Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,453
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,453 results for “Outcome research”
Figure 9. from: Data sharing tools adopted by the European Biodiversity Observation Network Project - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9390 (31 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9390
Figure 9. - Information flows between EU BON and LTER Europe, as envisaged on the 3rd EU BON Stakeholder Roundtable in Granada on 9-11 December 2015.
Figure 8. from: Data sharing tools adopted by the European Biodiversity Observation Network Project - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9390 (31 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9390
Figure 8. - The patchiness of survey coverage in Europe illustrated by the distribution map of Plantago lanceolata taken from GBIF in 2016. This species is one of the commonest and most widespread in Europe, it should occur in almost all areas of this map, but in fact the data traces out the borders of countries and area who have published data on GBIF.
Figure 6. from: Data sharing tools adopted by the European Biodiversity Observation Network Project - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9390 (31 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9390
Figure 6. - Individual Metacat instances can be connected to DataOne which replicates public files. Thus the data is still available if a single instance goes offline.https://search.dataone.org/#data/page/0
Figure 5. from: Data sharing tools adopted by the European Biodiversity Observation Network Project - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9390 (31 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9390
Figure 5. - PPBio has installed a Metacat instance for their researchers to upload and make publicly available the results of work related to biodiversity in the Western Amazon.https://ppbiodata.inpa.gov.br/metacatui/
Figure 4. from: Data sharing tools adopted by the European Biodiversity Observation Network Project - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9390 (31 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9390
Figure 4. - The public data repository provided by the Knowledge Network for Biocomplexity (KNB).https://knb.ecoinformatics.org/#data/page/0
Figure 3. from: Data sharing tools adopted by the European Biodiversity Observation Network Project - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9390 (31 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9390
Figure 3. - The implementation of Darwin Core Archive in Plazi to transfer treatment data. Observation data described with Darwin Core terms.
Figure 1. from: Data sharing tools adopted by the European Biodiversity Observation Network Project - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9390 (31 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9390
Figure 1. - ARPHA consists of two integrated workflows: in ARPHA-XML, the manuscript is written and processed via the ARPHA Writing Tool, and in ARPHA-DOC, the manuscript is submitted and processed as document file(s).
Figure 9b. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
<p>Figure 9b. - Visualization showing one example of development of a group's vision and progress to group principlesFigure 9a.One group's vision as a collection of ideas (session 7)Figure 9b.One group's vision as a interconnected elements (triples, derived after session 7)Figure 9c.One group's suggested principles (session 11)</p>
Figure 7c. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 7c. - Use of Trello during the workshopFigure 7a.Example of Trello card with tags. "using the public domain" - the idea name; #G2 - the idea came from the Group 2; #viz - the idea is ready to be included in the visualization; #triple - the idea has a link to another idea in the group's vision. Figure 7b.Example of Trello card comment with link to another idea. #dep_on - idea depends on another idea; "https://trello.com/c/RaNcbKSe" - is the short link to the Trello card with the connected idea. In the visualization it would be represented as a line connecting two ideas.Figure 7c.Screenshot of public Trello board <br>
Figure 7b. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 7b. - Use of Trello during the workshopFigure 7a.Example of Trello card with tags. "using the public domain" - the idea name; #G2 - the idea came from the Group 2; #viz - the idea is ready to be included in the visualization; #triple - the idea has a link to another idea in the group's vision. Figure 7b.Example of Trello card comment with link to another idea. #dep_on - idea depends on another idea; "https://trello.com/c/RaNcbKSe" - is the short link to the Trello card with the connected idea. In the visualization it would be represented as a line connecting two ideas.Figure 7c.Screenshot of public Trello board <br>
Figure 8b. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 8b. - Workshop visualization - collection of ideas and group visionsFigure 8a.Visualization showing all ideas generated collectively in the first round (session 3, dark grey) or second round (session 4, light grey), and those generated by the respective groups (solid colors) as part of their vision of scholarly communication. Figure 8b.Visualizaton showing all groups' visions as interconnected elements (triples), with common elements overlapping. <br>
Figure 6d. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 6d. - Workshop impressionsFigure 6a.Figure 6b.Figure 6c.Figure 6d. <br> One group's suggested principles (session 11)
Figure 9c. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 9c. - Visualization showing one example of development of a group's vision and progress to group principlesFigure 9a.One group's vision as a collection of ideas (session 7)Figure 9b.One group's vision as a interconnected elements (triples, derived after session 7)Figure 9c.One group's suggested principles (session 11) <br>
Figure 6a. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 6a. - Workshop impressionsFigure 6a.Figure 6b.Figure 6c.Figure 6d. <br> Visualizaton showing all groups' visions as interconnected elements (triples), with common elements overlapping.
Figure 5d. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 5d. - Fair of the Future of Scholarly CommunicationFigure 5a.Figure 5b.Figure 5c.Figure 5d. <br> Visualization showing all ideas generated collectively in the first round (session 3, dark grey) or second round (session 4, light grey), and those generated by the respective groups (solid colors) as part of their vision of scholarly communication.
Figure 6b. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 6b. - Workshop impressionsFigure 6a.Figure 6b.Figure 6c.Figure 6d. <br> One group's vision as a collection of ideas (session 7)
Figure 5c. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 5c. - Fair of the Future of Scholarly CommunicationFigure 5a.Figure 5b.Figure 5c.Figure 5d. <br> Screenshot of public Trello board
Figure 5b. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 5b. - Fair of the Future of Scholarly CommunicationFigure 5a.Figure 5b.Figure 5c.Figure 5d. <br> Example of Trello card comment with link to another idea. #dep_on - idea depends on another idea; "https://trello.com/c/RaNcbKSe" - is the short link to the Trello card with the connected idea. In the visualization it would be represented as a line connecting two ideas.
Figure 7a. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 7a. - Use of Trello during the workshopFigure 7a.Example of Trello card with tags. "using the public domain" - the idea name; #G2 - the idea came from the Group 2; #viz - the idea is ready to be included in the visualization; #triple - the idea has a link to another idea in the group's vision. Figure 7b.Example of Trello card comment with link to another idea. #dep_on - idea depends on another idea; "https://trello.com/c/RaNcbKSe" - is the short link to the Trello card with the connected idea. In the visualization it would be represented as a line connecting two ideas.Figure 7c.Screenshot of public Trello board <br>
Figure 9a. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 9a. - Visualization showing one example of development of a group's vision and progress to group principlesFigure 9a.One group's vision as a collection of ideas (session 7)Figure 9b.One group's vision as a interconnected elements (triples, derived after session 7)Figure 9c.One group's suggested principles (session 11) <br>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.