Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
48
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
48 results for “Mutualistic Network”
Fig.1. Bipartite graph depicting a plant-animal mutualistic network involving 10 in The Role Of Macaca Spp. (Primates: Cercopithecidae) In Seed Dispersal Networks
Fig.1. Bipartite graph depicting a plant-animal mutualistic network involving 10 frugivores (left) and 170 of the plant species (right) they disperse at Khao Yai National Park, Thailand. The list of plant species is based on Kitamura et al. (2002), then the list of frugivores dispersing each species has been completed thanks to data from bin Kassim (1987), Kitamura et al. (2005), Datta & Rawat (2008), Brockelman (2009), McConkey & Brockelman (2011), Albert et al. (2013), Ngoprasert (2012), Khamcha (pers. comm.), Latinne (pers. comm.), Martmoon (pers. comm.).
The impact of individual variation on abrupt collapses in mutualistic networks
<p>R Data and R scripts for the paper in Ecology Letters "The impact of individual variation on abrupt collapses in mutualistic networks"</p> <p>Contact: <a href="mailto:gbaruahecoevo@gmail.com">gbaruahecoevo@gmail.com</a></p>
Shifts from non-obligate generalists to obligate specialists in simulations of mutualistic network assembly
<p>Understanding ecosystem recovery after perturbation is crucial for ecosystem conservation. Mutualisms contribute key functions for plants such as pollination and seed dispersal. We modelled the assembly of mutualistic networks based on trait matching between plants and their animal partners that have different degrees of specialization on plant traits. Additionally, we addressed the role of non-obligate animal mutualists, including facultative mutualists or non-resident species that have their main resources outside the target site. Our computer simulations show that non-obligate animals facilitate network assembly during the early stages, furthering colonization by an increase in niche space and reduced competition. While non-obligate and generalist animals provide most of the fitness benefits to plants in the early stages of the assembly, obligate and specialist animals dominate at the end of the assembly. Our results thus demonstrate the combined occurrence of shifts from diet, trait, and habitat generalists to more specialised animals.</p>
Shifts from non-obligate generalists to obligate specialists in simulations of mutualistic network assembly
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Facilitation and biodiversity jointly drive mutualistic networks
<p>1. Facilitation by nurse plants increases understorey diversity and supports ecological communities. In turn, biodiversity shapes ecological networks and enhances ecosystem functioning. However, whether and how facilitation and increased biodiversity jointly influence community structure and ecosystem functioning remains unclear.</p> <p>2. We performed a field experiment disentangling the relative contribution of nurse plants and increasing understorey plant diversity in driving pollination interactions. Both the presence of nurse shrubs as well as increased understorey plant diversity increased pollinator diversity and visitation rates. While nurse and understorey diversity effects on pollinator visitation rates did not interact, the effects of increasing understorey plant diversity on pollinator diversity were stronger in the absence than in the presence of shrubs, meaning that nurse shrubs attenuated the effects of high understorey diversity and buffered the effects of low understorey diversity.</p> <p>3. We also found positive complementarity effects among understorey species as well as complementarity between nurse plants and understorey species at high diversity. Results also indicate negative selection effects, suggesting that species with generally few pollinators benefit the most in the polyculture, while a species (possibly the nurse plant) with generally lots of pollinators does not. The corresponding changes in pollination networks with the experimental treatments were due to both changes in the frequency of visits and turnover in pollinator community composition.</p> <p>4. <i>Synthesis</i> Plant–plant facilitative systems, where a nurse plant increases understorey plant diversity, are common in stressful environments. Here, we show that these facilitative systems positively influence mutualistic interactions with pollinators via both direct nurse effects and indirect positive effects of increasing plant diversity. Conserving and supporting nurse plant systems is crucial not only for maintaining plant diversity but also for supporting ecosystem functions and services.</p>
A patch-dynamic metacommunity perspective on the persistence of mutualistic and antagonistic bipartite networks
<p>The structure of interactions between species within a community plays a key role in maintaining biodiversity. Previous studies have found that the effects of these structures might substantially differ depending on interaction type, for example, a highly connected and nested architecture stabilizes mutualistic communities, while the stability of antagonistic communities is enhanced in modular and weakly connected structures. Here we show that, when network dynamics are modelled using a patch-dynamic metacommunity framework, the qualitative differences between antagonistic and mutualistic systems disappear, with nestedness and modularity interacting to promote metacommunity persistence. However, the interactive effects are significantly weaker in antagonistic metacommunities. Our model also predicts an increase in connectance, nestedness and modularity over time in both types of interaction, except in antagonistic networks where nestedness declines. At steady state, we find a strong negative correlation between nestedness and modularity in both mutualistic and antagonistic metacommunities. These predictions are consistent with the structural trends found in a large dataset of real-world antagonistic and mutualistic communities.</p>
Habitat loss shapes the structure and species roles in mutualistic seed dispersal networks
<p>This dataset has the variables used in the paper "Habitat loss shapes the structure and species roles in tropical seed dispersal networks" as well as the script to perform the analysis.</p>
Downscaling mutualistic networks from species to individuals reveals consistent interaction niches and roles within plant populations.
