Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2,359
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
2,359 results for “Online”
Dataset for Towards improved online dissolution evaluation of Pt-alloy PEMFC electrocatalysts via electrochemical flow cell - ICP-MS setup upgrades
<p>Experimental data comprises raw data from ICP-MS (Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry) (i.e. time dependence of signal intensity for Co59 and Pt195) for different cell geometry and operating parameters. <br>Model data comprise of time- and space-dependent values of Pt ions concentration in the modelling cell and local velocity vectors.</p>
[Dataset] Does Volunteer Engagement Pay Off? An Analysis of User Participation in Online Citizen Science Projects - Raw Data
<p><strong>Explanation/Overview:</strong></p> <p>Corresponding raw data for the analyses described in D3.3 (can be found here), which are the result of our research that culminated into the publication "Does Volunteer Engagement Pay Off? An Analysis of User Participation in Online Citizen Science Projects", a conference paper for the conference CollabTech 2022: <a href="https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-20218-6">Collaboration Technologies and Social Computing</a> and published as part of the <a href="https://link.springer.com/bookseries/558">Lecture Notes in Computer Science</a> book series (LNCS,volume 13632) <a href="https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-20218-6_5">here</a>. Usernames have been anonymised.</p> <p>The raw data is in the <code>.json</code> format and can be read by most languages/tools. It is recommended to import the data into a MongoDB to work with it.</p> <p><strong>Purpose:</strong></p> <p>The purpose of this dataset is to provide the basis for possible further examinations, involving additional (not yet analysed) features such as the content of the comments etc. and also new ways of extracting networks.</p> <p><strong>Relatedness:</strong></p> <p>The data of the different projects was derived from the forums of 7 Zooniverse projects based on similar discussion board features. The projects are: 'Galaxy Zoo', 'Gravity Spy', 'Seabirdwatch', 'Snapshot Wisconsin', 'Wildwatch Kenya', 'Galaxy Nurseries', 'Penguin Watch'.</p> <p><strong>Content:</strong></p> <p>The dataset contains three files:</p> <ul> <li><code>Comments.json</code> <ul> <li>contains the basic data representation with multiple fields (e.g., <code>time_created</code>, <code>user_login</code>). Each data field represents a comment.</li> </ul> </li> <li><code>Discussions.json</code> <ul> <li><code></code>contains all discussions. Each data field is a discussion, with multiple fields (e.g., <code>comments_count</code>, <code>user_login</code>)</li> </ul> </li> <li><code>Projects.json</code> <ul> <li><code></code>contains all projects. Each data field is a project, with multiple fields (e.g., <code>project_id</code>, <code>description</code>)</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p><strong>Grouping:</strong></p> <p>The projects (and thus the corresponding discussions and comments) were collected on the basis of common forum features such as the discussion boards.</p>
Salvaging the Internet Hate Machine: Using the discourse of extremist online subcultures to identify emergent extreme speech
<p>This dataset accompanies a paper submitted to the WebSci 20 conference. In this paper, we present a lexicon of 'extreme speech' that may be used to detect hate speech and extreme speech on online platforms. We outline a cross-disciplinary research protocol through which this lexicon is initially extracted from a corpus of 3,335,265 posts from 4chan's /pol/ sub-forum using a hybrid method comprising word2vec modeling and subsequent snowballing of nearest neighbours of a small initial expert seed list of extreme language. The choice of corpus is significant, as 4chan is a space of rapid language innovation and obscure extreme vernacular, complicating generalised approaches. Our lexicon detects significantly more extreme posts within a corpus from a more mainstream platform (Reddit) than another popular lexicon, Hatebase, with similar accuracy. Our lexicon and the method of its creation thus provide a contribution to the study of the toxicity of online subcultures similar to 4chan, as well as more mainstream platforms. As we demonstrate, the lexicon allows for more effective detecting of extreme speech in these spaces. This method and the lexicon have further been made available through an open-source web tool for the study of online social platforms, 4CAT. The computational methods and lexicon on offer here can thus be used by a wide academic audience, fostering interdisciplinary approaches to the study of online hate and extreme speech. </p> <p>The dataset comprises the following items:</p> <ul> <li>The 4chan corpus from which the extreme speech lexicon was generated (posts from /pol/, 1 October 2019 - 1 November 2019)</li> <li>The Reddit corpus used to verify and test the lexicon (posts from the_donald, theredpill, politics and chapotraphouse, 1 October 2019 - 1 November 2019)</li> <li>The word2vec model from which the extreme speech lexicon was generated</li> <li>The extreme speech lexicon that was generated</li> </ul>
