Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2015View details →

Figure 6 in Spatiotemporal distribution of planktonic copepod communities in Tokyo Bay where Oithona davisae Ferrari and Orsi dominated in mid-1980s

Figure 6. Horizontal distributions of the identified community groups in Tokyo Bay (the letters in parentheses in legends show the indicator species).

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2022View details →

Paradinium-Oithona annotated images and count data

Human annotated images, machine learning derived count data, and environmental data associated with our paper " Discovery and dynamics of a cryptic marine copepod-parasite interaction" published in Marine Ecology Progress Series. The work is based on imagery generated by the <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lom3.10394">Scripps Plankton Camera System</a> deployed at the Scripps Pier in La Jolla, California, USA. This repository contains: <ul> <li>human_annotated_SPC_data.zip - Regions of Interested collected by the SPC sorted by a human expert into relevant classes: Oithona, Oithona with parasite, and Oithona with eggs. Access to the "other" class is available upon request.</li> <li>corrected_counts_091817.txt - Count data from the summer of 2015 generated a fine tuned deep neural network with associated human corrected counts.</li> <li>oith_parasite_081420.txt - Count data from March 2015 - April 2016. Data collected after August 2015 is machine generated and should considered a maximum estimate of relative abundance.</li> <li>autoss_a8bc_287c_07d6.csv - Environmental data measured by the automated shore station deployed at Scripps Pier and maintained the <a href="https://sccoos.org/">Southern California Coastal Ocean Observing System</a>. Complete shore station data can be accessed via <a href="https://erddap.sccoos.org/erddap/tabledap/HABs-ScrippsPier.html?Location_Code,latitude,longitude&distinct()">NOAA ERDDAP</a>. </li> </ul>

Fig. 6 in Spatio-temporal variation of the invasive copepod Oithona davisae in the zooplankton community of Kavala harbour Abstract

Fig. 6: (Α) Cluster Analysis and (Β) Non-metric Multi-dimensional Scaling configuration (NMDS) on copepod's abundance data (50 μm net). The groups were delineated at a 60% similarity level (dashed line).

Fig. 2 in Spatio-temporal variation of the invasive copepod Oithona davisae in the zooplankton community of Kavala harbour Abstract

Fig. 2: Oithona davisae collected from Kavala's harbour A) dorsal view, B) side view, C) maxillule (scale 50 μm).

Fig. 3 in Spatio-temporal variation of the invasive copepod Oithona davisae in the zooplankton community of Kavala harbour Abstract

Fig. 3: Abundance (individuals m-3) of the zooplankton community, grouped by sampling stations, during the sampling period 2017-2018 in Kavala harbour.

Fig. 5 in Spatio-temporal variation of the invasive copepod Oithona davisae in the zooplankton community of Kavala harbour Abstract

Fig. 5: Abundances (ind m-3) (mean ± SD) of Oithona davisae and Oithona nana during the sampling period 2017-2018 in Kavala harbour.

Figure 9 in Population dynamics of the copepod invader Oithona davisae in the Black Sea

Figure 9. Relationship between the egg production rate and the temperature in Black Sea Oithona davisae, approximated by the exponential (----) and linear (-) equations within the range of 10–28 °С.

Figure 7 in Population dynamics of the copepod invader Oithona davisae in the Black Sea

Figure 7. Number of generations in Oithona davisae in 2014 (A), 2015 (B), and 2016 (C) distinguished on the basis of the maximum share of ovigerous females (F eggs, % of the total number of females), nauplii (N, % of the total population number), early copepodites of I and II stages (CI + II, % of the total number of copepodites), copepodites of III–V stages (CIII, CIV, and CV, respectively, % of the total number of copepodites), and females (F, % of the abundance of all copepodite stages). The solid lines show the succession of developmental stages within one generation (bold lines indicate the generations with the maximum numbers). The dotted lines show the relations between the generations.

Figure 4 in Population dynamics of the copepod invader Oithona davisae in the Black Sea

Figure 4. Seasonal dynamics of the mean (2013–2016) shares of males among adult males and females (А) and dead individuals (B) among females () and males (◊).

Figure 5 in Population dynamics of the copepod invader Oithona davisae in the Black Sea

Figure 5. Seasonal temperature deviations in the Sevastopol Bay during the period 2014–2016 compared with the seasonal temperature trend in 2013. The circle marks an abnormal water temperature in June 2016.

Figure 3 in Population dynamics of the copepod invader Oithona davisae in the Black Sea

Figure 3. Seasonal dynamics of total population abundance (), number of orthonauplii (), and copepodites (■) during 2014–2016.

Figure 8 in Population dynamics of the copepod invader Oithona davisae in the Black Sea

Figure 8. Relationships between the mean generation time and the mean development temperature in Sevastopol Bay () and Fukuyama Harbor (----) (Uye and Sano, 1998).

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2015View details →

zenodo36/100

Figure 7 in Spatiotemporal distribution of planktonic copepod communities in Tokyo Bay where Oithona davisae Ferrari and Orsi dominated in mid-1980s

Figure 7. Horizontal distribution of 12 indicator species of copepod communities in Tokyo Bay.

zenodo36/100

Fig. 1 in Spatio-temporal variation of the invasive copepod Oithona davisae in the zooplankton community of Kavala harbour Abstract

Fig. 1: A) Map of Greece, B) Map of the sampling stations in Kavala's harbour.

Figure 6 in First observation and seasonal dynamics of the new invasive planktonic copepod Oithona davisae Ferrari and Orsi, 1984 along the southern Black Sea (Anatolian Coast)

Figure 6. Major shipping lanes in the Black Sea http://www.marinevesseltraffic.com/2013/06/black-sea-marine-traffic.html. © Marine Vessel Traffic. Reproduced by permission of Marine Vessel Traffic. Permission to reuse must be obtained from the rightsholder.

Figure 5 in First observation and seasonal dynamics of the new invasive planktonic copepod Oithona davisae Ferrari and Orsi, 1984 along the southern Black Sea (Anatolian Coast)

Figure 5. (a) Abundance of Oithona davisae (ind. m−3); (b) abundance of female O. davisae with egg sac (ind. m−3).

Figure 4 in First observation and seasonal dynamics of the new invasive planktonic copepod Oithona davisae Ferrari and Orsi, 1984 along the southern Black Sea (Anatolian Coast)

Figure 4. Photographs of Oithona davisae: (a, b) lateral view of female with egg sac; (c) dorsal view of male; (d) lateral view of urosome; (e) rostrum of female (Photographs by Yildiz and Feyzioglu).

Figure 7 in First observation and seasonal dynamics of the new invasive planktonic copepod Oithona davisae Ferrari and Orsi, 1984 along the southern Black Sea (Anatolian Coast)

Figure 7. Black Sea coastal current system (http://www.ims.metu.edu.tr/cv/oguz/circulation.htm). © Temel Oguz. Reproduced by permission of Temel Oguz. Permission to reuse must be obtained from the rightsholder.

Figure 1 in First observation and seasonal dynamics of the new invasive planktonic copepod Oithona davisae Ferrari and Orsi, 1984 along the southern Black Sea (Anatolian Coast)

Figure 1. (●) Previous report sites of Oithona davisae (Altukhov et al. 2014), (▲) Time series stations and (+) sampling locations.

Figure 7 in First observation and seasonal dynamics of the new invasive planktonic copepod Oithona davisae Ferrari and Orsi, 1984 along the southern Black Sea (Anatolian Coast)