<p>Repository containing dataset and code for the manuscript entitled <em>Downscaling mutualistic networks from species to individuals reveals consistent interaction niches and roles within plant populations</em>.</p> <p>For this study, we compiled 46 empirical individual-based networks on plant-animal seed dispersal mutualism, encompassing 1037 plant individuals across 29 species from various regions. We compare the structure of individual-based networks to that of species-based networks and by extending the niche concept to interaction assemblages, we explore levels of individual plant specialization. We examine how individual variation influences network structure and how plant individuals "explore" the interaction niche of the population.</p> <p>Please refer to <strong>makefile.R</strong> for project outline, explanation and codes used, and to the <strong>README</strong> in networks folder for data structure and compilation.</p>
The global structure of marine cleaning mutualistic networks
<p># Global-Cleaning-Networks</p> <p>The data sets available here are parts of the following article:</p> <p>Quimbayo JP, Cantor M, Dias MS, Grutter AS, Gingins S, Becker JHA, Floeter SR. (2018) The global structure of marine cleaning mutualism networks. Global Ecology and Biogeography. DOI: 10.1111/geb.12780.</p> <p><br> Description</p> <p>We combined field and literature data to test if recurrent patterns in mutualistic networks—nestedness,<br> modularity—describe the distributions of marine cleaning interactions. Nested network structures suggest <br> some cleaner species interact with many clients while the others clean fewer, predictable subsets of these clients; <br> modular network structures suggest cleaners and clients interact with defined, densely-connected subsets of species. </p> <p>All datasets are binary matrices indicating cleaning interaction between cleaner species (columns) <br> and client species (rows) in 28 marine habitats across of 11 marine biogeographical provinces defined for reef fish fauna.<br> These were the Caribbean, the Southwestern, Central, North and Eastern Atlantic, the Western Indian,<br> the Central Indo-Pacific and the Southwestern, Central, Northeastern and Tropical Eastern Pacific.</p> <p>Each element of these matrices equal 1 when the cleaner species i interacts with the client species j, <br> and 0 otherwise. A cleaning event is defined as the observation of a cleaner removing ectoparasites, <br> diseased tissue, and/or mucus from the body surface, gills or buccal cavity of the clients.</p> <p>Data are provided in the form of comma separated values files (csv), one for each of the 28 localities.<br> Please refer to Table S1 in the electronic supplementary material of this article for further details</p> <p><br> If you use any dataset please cite the article above and the original reference for the data <br> set as described below.</p> <p>CARIBBEAN PROVINCE</p> <p>File: Barbados.cvs<br> Reference: Whiteman EA, Côté IM. 2002 <br> Cleaning activity of two Caribbean cleaning gobies: intra- and interspecific comparisons. <br> J. Fish Biol. 60, 1443–1458. (doi:10.1006/jfbi.2002.1947)</p> <p>File: Bonaire.cvs<br> Reference: Wicksten MK. 1998 <br> Behavior of cleaners and their client fishes at Bonaire Netherlands Antilles. <br> J. Nat. Hist. 32, 13–30. </p> <p>File: Curacao.cvs<br> Reference: Titus, B.M., Vondriska, C. & Daly, M. 2017 & This study<br> Comparative behavioural observations demonstrate the “cleaner” shrimp <em>Periclimenes </em><em>yucatanicus</em> engages in true <br> symbiotic cleaning interactions. <br> Royal Society Open Science, 4, 170078.</p> <p>File: Tobago.cvs<br> Reference: Dunkley, K., Cable J. & Perkins S.E. 2018 & This study <br> The selective cleaning behavior of juvenile blue-headed wrasse (<em>Thalassoma bifasciatum</em>) in the Caribbean. <br> Behavioural Processes. 147: 5–12.</p> <p>File: StCroix.cvs<br> Reference: Johnson WS, Ruben P. 1988 <br> Cleaning behavior of <em>Bodiunus </em><em>rufus</em><em>, Thalassomu </em><em>bifasciatum</em><em>, Gobiosoma </em><em>evelynae</em><em>, and Periclimenes </em><em>pedersoni</em> along a depth gradient at Salt River Submarine Canyon, St . Croix. Environ. Biol. Fishes 23, 225–232.