vulnerability indices for the period 2000-2015 of the Spanish Iberia Peninsula estuaries.

The dataset included in this repository was obtained during the project entitled 'Sensibilidad física y biotic de los estuarios peninsulares al cambio global (SENSES)' funded by 'Fundación Biodiversidad', PRCV00487. The data were used in the research article 'Sensitivity of Iberian estuaries to changes in sea water temperature, salinity, river-flow, mean sea level, and tidal amplitudes' submitted to Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. Brief description of dataset: For each estuary, the following parameters were calculated <ul> <li>Fachade: the location of the estuary</li> <li>Area (km2) </li> <li>D (m): water depth at the mouth of the estuary in 2000 and 2015</li> <li>Tidal Prim (m3)</li> <li>Qf (m3/s): river flow in 2000 and 2015</li> <li>a (m): tidal amplitude of the free surface elevation in 2000 and 2015</li> <li>∆U (m/s): absolute variation of the tidal current amplitude between 2000 and 2015</li> <li>∆E (W/m2): absolute variation of the tidal energy flux propagation index between 2000 and 2015</li> <li>∆Ri : absolute variation of the bulk Richardson number index between 2000 and 2015</li> <li>∆SI: absolute variation of the salinity intrusion index between 2000 and 2015</li> </ul> A wide description of the parameters can be found in Serrano, M. A. et al (submitted to Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science) Contact person: mserranog@ugr.es

Fig. 8 in Impact of increasing morphological information by micro-CT scanning on the phylogenetic placement of Darwin wasps (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) in amber

Fig. 8 Holotype of Rhyssa gulliveri sp. nov. A Habitus of specimen, lateral view. B Rugae dorsally on mesoscutum. C Face, anterior view, partially hidden by spider inclusion and milky coatings. D Face, more laterally with visible mandibles. E First tergite on metasoma, lateral view. F Head and mesoscutum, dorsal view. G Interpretative drawing with an additional drawing of the propodeum and T1 in dorsal view, where photos and micro-CT scan were used as templates. Scale bar A: 2 mm, B and C: 1 mm, D: upper 1 mm, lower 2 mm

Fig. 7 in Impact of increasing morphological information by micro-CT scanning on the phylogenetic placement of Darwin wasps (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) in amber

Fig. 7 Holotype of Firkantus freddykruegeri gen. et sp. nov. A Habitus of specimen, lateral view. B Anterior view of face, right side with facial structures indicated. C Fore wing with folds indicating wing venation. D Anterior part of metasoma, dorsal view. E Posterior part of metasoma, with parameters and aedeagus. F Interpretative drawing with an additional drawing of the propodeum and T1 in dorsal view, where photos and micro-CT scan were used as templates. Scale bar A: 1 mm, B: 0.5 mm, F: lower 1 mm, right 0.5 mm

Fig. 3 in Impact of increasing morphological information by micro-CT scanning on the phylogenetic placement of Darwin wasps (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) in amber

Fig. 3 RoguePlot placement of Pimplinae fossil Firkantus freddykruegeri gen. et sp. nov. before and after micro-CT scanning. The plots include all branches from the majority-rule consensus tree where the attachment probability was higher than 1%. A Firkantus freddykruegeri gen. et sp. nov. with colours indicating newly revealed body characteristics. Blue colouration represents newly added measurements; orange highlights either newly coded characters or characters where states could be reduced after the CT scan. B Placement before CT scanning. C Placement after CT scanning

Fig. 6 in Impact of increasing morphological information by micro-CT scanning on the phylogenetic placement of Darwin wasps (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) in amber

Fig. 6 Holotype of Triclistus levii sp. nov. A Partial fore wing. B Metasoma, posterior end with the parameres. C Habitus of specimen, lateral view. D Head and mesoscutum, dorsal view. E Head. F Interpretative drawing with an additional drawing of the propodeum and T1, in dorsal view, where photos and micro-CT scan were used as templates. Scale bars A: 1 mm, B: 0.5 mm C: 1 mm F: bottom 1 mm, top right 0.5 mm

Fig. 9 in Impact of increasing morphological information by micro-CT scanning on the phylogenetic placement of Darwin wasps (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) in amber

Fig. 9 Holotype Magnocula sarcophaga gen. et sp. nov. A Habitus of specimen, ventral view. B Habitus of holotype, lateral view. CT scan of C head and mesoscutum in dorsal view, D face in anterior view, and E last tergites with ovipositor and sheaths. F Photo of a partial fore wing, in top left is T2 with its rugopunctate to striate structure. G Interpretative drawing with an additional drawing of the propodeum and T1 in dorsal view, where photos and micro-CT scan were used as templates. Scale bar A: 1 mm, F: 0.5 mm G: lower 1 mm, right 0.5 mm

Fig. 2 in Impact of increasing morphological information by micro-CT scanning on the phylogenetic placement of Darwin wasps (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) in amber

Fig. 2 RoguePlot placement of Metopiinae fossil Triclistus levii sp. nov. before and after micro-CT scanning. The plots include all branches from the majority-rule consensus tree where the attachment probability was higher than 1%. A Triclistus levii sp. nov. with colours indicating newly revealed body characteristics after the CT scan. Blue colouration represents newly added measurements; orange highlights either newly coded characters or characters where states could be reduced after the CT scan. B Placement before CT scanning. C Placement after CT scanning

