Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
242
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
242 results for “Open Science”
Data for "Breaking the Paywall: The role of Open Journal System as key Open Science infrastructure"
<h3><strong>Context</strong></h3> <p>This research was conducted within the NSF-SEEKCommons Project, a research initiative dedicated to supporting Open Science and Open Access in disciplinary research. The project has a special interest in understanding the role that critical infrastructure has in supporting open initiatives. The Open Journal System (OJS) serves as a long-standing fundamental piece for Open Access throughout the globe. Hence, it provides valuable information about experiences developing, deploying, and maintaining open technologies. </p> <h3><strong>Methods<br></strong></h3> <div> <div>We used mixed methods for our research, triangulating repository data, installation data, interviews, and documentary analysis. We collected repository data using a report generator (Kopp [2018] 2024) that uses repository metadata to present general statistics about a Git project. The resulting information was manually curated, disambiguated, and annotated to have a homogeneous set of developers with information about their institutional affiliation and country. </div> <div> </div> <div>Names are normalized based on the information in qualitative interviews and by browsing the full-extent commits in the GitHub repository. Other sources for this were the institutional materials (available in current and archived versions of the PKP website), meeting minutes, the user forum, and further project documentation available online. GitHub handles are homologated to their most comprehensive version. For institutional and country affiliation, we resorted to GitHub profiles, PKP documentation and forums, institutional domains available in emails, and researchers' ORCID IDs. </div> </div> <h3><strong>Available files</strong></h3> <ol> <li><strong>Information about the codebase</strong> (number of files, lines of code, and timestamp) organized by <strong>month, quarter, and semester. </strong><br>See file: OJS_GitStats_04-24.csv</li> <li>Information about the historical evolution of the codebase (number of files, lines of code, and timestamp), including <strong>a description of the top committers for each month</strong>. Commiters are described by including their institutional affiliation and country of origin. <br>See file: OJS_DevStats_Institution-Country_1.tsv</li> <li>Information about the <strong>historical evolution of the codebase </strong>focusing on <strong>top committers</strong>, along with their institution and country. This file is formatted to map the co-occurrence of developers and attributes by month between 2004-2024.<br>See file: OJS_DevStats_Institution-Country_2.tsv</li> <li>Selected fields to describe<strong> working and regularly maintained plugins for OJS as of October 2024.</strong> Includes name of the plugin, homepage, description, maintainer, and institutional affiliation. <br>See file: OJS_Plugins_2024_Processed.tsv</li> <li>Details of the aggregated <strong>information</strong> included in <strong>Table</strong> <strong>5</strong> of the article.<br>See file: OJS_Plugins_2024_Table5.tsv</li> <li><strong>Snapshot</strong> to XML information of the <strong>plugin gallery of OJS </strong>(October 21) retrieved from PKP website (Smecher 2024)<br>See file: OJS_Plugins_2024.csv</li> </ol> <h3>Funding</h3> <p><span>The SEEKCommons Project is funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), grant #2226425</span></p>
COSN paper data (The Chinese Open Science Network (COSN): Building an Open Science community from scratch)
<p>This is the dataset for generating figure1 and figure 3 in the manuscript <em>The Chinese Open Science Network (COSN): Building an Open Science community from scratch </em>(Accepted by AMPPS). Preprint at: <a href="https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ac9by">https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ac9by</a>.</p> <p>All the data and codes are available in repo: <a href="https://github.com/OpenSci-CN/COSN_AMPPS_Paper">COSN_AMPPS_Paper</a> Accepted Version.</p>
Open Science Quest