</p> <p>SOUTHWESTERN ATLANTIC</p> <p>File: Abrolhos.cvs<br> Reference: Sazima C. 2002 <br> Atividade de limpeza de duas espécies sintópicas de peixes limpadores e <br> diversidade de seus clientes em Abrolhos, Bahia. </p> <p>File: Noronha.cvs<br> Reference: Francini-Filho RB, Sazima I. 2007 & This study<br> A comparative study of cleaning activity of two reef fishes at Fernando de Noronha Archipelago, Tropical West Atlantic. <br> Environ. Biol. Fishes 83, 213–220. (doi:10.1007/s10641-007-9322-6)</p> <p>File: Rocas.cvs<br> Reference: Quimbayo JP, Nunes LT, Ozekoski R, Floeter SR, Morais RA, Fontoura L, Bonaldo RM, Ferreira CEL, Sazima I. 2017<br> Cleaning interactions at the only atoll in the South Atlantic. <br> Environ. Biol. Fishes 100, 865–875. (doi:10.1007/s10641-017-0612-3)</p> <p>File: SantaCatarina.cvs<br> Reference:Quimbayo, J.P., Schlickmann, O.C., Floeter, S.R. & Sazima I 2018. <br> Cleaning interactions at the southern limit of tropical reef fishes in the Western Atlantic. <br> Environmental Biology of Fishes. doi: 10.1007/s10641-018-0768-5.</p> <p>File: StPaulsRocks.cvs<br> Reference: This study; Quimbayo JP, Cantor M, Dias MS, Grutter AS, Gingins S, Becker JHA, Floeter SR.<br> The global structure of marine cleaning mutualism</p> <p>File: Trindade.cvs<br> Reference: This study; Quimbayo JP, Cantor M, Dias MS, Grutter AS, Gingins S, Becker JHA, Floeter SR.<br> The global structure of marine cleaning mutualism</p> <p>CENTRAL ATLANTIC</p> <p>File: Ascension.cvs<br> Reference: Morais RA, Brown J, Ferreira CEL, Floeter SR, Quimbayo JP, Rocha LA, Sazima I. 2017 <br> Mob rulers and part-time cleaners: two reef fish associations at the isolated Ascension Island. <br> J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. United Kingdom 97, 799–811. (doi:10.1017/S0025315416001041).</p> <p>NORTH ATLANTIC</p> <p>File: Banyuls.cvs <br> Reference: Zander CD, Sötje I. 2002 <br> Seasonal and geographical differences in cleaner fish activity in the Mediterranean Sea. <br> Helgol. Mar. Reser 55, 232–241. (doi:10.1007/s101520100084)</p> <p>File: Azores.cvs<br> Reference: Narvaez P, Furtado M, Neto A, Moniz I, Azevedo J, Soares M. 2015 <br> Temperate facultative cleaner wrasses selectively remove ectoparasites from their client-fish in the Azores. <br> Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 540, 217–226. (doi:10.3354/meps11522)</p> <p>EASTERN ATLANTIC</p> <p>File: Canarias.cvs<br> Reference: Van Tassell JL, Brito A, Bortone SA. 1994 <br> Cleaning Behavior among marine fishes and invertebrates in the Canary Islands. <br> Cybium 18, 117–127. </p> <p>File: CapeVerde.cvs<br> Reference: Quimbayo JP, Floeter SR, Noguchi R, Rangel CA, Gasparini JL, Sampaio CLS, Ferreira CEL, Rocha LA. 2012<br> Cleaning mutualism in Santa Luzia (Cape Verde Archipelago) and São Tomé Islands, Tropical Eastern Atlantic. Mar. <br> Biodivers. Rec. 5, e118. (doi:10.1017/S175526721200108X)</p> <p>File: Principe.cvs<br> Reference: This study; Quimbayo JP, Cantor M, Dias MS, Grutter AS, Gingins S, Becker JHA, Floeter SR.<br> The global structure of marine cleaning mutualism</p> <p><br> File: SaoTome.cvs<br> Reference: Quimbayo JP, Floeter SR, Noguchi R, Rangel CA, Gasparini JL, Sampaio CLS, Ferreira CEL, Rocha LA. 2012<br> Cleaning mutualism in Santa Luzia (Cape Verde Archipelago) and São Tomé Islands, Tropical Eastern Atlantic. <br> Mar. Biodivers. Rec. 5, e118. (doi:10.1017/S175526721200108X)</p> <p>WESTERN INDIAN<br> File: RedSea.cvs<br> Reference: Barbu, L., Guinand, C., Bergmüller, R., Alvarez, N. & Bshary, R. 2011 & This study<br> Cleaning wrasse species vary with respect to dependency on the mutualism and behavioural adaptations in interactions. <br> Animal Behaviour, 82, 1067–1074.