Fig. 5 in Impact of increasing morphological information by micro-CT scanning on the phylogenetic placement of Darwin wasps (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) in amber

Fig. 5 RoguePlot placement of Phygadeuontinae fossil Magnocula sarcophaga gen. et sp. nov. before and after micro-CT scanning. The plots include all branches from the majority-rule consensus tree where the attachment probability was higher than 1%. A Magnocula sarcophaga gen. et sp. nov. with colours indicating newly revealed body characteristics. Blue colouration represents newly added measurements; orange highlights either newly coded characters or characters where states could be reduced after the CT scan. B Placement before CT scanning. C Placement after CT scanning

Fig. 4 in Impact of increasing morphological information by micro-CT scanning on the phylogenetic placement of Darwin wasps (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) in amber

Fig. 4 RoguePlot placement of Rhyssinae fossil Rhyssa gulliveri sp. nov. before and after micro-CT scanning. The plots include all branches from the majority-rule consensus tree where the attachment probability was higher than 1%. A Rhyssa guliveri sp. nov. with colours indicating newly revealed body characteristics. Blue colouration represents newly added measurements; orange highlights either newly coded characters or characters where states could be reduced after the CT scan. B Placement before CT scanning. C Placement after CT scanning

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2021View details →

Fig. 1 in Can maxillary canal morphology inform varanopid phylogenetic affinities?

Fig. 1. Lateral view of the maxillary canal in left lateral view. A. Orovenator mayorum Reisz, Modesto, and Scott, 2011 (OMNH 74606) from the lower Permian of the Dolese Brothers Limestone Quarry (Oklahoma, USA). B. Prolacerta broomi Parrington, 1935 (UCMP 7151, mirrored for comparison) from the Lower Triassic of Big Bank (Harrismith District, South Africa). C. Heleosaurus scholtzi Broom, 1907 (CGRMS353) from the middle Permian of South Africa. D. Varanosaurus acutirostris Broili, 1904 (FMNH PR 1670) from the lower Permian Wellington Formation (Garvin County, Oklahoma, USA). The maxillary canal is in green, the maxillary sinus is in purple, and the skull is transparent. Circles represent the position of a structure not visible in lateral view. Abbreviations: 1, conical cavity; 2, main trunk of the maxillary canal; 3, caudal section of the maxillary canal; 4, caudally extended side branches.

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2024View details →

◂Fig. 6 A molecular phylogeny of 56 systematically representative Peridiniaceae, including 42 accessions assignable to P. cinctum from various geographic regions. Maximum likelihood tree (– ln = 21,884.93), as inferred from a rRNA nucleotide alignment (1137 parsimony-informative sites) and with strain number information. Numbers on branches are ML bootstrap (above) and Bayesian support values (below) for the clusters (asterisks indicate maximal support values, values under 50 and 0.90, respectively, are not shown). Clades are indicated (CZE Czech Republic, E East, GER Germany, HET Heterocapsaceae, N North, PPE Protoperidiniaceae, POL Poland, rbn ribotype n, S South, SWE Sweden, UKR Ukraine, W West) in Bumps on the back: An unusual morphology in phylogenetically distinct Peridinium aff. cinctum (= Peridinium tuberosum; Peridiniales, Dinophyceae)

◂Fig. 6 A molecular phylogeny of 56 systematically representative Peridiniaceae, including 42 accessions assignable to P. cinctum from various geographic regions. Maximum likelihood tree (– ln = 21,884.93), as inferred from a rRNA nucleotide alignment (1137 parsimony-informative sites) and with strain number information. Numbers on branches are ML bootstrap (above) and Bayesian support values (below) for the clusters (asterisks indicate maximal support values, values under 50 and 0.90, respectively, are not shown). Clades are indicated (CZE Czech Republic, E East, GER Germany, HET Heterocapsaceae, N North, PPE Protoperidiniaceae, POL Poland, rbn ribotype n, S South, SWE Sweden, UKR Ukraine, W West)

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2021View details →

◂Fig. 4 A molecular tree of 51 systematically representative Peridiniaceae, including all 28 accessions assignable to P. volzii. Maximum Likelihood tree (–ln = 22,017.62), as inferred from a rRNA nucleotide alignment (1,129 parsimony-informative sites) and with strain number information. Numbers on branches are ML bootstrap (above) and Bayesian support values (below) for the clusters (asterisks indicate maximal support values, values under 50 and 0.90, respectively, are not shown). Clades are indicated (abbreviations: HET, Heterocapsaceae; PPE, Protoperidiniaceae) in Morphological and molecular variability of Peridinium volzii Lemmerm. (Peridiniaceae, Dinophyceae) and its relevance for infraspecific taxonomy

