Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
26
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
26 results for “Multi-Temporal”
SEN12 Multi-Temporal Urban Mapping Dataset
<p>Monthly mean Sentinel-1 SAR and cloud-free Sentinel-2 MSI images for the SpaceNet 7 training and test sites. Our dataset also includes monthly rasterized built-up area labels for the 60 training sites.</p>
Data repository of multi-temporal high-resolution data products of ecosystem structure derived from country-wide airborne laser scanning surveys of the Netherlands
<p><span lang="EN-GB">This data repository contains a set of multi-temporal data products of ecosystem structure derived from four national ALS surveys of the Netherlands (AHN1–AHN4) (folders:<strong> 1_AHN1, 2_AHN2, 3_AHN3, and 4_AHN4</strong>). Four sets of 25 LiDAR-derived vegetation metrics representing ecosystem height, cover, and structural variability are provided at 10 m spatial resolution, providing valuable data sources for a wide range of ecological research and field beyond. A preview of all generated LiDAR metrics are also provided (folder: <strong>5_Maps</strong>). All 25 LiDAR metrics were calculated using Laserfarm workflow (<a href="https://laserfarm.readthedocs.io/en/latest/">https://laserfarm.readthedocs.io/en/latest/</a>) (building on the user-extendable features from the “Laserchicken” software: <a href="https://laserchicken.readthedocs.io/en/latest/#features">https://laserchicken.readthedocs.io/en/latest/#features</a>). All metrics are calculated with the normalized point cloud. More details on metric calculation are provided on GitHub (Laserchicken: <a href="https://github.com/eEcoLiDAR/laserchicken">https://github.com/eEcoLiDAR/laserchicken</a> and Laserfarm: <a href="https://github.com/eEcoLiDAR/Laserfarm">https://github.com/eEcoLiDAR/Laserfarm</a>), as well as on the “Laserchicken” documentation page (<a href="https://laserchicken.readthedocs.io/en/latest/">https://laserchicken.readthedocs.io/en/latest/</a>). We also provided masks to minimize the influence of water surfaces, buildings and roads, powerlines and NA values in the data products (folder: <strong>6_Masks</strong>). To supplement the generated data products, we also provided a set of raster layers that contains point/pulse density of each AHN survey and the DTM and DSM raster layers for each AHN dataset (folder: <strong>7_Auxiliary_data</strong>). To test the robustness of the LiDAR metrics, we also compared the metrics generated from different pulse densities across different habitat types (folder: <strong>8_Sensitivity_analysis</strong>). Two use cases demonstrated the utility of the presented data products: (use case 1) monitoring forest structural change across time using multi-temporal ALS data and (use case 2) comparison of vegetation structural difference within Natura 2000 sites. The used data are also provided (folder: <strong>9_Use_case</strong>). Note that all the raster layers are provided at 10 m resolution under the local Dutch coordinate system “RD_new” (EPSG: 28992, NAP:5709). To gain more insights of the pre-classification accuracy of the AHN datasets, we also conducted a preliminary assessment of the effect of terrain filtering on vegetation change detection across AHN datasets (i.e. AHN2–AHN4). The data used in this analysis are made available (folder: <strong>10_Ground_classification</strong>). </span></p> <p><span lang="EN-GB">An overview of all the folders in the repository:</span></p> <p><strong><span lang="EN-GB">1. </span></strong><strong><span lang="EN-GB">AHN1</span></strong></p> <p><strong><span lang="EN-GB">2. </span></strong><strong><span lang="EN-GB">AHN2</span></strong></p> <p><strong><span lang="EN-GB">3. </span></strong><strong><span lang="EN-GB">AHN3</span></strong></p> <p><strong><span lang="EN-GB">4. </span></strong><strong><span lang="EN-GB">AHN4</span></strong></p> <p><strong><span lang="EN-GB">5. </span></strong><strong><span lang="EN-GB">Maps</span></strong></p> <p><span lang="EN-GB">Those folders contain four sets of 25 LiDAR metrics at 10 m resolution generated from each AHN dataset. The file names and their corresponding LiDAR metrics can be found in Table 1. An additional folder (5_Maps) contains the maps (.pdf format) of all 25 metrics for each AHN dataset.</span></p> <p><strong><span lang="EN-GB">6. Masks</span></strong></p> <ul> <li><span lang="EN-GB">ahn3_10m_mask_building_road_water.tif</span></li> <li><span lang="EN-GB">ahn4_10m_mask_building_road_water.tif</span></li> <li><span lang="EN-GB">ahn4_10m_mask_powerline.tif</span></li> <li><span lang="NL">ahn1_10m_NA_mask.tif</span></li> <li><span lang="NL">ahn2_10m_NA_mask.tif</span></li> <li><span lang="NL">ahn3_10m_NA_mask.tif</span></li> <li><span lang="NL">a</span><span lang="NL">hn4_10m_NA_mask.tif</span></li> </ul> <p><span lang="NL"> </span></p> <p><span lang="EN-GB">It contains two mask layers of water surfaces, buildings and roads for both AHN3 and AHN4 data products based on the Dutch cadaster data (TOP10NL) from 2018 (corresponding to AHN3) and 2021 (corresponding to AHN4) (<a href="https://www.kadaster.nl/zakelijk/producten/geo-informatie/topnl">https://www.kadaster.nl/zakelijk/producten/geo-informatie/topnl</a>). In the masks, water surfaces, buildings and roads were merged into one class with pixel value assigned to 1 and the rest has the pixel value of 0. There is also a powerline mask generated from the AHN4 dataset at 10 m resolution, where pixels containing powerlines were assigned a value of 1 and the rest as NoData. We provide those masks to minimize the inaccuracies of the data products caused by human infrastructures and water surfaces. We also provided a mask for each AHN dataset where NA value occurs — areas with no vegetation points (“unclassified” class in the AHN datasets). Pixels with NA value were assigned with a value of 1 and the rest as 0.