</p> <p>CENTRAL INDO-PACIFIC</p> <p>File: KimbeBay.cvs<br> Reference 1: Becker, J.H.A. 2006 <br> Interactions between cleaner shrimp and their client fishes on coral reefs. <br> Ph.D. thesis, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia, 154 pp. </p> <p>Reference 2: Grutter A.S. & Feeney W.E. 2016 <br> Equivalent cleaning in a juvenile facultative and obligate cleaning wrasse: an insight into the evolution of cleaning in labrids? <br> Coral Reefs. 35: 991–997. doi:10.1007/s00338-016-1460-x</p> <p>File: LizardIsland.cvs<br> Reference 1: Becker, J.H.A. & Grutter, A.S. 2004 <br> Cleaner shrimp do clean. <br> Coral Reefs, 23, 515–520.</p> <p>Reference 2: Grutter, A.S. & Poulin, R. 1998 <br> Intraspecific and interspecific relationships between host size and the abundance of parasitic larval gnathiid isopods<br> on coral reef fishes. <br> Marine Ecology Progress Series, 164, 263–271.</p> <p>SOUTHWESTERN PACIFIC</p> <p>File: AlthorpeIsland.cvs<br> Reference: Shepherd, S.A., Teale, J. & Muirhead, D. 2005<br> Cleaning symbiosis among inshore fishes at Althorpe Island, South Australia and elsewhere. <br> Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia, 129, 193–201.</p> <p>File: NewZealand.cvs<br> Reference: Ayling, A. M. & Grace, R. V. 1971<br> Cleaning symbiosis among New Zealand fishes. <br> New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 5, 205–218.</p> <p>NORTHEASTERN PACIFIC</p> <p>File: LaJolla.cvs<br> Reference: Hobson, E.S. 1971<br> Cleaning symbiosis among California inshore fishes. <br> Fishery Bulletin, 69, 491–523.</p> <p>TROPICAL EASTERN PACIFIC</p> <p>File: Galápagos.cvs<br> Reference: This study; Quimbayo JP, Cantor M, Dias MS, Grutter AS, Gingins S, Becker JHA, Floeter SR.<br> The global structure of marine cleaning mutualism</p> <p>File: Gorgona.cvs<br> Reference 1: Rodríguez-Moreno M. 2005<br> Interacciones y patrones diarios de actividad de limpieza en peces de un arrecife coralino de la Isla Gorgona. <br> Departamento de Biologia, BSc thesis, Universidad del Valle, Cali-Colombia.</p> <p>Reference 2: Quimbayo, J.P., & Zapata, F.A. 2018 <br> Cleaning interactions by gobies on a Tropical Eastern Pacific coral reef. <br> Journal of Fish Biology. doi:10.1111/jfb.13573.</p> <p>File: Malpelo.cvs<br> Quimbayo, J.P., Dias, M.S., Schlickmann, O.C. & Mendes, T.C. 2017 <br> Fish cleaning interactions on a remote island from the Tropical Eastern Pacific.<br> Marine Biodiversity, 47, 603–608.</p> <p><br> All R codes for reproducing analyses are available from the authors on request. </p> <p>Any additional queries should be directed to the corresponding author <br> Juan P. Quimbayo (quimbayo.j.p@gmail.com)</p> <p>The release of this data does not exempt those who reuse the data from <br> following community norms for scholarly communication, in particular from citation<br> of this paper and the original data authors as detailed above.</p>
Individual-based networks reveal the highly skewed interactions of a frugivore mutualist with individual plants in a diverse community
<p>While plant-animal interactions occur fundamentally at the individual level, the bulk of research examining the mechanisms that drive interaction patterns has focused on the species or population level. In seed-dispersal mutualisms between frugivores and plants, little is known about the role of space and individual-level variation among plants in structuring patterns of frugivore foraging and, thus, seed dispersal in a plant community. Here we use an animal perspective to examine how space and variation between individual plants affect movement and visitation by frugivores foraging on individual fruiting plants. To do this, we used a spatially explicit network approach informed by observations of the movement and foraging of a frugivorous lemur species (Eulemur rubriventer) amongst individual plants in a diverse plant community in Madagascar. The resulting hierarchical networks, in which a few individual plants received the bulk of the interactions, demonstrated how a generalist frugivore species could act as an individual-plant specialist within a plant community. The few individual plants that dominated interactions with the lemurs shaped the modular spatial structure of frugivory