Data set and code supporting Marshall et al., "An inventory of online reptile images"
<p>Data set and code supporting: MARSHALL, B.M., FREED, P., VITT, L.J., BERNARDO, P., VOGEL, G., LOTZKAT, S., FRANZEN, M., HALLERMANN, J., SAGE, R.D., BUSH, B. and DUARTE, M.R., 2020. An inventory of online reptile images. <em>Zootaxa</em>, <em>4896</em>(2), pp.251-264. DOI:<a href="https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4896.2.6">10.11646/zootaxa.4896.2.6</a></p> <p>Data includes: </p> <ul> <li>Supplementary Table 1. List of all species and the number of photos in each of the 6 repositories: "SuppData1_Species_Photo_Count_Table_2020-08-04_no_syn.csv"</li> <li>Supplementary Table 2. List of species without photo in any of the 6 repositories: "SuppData2_Species_no_photos.csv"</li> <li>Supplementary Table 3. Per country summary data of number of species present and number with images: "SuppData3_Country_species_counts.csv"</li> <li>Reptile Database species checklist: "reptile_checklist_2020_04.csv"</li> <li>Reptile Database species synonyms used in second Wikimedia search: "reptile names 2019 syno.csv"</li> </ul> <p>Code includes:</p> <ul> <li>R code used to retrieve Flickr photograph metadata: "SuppCode1_Flickr_search.R"</li> <li>R code used to retrieve Wikimedia photograph metadata: "SuppCode2_Wikimedia_query.R"</li> <li>R code used to retrieve HerpMapper photograph metadata: "SuppCode3_HerpMapper_search.R"</li> <li>R code used to generate figures: "SuppCode4_Figure Generation.R"</li> </ul> <p>Also includes Zootaxa supplementary table.</p> <p> </p>
Fostering safe food handling among consumers: Data from an online survey experiment with 1,973 consumers from Norway and the UK
<p>Data and replication codes for the article "Fostering safe food handling among consumers: Causal evidence on game- and video-based online interventions". 1,973 participants from the UK and Norway, aged 18- 89 years, were assigned to (i) a control condition, or (ii) exposed to a brief information video, or (iii) in addition played an online game (two different conditions). In all conditions, participants answered a pre-survey and seven days later a post-survey. In the survey, next to collecting some information on sociodemographic background and certain preferences, subjects reported some recent food safety behaviors and we elicited beliefs in the efficacy of certain food safety actions, as well as beliefs in myths related to food and hygiene.</p> <p>We use this data set in our publication <br> Koch, A. K., Mønster, D., Nafziger, J., & Veflen, N. (2022). Fostering safe food handling among consumers: Causal evidence on game-and video-based online interventions. <em>Food Control</em>, 108825.</p>
Online survey among students and teachers in the Swiss farm management course
<p>This dataset contains survey data including the codebook for an online survey conducted in German and French in Switzerland in spring 2021. With this survey, we aimed to find out what students learn and what teachers teach in this course about digital technologies in agriculture. </p>
EEG data offline and online during motor imagery for standing and sitting
<p>The experiments were conducted in an acoustically isolated room where only the participant and the experimenter were present. Participants voluntarily signed an informed consent form in accordance with the experimental protocol approved by the ethics committee of the Universidad Antonio Nariño. The participant was seated in a chair in a posture that was comfortable for him/her but did not affect data collection. In front of the participant, a 40-inch TV screen was placed at about 3 m. On this screen, a graphical user interface (GUI) displayed images that guided the participant through the experiment. Each experimental session was divided into two phases: an offline phase and an online phase. </p> <p>The offline experiments consisted of recording participants' EEG signals during motor imagery trials for standing and sitting that were guided by the GUI presented on the TV screen. Six offline runs were conducted in which the participants were standing in three runs and sitting in the other three runs. In each run, the participant had to repeat a block of 30 trials of mental tasks indicated by visual cues continuously presented on the screen in a pseudo-random sequence.