<p>The Open Science Quest was an activity organised as part of a national Open Science event in Luxembourg at the university library and was displayed for two weeks from 12 to 23 November 2018. Its aim was for library users (mainly Bachelor and Master students) and the event’s attendees (early-career and senior researchers, librarians and research support staff) to explore and discover Open Science practices at their own pace.</p> <p><br> The activity was stand-alone and promoted independent learning – once set up no external help was needed apart from issuing the diploma and prize for completing the Quest. The aim was also to make the activity as informative and engaging as possible by requiring participants to use a mix of information gathering techniques – text, images and videos presented on the displays, websearch and online tools, (very simple) puzzle-solving. The Quest was created and displayed in such a way that allowed various types of individual learning goals – each display provided knowledge without requiring to do the Quest and the Quest itself could be completed by grasping a minimal of concepts, while allowing participants to get more in-depth knowledge of each subject if they wanted to.</p> <p>All resources and materials used to prepare and showcase the Quest can be found here.<strong> Please read the 'User Guide' and the README files</strong> included in each folder and sub-folder to get more detailed information. You may also be interested in the blogpost: <a href="https://www.openaire.eu/blogs/open-science-quest">https://www.openaire.eu/blogs/open-science-quest</a></p> <p>Share, reuse, adapt and organise your own Open Science Quest! #OpenScienceQuest</p>
ALL-READY Questionnare on potential drivers and barriers to the adoption of innovation management, open science, and Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) among the members of the Pilot Network
<p><strong>Background & Summary</strong>: </p><p>The ALL-READY project unites a diverse consortium of Research Infrastructures (RI) and Living Labs, instrumental in developing new methodologies and technologies in agroecology. The project focuses on effective management of innovation, adherence to open science principles, and strategic application of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR). Task 6.4 of the project, which concentrates on Innovation and IPR Management, seeks to understand the dynamics influencing the adoption of these practices among its members. Recognizing the need for end-to-end data management, the project emphasizes standardized data collection and management while adhering to FAIR principles.</p><p><strong>Methods</strong>: </p><p>The questionnaire was developed by LifeWatch ERIC to capture data reflecting current practices and perceptions in agroecology. It included 26 questions divided into four sections, focusing on existing practices, potential drivers, and barriers in innovation management, open science, and IPR. The survey was disseminated via an online platform to the ALLREADY Pilot Network, ensuring a representative sample from diverse organizations. The data collection process was closely monitored, and the responses were analyzed using a mixed-methods approach to extract meaningful insights.</p><p><strong>Data Records of the ALLREADY Project Questionnaire</strong>: </p><p>The dataset, collected through an online survey platform, underwent a meticulous process of data preparation, download, formatting, and anonymization. It consists of one text file containing metadata (Readme.txt) and a single CSV file encompassing all questionnaire responses. The dataset provides a comprehensive view of innovation management, open science adoption, and IPR handling within the agroecology sector, particularly among the network of RIs and Living Labs involved in the project.</p><p><strong>Technical Validation of the ALLREADY Project Questionnaire</strong>: </p><p>Several critical steps were taken to ensure the accuracy, reliability, and overall quality of the data collected. This included development and testing of the questionnaire, rigorous monitoring of the data collection process, and thorough checks for data quality and completeness. The representativeness of the sample was analyzed specifically with respect to the Pilot Network rather than the broader population involved in agroecology. Strategies were employed to counter survey fatigue and maintain respondent engagement.</p><p><strong>Usage Notes for the ALLREADY Project Questionnaire</strong>: </p><p>The dataset's proper usage is vital for ensuring the validity and reproducibility of research. Researchers are advised to consider the nature of the data, the representativeness of the dataset, and its generalizability. The dataset allows for comprehensive analysis and integration of different sections, and analysts have the flexibility to handle open and write-in responses according to their research needs. Additional information to facilitate analysis is provided in a separate documentation file.</p><p> </p>
Data of Survey on National Contributions to EOSC and Open Science 2023