</span></p> <p><strong><span lang="EN-GB">7. Auxiliary data</span></strong></p> <p><span lang="EN-GB">(1) Point_density</span></p> <ul> <li><span lang="EN-GB">ahn1_10m_point_density.tif</span></li> <li><span lang="EN-GB">ahn2_10m_point_density.tif</span></li> <li><span lang="EN-GB">ahn3_10m_point_density.tif</span></li> <li><span lang="EN-GB">ahn4_10m_point_density.tif</span></li> </ul> <p><span lang="EN-GB">(2) Pulse_density</span></p> <ul> <li><span lang="EN-GB">ahn3_10m_pulse_density.tif</span></li> <li><span lang="EN-GB">ahn4_10m_pulse_density.tif</span></li> </ul> <p><span lang="EN-GB">(3) Flighttime</span></p> <ul> <li><span lang="EN-GB">ahn3_10m_flighttime.tif</span></li> <li><span lang="EN-GB">ahn4_10m_flighttime.tif</span></li> </ul> <p><span lang="EN-GB">(4) DTM_DSM</span></p> <ul> <li><span lang="EN-GB">ahn2_10m_dtm.tif</span></li> <li><span lang="EN-GB">ahn2_10m_dsm.tif</span></li> <li><span lang="EN-GB">ahn3_10m_dtm.tif</span></li> <li><span lang="EN-GB">ahn3_10m_dsm.tif</span></li> <li><span lang="EN-GB">ahn4_10m_dtm.tif</span></li> <li><span lang="EN-GB">ahn4_10m_dsm.tif</span></li> </ul> <p><span lang="EN-GB">It contains four raster layers representing the point density of each AHN dataset, two raster layers for pulse density of the AHN3 and AHN4, two raster layers for flight timestamp of the AHN3 and AHN4, and six DTM and DSM layers for AHN2</span><span lang="EN-GB">–</span><span lang="EN-GB">AHN4. All raster layers are provide at 10 m resolution.</span></p> <p><strong><span lang="EN-GB">8. Sensitivity analysis</span></strong></p> <ul> <li><span lang="EN-GB">Dunes</span></li> <li><span lang="EN-GB">Marsh</span></li> <li><span lang="EN-GB">Grassland</span></li> <li><span lang="EN-GB">Shrubland</span></li> <li><span lang="EN-GB">Woodland</span></li> <li><span lang="EN-GB">Code</span></li> <li><span lang="EN-GB">Figure</span></li> </ul> <p><span lang="EN-GB">It contains the 25 metrics generated from point clouds with the original and down-sampled pulse densities (original pulse density of the AHN4, pulse density of the AHN3, ½ of the pulse density of the AHN3, and ¼ of the pulse density of AHN3) for each habitat type (i.e. dunes, marsh, grassland, shrubland, and woodland). We also provided the code and the figures generated from this analysis.</span></p> <p><strong><span lang="EN-GB">9. Use_case</span></strong></p> <p><span lang="EN-GB">(1) Multi-temporal_AHN</span></p> <ul> <li><span lang="EN-GB">Data</span></li> <li><span lang="EN-GB">Usecase_multi-temporal_AHN.R</span></li> </ul> <p><span lang="EN-GB">It contains the input data for the use case data processing (i.e. Data folder), including the shapefile of the area (i.e. shp folder), and extracted pixel value from six selected LiDAR metrics from AHN1–AHN5 (i.e. Metrics folder), and the selected LiDAR metrics of the area (e.g. Hp95 folder), and the R code for data processing (i.e. Usecase_multi-temporal_AHN.R). </span></p> <p><span lang="EN-GB">(2) Natura2000</span></p> <ul> <li><span lang="EN-GB">Data</span></li> <li><span lang="EN-GB">Natura2000_end2021_HABITATCLASS.csv</span></li> <li><span lang="EN-GB">Natura2000_NL_habitat_grouped.csv</span></li> <li><span lang="EN-GB">Usecase_Natura2000.R</span></li> </ul> <p><span lang="EN-GB">It contains a folder of the input data used for the use case (i.e. Data folder), including the shapefile (i.e. shp folder) of the Natura 2000 sites in the Netherlands (i.e. Nature2000_NL_RDnew.shp) and the 100 random sample plots from each habitat type (e.g. woodland_points.shp), and the LiDAR metrics from AHN4 used for demonstrating the vegetation structure within each habitat type (i.e. AHN4_metrics folder). The table “Natura2000_end2021_HABITATCLASS.csv” is the original attribute table of Natura 2000 sites, including information related to the description of habitat classes (column “DESCRIPTION”), the code corresponding to the habitat class (column “HABITATCODE”), the code for the specific site (column “SITECODE”), and the percentage of the cover of a specific habitat class in one site (column “PERCENTAGECOVER”). The table “Natura2000_NL_habitat_grouped.csv” contains two subtabs, one (i.e. “Habitatclass”) is the copy of the original attribute table of Natura 2000 sites in the Netherlands, and the other one (i.e. “Habitat_class_summary”) is the grouped habitat type based on the dominant habitat class (i.e. class with the highest percentage cover) in each site. Different colors indicate different habitat types, corresponding to the colors in the first tab (“Habitatclass”) where the dominant habitat class was highlighted for each site. </span></p> <p><strong><span lang="EN-GB">10. Ground classification</span></strong></p> <ul> <li><span lang="EN-GB">Raw_point_cloud</span></li> <li><span lang="EN-GB">Computed_metrics </span></li> <li><span lang="EN-GB">Plottings_and_code</span></li> <li><span lang="EN-GB">ArcGIS_project</span></li> </ul> <p><span lang="EN-GB">It contains four subfolders: (1) The original point cloud for each sample area (AHN2–AHN4) (subfolder: Raw_point_cloud); (2) The 25 LiDAR metrics computed from the original point clouds with pre-classification of AHN and from the new terrain filtering method across AHN2–AHN4 (subfolder: Computed_metrics); (3) Generated violin plots for the comparison of vegetation change detection and the python code employed (subfolder: Plottings_and_code); (4) an ArcGIS project which the shapefiles of the study area and sample plots are provided (subfolder: ArcGIS_project).</span></p> <p><strong><span lang="EN-GB">Code availability</span></strong></p> <p><span lang="EN-GB">Jupyter Notebooks for processing AHN datasets: </span></p> <p><span lang="EN-GB"><a href="https://github.com/ShiYifang/AHN">https://github.com/ShiYifang/AHN</a></span></p> <p><span lang="EN-GB">Laserfarm workflow repository: </span></p> <p><span lang="EN-GB"><a href="https://github.com/eEcoLiDAR/Laserfarm">https://github.com/eEcoLiDAR/Laserfarm</a></span></p> <p><span lang="EN-GB">Laserchicken software repository: </span></p> <p><span lang="EN-GB"><a href="https://github.com/eEcoLiDAR/laserchicken">https://github.com/eEcoLiDAR/laserchicken</a></span></p> <p><span lang="EN-GB">Code for downloading AHN dataset: <a href="https://github.com/ShiYifang/AHN/tree/main/AHN_downloading">https://github.com/ShiYifang/AHN/tree/main/AHN_downloading</a></span></p> <p><span lang="EN-GB">Code for generating masks for AHN datasets: <a href="https://github.com/ShiYifang/AHN/tree/main/AHN_masks">https://github.com/ShiYifang/AHN/tree/main/AHN_masks</a></span></p> <p><span lang="EN-GB">Code for demonstration of ecological use cases: <a href="https://github.com/ShiYifang/AHN/tree/main/Use_case">https://github.com/ShiYifang/AHN/tree/main/Use_case</a></span></p> <p> </p>
High-resolution, Decadal to Weekly Geomorphic Change Analysis of the Elbow River in Calgary, using Multi-temporal Lidar and Repeat Terrestrial Laser Scanning