</p> <p>The first phase of the experimental session was conducted to construct the offline parts of the dataset: (A) Sit-to-stand and (B) Stand-to-sit. The participant's EEG data were collected from 90 sequences for part A (45 trials of MotorImageryA tasks and 45 trials of IdleStateA tasks) and 90 sequences for part B (45 trials of MotorImageryB tasks and 45 trials of IdleStateB tasks).</p> <p>For each participant, the two machine learning models obtained in the offline phase were used to carry out the online experiment parts of the dataset: (C) Sit-to-stand and (D) Stand-to-sit. Each participant was instructed to select, in no particular order, 30 sequences for part C (15 trials of MotorImageryA tasks and 15 trials of IdleStateA tasks) and 30 other sequences for part D (15 trials of MotorImageryB tasks and 15 trials of IdleStateB tasks). Each trial was unique and was generated pseudo-randomly before the experiment.</p> <p>The database consisted of 32 electroencephalographic files corresponding to the 32 participants. All recordings were collected on channels F3, Fz, F4, FC5, FC1, FC2, FC6, C3, Cz, C4, CP5, CP1, CP2, CP6, P3, Pz, and P4 according to the 10-20 EEG electrode placement standard, grounded to AFz channel and referenced to right mastoid (M2). Each data file contained the data stream in a 2D matrix where rows corresponded to channels and columns corresponded to time samples with a sampling frequency of 250Hz.</p> <p>The following marker numbers encoded information about the execution of the experiment. Marker numbers 200, 201, 202, and 203, indicated the beginning and end of the four steps of the sequence in a trial (resting, fixation, action observation, and imagining). Marker numbers 1, 2, 3, and 4, indicated the figure activated on the screen to the participant perform the task corresponding to 1. actively imagining the sit-to-stand movement (labeled as MotorImageryA), 2. sitting motionless without imagining the sit-to-stand movement (labeled as IdleStateA), 3. standing motionless while actively imagining the stand-to-sit movement (labeled as MotorImageryB), or 4. standing motionless without imagining the stand-to-sit movement (labeled as IdleStateB). Finally, marker numbers 101, 102, 103, and 104, indicated the task detected by the BCI in real time during the online experiment: 101. MotorImageryA, 102. IdleStateA, 103. MotorImageryB, or 104. IdleStateB.</p>
Replication data for: Online Media Use and COVID-19 Vaccination in Real-World Personal Networks: Quantitative Study
<p>This is the replication data for the scientific paper titled "Online Media Use and COVID-19 Vaccination in Real-World Personal Networks: Quantitative Study" accepted for publication in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR). For details on how to use the data files, please consider the "supplementary_material.R" file or the "supplementary_material.pdf" where the variables of interest and R code are presented.</p> <p>For the code to run correctly, have the files "multilevel_labels.R" and "glm_labels.R" in the same working directory as the .R or .Rmd script. They are executed in the background, applying modifications to labels inside the regression tables. </p> <p> </p>
Combined data online measurements_WIDER UPTAKE
<p>Raw data from daily online measurements at the WIDER UPTAKE H2020 project's case study site in the Czech Republic.</p>
HI line observations of 290 evolved stars made with the Nancay Radio Telescope - I. Data: online Tables
<p>--- Table B.1: Clear NRT HI detections - basic data </p> <p>Description of the columns:</p> <p>(1) Name: common catalogue name of the target. <br> An ^n after a name indicates that it is clearly not an AGB star, <br> a ^d that we consider its classification as an AGB to be dubious, <br> and a ^* indicates that notes on the object can be found in Appendix A;<br>(2,3) RA,DEC: literature right ascension and declination of the target from Gaia EDR 3, <br> for epoch J2000.0;<br>(4) Type: target type. <br> Primarily the variability type as listed in Version 5.1 of the General Catalogue of Variable Stars, <br> GCVS (A description of GCVS types is given in https://cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr/ftp/cats/B/gcvs/vartype.txt),<br> but if an object is not included in the GCVS, other identifiers are listed in brackets: <br> HPM = high proper motion star, (OH/IR) = OH/IR maser, LPVc = long-period variable candidate, <br> PN = planetary nebula, pPN = proto-planetary nebula, and post-AGB star;<br>(5,6) Spec & ref: spectral type of the star, followed by its literature reference, <br> as retrieved from the SIMBAD database. If none was listed there, the reference is noted as 'SIMBAD';<br>(7,8) Teff & ref: effective temperature of the star, in K, followed by its literature reference; <br>(9) d: distance of the target, based on its parallax (mainly from the Gaia EDR3), in pc.