<p>This is the data set of the annual survey on National Contributions to EOSC and Open Science 2023 for the EOSC Steering Board</p> <p>The annual survey on National Contributions to EOSC and Open Science was developed by the EOSC Future project and EOSC Steering Board to monitor policies, practices, and impacts related to EOSC and Open Science at national and institutional levels in Europe</p> <p>The annual survey for 2023 was published in the EOSC Open Science Observatory on 17 January 2024 and ran until 01 July 2024 whereby 32 European member states, associated countries, and other countries responded to the survey</p> <p>The data of the annual survey for 2023 is available and exploitable in the online dashboard of the EOSC Open Science Observatory developed by Technopolis Group and OpenAIRE in the EOSC Future project and continued in the EOSC Track project: [<a href="https://eoscobservatory.eosc-portal.eu">https://eoscobservatory.eosc-portal.eu</a>]</p> <p>Disclaimer 1: The annual survey on National Contributions to EOSC and Open Science is in an initial stage of implementation and will be improved in future iterations whereby the data should for now be taken as a best-effort attempt by participating countries</p> <p>Disclaimer 2: V1 of the data set included an error in the data set and has thus been restricted and replaced by an updated V2 of the data set</p>
Number of Attendees of Hungarian Open Science Forum Events, and Number of Visitors of KIFÜ Open Science Newsfeed
<p>Number of attendees of Hungarian Open Science Forum events, which took place on 28/5/2021, 24/9/2021, 19/1/2022, and 28/4/2022.</p> <p>Number of visitors of KIFÜ open science newsfeed till 30/6/2022. Altogether 133 posts that were published between 5 May 2021 and 7 April 2022.</p>
Annual Article Processing Charges (APCs) and number of gold and hybrid open access articles in Web of Science indexed journals published by Elsevier, Sage, Springer-Nature, Taylor & Francis and Wiley 2015-2018
<p><strong>Dataset of annual Article Processing Charges (APCs) for 6,252 journals from 2015 to 2018. </strong>The dataset contains annual APCs for journals indexed in the Web of Science (WoS) and published by the oligopoly of academic publishers (Elsevier, Sage, Springer-Nature, Taylor & Francis, Wiley). It also includes an estimate of the total APCs paid by the academic community based on the number of gold and hybrid articles published between 2015 and 2018. The dataset was created using publication data from WoS, OA status from Unpaywall and annual APC prices from open datasets (<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3841568">Matthias, 2020</a>; <a href="https://doi.org/10.5683/SP2/84PNSG">Morrison, 2021</a>) and historical fees retrieved via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine. </p> <p>Detailed methods and findings are reported in the following journal article</p> <p>Butler, L.-A., Matthias, L., Simard, M.-A., Mongeon, P., & Haustein, S. (2023). The Oligopoly's Shift to Open Access. How the Big Five Academic Publishers Profit from Article Processing Charges. <em>Quantitative Science Studies</em>. Preprint: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8322555">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8322555</a></p> <p><strong>Description of included files (v1):</strong></p> <p><em>APCs.csv: </em>contains the annual APCs for gold and hybrid OA journals indexed in Web of Science published by the oligopoly of academic publishers (Elsevier, Sage, Springer-Nature, Taylor & Francis, Wiley) between 2015 and 2018 including the total estimate of APCs paid per journal per year. It contains APC data for 18,846 journal-year-OA status combinations.</p> <p><em>countries.csv</em>: contains the fractionalized number of annual gold and hybrid OA articles by oligopoly publishers between 2015 and 2018 and the total estimate of fractionalized APCs paid per country per journal per year.</p> <p><em>oecd.csv</em>: contains the fractionalized number of annual gold and hybrid OA articles by oligopoly publishers between 2015 and 2018 and the total estimate of fractionalized APCs per discipline per journal per year.</p> <p><em>ReadMe.csv</em>: contains a description of the variables used in <em>APCs.csv</em>, <em>countries.csv</em> and <em>oecd.csv</em>.</p> <p> </p>
ENLIGHT Open Science Surveys datasets
<p>This data was collected in the context of Open Science surveys of the <a href="https://enlight-eu.org/" rel="nofollow">ENLIGHT</a> European university alliance.</p> <p>ENLIGHT RISE collected data from its partner universities:</p> <ul> <li> <p>Information on research data management (RDM) policies, support services and other activities was collected in November 2021. The dataset contains information from 9 partner universities.</p> </li> <li> <p>Information on Open Science (OS) activities, infrastructure and support, skills and knowledge, community activities, policy, recognition and rewards, and environment was collected from 11 December 2021 until 31 January 2022. The dataset contains information from 9 partner universities.</p> </li> <li> <p>Updated information on OS and RDM policies, support and other activities was collected in February/March 2024. Moreover, views on joint achievements and possible future actions were investigated. The 2024 dataset contains information from 10 universities (one additional partner joined on 1 December 2023).</p> </li> </ul>
