Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
13
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
13 results for “OGD”
An Integrated Usability Framework for Evaluating Open Government Data Portals and Analysis of EU and GCC OGD Portals
<p><span>This dataset contains data collected during a study (<em><strong>"<a href="https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2403/2403.08451.pdf">An Integrated Usability Framework for Evaluating Open Government Data Portals: Comparative Analysis of EU and GCC Countries</a>"</strong></em>) conducted by Fillip Molodtsov and Anastasija Nikiforova (University of Tartu).</span></p> <p><span> </span><span>It being made public both to act as supplementary data for the paper and in order for other researchers to use these data in their own work potentially contributing to the improvement of current data ecosystems and develop user-friendly, collaborative, robust, and sustainable open data portals.</span></p> <p><span>***Purpose of the study***</span></p> <p><span>This paper develops an integrated framework for evaluating OGD portal effectiveness that accommodates user diversity (regardless of their data literacy and language), evaluates collaboration and participation, and the ability of users to explore and understand the data provided through them. </span></p> <p><span>The framework is validated by applying it to 33 national portals across European Union (EU) and Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, as a result of which we rank OGD portals, identify some good practices that lower-performing portals can learn from, and common shortcomings.</span></p> <p><span>***Methodology***</span></p> <p><span>(1) systematic literature review to establish a knowledge base and identify frameworks have been used to evaluate OGD portals, we conducted a systematic literature review - Dataset_ Usability_Framework_SLR;</span></p> <p><span>(2) development of the Integrated Usability Framework for Evaluating Open Government Data Portals, which content is based on the outputs of the first step, along with selected articles of experts in portal design, and an exploratory assessment of the French, Irish, Estonian and Spanish portals - Dataset_Integrated_Usability_Framework;</span></p> <p><span>(3) data collection, that is a completion of the protocol developed in the previous step by analysing 34 national OGD portals of the EU and GCC countries. When all individual protocols were collected, the total score are calculated using the weighting system. The average scores are calculated for the EU and GCC. The portals are ranked. The top portals (best performers) are determined for each dimension - Dataset_EU_GCC_OGDportal_Usability_results_clustering.</span></p> <p><span>(4) identification of relationships and patterns among different portals based on their performance metrics as a result of the cluster analysis. By calculating the average dimensional scores of portals from both types of clusters, their performance across multiple dimensions is evaluated - Dataset_EU_GCC_OGDportal_Usability_results_clustering.</span></p> <p> </p> <p><strong><em><span>For more details see Molodtsov, F., Nikiforova, A. (2024). “An Integrated Usability Framework for Evaluating Open Government Data Portals: Comparative Analysis of EU and GCC Countries”. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (DGO 2024), June 11--14, 2024, Taipei, Taiwan, 10.1145/3657054.3657159</span></em></strong></p> <p><span>***Format of the file***</span></p> <p><span>.xls, .csv</span></p> <p><span>***Licenses or restrictions***</span></p> <p><span>CC-BY</span></p>
Smarter open government data for Society 5.0: analysis of 51 OGD portals
<p>This dataset contains data collected during a study <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/s21155204">"Smarter open government data for Society 5.0: are your open data smart enough"</a> (<em>Sensors</em>. 2021; 21(15):5204) conducted by Anastasija Nikiforova (University of Latvia).<br> It being made public both to act as supplementary data for "Smarter open government data for Society 5.0: are your open data smart enough" paper and in order for other researchers to use these data in their own work.</p> <p>The data in this dataset were collected in the result of the inspection of 60 countries and their OGD portals (total of 51 OGD portal in May 2021) to find out whether they meet the trends of Society 5.0 and Industry 4.0 obtained by conducting an analysis of relevant OGD portals.</p> <p>Each portal has been studied starting with a search for a data set of interest, i.e. “real-time”, “sensor” and “covid-19”, follwing by asking a list of additional questions.<br> These questions were formulated on the basis of combination of (1) crucial open (government) data-related aspects, including open data principles, success factors, recent studies on the topic, PSI Directive etc., (2) trends and features of Society 5.0 and Industry 4.0, (3) elements of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use Model (UTAUT).</p> <p>The method used belongs to typical / daily tasks of open data portals sometimes called “usability test” – keywords related to a research question are used to filter data sets, i.e. “real-time”, “real time” and “real time”, “sensor”, covid”, “covid-19”, “corona”, “coronavirus”, “virus”. In most cases, “real-time”, “sensor” and “covid” keywords were sufficient.<br> The examination of the respective aspects for less user-friendly portals was adapted to particular case based on the portal or data set specifics, by checking:<br> 1. are the open data related to the topic under question ({sensor; real-time; Covid-19}) published, i.e. available?<br> 2. are these data available in a machine-readable format?<br> 3. are these data current, i.e. regularly updated? Where the criteria on the currency depends on the nature of data, i.e. Covid-19 data on the number of cases per day is expected to be updated daily, which won’t be sufficient for real-time data as the title supposes etc.<br> 4. is API ensured for these data? having most importance for real-time and sensor data;<br> 5. have they been published in a timely manner? which was verified mainly for Covid-19 related data. The timeliness is assessed by comparing the dates of the first case identified in a given country and the first release of open data on this topic.<br> 6. what is the total number of available data sets?<br> 7. does the open government data portal provides use-cases / showcases? <br> 8. does the open government portal provide an opportunity to gain insight into the popularity of the data, i.e. does the portal provide statistics of this nature, such as the number of views, downloads, reuses, rating etc.?<br> 9. is there an opportunity to provide a feedback, comment, suggestion or complaint?<br> 10. (9a) is the artifact, i.e. feedback, comment, suggestion or complaint, visible to other users?</p> <p>***Format of the file***<br> .xls, .ods, .csv (for the first spreadsheet only)</p> <p>***Licenses or restrictions***<br> CC-BY</p> <p>For more info, see README.txt</p>
OGD triggered Zn2+ rises and Ca2+ deregulation events in CA1 and CA3 hippocampal pyramidal neurons of MT-III and ZnT3 knockout mice.