<br> If no Gaia parallax was available a reference to the distance we adopted is given in Appendix A<br> (for RAFGL 3099, mu Cep, and V Peg);<br>(10) Vlit: published radial velocity of the target in the LSR reference frame, in km/s;<br>(11) Vexp: literature expansion velocity measured from CO or OH 1612 MHz line observations, in km/s. <br> If a pair of values was published for a two-velocity component CO line fit, the largest value is listed here;<br>(12) ref: literature references to the published Vlit and Vexp values; <br>(13) line: spectral line on which the published radial velocity measurement (Vlit) was based;<br>(14,15) Mdot & ref: literature mass loss rates, in solar masses per year, <br> followed by its literature reference.</p> <p>Notes to Table B.1:</p> <p>References: see Table B.1 in the Astronomy & Astrophysics paper.</p> <p><br>--- Table B.2: Clear NRT HI detections - HI data </p> <p>Description of the columns:</p> <p>(1) Name: common catalogue name of the target. <br> A ^T after a name indicates that HI line parameters are based on a 'total' spectrum, whereas <br> a ^P indicates that a 'peak' spectrum was used. <br> An ^n indicates that it is clearly not an AGB star, <br> a ^d that we consider its classification as an AGB to be dubious, <br> and a ^* indicates that notes on the object can be found in Appendix A;<br>(2) VHI: our central radial velocity in the LSR reference frame of the Gaussian fitted <br> to the HI profile, in km/s.<br>(3) FWHM: our full width half maximum of the Gaussian fitted to the HI line profile, in km/s;<br>(4) Speak: our peak flux density of the HI line profile, in Jy;<br>(5) diam: our estimated angular size of the HI CSE in the east-west direction, in arcmin;<br>(6) FHI: our integrated line flux of the HI profile, in Jy km/s;<br>(7) MHI: our total HI mass, in Msun;<br>(8) HI ref: references to previously published HI studies,<br> see Table B.2 in the Astronomy & Astrophysics paper.</p> <p><br>--- Table B.3: Possible NRT HI detections - basic data</p> <p>Description of the columns:</p> <p>(1) Name: common catalogue name of the target. <br> An ^n after a name indicates that it is clearly not an AGB star, <br> a ^d that we consider its classification as an AGB to be dubious, <br> and a ^* indicates that notes on the object can be found in Appendix A;<br>(2,3) RA,DEC: literature right ascension and declination of the target from Gaia EDR 3, <br> for epoch J2000.0;<br>(4) Type: target type. <br> Primarily the variability type as listed in Version 5.1 of the General Catalogue of Variable Stars, <br> GCVS (A description of GCVS types is given in https://cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr/ftp/cats/B/gcvs/vartype.txt),<br> but if an object is not included in the GCVS, other identifiers are listed in brackets: <br> HPM = high proper motion star, (OH/IR) = OH/IR maser, LPVc = long-period variable candidate, <br> PN = planetary nebula, pPN = proto-planetary nebula, and post-AGB star;<br>(5,6) Spec & ref: spectral type of the star, followed by its literature reference, <br> as retrieved from the SIMBAD database. If none was listed there, the reference is noted as 'SIMBAD';<br>(7,8) Teff & ref: effective temperature of the star, in K, followed by its literature reference; <br>(9) d: distance of the target, based on its parallax (mainly from the Gaia ED33), in pc.<br> If no Gaia parallax was available a reference to the distance we adopted is given in Appendix A<br> (for RAFGL 3099, mu Cep, and V Peg);<br>(10) Vlit: published radial velocity of the target in the LSR reference frame, in km/s;<br>(11) Vexp: literature expansion velocity measured from CO or OH 1612 MHz line observations, in km/s. <br> If a pair of values was published for a two-velocity component CO line fit, the largest value is listed here;<br>(12) Mdot : literature mass loss rates, in solar masses per year, <br>(13) line: spectral line on which the published radial velocity measurement (Vlit) was based;<br>(14) ref: literature references to the published Vlit, Vexp and Mdot values; </p> <p>Notes to Table B.3:</p> <p>References: see Table B.1 in the Astronomy & Astrophysics paper.</p> <p><br>--- Table B.4: Possible NRT HI detections - HI data</p> <p>Description of the columns:</p> <p>See the description of the columns of Table B.2.