Raw Data for Mapping Repositories and their Institutional Open Science Policies in Asia
<p>Persistent Identifiers (PIDs), particularly Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs), are crucial for establishing a robust and globally accessible research infrastructure. In Asia, a diverse array of research outputs and resources are produced and published in repositories. However, a significant number of these repositories, and outputs remain undiscoverable in global registries and aggregators. <br><br>These three datasets provides comprehensive information on the adoption of repositories, Open Access mandates, and DOIs adoption in Asian countries. It includes detailed records from different registry sources and repository platforms.<br><br>You can read the full report titled 'Mapping Repositories and their Institutional Open Science Policies in Asia' at <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12566244">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12566244</a></p>
Raw Data for Mapping Repositories and their Institutional Open Science Policies in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA)
<div> <p>Persistent Identifiers (PIDs), particularly Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs), are crucial for establishing a robust and globally accessible research infrastructure. In the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, a diverse array of research outputs and resources are produced and published in repositories. However, a significant number of these repositories, and outputs remain undiscoverable in global registries and aggregators. <br><br>These three datasets provides comprehensive information on the adoption of repositories, Open Access mandates, and DOIs adoption in MENA countries. It includes detailed records from different registry sources and repository platforms.<br><br>You can read the full report titled 'Mapping Repositories and their Institutional Open Science Policies in MENA' at <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11370031">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11370031</a></p> </div>
Data from "PathOS - D1.2 Scoping Review of Open Science Impact"
<p>This dataset contains the data from the Scoping Review of Open Science Impact. Included are all record for which we assessed the full-text.</p> <p>The columns are as follows:</p> <ul> <li>id: Internal identifier</li> <li>Several metadata columns from Scopus/Web of Science: authors, year, title, abstract, type, DOI</li> <li>OS type: type of Open Science (e.g., Open Access, Citizen Science)</li> <li>inclusion_status: included, duplicate, out of scope, non-english</li> <li>justification: reasons for decision on inclusion_status</li> <li>Several columns with data extracted by the authors: Study details and design, Types of data sources, Study aims, Relevance to which aspect of impact, Key findings, Coverage/Context, Confidence assessment</li> </ul> <p>A complete description of the methods and detailed instructions for coders for extracting data from reports is contained in section 2 of the deliverable report which is available at <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7883699">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7883699</a>.</p>
Open Science: New Challenges and Opportunities for the PV sector
<p>Presentation given at the European PV Solar Energy Conference, Marseille, 2019 about the development of Open Science in the context of photovoltaics</p>
Artikel- und Buchpublikationen aus der Soziologie: Open Science, Open Access zu Texten, Open Access zu Forschungsdaten, Open Access zu Forschungssoftware, Altmetrics [open version]