<p>This directory contains files related to the scientific research project of Luc van Dijk at the Department of Earth, Energy, and Environment, University of Calgary. The project title is "High-resolution, Decadal to Weekly Geomorphic Change Analysis of the Elbow River in Calgary, using Multi-temporal Lidar and Repeat Terrestrial Laser Scanning". This project in the field of geomorphology was a collaboration between the University of Calgary and Utrecht University in the Netherlands. The project was completed on October 27, 2023. Below is a description of the files in this directory.</p><p> </p><p><strong>DisplacementVolumeDistributions_TLS.xlsx</strong></p><p>Excel file containing tabular data of the normalized sediment displacement volumes that were obtained using TLS. Each tab in the Excel file represents a period of interest in 2023. The data in this file were used to generate the 'histogram-like' figures in the report.</p><p> </p><p><strong>DoD_rasters.zip</strong></p><p>Folder containing the aerial lidar DEMs of Difference (DoDs) for each period of interest. The DoDs are 'waterless', i.e. the water surface is masked. The suffix of the file name before the file extension (e.g., ..._10cm.tif) indicates the maximum REM value that was used for the automated masking of the water surface extent (see report section 3.1.2). If the file name contains "large", it refers to the upstream greater area (see report section 3.1.3).</p><p>Within this folder is another folder called 'Clipped2AOIs'. This folder contains the same DoDs, but covering only the extents of the sites of interest ('AOIs' = Areas Of Interest).</p><p> </p><p><strong>FilteredPointClouds_TLS.zip</strong></p><p>Folder containing the processed and filtered point clouds that were acquired throughout the summer of 2023 using TLS. These point clouds have been pre-processed and filtered to remove vegetation (see report section 3.2). They are grouped in sub-folders per acquisition date. The filenames are numbered to location, i.e. 'elbow1', 'elbow2', 'elbow3' and 'elbow4'. These correspond to the sites of interest: Glenmore Dam, golf club, Sandy Beach and Riverdale, respectively.</p><p> </p><p><strong>PythonScripts_Discharge_Rainfall.zip</strong></p><p>Folder containing the Python scripts that were made to process the discharge and rainfall data that were sourced from Environment Canada and The City of Calgary (see report section 3.3). The scripts themselves contain descriptions of their purpose.</p><p> </p><p><strong>PythonScripts_DisplacementVolumeAnalysis.zip</strong></p><p>Folder containing the Python scripts that were made to process and analyze the aerial lidar DoDs and the TLS rasterized difference point clouds (M3C2 output). The 'convert2pickle' scripts converted the sizable rasters to smaller pickle files, which were easier and faster to work with. The 'chart' scripts load the data from the pickle files, analyze them and produce the 'histogram-like' figures in the report. The scripts themselves contain descriptions of their purpose.</p><p> </p><p><strong>RainfallDischargeData.xlsx</strong></p><p>Excel file containing the discharge and rainfall data from Environment Canada and The City of Calgary. The data came from different sources in different formats and were combined into this single table.</p><p> </p><p><strong>RasterizedDifferencedPointClouds_M3C2.zip</strong></p><p>Folder containing the rasterized results of the differenced TLS point clouds (M3C2 output) (see report section 3.2.4). The filenames are numbered to location, i.e. 'Elbow1', 'Elbow2', 'Elbow3' and 'Elbow4'. These correspond to the sites of interest: Glenmore Dam, golf club, Sandy Beach and Riverdale, respectively. The numeric sequence in the file name indicates the start and end date of the change analysis in a 'mm-dd' format. The suffixes '_dist', '_unc' and '_sig' refer to the three output layers of the M3C2 algorithm: distance, uncertainty and significance of change. The main files of interest are the '.tif' files. Files sharing the same name, but with different extensions (.tfw, .tif.aux.xml, .tif.xml) are supplementary/auxiliary files for the '.tif' file, generated by ArcGIS Pro.</p><p> </p><p><strong>ScarpsOfInterest_shapefile.zip</strong></p><p>Folder containing a polygon shapefile describing the extents and locations of the sites of interest. The main file of interest is the '.shp' file. The other files with the same name, but different extensions (.cpg, .dbf, .prj, .sbn, .sbx, .shp.xml, .shx) are supplementary/auxiliary files for the '.shp' file, generated by ArcGIS Pro.</p>
Multi-temporal digital terrain models of the NBS experiment in OAL-Austria
<p>Multi-temporal digital terrain models of the NBS experiment in OAL-Austria with a spatial resolution of 10cm, derived from 3D point clouds acquired with a terrestrial laser scanner (Riegl-VZ2000i); Projection: EPSG 31254</p> <p>The TLS-monitoring is intended for assessing the stability of the embankment at the NBS field demonstrator in OAL-Austria. The digital terrain models were acquired after applying the ground classification filter proposed by Axelsson (2000)</p>
Remote sensing of river discharge (RSQ) estimates derived from multi-temporal Landsat width observations and BAM/geoBAM discharge inversion algorithms
<p><strong>This repository provides three data files in CSV format:</strong><br> 1. Gauge name, lat/lon information<br> 2. Gauge name, date, and multi-temporal river width extracted from Landsat<br> 3. Gauge name, date, and BAM/geoBAM estimates of river discharge with monthly Q priors</p> <p>Note: the multi-temporal river width data were extracted from Landsat imageries using RivWidthCloud, where the river centerline/orthogonal line definition and the cross-section sampling strategies were made prior to, and different from Feng et al. (2022). So the width values may be different from Feng et al. (2022) at some locations due to these differences. The discharge estimates were derived from BAM/geoBAM algorithms with width-only observations. More details of the technical workflow and the inner workings of BAM/geoBAM were provided in the literature below and papers therein.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Reference:</strong></p> <p>Lin, P., D. Feng, C.J. Gleason, M. Pan, C.B. Brinkerhoff, X. Yang, H.E. Beck, R. Frasson (2023). Inversion of river discharge from remotely sensed river widths: a critical assessment at three-thousand global river gauges. <em>RSE</em>.</p> <p> </p> <p>Updated: 2022/6/17, 2023/1/19</p> <p> </p>