</p> <p><br>--- Online only Table 5: Upper limits to NRT HI lines </p> <p>Description of the columns:</p> <p>(1) Name: common catalogue name of the target. <br> An ^n after a name indicates that it is clearly not an AGB star, <br> a ^d that we consider its classification as an AGB to be dubious, <br> and a ^* indicates that notes on the object can be found in Appendix A;<br>(2,3) RA,DEC: literature right ascension and declination of the target from Gaia EDR 3, <br> for epoch J2000.0;<br>(4) Type: target type. <br> Primarily the variability type as listed in Version 5.1 of the General Catalogue of Variable Stars, <br> GCVS (A description of GCVS types is given in https://cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr/ftp/cats/B/gcvs/vartype.txt),<br> but if an object is not included in the GCVS, other identifiers are listed in brackets: <br> HPM = high proper motion star, (OH/IR) = OH/IR maser, LPVc = long-period variable candidate, <br> PN = planetary nebula, pPN = proto-planetary nebula, and post-AGB star;<br>(5,6) spec & ref: spectral type of the star, followed by its literature reference, <br> as retrieved from the SIMBAD database. If none was listed there, the reference is noted as 'SIMBAD';<br>(7,8) Teff & ref: effective temperature of the star, in K, followed by its literature reference; <br>(9) d: distance of the target, based on its parallax (mainly from the Gaia EDR3, in pc.<br> If no Gaia parallax was available a reference to the distance we adopted is given in Appendix A<br> (for RAFGL 3099, mu Cep, and V Peg);<br>(10) Vlit: published radial velocity of the target in the LSR reference frame, in km/s;<br>(11) Vexp: literature expansion velocity measured from CO or OH 1612 MHz line observations, in km/s. <br> If a pair of values was published for a two-velocity component CO line fit, the largest value is listed here;<br>(12) Mdot : literature mass loss rates, in solar masses per year, <br>(13) ref: literature references for Vlit, Vexp and Mdot, as applicable;<br>(14) line: spectral line on which the published radial velocity measurement (Vlit) was based;<br>(15) Speak: peak flux density of our HI line profile, in Jy;<br>(16) notes: 'old data' indicates objects observed only in 1992/1993, before the renovation of the NRT; <br> 'blue/red side' indicates that either the blue or red side of the HI profile could be used to measure <br> an upper limit to the line flux;<br>(17) HI ref: references to previously published HI studies;</p> <p>Notes to online only Table 5: </p> <p>HI references: see Table B.2 in the Astronomy & Astrophysics paper.<br>Other references: see Table B.1 in the Astronomy & Astrophysics paper.</p> <p><br>--- Online only Table 6: Confused NRT HI spectra</p> <p>Description of the columns:</p> <p>(1) Name: common catalogue name of the target. <br>(2,3) RA, DEC: literature right ascension and declination of the target from Gaia EDR3, <br> for epoch J2000.0; <br>(4) type: target type. Primarily the variability type as listed in Version 5.1 of the <br> General Catalogue of Variable Stars, GCVS; but if an object is not included in the GCVS, <br> other identifiers are listed in brackets: HPM = high proper motion star, (OH/IR) = OH/IR maser, <br> LPVc = long-period variable candidate, PN = planetary nebula, pPN = proto-planetary nebula, <br> and post-AGB star; <br>(5,6) spec & ref spectral type of the star, followed by its literature reference, <br> as retrieved from the SIMBAD database. If none was listed there, the reference is noted as 'SIMBAD'; <br>(7,8) Vlit & ref: published radial velocity of the target in the LSR reference frame, in km/s; <br>(9) line: spectral line on which the published radial velocity measurement (Vlit) was based; <br>(10) notes: 'old data' denotes objects observed only in 1992/1993, before the renovation of the NRT<br> (see Section 3), for which no observations in digital form are available; <br>(11) HI ref: references to previously published HI studies.</p> <p>Notes to online only Table 6:</p> <p>HI references: see Table B.2 in the Astronomy & Astrophysics paper.<br>Other references: see Table B.1 in the Astronomy & Astrophysics paper.</p>
Local Governance in Ukraine during the full-scale Russian invasion. – Merged data from online surveys of local self-government authorities by the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe in 2022 and Kyiv School of Economics in 2024.
The dataset includes responses from two waves of online surveys targeting local self-government representatives in Ukraine, with a focus on crisis governance during the ongoing Russian war. The first wave was conducted from August 30 to September 20, 2022, by the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe, yielding 241 responses (16% of all Ukrainian local communities). The second wave was conducted by Kyiv School of Economics from January 1 to March 12, 2024, with 181 responses (14% of government-controlled municipalities). Data formats include CSV and SAV files, along with an XSL codebook for both waves. The merged dataset comprises 442 responses from small, medium, and large municipalities under varied security conditions, with a total file size of approximately 4 MB.