<p>Die Daten umfassen Stichproben an je 100 Journalartikeln und Buchpublikationen aus der Soziologie. Ausgwählt wurden Veröffentlichungen aus deutschsprachigen und nicht-deutschsprachigen Ländern.</p> <p>Für alle Artikel der Stichprobe wurde geprüft,</p> <p>1) ob sie im Gold Open Access verfügbar waren<br> 2) ob sie im Green Open Access verfügbar waren<br> 3) auf welchem Repository-Typ sie (im Falle einer Green Open Access Publikation) verfügbar waren<br> 4) seit wann sie im Green Open Access verfügbar waren<br> 5) ob Forschungsdaten zum Artikel verfügbar waren<br> 6) ob Forschungssoftware zum Artikel verfügbar war<br> 7) wie häufig der Artikel in Google Scholar zitiert wurde<br> 8) wie häufig der Artikel im Web of Science zitiert wurde<br> 9) wie häufig der Artikel in Scopus zitiert wurde<br> 10) wie häufig der Artikel in den Sociological Abstracts zitiert wurde<br> 11) wie viele Mendeley User Counts der Artikel aufwies<br> 12) wie häufig der Artikel getwittert wurde (Datenquelle: Topsy)</p> <p> </p> <p>Für alle Bücher der Stichprobe wurde geprüft,</p> <p>1) ob sie im Gold Open Access verfügbar waren<br> 2) ob sie im Green Open Access verfügbar waren<br> 3) auf welchem Repository-Typ sie (im Falle einer Green Open Access Publikation) verfügbar waren<br> 4) seit wann sie im Green Open Access verfügbar waren<br> 5) wie häufig das Buch in Google Scholar zitiert wurde<br> 6) wie häufig das Buch im Web of Science zitiert wurde (als Cited-Reference-Analyse)<br> 7) wie häufig das Buch in Scopus zitiert wurde<br> 8) wie häufig das Buch in der International Bibliography of the Social Sciences zitiert wurde<br> 9) wie viele Mendeley User Counts das Buch aufwies<br> 10) wie häufig das Buch getwittert wurde (Datenquelle: Topsy)</p> <p><br> Da die Impact-Informationen unter Copyright-Schutz der Datenbank-Anbieter stehen, können diese nicht frei zugänglich gemacht werden. Es existiert jedoch eine nicht offen verfügbare Version dieser Datensammlung, die Impact-Informationen enthält und die auf Anfrage bereitgestellt werden kann.</p>
Micro and Macro Open Science Perspective Taxonomy
<h1>Micro and Macro Open Science (OS) Perspective Taxonomy</h1> <h2>Micro OS Perspective</h2> <p>Taxonomy related to terminologies and knowledge around the practice (workflow) of the OS knowledge generator (e.g., researcher), based on reading by <a title="Taxonomia da Ciência Aberta: revisada e ampliada" href="https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2023.e91712" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Silveira et al. (2023)</a> and <a title="UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science" href="https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379949" target="_blank" rel="noopener">UNESCO (2021)</a>.</p> <h2>Macro OS Perspective</h2> <p>Taxonomy related to the conceptual ramifications of OS concerning (public) policies, infrastructure, open involvement of social actors (society) and open dialogue with other knowledge systems, based on reading by <a title="Taxonomia da Ciência Aberta: revisada e ampliada" href="https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2023.e91712" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Silveira et al. (2023)</a> and <a title="UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science" href="https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379949" target="_blank" rel="noopener">UNESCO (2021)</a>.</p> <h3>Instructions:</h3> <ul> <li>There is nothing new in this repository. This is just the taxonomy revised and expanded by <a title="Taxonomia da Ciência Aberta: revisada e ampliada" href="https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2023.e91712" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Silveira et al. (2023)</a> segregated into two perspectives: Micro and Macro;</li> <li>The reason for this segregation was to document the terminologies and knowledge surrounding the practice (workflow) of OS, which from an individual (micro) point of view, is most interest to the researcher;</li> <li>These two concepts are presented in the form of a mindmap in English and Portuguese (four .png files);</li> <li>If the user wishes to develop another mindmap, with another theme and/or colors, or another flowchart, there are also eight *.txt files with the markdown and memaid hierarchies.</li> </ul>
Video 1 - Open Science, why do we need it?
<p>Interview with York Sure-Vetter, Director of NFDI, Germany and Professor at Karlsruhe Institute of Technology; Eva Maria Méndez, PhD in Library and Information Science; Joaquín Tintoré, Professor of Physical Oceanography; Michael Arentoft, Head of Unit, Open Science, DG R&I, European Commission; and Iryna Kuchma, Open Access Programme Manager for EIFL on the necessity of funding Open Science infrastructure and Open Science in general in order to accelerate the shift towards more openness and higher quality in science.</p> <p>Open Science is an attitude of collaboration, transparency, and equitability. SOCIB is one research organisation which makes research data available, which in turn triggers a new understanding in oceanography and allows for faster responses to societal needs. Funding Open Science means funding higher quality, faster, and more impactful science. Funders can also fund Open Science infrastructure to facilitate the shift to Open Science.</p>
Video 4 - Open Science: equitable access for everyone.