Multi-Temporal Cloud Gap Imputation With HLS Data Across CONUS
<p>This release contains the version 1.0 of the dataset which was used in <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.19609">Seeing Through the Clouds: Cloud Gap Imputation with Prithvi Foundation Model</a> and is included as one of the tasks in the <a href="https://madewithclay.org/challenge">AI for Earth Challenge 2024</a>.</p>
Multi-temporal digital terrain models of the active deep-seated Vögelsberg landslide (OAL-Austria)
<p>Multi-temporal digital terrain models of the active deep-seated Vögelsberg landslide in OAL Austria (Lat: 47.272°, Lon: 11.597°) with a spatial resolution of 50cm. Raster were derived from classified 3D point clouds acquired with a Riegl VUX-1LR unmanned aerial vehicle laser scanner on August 3<sup>rd</sup> 2018, August 14<sup>th</sup> 2019 and November 6<sup>th</sup> 2020 (Projection: EPSG 31254). Ground classification after Axelsson (2000). Data was used to assess topographic changes at the toe of the active deep-seated Vögelsberg landslide in OAL-Austria.</p>
Multi-temporal Landslide Inventory for the Far-Western region of Nepal
<p>The Multi-Temporal Landslide Inventory for the Far-Western region of Nepal datasets comprises 26350 different landslide events digitize in form of polygons from Google Earth satellite imagery interpretation. In Google earth has been used for interpretation 93 different sources for 79 different time slices between 2002 and 2018. The maximum scale of interpretation used is 1:1000, meanwhile the scale of digitalization was constant between 1:800 and 1:2000, resulting in a final visualization scale of 1:1000. All landslides in the inventory have been classified between deep-seated and shallow types (attribute field "Depth") by visual interpretation which have been later corroborated with calculations of the elevation differences within the surface of rupture area of the landslides</p> <p>The dataset comprises 4 different shapefiles:</p> <ul> <li><strong>"LandslideInventory_FarWesternNepal_Pol.shp"</strong>: Shapefile with 26350 Polygon features that bound completely the “zone of depletion” and partially the “zone of accumulation” of each identified landslide. Including completely the surface of rupture and more or less partially the depositional zone of the landslides. Landslide</li> <li><strong>"LandslideInventory_FarWesternNepal_Points.shp"</strong>: Shapefile with 25639 Point features that approximately correspond with the center of the surface of rupture area, the point location within each landslide has ben extracted automatically with GIS tools using ALOS PALSAR (12.5 m) DEM. </li> <li><strong>"LandslideInventory_FarWesternNepal_Points_Dated1992_2018.shp"</strong>: Shapefile with 8778 Point features for landslides in the inventory that have been dated within the period 1992-2018 (attribute field "Year". The dating of the landslides has been perform automatically by an own new toolbox in ArcGIS that compare annual Landsat (4-5, 7 and 8), to find sudden vegetation changes within the areas of the digitized landsldies. The tool has an accuracy of 83% to detect annual dates of activation or reactivations of the inventoried landslides. </li> <li><strong>"LandslideInventory_FarWesternNepal_AOI.shp"</strong>: Shapefile with the Polygon boundary of the landslide inventory Area of Interpretation.</li> </ul> <p>All shapefiles are in a UTM projected coordinate system UTM44N (WGS84).</p> <p> </p> <p>This research was funded by the UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and Department for International Development (DFID) as project NE/P000452/1 (LandslideEVO) under the Science for Humanitarian Emergencies and Resilience (SHEAR) program.</p> <p> </p>
Supplementary Material: Automated Extraction of Inundated Areas from Multi-Temporal Dual-Polarization RADARSAT-2 Images of the 2011 Central Thailand Flood
<p>Supplementary figures for Figure 4. Automated threshold values using the neighborhood valley method of water references in the red elliptical areas from the HH, HV and HH + HV sigma-naught values. The dashed lines represent unimodal distributions, and the solid lines represent bimodal distributions.</p>
Multi-temporal elevation changes of Fedchenko Glacier (Tajikistan) from 1928 to 2021
<p>This dataset contains rasters of elevation changes on and around Fedchenko Glacier. All the elevation change maps are provided relatively to a Pléiades DEM acquired on 2021-09-20. Rasters are georeferenced in UTM43, and are provided in the form of *.tif files.</p> <p>For methodological details, please refer to the final publication of the article "Multi-temporal elevation changes of Fedchenko Glacier (Tajikistan) from 1928 to 2021" by Brun and others, or refer to the pre-print available at <a href="https://doi.org/10.31223/X5CX1H">https://doi.org/10.31223/X5CX1H</a></p>
The Multi-Temporal Dual Channel Algorithm (MT-DCA)
<p>I) SUMMARY</p> <p>This soil moisture and vegetation optical depth product is called the Multi-Temporal Dual Channel Algorithm (MT-DCA). It retrieves surface soil moisture and vegetation optical depth (directly related to total water volume in the vegetation canopy) from <a href="https://nsidc.org/data/SPL1CTB_E">SMAP level 1C brightness temperature</a> observations using a robust estimation technique. It is an in-house MIT algorithm and is not an official SMAP product. The data are freely available on 9km and 36km grids from April 2015 to July 2021 in daily time steps.</p> <p>No co-authorship is required for use of this data in publications. However, to properly acknowledge the dataset when publishing any research using the MT-DCA, we ask data users to (1) cite the DOI as an in-text citation and/or in the data acknowledgements in any publication and (2) reference <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425717302961">Konings et al. (2017</a>) when referring to the MT-DCA in the text. Feel free to send us an email at <a href="mailto:afeld24@mit.edu">afeld24@mit.edu</a> to let us know how you are using the data. </p> <p>The version 5 update is a re-implementation of the MT-DCA using the updated SMAP L1C brightness temperatures. It extends the data through July 2021.