[Dataset] Does Volunteer Engagement Pay Off? An Analysis of User Participation in Online Citizen Science Projects
<p><strong>Explanation/Overview:</strong></p> <p>Corresponding dataset for the analyses and results achieved in the CS Track project in the research line on participation analyses, which is also reported in the publication "Does Volunteer Engagement Pay Off? An Analysis of User Participation in Online Citizen Science Projects", a conference paper for the conference CollabTech 2022: <a href="https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-20218-6">Collaboration Technologies and Social Computing</a> and published as part of the <a href="https://link.springer.com/bookseries/558">Lecture Notes in Computer Science</a> book series (LNCS,volume 13632) <a href="https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-20218-6_5">here</a>. The usernames have been anonymised.</p> <p><strong>Purpose:</strong></p> <p>The purpose of this dataset is to provide the basis to reproduce the results reported in the associated deliverable, and in the above-mentioned publication. As such, it <strong>does not</strong> represent <strong>raw data</strong>, but rather files that already include certain analysis steps (like calculated degrees or other SNA-related measures), ready for analysis, visualisation and interpretation with R.</p> <p><strong>Relatedness:</strong></p> <p>The data of the different projects was derived from the forums of 7 Zooniverse projects based on similar discussion board features. The projects are: 'Galaxy Zoo', 'Gravity Spy', 'Seabirdwatch', 'Snapshot Wisconsin', 'Wildwatch Kenya', 'Galaxy Nurseries', 'Penguin Watch'.</p> <p><strong>Content:</strong></p> <p>In this Zenodo entry, several files can be found. The structure is as follows (<code>files</code> and <strong>folders </strong>and<strong> </strong><em>descriptions</em>).</p> <ul> <li><code>corresponding_calculations.html</code> <ul> <li><em>Quarto-notebook to view in browser</em></li> </ul> </li> <li><code>corresponding_calculations.qmd</code> <ul> <li><em>Quarto-notebook to view in RStudio</em></li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>assets</strong> <ul> <li><strong>data</strong> <ul> <li><strong>annotations</strong> <ul> <li><code>annotations.csv</code> <ul> <li><em>List of annotations made per day for each of the analysed projects</em></li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>comments</strong> <ul> <li><code>comments.csv </code> <ul> <li><em>Total list of comments with several data fields (i.e., comment id, text, reply_user_id)</em></li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>rolechanges</strong> <ul> <li><code>478_rolechanges.csv</code> <ul> <li><em>List of roles per user to determine number of role changes </em></li> </ul> </li> <li><code>1104_rolechanges.csv</code> <ul> <li><em>...</em></li> </ul> </li> <li><code>...</code></li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>totalnetworkdata</strong> <ul> <li><strong>Edges</strong> <ul> <li><code>478_edges.csv</code> <ul> <li><em>Network data (edge set) for the given projects (without time slices)</em></li> </ul> </li> <li><code>1104_edges.csv</code> <ul> <li><em>...</em></li> </ul> </li> <li><code>...</code></li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Nodes</strong> <ul> <li><code>478_nodes.csv</code> <ul> <li><em>Network data (node set) for the given projects (without time slices)</em></li> </ul> </li> <li><code>1104_nodes.csv</code> <ul> <li><em>...</em></li> </ul> </li> <li><code>...</code></li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>trajectories</strong> <ul> <li><em>Network data (edge and node sets) for the given projects and all time slices (Q1 2016 - Q4 2021)</em></li> <li><strong>478</strong> <ul> <li><strong>Edges</strong> <ul> <li> <p><code>edges_4782016_q1.csv</code></p> </li> <li> <p><code>edges_4782016_q2.csv</code></p> </li> <li> <p><code>edges_4782016_q3.csv</code></p> </li> <li> <p><code>edges_4782016_q4.csv</code></p> </li> <li> <p><code>...</code></p> </li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Nodes</strong> <ul> <li><code>nodes_4782016_q1.csv</code></li> <li> <p><code>nodes_4782016_q4.csv</code></p> </li> <li> <p><code>nodes_4782016_q3.csv</code></p> </li> <li> <p><code>nodes_4782016_q2.csv</code></p> </li> <li> <p><code>...</code></p> </li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <p><strong>1104</strong> </p> <ul> <li> <p><strong>Edges</strong> </p> <ul> <li> <p><code>...</code></p> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <p><strong>Nodes</strong> </p> <ul> <li> <p><code>...</code></p> </li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <p>...</p> </li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>scripts</strong> <ul> <li><code>datavizfuncs.R</code> <ul> <li><em>script for the data visualisation functions, automatically executed from within </em><code>corresponding_calculations.qmd</code></li> </ul> </li> <li><code>import.R</code> <ul> <li><em>script for the import of data, automatically executed from within </em><code>corresponding_calculations.qmd</code></li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>corresponding_calculations_files</strong> <ul> <li>f<em>iles for the html/qmd view in the browser/RStudio</em></li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p><strong>Grouping:</strong></p> <p>The data is grouped according to given criteria (e.g., <code>project_title </code>or <code>time</code>). Accordingly, the respective files can be found in the data structure</p>