<p>An interview about the necessity of funding Open Science platforms as a means of achieving equitable science with Iryna Kuchma, Open Access Programme Manager for EIFL; Ana María Cetto, Professor of Physics at Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; Yensi Flores, Postdoctoral researcher at the Cancer Research Centre, University College Cork; and <span>Bregt Saenen, Senior Policy Officer for Open Science at Science Europe</span>.<br><br></p> <p><span>Science is a global enterprise targeting global problems – limiting access to science defeats this purpose. Open Science platforms are necessary for researchers from all countries and organizations to be able to participate in the global scientific effort. Funding bodies can support Open Science platforms as a way of ensuring equitable and trustworthy science. </span></p> <p> </p>
Video 6 - Open Science: science for and with citizens.
<p><span>An interview on Open Science funding with Ignasi Labastida, director of the Office for the Dissemination of Knowledge, University of Barcelona; Bregt Saenen, Senior Policy Officer for Open Science at Science Europe; Victoria Tsoukala, Policy Officer – Open Science at the European Commissions, DG-Reearch and Innovation; and Sumithra Vellupilai, Senior Research Officer at the Swedish Research Council.</span></p> <p><span>Universities should fund Open Science as a means of sharing knowledge, and as a means of providing tools for all of society to access knowledge. All parts of society should be able to benefit from the knowledge produced through the scientific process. Making openness the norm is a way for including society’s stakeholders in the research process. This level of openness and transparency requires funding infrastructure for sharing articles, data and other research results.</span></p> <p><span> </span></p>
Video 5 - Open Science: why do we need data stewards.
<p><span>An interview on the need of data professionals and Open Science skills with York Sure-Vetter, Director of NFDI, Germany and Professor at Karlsruhe Institute of Technology; Jessica Lindvall, Head of Training at SciLifeLab Training Hub; Anne Sophie Fink, Head of Data Management at DeiC (Denmark); and Sally Chambers, Director at DARIAH-EU.</span></p> <p><span>Modern research and technology can require not only large amounts of data, but also good data quality. Ensuring good data quality requires specialized expertise. Data stewards and other data management professionals support researchers with providing and working with good quality data which are also FAIR. Open software, open infrastructures are also important bits in the Open Science puzzle, all of which require funding. The uptake of Open Science depends on widespread Open Science awareness and skills. These require outreach, training and formal education.</span></p>
Video 2 - Open Science to enable collaboration.
<p><span>Interview with Maria Bellantone, PhD in materials science; Bregt Saenen, Senior Policy Officer for Open Science at Science Europe; Pilar Rica Castro, Senior project officer for Open Access, Spanish Foundation for Science & Technology; and Iryna Kuchma, Open Access Programme Manager for EIFL on the importance of policies supporting Open Science infrastructures as a tool for implementing and promoting Open Science.</span></p> <p><span>Open Science fosters inter- and transdisciplinarity. This requires open data infrastructure and interoperability. Open Science policies can be a tool for changing how research is performed and assessed. The Spanish Foundation for Science and Technology funds such infrastructures at a local level. This provides digital infrastructures and expertise to make it possible to share interoperable data. This interoperability also makes it possible for infrastructures to collaborate. Funders have a responsibility to ensure that the research they fund makes an impact, and Open Science infrastructure increases the impact potential of research.</span></p>
Video 3 - Open Science: a better return on investment.
<p><span>An interview with Roberto Sabatino, Research Engagement Officer at HEAnet, Dublin Ireland; Nadia Tonello, Data Management Manager at the Barcelona Supercomputing Centre; and Eva Mendes, PhD in Library and Information Science on the potential of Open Science to enhance humanity’s ability to respond to crises and to provide a better return on investment.</span></p> <p><span>Science is increasingly collaborative, and this includes sharing data. Funding needs to include data management, sharing, and infrastructure. Increased interoperability in research can help humanity collaboratively face challenges such as climate change. The response to the Covid-19 pandemic was also facilitated by data sharing, showing the positive societal impact and net benefit of Open Science.</span></p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.