</p> <p>II) CONTACT</p> <p>For questions, please email Andrew Feldman at <a href="mailto:afeld24@mit.edu">afeld24@mit.edu</a>.</p> <p>III) ALGORITHM DESCRIPTION</p> <p>The algorithmic approach uses both horizontally and vertically polarized brightness temperatures to retrieve soil moisture and VOD simultaneously. The key innovation of the MT-DCA is that it recognizes that classical dual-channel algorithms are under-determined: brightness temperature observations are correlated and cannot retrieve two unknowns (soil moisture and VOD) (as illustrated in Konings et al, RSE 2016). This creates amplifying errors in retrievals from snapshot dual-channel algorithms. The MT-DCA uses a viable assumption that VOD changes more slowly than soil moisture between overpasses, and uses information from multiple SMAP overpasses to stabilize the retrieval. It is considered a regularization approach similar to the Sobolev Norm regularization. Specifically, this approach is applied to each temporally adjacent pair of overpasses (for SMAP, two overpasses approximately 2-3-days apart), which includes four brightness temperature measurements. For each overpass pair, the soil moisture at both overpasses is retrieved, along with a constant VOD for both overpasses. This leads to two retrievals of each of soil moisture and VOD at any given overpass time: one where the parameters are retrieved using additional TB information from the overpass before and one from the overpass after. Both retrievals of VOD and soil moisture values at each overpass are averaged. Ultimately, VOD is not held constant, but rather is slowed in time between overpasses. A second key innovation of the MT-DCA is that, because the retrievals are no longer under determined, it is also possible to retrieve a constant single scattering albedo for each pixel. The single scattering albedo is estimated through model selection of the value of the parameter that minimizes the sum of all overpass cost functions. The retrieved albedo is also included in the files here. VOD is reported at nadir.</p> <p>The single scattering albedo is assumed constant over the full record of SMAP data, as is currently accepted practice across approaches with SMAP, SMOS, and AMSR. There is a high amount of computational power required to retrieve an albedo over more than three years of SMAP data. Therefore, an adjustment was made: the single scattering albedo was retrieved over the third year of SMAP data (April 1st, 2017 to March 31st, 2018). This constant value was then applied to the other years without requiring the albedo optimization loop. Tests across many individual pixels revealed that albedo in the third year does not differ greatly from albedo over all years and the other individual years. </p> <p>The algorithm is described in more detail in Konings et al. (2017). The algorithm is based on principles explained in more detail in Konings et al. (2016), which describes the original algorithm development using Aquarius observations. See also the related Konings et al. (2015) publication for quantitative justification for the approach. While the dataset has not been officially validated, the MT-DCA soil moisture retrievals show in-situ comparison statistics similarly to the official baseline SMAP soil moisture product (SMAP soil moisture retrieval in-situ assessment can be found in Chan et al. (2016)). Finally, the MT-DCA vegetation optical depth retrievals are not validated due to only sparsely available ground information related to vegetation water content. Nevertheless, information about error propagation into the MT-DCA soil moisture and VOD retrievals as well as VOD error reductions using the MT-DCA regularization technique can be found in Feldman et al. (2021).</p> <p>Chan, S.K., Bindlish, R., O’Neill, P.E., Njoku, E., Jackson, T., Colliander, A., Chen, F., Burgin, M., Dunbar, S., Piepmeier, J., Yueh, S., Entekhabi, D., Cosh, M.H., Caldwell, T., Walker, J., Wu, X., Berg, A., Rowlandson, T., Pacheco, A., McNairn, H., Thibeault, M., Martinez-Fernandez, J., Gonzalez-Zamora, A., Seyfried, M., Bosch, D., Starks, P., Goodrich, D., Prueger, J., Palecki, M., Small, E.E., Zreda, M., Calvet, J.C., Crow, W.T., Kerr, Y., 2016. Assessment of the SMAP Passive Soil Moisture Product. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 54, 4994–5007. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2016.2561938">https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2016.2561938</a></p> <p>Feldman, A.F., D. Chaparro, and D. Entekhabi (2021). Error propagation in microwave soil moisture and vegetation optical depth retrievals. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. In Press.</p> <p>Konings, A.G., M. Piles, N. Das, and D. Entekhabi (2017). L-band vegetation optical depth and effective scattering albedo estimation from SMAP. Remote Sensing of Environment, 198:460-470. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.037">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.037</a></p> <p>Konings, A.G., M. Piles, K. Rötzer, K.A. McColl, S. Chan, and D. Entekhabi (2016). Vegetation optical depth and scattering albedo retrieval using time-series of dual-polarized L-band radiometer observations. Remote Sensing of Environment. 172, 178-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.11.009</p> <p>Konings, A.G., K.A. McColl, M. Piles and D. Entekhabi (2015): How many parameters can be maximally estimated from a set of measurements? IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 12(5), 1081-1085. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2014.2381641</p> <p>IV) QUALITY CONTROL</p> <p>Several conditions can create uncertainty in the MT-DCA retrievals including surface water bodies (lakes, rivers, coastal areas, etc.), radio frequency interference (RFI), highly sloped surfaces (mountainous regions), dense vegetation, frozen ground, and others. The MT-DCA removes time periods of frozen ground and removes pixels with water body fractions of greater than 0.5. SMAP L1C brightness temperatures are adjusted considering RFI and surface water body information. Nevertheless, the MT-DCA retrievals are purposefully not substantially quality controlled to increase the range of science applications of the data. Therefore, the retrievals are subject to uncertainty in regions where and times when these aforementioned issues occur. We suggest the data user familiarize themselves with quality flags in the SMAP algorithm theoretical basis document in <a href="https://nsidc.org/data/SPL3SMP_E">https://nsidc.org/data/SPL3SMP_E</a>. Conservative quality control can be applied using SMAP quality flag information directly applicable to the dataset here. These quality flags can be downloaded from the SMAP official product files at <a href="https://nsidc.org/data/SPL3SMP_E">https://nsidc.org/data/SPL3SMP_E</a>.