Online Data for 'The role of wildfires in the interplay of forest carbon stocks and wood harvest in the contiguous United States during the 20th century'
<p>This data file (.xlsx) contains all data used to create table 1, figures 1a-d, figure 2, figure S1, S2, and S5 of the study "The role of wildfires in the interplay of forest carbon stocks and wood harvest in the contiguous United States during the 20th century". Main article is available under: https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GB007813</p>
Influences on charitable giving for conservation: Online survey data of 1,331 respondents across the US, August 2017
This dataset records survey data collected from an online panel of 1,331 anonymous, nationwide U.S respondents. Data collection was both initiated and completed in August 2017. Survey data is of two major types. The first type, information about respondents, includes (1) select background and demographic information; (2) a brief version of a social desirability scale, measured to test and control for potential bias related to socially desirable responding; and (3) a scale developed to measure moral inclusivity, conceptualized as the breadth of an individual’s moral community (i.e., to what extent do different types of entities “count,” in a moral sense). The second type of data records information about an experimental message manipulation featured in the survey. The dataset includes one variable indicating which of seven manipulated textual messages each respondent viewed, along with several variables used as metrics of response to the messages, including (1) attitudes toward the message; (2) hypothetical willingness to donate for the cause promoted in the message; (3) perceived moral salience of the message (i.e., the extent to which it was perceived as a matter of moral concern); (4) manipulation checks, to test whether the manipulated elements of the messages were perceived as intended, and (5) a donation set-up, in which individuals were given the option to donate between $0 and $5 for a conservation organization, from an incentive fee provided by the researchers.
cldf-datasets/apics: The "Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online" as CLDF dataset
<p>Cite as</p> <blockquote> <p>Michaelis, Susanne Maria & Maurer, Philippe & Haspelmath, Martin & Huber, Magnus (eds.) 2013. Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at <a href="https://apics-online.info">https://apics-online.info</a>)</p> </blockquote>
How to produce a farm video - Legumes Translated online seminar
<p>On September 1st, 2020 Legumes Translated and Thomas Alföldi of FiBL (Research Institute of Organic Agriculture) hosted an online seminar about the production of low-budget audio-visual material for research and innovation projects in the field of agriculture. In this webinar, affordable equipment for realising good quality videos are demonstrated and his experiences from planning, filming and editing videos are shared.</p>
Bonpreu-Esclat Online Supermarket Products
<p>Dataset obtingut capturant tots els productes que s'ofereixen al supermercat online de Bonpreu-Esclat. Durant aquesta captura, hem obtingut informació com: el nom del producte, el seu preu, la quantitat de producte, el preu per unitat de referència, cinc categories de classificació, si el producte es troba en oferta o no, quina promoció té, l'enllaç url del producte i la data en la que s’han obtingut els valors.</p>
Bonpreu-Esclat Online Supermarket Products
<p>Dataset obtingut capturant tots els productes que s'ofereixen al supermercat online de Bonpreu-Esclat. Durant aquesta captura hem obtingut informació com: el nom del producte, el seu preu, la quantitat de producte, el preu per unitat de referència, cinc categories de classificació, si el producte es troba en oferta o no, quina promoció té, l'enllaç url del producte i la data en la que s’han obtingut els valors. Les dades han estat capturades diàriament al llarg de la setmana del 02/11/2020 al 06/11/2020 i finalment s'han agrupat totes en un únic dataset on es pot veure l'evolució temporal de la informació continguda.</p>
Massive Open Online Courses(MOOCs) and why they fail. A case of HarvardX
