Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 2 in Reproductive ecology of a Tibetan frog Nanorana parkeri (Anura: Ranidae)

Figure 2. Typical habitats used by the frogs, and spatial locations of the hibernation (closed circles) and spawning (open circles) ponds in the study plot (100 × 55 m). Sizes of the circles represent pond area.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2020View details →

Figure 1 in Description of Nanorana conaensis (Fei and Huang, 1981) (Amphibia: Anura: Dicroglossidae) reported from Arunachal Pradesh, India

Figure 1. Maximum Likelihood (ML) tree for the species of Nanorana based on 570 bp of mitochondrial 16S rRNA (*represents the bootstrap values above 50%).

Fig. 4 in Natural history notes on three sympatric frogs, Amolops formosus (Günther 1875), Nanorana liebigii (Günther 1860), and Ombrana sikimensis (Jerdon 1870), from Manaslu Conservation Area, Nepal

Fig. 4. Ventral views of live adults: (A) male of Amolops formosus, (B) female of Amolops formosus, (C) male of Nanorana liebigii, and (D) female of Nanorana liebigii. Photos: Biraj Shrestha.

Fig. 6 in Natural history notes on three sympatric frogs, Amolops formosus (Günther 1875), Nanorana liebigii (Günther 1860), and Ombrana sikimensis (Jerdon 1870), from Manaslu Conservation Area, Nepal

Fig. 6. Habitat varieties of the three sympatric frogs: (A) rapidly flowing stream, (B) series of waterfalls inhabited by Amolops formosus, (C) slow flowing shallow stream, and (D) irrigation ditch. Photos: Biraj Shrestha.

Fig. 2 in Natural history notes on three sympatric frogs, Amolops formosus (Günther 1875), Nanorana liebigii (Günther 1860), and Ombrana sikimensis (Jerdon 1870), from Manaslu Conservation Area, Nepal

Fig. 2. Dorsal view of live adults: (A) Ombrana sikimensis, (B) Amolops formosus, and (C) Nanorana liebigii. (D) Dorso-lateral view of Nanorana liebigii. Photos: Biraj Shrestha and Min Bahadur Gurung.

Fig. 5 in Natural history notes on three sympatric frogs, Amolops formosus (Günther 1875), Nanorana liebigii (Günther 1860), and Ombrana sikimensis (Jerdon 1870), from Manaslu Conservation Area, Nepal

Fig. 5. Life stages of Nanorana liebigii: (A) eggs deposition underneath a stone, (B) egg clutch, (C) embryo development, and (D) tadpole with metamorphosed legs. Photos: Biraj Shrestha.

zenodo36/100

Figure 5 in Reproductive ecology of a Tibetan frog Nanorana parkeri (Anura: Ranidae)

Figure 5. Relationship between clutch size and egg size.

zenodo36/100

Fig. 3 in Natural history notes on three sympatric frogs, Amolops formosus (Günther 1875), Nanorana liebigii (Günther 1860), and Ombrana sikimensis (Jerdon 1870), from Manaslu Conservation Area, Nepal

Fig. 3. Frog observation sites and distances travelled throughout the survey.

zenodo36/100

Fig. 1 in Natural history notes on three sympatric frogs, Amolops formosus (Günther 1875), Nanorana liebigii (Günther 1860), and Ombrana sikimensis (Jerdon 1870), from Manaslu Conservation Area, Nepal

Fig. 1. Study sites in Manaslu Conservation Area, Nepal, with villages indicated in blue text.

opencc-zeroDec 2009View details →

dryad32/100

Data from: Genealogy and palaeodrainage basins in Yunnan Province: phylogeography of the Yunnan spiny frog, Nanorana yunnanensis (Dicroglossidae)