◂Fig. 4 A molecular tree of 51 systematically representative Peridiniaceae, including all 28 accessions assignable to P. volzii. Maximum Likelihood tree (–ln = 22,017.62), as inferred from a rRNA nucleotide alignment (1,129 parsimony-informative sites) and with strain number information. Numbers on branches are ML bootstrap (above) and Bayesian support values (below) for the clusters (asterisks indicate maximal support values, values under 50 and 0.90, respectively, are not shown). Clades are indicated (abbreviations: HET, Heterocapsaceae; PPE, Protoperidiniaceae)

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →

Fig. 1 in Morphological description and DNA barcode information of seven newly reported nudibranch species from Korea

Fig. 1. Images of seven Nudibranchia species in Korea. A, Dendronotus primorjensis Martynov, Sanamyan & Korshunova, 2015; B, Doto japonica Odhner, 1936; C, Trinchesia ornata (Baba, 1937); D, E, Antiopella fusca (O'Donoghue, 1924); F, Cadlina paninae Korshunova, Fletcher, Picton, Lundin, Kashio, N. Sanamyan, K. Sanamyan, Padula, Schrödi & Martynov, 2020; G, Rostanga bifurcata Rudman & Avern, 1989; and H, Goniodoridella savignyi Pruvot-Fol, 1933.

Fig. 6 in Enlarging the monotypic Monocarpieae (Annonaceae, Malmeoideae): recognition of a second genus from Vietnam informed by morphology and molecular phylogenetics

Fig. 6. – Leoheo domatiophorus Chaowasku, D.T. Ngo & H.T. Le, showing habit with inflorescences and flowers. [HUAF collectors 2009-03-19-ND,CMUB] [Drawing: A. Damthongdee]

Fig. 5 in Enlarging the monotypic Monocarpieae (Annonaceae, Malmeoideae): recognition of a second genus from Vietnam informed by morphology and molecular phylogenetics

Fig. 5. – Reproductive organs of Leoheo domatiophorus Chaowasku, D.T. Ngo & H.T. Le: A. Flower with petals and stamens removed; B. Flower with petals, stamens, and carpels removed, back view, showing outer side of sepals; C. Same as (B), but on another side, showing a volcano-shaped torus and inner side of sepals; D. Inner side of an outer petal; E. Outer side of an outer petal; F. Inner side of an inner petal; G. Outer side of an inner petal; H. Stamen, abaxial side; I. Stamen, adaxial side; J. Carpels, showing enlarged and irregularly lobed stigmas; K. Fruit, showing longitudinal ridges on monocarp surface; L. Seed, lateral view, showing a raphe; M. Seed, lateral view, showing a pitteand slightly rugose surface; N. Cross section of a seed, showing spiniform endosperm ruminations. [A–J: HUAF collectors 2009-03-19-ND, CMUB; K: Chaowasku 131, CMUB; L–N: Chaowasku 165, CMUB] [Drawing: A. Damthongdee]

Fig. 3 in Enlarging the monotypic Monocarpieae (Annonaceae, Malmeoideae): recognition of a second genus from Vietnam informed by morphology and molecular phylogenetics

Fig. 3. – Inflorescence position of Leoheo Chaowasku (A) and Monocarpia Miq. (B). A. Axillary inflorescences/infructescences of Leoheo domatiophorus Chaowasku, D.T. Ngo & H.T. Le; B. Terminal inflorescence of Monocarpia kalimantanensis Kessler. [A: HUAF collectors 2009-03-19-ND, CMUB; B: Sidiyasa et al. 3469, L] [Photos: A: D.T. Ngo; B: Arbainsyah]

Fig. 4 in Enlarging the monotypic Monocarpieae (Annonaceae, Malmeoideae): recognition of a second genus from Vietnam informed by morphology and molecular phylogenetics

Fig. 4. – Lower leaf surface of Leoheo Chaowasku (A) and Monocarpia Miq. (B). A. Leoheo domatiophorus Chaowasku, D.T. Ngo & H.T. Le, with a hairy domatium; B. Monocarpia maingayi (Hook. f. & Thomson) I.M. Turner, without domatia. [A: Chaowasku 131, CMUB; B: Promchua 18, CMUB]

Fig. 2. – A in Enlarging the monotypic Monocarpieae (Annonaceae, Malmeoideae): recognition of a second genus from Vietnam informed by morphology and molecular phylogenetics

Fig. 2. – A. Leaf of Monocarpia kalimantanensis Kessler, showing conspicuous intramarginal veins; B. Fruit of Monocarpia maingayi (Hook. f. & Thomson) I.M. Turner, showing monocarps without longitudinal ridges; C– H: Leoheo domatiophorus Chaowasku, D.T. Ngo & H.T. Le; C. Leaf without intramarginal veins; D. Fruit, showing monocarps with longitudinal ridges; E. Flowering branches; F. Dissected flower and young fruit; G. Dissected flower, showing detached stamens and stigmas; H. Flower, showing enlarged and irregularly lobed stigmas. [A: Sidiyasa et al. 3469, L; B: Gardner & Sidisunthorn ST0541a, L; C–D: Chaowasku 131, CMUB; E–H: HUAF collectors 2009-03-19-ND, CMUB] [Photos: A: Arbainsyah; B: S. Gardner & P. Sidisunthorn; C–H: D.T. Ngo]