<p>Massive open online courses (MOOCs) are free online courses open for everyone to enroll. MOOCs are attractive because they attempt to level the playing field and provide opportunities for students from all walks of life and from different countries to study "together" at the comfort of their own homes and this is facilitated by leading professors from renowned universities at little to no cost. They are sold as an on-demand online education to accommodate conflicting family and work responsibilities which offer students the flexibility to study and do life. Schools like University of Maryland University College were among the first universities to accept MOOCs for credit, since then more institutions have welcomed the idea of providing online education for free. MOOCs sadly have simply not lived up to their mission to transform the educational system around the world and once again we see how a good free initiative fails.<br> <br> Despite of the popularity of MOOCs, employers do not regard certifications from MOOCs as valid credentials neither as an alternative to traditional educational institutions, in essence, it is pretty useless, unless you already possess a degree from an accredited traditional educational institution. We will analyze the first two years of Harvard's attempt at offering open and free courses to all, we will look at its successes, failures and the way forward.</p> <p>The first two years 2012, 2013 Harvard offered only 5 courses. Out of the <strong>290,498</strong> registrations, <strong>49.2%</strong> of the students registered for Introduction to Computer Science, <strong>16.9%</strong> for Justice, <strong>13% </strong>for Health in numbers, <strong>12.2%</strong> for Human Health and Global environmental change and finally <strong>8.7%</strong> registered for the Ancient Greek Hero. When we break this down by gender, males outnumber females in overall registration by <strong>106,149</strong>. Analyzing individual course registration, males still outnumber females, we see this in all the courses listed and even more significantly in the Computer science subject.</p> <p>The goal of MOOCs is to make world class education accessible to all persons including students from developing countries. We do see however that the United States leads the pack in student enrollments (which is a developed country) instead of the targeted countries from the global south. <strong>78.8%</strong> of students who registered for the courseware were between ages <strong>16 and 34</strong>, we can be reasonably confident and say that most of the students are either millennials or generation z. <strong>68%</strong> of the students who registered for the courseware already possess either a bachelor's, master's or a doctorate degree(s).</p> <p>MOOCs have grown in number and popularity but failed to live up to its mission of democratizing education around the world. Out of the <strong>290948</strong> students who registered for the HarvardX open courseware in 2012 and 2013, only <strong>65,261</strong> completed the courseware representing <strong>22.4%</strong> of total student enrollments. Out of the <strong>65,261</strong> who completed the courseware only <strong>5728</strong> received certifications, distressingly representing <strong>2%</strong> of total student enrollments.</p> <p>Certification rate in general is disappointingly low but we want to see if this is true for all demographics in this dataset. We will analyze individual courses, student age, level of education as well as the country of origin to perhaps diagnose the problem of low completion and low certification. First, out of <strong>143,266</strong> students who registered for Introduction to Computer Science, only <strong>1%</strong> were certified. Out of <strong>49,293</strong> students who registered for Justice, <strong>4%</strong> were certified. Out of <strong>37709</strong> students who registered for Health in numbers, <strong>5%</strong> were certified. Out of the <strong>35509</strong> students who registered for Human health and global environmental change, <strong>2%</strong> were certified. Out of the <strong>25171</strong> students who registered for the Ancient Greek hero, only <strong>1%</strong> received certifications.</p> <p>Secondly, about 73% of the students who completed the courseware and received certification already have a bachelor's, master's or doctorate degree(s). This shows that students accessing the courseware regard it merely as a resource to fill in gaps to supplement skills already learnt in a four year traditional institution. Additionally about 67% of those who received certifications fall within ages 16 to 30 which is the targeted age group, the only problem is that there are simple not enough certifications for students within this age group compared to the number of enrollments. Out of the 229301 students enrollments who fall within this age group, only 3822 received certifications representing 1.67% of enrollments.</p> <p>We can agree that MOOCs began conceptually as a great idea but fails in implementation, the simple truth is that attitudes towards initiatives labelled 'free' in certain parts of the world encourage apathy. We see that in most countries from every continent except for Europe. Secondly, some students need external discipline to stay committed and complete the courseware but because the stakes are low and there is nothing to lose, most students simply do not see the reason to do so. Thirdly, a large number of those who registered for these courses as well as those who received certifications were from developed countries, failing to democratize education for those who need it the most, students from the global south.</p>
phoible: PHOIBLE Online
<p>Moran, Steven & McCloy, Daniel & Wright, Richard (eds.) 2014. PHOIBLE Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at http://phoible.org)</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.