</p> <p>V) DATA FORMATTING AND FILE NAMES </p> <p>Data are provided in zipped folders in both netcdf4 (.nc) and matfile (.mat) formats. Each zipped folder contains soil moisture, vegetation optical depth, single scattering albedo, latitude, longitude, and time vector information. Note that as an update in Version 5, the zipped folders for 9km .mat files are separated into soil moisture and vegetation optical depth to reduce zip folder size. The other zipped folders still have all variables within them. These variables are provided at a 9km resolution as well as upscaled to 36km. For both .nc and .mat files, the 9km data are provided in 3-month periods with a naming convention of ‘YYYYMM_YYYYMM’ where YYYY is the 4-digit year, and MM is the 2-digit month. The first YYYYMM string represents the first month and the second YYYYMM string is the final month of the period. The 36km data are provided in 12-month periods with the same naming conventions in the file names.</p> <p>Retrievals are obtained from enhanced-resolution brightness temperatures from SMAP that are gridded at 9km. As such, they are on a 9km EASE2-grid. These retrievals are upscaled to 36km and gridded on a 36km EASE2 grid. Additional information and geolocation tools are available at <a href="https://nsidc.org/data/ease/ease_grid2.html">https://nsidc.org/data/ease/ease_grid2.html</a>. </p> <p>Information specific to folders with .nc and .mat formats is given below:</p> <p>a) NETCDF Files (.nc): The folders with netcdf files contain files with the convention MTDCA_YYYYMM_YYYYMM_Xkm_VX.nc where VX is the version number, Xkm is the grid scale, and YYYYMM strings are the first and last months of the range of data saved in the file. Soil moisture, vegetation optical depth, latitude, longitude, and time index information are provided in these files. A map of single scattering albedo for the full time series is saved in a separate file as MTDCA_OMEGA_Xkm_VX.nc along with latitude and longitude information.</p> <p>b) MATFILES (.mat): The folders with matfiles contain individual files for:</p> <ol> <li>Soil moisture: MTDCA_VX_SM_YYYYXX_YYYYXX_Xkm.mat</li> <li>Vegetation Optical Depth: MTDCA_VX_TAU_YYYYXX_YYYYXX_Xkm.mat</li> <li>Single Scattering Albedo: MTDCA_VX_OMEGA_Xkm.mat</li> <li>Latitude/Longitude: SMAPCenterCoordinatesXKM.mat</li> </ol> <p>A datevector variable in each soil moisture and vegetation optical depth file contains information on the year, month, and day corresponding to the timestep of each variable.</p>
Multi-temporal Structure from Motion ponit clouds of riparian vegetation
<p>the dataset consists of three pointclouds and two NIR orthomosaics generated through a Structure from Motion standard workflow of the same forested area. The study area is typical riparian habitat vegetation. The data were acquired in different phenological stages:</p> <p>the first acquisition was realised in leaves-off conditions (march 2020)</p> <p>The second acquisition was realised in June 2020</p> <p>the third acquisition was realised in July 2020.</p> <p>Reference system: WGS84/32N [EPGS: 32632]</p> <p>For further information regarding the data processing please refer to https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13091756<br> </p>
Two multi-temporal datasets to track the enhanced landsliding after the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake
<p>We release two datasets that track the enhanced landsliding induced by the 2008 M<sub>w</sub> 7.9 Wenchuan earthquake over a portion of the Longmen mountains, at the eastern margin of the Tibetan plateau (Sichuan, China). The first dataset is a geo-referenced multi-temporal polygon-based inventory of pre- and coseismic landslides, post-seismic remobilisations of coseismic landslide debris, and post-seismic landslides (new failures). It covers 471 km<sup>2</sup> in the earthquake’s epicentral area, from 2005 to 2018. The second dataset records the debris flows that occurred from 2008 to 2017 in a larger area (~17,000 km<sup>2</sup>), together with information on their triggering rainfall as recorded by a network of rain gauges. For some well-monitored events, we provide more detailed data on rainfall, discharge, flow depth and density. The datasets can be used to analyse, at various scales, the patterns of landsliding caused by the earthquake. They can be compared to inventories relative to past or new earthquakes or other triggers to reveal common or distinctive controlling factors. To our knowledge, no other inventories that track the temporal evolution of earthquake-induced mass wasting have been made freely available thus far. Our datasets can be accessed from <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1405490">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1405490</a>. We also encourage other researchers to share their datasets to facilitate research on post-seismic geological hazards.</p>
Multi-temporal landslide inventory for southern Sikkim State, India
<p>The <em>Multi-temporal landslide inventory for southern Sikkim State, India</em>, is based on two data-sources (mapped extent given in <strong>Shapefile A</strong>): Google Earth images (<strong>Shapefiles B–C</strong>) and stereoscopic Cartosat-1 satellite images (<strong>Shapefiles D–F</strong>). The landslide inventories were collected for the purpose of mapping landslide domains (regions with similar physical and environmental characteristics that specifically drive landslide style) and the data was used to give a general idea of landslides occurring in the region rather than a detailed overview. The landslide inventories are given as shapefiles with two sources of data described separately, after which a summary of all shapefiles is given.