Historical drainage patterns adjacent to the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau differed markedly from those of today. We examined the relationship between drainage history and geographic patterns of genetic variation in the Yunnan spiny frog, Nanorana yunnanensis, using approximately 981 base pairs of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) partial sequences from encoding genes ND1 and ND2, and intervening areas including complete tRNA Ile, tRNA Gln, and tRNA Met. Two null hypotheses were tested, including (1) that genetic patterns do not correspond to the development of drainage systems and (2) that populations had been stable and not experienced population expansion, bottlenecking and selection. Genealogical analyses identified three, major, well-supported maternal lineages, each of which had two sublineages. These divergent lineages were completely concordant with six geographical regions. Genetic structure and divergence were strongly congruent with historical rather than contemporary drainage patterns. Most lineages and sublineages were formed through population fragmentation events during the rearrangement of paleodrainage basins in the early Pliocene and early Pleistocene. Sympatric lineages occurred only in localities at the boundaries of major drainages, likely reflecting secondary contact of previously allopatric populations. Extensive population expansion probably occurred early in the Middle Pleistocene accompanying dramatic climatic oscillations.

FIGURE 5 in The identity of Nanorana yunnanensis (Anderson, 1879) from Thailand, with a description of its tadpole (Anura, Dicroglossidae)

FIGURE 5. Buccal cavity of N. yunnanensis tadpole (PT02799.2). (A) Buccal roof, (B) buccal floor, (C) prenarial arena protrusion, (D) narial valve projection, (E) lingual papillae, (F) buccal floor arena papillae. 1 = upper labium, 2 = prenarial arena protrusion, 3 = choanae, 4 = prenarial papillae, 5 = narial valve projection, 6 = median ridge, 7 = buccal roof arena, 8 = lower labium, 9 = infralabial papillae, 10 = lingual papillae, 11 = buccal floor arena papillae, 12 = filter rows.

FIGURE 4 in The identity of Nanorana yunnanensis (Anderson, 1879) from Thailand, with a description of its tadpole (Anura, Dicroglossidae)

FIGURE 4. External morphology of N. yunnanensis tadpole. (A–C) Specimen no. PT 02799.1 (Gosner stage 35) in lateral, dorsal, and ventral views; (D) specimen no. THNHM 25480 (Gosner stage 30); (E) oral disc of tadpole (specimen no. PT02799.2), (F) upper labial tooth row (specimen no. PT02799.2), (G) upper jaw sheath (specimen no. PT02799.2).

FIGURE 6 in The identity of Nanorana yunnanensis (Anderson, 1879) from Thailand, with a description of its tadpole (Anura, Dicroglossidae)

FIGURE 6. Distribution map and habitat of N. yunnanensis in Thailand. (A) Map showing current distribution of N. yunnanensis in Thailand. Red circle indicates locality where this species is found in Thailand. Map was generated using SimpleMappr (www. simplemappr.net). (B) Habitat of N. yunnanensis at Doi Pha Hom Pok National Park, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

FIGURE 3 in The identity of Nanorana yunnanensis (Anderson, 1879) from Thailand, with a description of its tadpole (Anura, Dicroglossidae)

FIGURE 3. Adult male specimen of N. yunnanensis (PT 02794). (A) Dorsal view of body, (B) ventral view of body, (C) lateral side of head, (D) ventral view of hand, (E) ventral view of foot.

FIGURE 1 in The identity of Nanorana yunnanensis (Anderson, 1879) from Thailand, with a description of its tadpole (Anura, Dicroglossidae)

FIGURE 1. Phylogenetic tree based on the combined 12S rRNA, 16S rRNA, and ND2 genes of N. yunnanensis and the closely related species, N. phrynoides and N. sichuanensis. Numbers at nodes are Bayesian posterior probability and maximum parsimony bootstrap values ≥ 75.

publicMay 2010View details →

dryad32/100

Data from: Genealogy and palaeodrainage basins in Yunnan Province: phylogeography of the Yunnan spiny frog, Nanorana yunnanensis (Dicroglossidae)

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

zenodo28/100

Figure 4 in Reproductive ecology of a Tibetan frog Nanorana parkeri (Anura: Ranidae)

Figure 4. Plots of body size of males and females in amplexus found in early and late breeding season. SVL: snout-vent length.

zenodo28/100

Figure 3 in Reproductive ecology of a Tibetan frog Nanorana parkeri (Anura: Ranidae)

Figure 3. Breeding chronology (the number of amplectant pairs observed per day) of the frogs in relation to ambient temperature and rainfall during the 2007 breeding season.