<p>The posted data provide the control characterization of the oxygen glucose deprivation (OGD) triggered occurrences of cytosolic Zn<sup>2+</sup> rises and terminal Ca<sup>2+</sup> deregulation events in individual CA1 and CA3 pyramidal neurons in acute hippocampal slices of the MT-III knockout mice ( <strong>004649 - 129S7-Mt3<sup>tm1Rpa</sup>/J</strong>, Jackson Laboratory) and ZnT3 knockout mice ( <strong>005064 -</strong> <strong>B6;129-Slc30a3<sup>tm1Rpa</sup>/J</strong>, Jackson Laboratory).</p>
Associated data underlying the article "OPEN GOVERNMENT DATA (OGD) IN EUROPEAN EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS CURRICULUM CURRENT STATE AND PROSPECTS"
<p>Associated data underlying the article</p> <p>Rizun, Nina; Ciesielska, Magdalena; Alexopoulos, Charalampos; Saxena,Stuti; Papageorgiou, Georgios International Conference on Open Data (ICOD 2022): Book of abstracts, Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia, pp. 26-29 (978-953-270-167-8).</p> <pre><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8069910">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8069910</a></pre> <p>It is everybody’s knowledge now that Open Government Data (OGD) pertains to the availability of datasets pertaining to government operations and functioning via license-free formats (Afful-Dadzie and Afful-Dadzie, 2017) and these datasets are linked with different themes contingent upon the area of administration like energy, education, climate, tourism, environment, infrastructure, etc. (Ubaldi, 2013). Governments have been benchmarking their OGD initiatives across standard indices like ODIN, OKFN, Open Data Barometer, etc. (Lnenicka et al., 2022; Lnenicka and Nikiforova, 2021) and ample research exists on assessing the quality of OGD portals from the demand (i.e. the governments’ efforts at maintaining the quality of datasets) and supply (i.e. the perceptions of users regarding the quality of datasets) side (Crusoe et al., 2019; de Souza et al., 2022; Islam et al., 2021; Kaasenbrood et al., 2015; Khurshid et al., 2022; Lnenicka et al., 2022; Purwanto et al., 2020; Saxena and Janssen, 2017; Shehata and Elgllab, 2021; Talukder et al., 2019; Weerakkody et al., 2017; Wirtz et al., 2016; Wirtz et al., 2018; Wirtz et al., 2019; Zuiderwijk et al., 2015). Given the magnitude of academic interest on OGD- especially in the last 10 years- it remains to be assessed as to how far has the domain progressed in the academic environs and surprisingly, no research has been conducted to elucidate the infusion of this very significant domain- that is relatable to the extent to which the governments are forwarding their claims regarding the furtherance of transparent and corruption-free administration apart from bolstering citizen participation, collaboration and trust (Gil-Garcia et al., 2020; Hellberg and Hedstrom, 2015) besides serving as a means for value creation and innovation by a range of stakeholders (Jetzek et al., 2012; Jetzek et al., 2014) - in the diverse platforms that are meant for furthering academic dialogue and discussion.</p>
Gene expression changes in HT-22 cells with or without PGC-1α overexpression upon OGD stimulation
GEO Series GSE127788. Mus musculus. 4 samples. Type: Expression profiling by high throughput sequencing.
PHD inhibition upregulates glycolytic pathway in OGD
GEO Series GSE130144. Homo sapiens. 9 samples. Type: Expression profiling by array.
Transcriptomic study of the HT22 cells after OGD treatment.
GEO Series GSE178997. Mus musculus. 6 samples. Type: Expression profiling by high throughput sequencing.
Acupuncture Treatment in Adults Undergoing Diagnostic OGD : A Double-Blind Placebo Controlled Randomized Trial
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00449241. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
The Use of AI to Improve Quality of OGD
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04883567. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
OGD-Induced Lactylation of H3K9 Contributes to M1 polarization and Inflammation of microglia Through TNF pathway
GEO Series GSE272754. Mus musculus. 9 samples. Type: Expression profiling by high throughput sequencing.
miRNAs expression data from the exosomes of normal and oxygen glucose deprivation(OGD)-treated brain microvascular endothelial cell
GEO Series GSE224961. synthetic construct; Homo sapiens. 6 samples. Type: Non-coding RNA profiling by array.
Carbon Dioxide Versus Air Insufflation in Oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (OGD)
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00627211. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.
Global transcriptomic profiling of oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD)-mediated neuronal injury
GEO Series GSE23158. Mus musculus. 20 samples. Type: Expression profiling by array.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.