interactions in the community and facilitated visitation to near neighbors. This interaction structure was primarily driven by extrinsic factors, as lemur movements among plants were significantly influenced by the individual plant's spatial position and the species richness of fruiting plants in its immediate neighborhood. Individual plants in central spatial locations, with a rich fruiting neighborhood and large fruit crops, received the most visits. The observed drastic inequality in the interactions of a generalist frugivore within a highly diverse plant community highlights the importance of considering individual-level variation for essential ecosystem processes, such as seed dispersal.</p>
data for Newbury et al Short term fitness effects of bipartite interactions shape network structure of mutualistic and antagonistic communities
<p>speciescountdata.csv contains colony couts and plasmid detection from the main experiment.</p> <p>evonet.csv conatins colony counts of bacteria with and without plasmid pkjk5 from commuities where donors were o/ p ancestral/evolved. </p> <p>AOPV.csv contains optical density data for species a,o,p and v. column 1 is time in hours. Then columns alternate between a, o, p, s, v, a+,o+,p+,s+,v+,s+,v+ (where + denotes plasmid carriage) until column 49. After which the same patten continues, but these were grown with tetracycline. s did not grow at all in the 96-well plate this data was taken from. This is likely due to experimental error, so an additional well plate was used just for s (S.scv).</p> <p>S.csv contains optical density data for species s. column 1 is time in hours. then there are 6 colulmns of s and 6 columns of s+ until column 49. After this the same pattern continues but bacteria were grown with tetracycline.</p>
melian009/Mispark: Preliminary analysis mutualistic networks in space, rarefaction, sierra size and sampling individuals, species, and traits
<p>Mutualistic networks in space, morphological traits and colors, or how to put all together to understand rare and common species in rapidly changing landscapes</p>
Data from: Empirical evidence for the ecological significance of interaction network indices within a mutualistic network
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Facilitation and biodiversity jointly drive mutualistic networks
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
A patch-dynamic metacommunity perspective on the persistence of mutualistic and antagonistic bipartite networks
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
The influence of biogeographical and evolutionary histories on morphological trait-matching and resource specialization in mutualistic hummingbird-plant networks
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Individual-based networks reveal the highly skewed interactions of a frugivore mutualist with individual plants in a diverse community
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Glacier retreat decreases mutualistic network robustness over spacetime
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: From structure to function in mutualistic interaction networks: topologically important frugivores have greater potential as seed dispersers
1. Networks of mutualistic interactions between animals and plants are considered a pivotal part of ecological communities. However, mutualistic networks are rarely studied from the perspective of species-specific roles, and it remains to be established whether those animal species more relevant for network structure also contribute more to the ecological functions derived from interactions. 2. Here, we relate the contribution to seed dispersal of vertebrate species with their topological role in frugivore-plant interaction networks. For one year in two localities with remnant patches of Colombian tropical dry forest, we sampled abundance, morphology, behavior, and fruit consumption from fleshy-fruited plants of various frugivore species. 