</p> <p>Google Earth landslides are mapped using images from 2002 to 2019 with a mapped extent of approximately 3000 km<sup>2</sup> and was ground-truthed during a 12-day field visit from 23 February to 6 March 2019. The resultant landslide inventory contains 440 landslides with three main landslide types identified: translational slides, debris flows, and rockfalls. Translational slides include debris slides, rock slides, and unclassified translational slides. In the landslide inventory, debris flows and rockfalls are mapped as points representing their source area and translational slides are mapped as polygons representing both the source and depositional area. A complete description of the landslide types and mapping is given in Heijenk (2022, Chapter 3, section 3.4.2) The final landslide inventory (refer to how they would access it here, so a reference, or shapefile) includes the following:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Year</strong>, the year of the first image that the landslide appears in is taken,</li> <li><strong>Geology</strong>, the geological unit that the landslide occurs in is taken from Mottram <em>et al.</em> (2004),</li> <li><strong>Area</strong>, for translational slides the area is given,</li> <li><strong>Topographic data</strong> (elevation, aspect, slope, and curvature), which is taken from ASTER GDEM (Version 3.0, 2018, 30 m horizontal resolution, 30 m vertical resolution).</li> </ul> <p>The Cartosat landslide inventory contains 44 features mapped from one pair of stereoscopic Cartosat-1 images (National Remote Sensing Centre, Cartosat-1 ID 197823411, https://www.nrsc.gov.in/, 2.5 m x 2.5 m) captured on 30 September 2011 with extents of 851 km<sup>2</sup> and 957 km<sup>2</sup>. Three main landslide types have been mapped: deep-seated landslides, multi-temporal landslide areas, and rockfall areas. For deep-seated landslides, the scarp is mapped separately from the depositional area. A complete description of the methodology is given in Heijenk (2022, Chapter 3, section 3.4.3).</p> <p>The following shapefiles are included in this dataset:</p> <ol> <li><strong>Google_Earth_mapped_extent_21Dec2021.shp</strong>: Shapefile with a polygon that denotes the mapped extent of southern Sikkim State.</li> <li><strong>Google_Earth_landslides_polygon_21Dec2021.shp</strong>: Shapefile with 255 polygon features, where the polygon includes the source and depositional area of translational landslides.</li> <li><strong>Google_Earth_landslides_point_21Dec2021.shp</strong>: Shapefile with 185 point features that denote the source area of both debris flows and rockfalls.</li> <li><strong>Cartosat_197823411_extents.shp</strong>: Shapefile with 2 polygon features that denote the extent of the Cartosat-1 image pair captured on 30 September 2011.</li> <li><strong>Cartosat_landslides_21Dec2021.shp</strong>: Shapefile with 67 polygon features that describe 44 landslide features. Some landslide features have been mapped with separate polygons for the scarp and the depositional area.</li> <li><strong>Cartosat_197823411clouds.shp</strong>: Shapefile with 5 polygon features that show an estimated area of the clouds that block landslide mapping in the 30 September 2011 Cartosat-1 image pair.</li> </ol> <p>All shapefiles are in an WGS 84 EPSG:3857 projection.</p> <p>This research was funded by the UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC, Grant # NE/R012148/1) and the British Geological Survey (BGS, BUFI).</p> <p>References: </p> <p>Heijenk, R.A. (2022). Landslide Variables, Inventories, and Domains in Data-Poor Regions: A Case Study in East Sikkim, India. [PhD thesis]. King’s College London.</p>
Multi-temporal TM-NDVI Vectors at Rodent Webs from the Sevilleta National Wildlife Refuge, New Mexico (1984-1993)
This database contains mean NDVI values for 200 m diameter circles encompassing Rodent Webs on the Sevilleta National Wildlife Refuge (NWR), for 21 Landsat TM scene dating from 1984 to 1993. These NDVI vectors were generated as part of cooperative project between the Sevilleta LTER and the Indian Health Service, to study the 1992 Hantavirus outbreak.
Two multi-temporal datasets to track debris flow after the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake
<p>We provide two datasets for tracking the debris flow induced by the 2008 Wenchuan Mw 7.9 earthquake on a section of the Longmen mountains on the eastern side of the Tibetan plateau (Sichuan, China). The database was obtained through a literature review and field survey reports in the epicenter area, combined with high-resolution remote sensing imagery and extensive data collection and processing. The first dataset covers an area of 892 km<sup>2</sup>, including debris flows from 2008 to 2020. 186 debris flows affecting 79 watersheds were identified. 89 rainfall stations were collected to determine the rainfall events for the post-earthquake debris flow outbreak. The second database is a list of mitigation measures for post-earthquake debris flows, including catchment name, check dam number, coordinates, construction time, and successful debris flow mitigation date. This two datasets can aid different applications, including the early warning monitoring and engineering prevention of post-earthquake debris flow, as well as provide valuable data support for research in related disciplines.</p>
BreizhSR: multi-temporal cross-sensor super-resolution of satellite imagery
<h1>BreizhSR, a super-resolution Sentinel-2 to SPOT-6/7 dataset </h1> <h2>1. Dataset motivation</h2> <p><strong>BreizhSR</strong> is a dataset targetting super-resolution of (RGB bands of) Sentinel-2 images by providing time series colocated in space and time with SPOT-6/7 acquisitions. This dataset is composed of cloud free Sentinel-2 time series (visible bands at 10m resolution) and SPOT-6/7 pansharpened color images resampled 2.5m resolution. The study area is the region of Brittany (Breizh in the local language), located on the northwestern coast of France with an oceanic climate. The dataset covers about 35 000 km² with mostly agricultural areas (about 80 %). All acquisitions are from 2018 in the Brittany region of France.</p> <h2>2. Dataset organization</h2> <p>The dataset folder follows the structure detailed below :</p> <p><code>BreizhSR</code><br><code>├── dataset_test.pkl</code><br><code>├── dataset_train.pkl</code><br><code>├── README.md</code><br><code>├── x</code><br><code>├── x_test</code><br><code>├── y</code><br><code>└── y_test</code></p> <p>The <code>README.md</code> file contains the same information as this description.