Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
6
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
6 results for “National Science Foundation”
Related Works for the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka and the National Sleep Foundation retrieved from the DataCite Commons.
<p>These data were retrieved in order to help understand the use of funder identifiers associated with common acronyms like NSF. They include the following fields: doi, registrationAgency, type, publisher, publicationYear, funderName, funderIdentifier, and awardNumber retrieved from DataCite Commons using the query</p> <div> <div>{organization(id: "' + ror + '") {id name works(first:2000) { totalCount pageInfo {endCursor hasNextPage} nodes {doi type registrationAgency {name} publisher {name} publicationYear fundingReferences {funderName funderIdentifier awardNumber}}}}}'</div> <div> </div> <div>The files are identifier with RORs:</div> <div><a href="../api/records/11116776/draft/files/00zc1hf95_relatedWorks_20240505_10.csv/content" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">00zc1hf95_relatedWorks_20240505_10.csv</a> are data for the National Sleep Foundation</div> <div><a href="../api/records/11116776/draft/files/010xaa060_relatedWorks_20240505_10.csv/content" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">010xaa060_relatedWorks_20240505_10.csv</a> are data for the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka</div> <div> </div> <div>A blog post describing this work is at https://metadatagamechangers.com/blog/2024/4/12/funder-acronyms-are-still-not-enough</div> <div> </div> </div>
Data Potential Bias in Peer Review of Grant Applications at the Swiss National Science Foundation
<p>Potential biases in the peer review of grant applications at the Swiss National Science Foundation.</p> <p> </p>
OAPEN-CH – The impact of open access on scientific monographs in Switzerland. A project conducted by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF)
<p>The Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) launched the OAPEN-CH pilot project in summer 2014. At that time, it had introduced new funding policies that only covered books that were published online and openly accessible after an embargo period of no more than 24 months. The pilot study set out to learn more about the changes to academic publishing and pave the way for future adaptations to funding policies.</p> <p>The findings of the shared learning process are now available. They are encouraging in that they produce a clear verdict for the scientific monograph: a digital edition that is freely available on the Internet increases the trackability, visibility and use of monographs. Open access does not have a negative impact on printed book sales. Facilitating and promoting open access will benefit the academic community and society at large as well as publishers and funders.</p> <p>The results of the OAPEN-CH pilot study have already been integrated into the new open access policy of the SNSF, which entered into force on 1 April 2018.</p>
Systemic racial disparities in funding rates at the National Science Foundation
<p>Concerns about systemic racism at academic and research institutions have increased over the past decade. Here, we investigate data from the National Science Foundation (NSF), a major funder of research in the United States, and find evidence for pervasive racial disparities. In particular, white principal investigators (PIs) are consistently funded at higher rates than most non-white PIs. Funding rates for white PIs have also been increasing relative to annual overall rates with time. Moreover, disparities occur across all disciplinary directorates within the NSF and are greater for research proposals. The distributions of average external review scores also exhibit systematic offsets based on PI race. Similar patterns have been described in other research funding bodies, suggesting that racial disparities are widespread. The prevalence and persistence of these racial disparities in funding have cascading impacts that perpetuate a cumulative advantage to white PIs across all of science, technology, engineering and mathematics.</p>
Systemic racial disparities in funding rates at the National Science Foundation
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
National Science Foundation (NSF)-Blue Water Zone (BWZ) measurements
Measurements taken in the Blue Water Zone (BWZ) under NSF funding near Antarctica and Drakes Passage in 2004 to 2006.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.