3. We assessed the network topological role of each frugivore species by integrating their degree of generalization in interactions with plants with their contributions to network nestedness and modularity. We estimated the potential contribution of each frugivore species to community-wide seed dispersal, on the basis of a set of frugivore ecological, morphological and behavioral characteristics important for seed dispersal, together with frugivore abundance and frugivory degree. 4. The various frugivore species showed strong differences in their network structural roles, with generalist species contributing the most to network modularity and nestedness. Frugivores also showed strong variability in terms of potential contribution to seed dispersal, depending on the specific combinations of frugivore abundance, frugivory degree and the different traits and behaviors. 5. For both localities, the seed dispersal potential of a frugivore species responded positively to its contribution to network structure, evidencing that the most important frugivore species in the network topology were also those making the strongest contribution as seed dispersers. Contribution to network structure was correlated with frugivore abundance, diet, and behavioral characteristics. This suggests that the species-level link between structure and function is due to the fact that the occurrence of frugivore-plant interactions depends largely on the characteristics of the frugivore involved, which also condition its ultimate role in seed dispersal. 22-May-2020
Data from: Functional outcomes of mutualistic network interactions: a community-scale study of frugivore gut passage on germination
1. Current understanding of mutualistic networks is grounded largely in data on interaction frequency, yet mutualistic network dynamics are also shaped by interaction quality—the functional outcomes of individual interactions on reproduction and survival. The difficulty of obtaining data on functional outcomes has resulted in limited understanding of functional variation among a network's pairwise species interactions, of the study designs that are necessary to capture major sources of functional variation, and of predictors of functional variation that may allow generalization across networks. 2. In this community-scale study, we targeted a key functional outcome in plant-frugivore networks: the impact of frugivore gut passage on seed germination. We used captive frugivore feeding trials and germination experiments in an island ecosystem, attaining species-level coverage across all extant native frugivores and the plants they consume to 1) assess sources of functional variation, 2) separate effects of pulp removal from those of scarification via gut passage, and 3) test trait-based correlates of gut passage effect sizes. 3. We found antagonistic seed predation effects of a frugivore previously assumed to be a seed disperser, highlighting the need to consider functional outcomes rather than interaction frequency alone. The other frugivores each exhibited similar impacts for individual plant species, with benefits primarily caused by pulp removal rather than scarification, supporting the use of animal functional groups in this context. In contrast, plant species varied widely in impacts of gut passage on germination. Species with smaller seeds and more frugivore partners had larger benefits of gut passage, showing promise for network metrics and functional traits to predict functional variation among plants. 4. Synthesis. Combining network and demographic approaches, we assessed the degree and sources of variation in a key functional outcome of plant-frugivore interactions across an entire network. Using a detailed study design, our work shows how simpler study designs can capture primary sources of functional variation and that functional traits and network metrics may allow generalization across networks. Efficiently measuring and generalizing sources of functional variation within mutualistic networks will strengthen our ability to model network dynamics and predict mutualist responses to global change.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.