</p> <p>Actual image patches are stored in the <code>x</code> and <code>x_test</code> folders for Sentinel-2 patches, and in the <code>y</code> and <code>y_test</code> folders for ground truth SPOT patches. Subfolders are organized using a integer identifier (e.g. <code>8355</code>) that denote the series identifier. Therefore, for the S2 series <code>x/8355</code>, the corresponding SPOT patch is in subfolder <code>y/8355</code>.</p> <p>This organization and additional metadata are described in two <a href="https://pandas.pydata.org/docs/reference/api/pandas.DataFrame.html">Pandas Dataframes</a> : <code>dataset_train.pkl</code> and <code>dataset_test.pkl</code>. These files are Dataframes serialized using the <a href="https://docs.python.org/3/library/pickle.html">pickle Python serialization protocol</a>. The columns available in these Dataframes are described in the table below.</p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td>x</td> <td>y</td> <td>wkt</td> <td>spot6_name</td> <td>sen2_acquisitions</td> <td>dates_sen2</td> <td>dates_spot6</td> <td>split</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Latitude of the center point (expressed in Lambert 93 CRS)</td> <td>Longitude of the center point (expressed in Lambert 93 CRS)</td> <td>Area of interest geometry in well-known text format</td> <td>Path to the SPOT ground truth</td> <td>Paths to the Sentinel-2 input series</td> <td>Acquisition dates for the Sentinel-2 images</td> <td>Acquisition date for the SPOT ground truth</td> <td>`train` or `test`</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <h2>3. Data collection and preprocessing</h2> <h3>Sentinel-2</h3> <p>Sentinel-2 constellation has twin satellites launched by the European Space Agency (ESA) in 2015 and 2017 that cover all Earth’s surfaces every five days at the equator. Level-2A images of the BreizhSR dataset are gathered via the THEIA platform, which employs the MAJA pre-processing algorithm to obtain atmospherically corrected ground reflectance. To match the SPOT-6 spectral characteristics, only RGB bands at a 10-meter spatial resolution (B4, B3,and B2) are used in the analysis. The images were collected for the nine tiles covering the Brittany region from the 1st of April 2018 to the 31st of August 2018, filtering images with a cloud cover under 5 %. Since the SPOT-6 data was acquired in the summer of 2018, the Sentinel-2 time period was chosen to include images from before and after the SPOT-6 acquisitions while staying in a range of similar seasonal and climate conditions.</p> <p>Sentinel-2 tiles are cropped into 3x74x74 patches. The dataset is preprocessed with a min-max normalization, using the 2% and 98% percentile as an estimation of minimum and maximum values of Sentinel-2 data to take into account the presence of outliers due to artifacts such as clouds and their shadows.</p> <h3>SPOT-6/7</h3> <p>Orthorectified SPOT data under the Licence Ouverte is collected from the <a href="https://openspot-dinamis.data-terra.org/">DINAMIS</a> platform. Multispectral images at 6m resolution are pansharpened using the panchromatic 1.5m reference using the RCS algorithm <a href="https://www.orfeo-toolbox.org/CookBook/Applications/app_BundleToPerfectSensor.html">Orfeo ToolBox</a>, similar to the Brovey pansharpening algorithm. The pansharpened tiles are preprocessed with a min-max normalization, downsampled at 2.5m resolution and patches are finally cropped with dimensions 3x296x296.</p> <h2>4. License</h2> <p>SPOT images and the Sentinel-2 Theia L2A products are released under the <a href="https://www.etalab.gouv.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/open-licence.pdf">Licence Ouverte 2.0</a> from the French government. This dataset contains modified Coprnicus Sentinel data from 2018, made available under free access by EU law. Other files in the dataset are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0).</p> <h3>Acknowledgements</h3> <p>We thank the support of GDR IASIS for funding this work under the SESURE project, the DINAMIS consortium, CNES/Airbus and IGN for access to the SPOT-6 data, and ESA for access to Sentinel-2 data. During the conduct of this research, Simon Donike received a European scholarship to engage in Master Copernicus in Digital Earth, Erasmus Mundus Joint Master Degree (EMJMD). We thank Dirk Tiede (Uni. Salzburg) for his help and feedback on BreizhSR. This work was performed using HPC resources from GENCI–IDRIS (grant 2022-AD011013003).</p>
Development of a global 30-m impervious surface map using multi-source and multi-temporal remote sensing datasets with the Google Earth Engine platform
<p>An accurate global impervious surface map at a resolution of 30-m for 2015 by combining Landsat-8 OLI optical images, Sentinel-1 SAR images and VIIRS NTL images based on the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform.</p>
National High-Resolution Cropland Classification of Japan with Agricultural Census Information and Multi-temporal Multi-modality datasets
<p>Multi-modality datasets offer advantages for processing frameworks with complementary information, particularly for large-scale cropland mapping. Extensive training datasets are required to train machine learning algorithms, which can be challenging to obtain. To alleviate the limitations, we extract the training samples from the agricultural census information. We focus on Japan and demonstrate how agricultural census data in 2015 can map different crop types for the entire country. Due to the lack of Sentinel-2 datasets in 2015, this study utilized Sentinel-1 and Landsat-8 collected across Japan and combined observations into composites for different prefecture periods (monthly, bimonthly, seasonal). Recent deep learning techniques have been investigated the performance of the samples from agricultural census information.<br> Finally, we obtain nine crop types on a countrywide scale (around 31 million parcels) and compare our results to those obtained from agricultural census testing samples as well as those obtained from recent land cover products in Japan. The generated map accurately represents the distribution of crop types across Japan and achieves an overall accuracy of 87% for nine classes in 47 prefectures.</p>
Monitoring long-term vegetation dynamics over the Yangtze River Basin, China, using multi-temporal remote sensing data
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.