Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 11 in The Use of Molecular Phylogenetic and Morphological Tools to Identify Cryptic and Paraphyletic Species: Examples from the Diminutive Long-fingered Bats (Chiroptera: Miniopteridae: Miniopterus) on Madagascar

Fig. 11. Projections of factor 1 (x-axis) and factor 2 (y-axis) in principal component analysis of A, cranial measurements and B, dental measurements of different diminutive species of Miniopterus from Madagascar, all of which were previously considered to be M. manavi, as well as M. petersoni. Loadings of variables on each axis are shown in table 6.

Fig. 10 in The Use of Molecular Phylogenetic and Morphological Tools to Identify Cryptic and Paraphyletic Species: Examples from the Diminutive Long-fingered Bats (Chiroptera: Miniopteridae: Miniopterus) on Madagascar

Fig. 10. Lateral views of skulls and mandibles of Miniopterus spp. from Madagascar: (above, from left to right) M. manavi (FMNH 194074) from the Grotte de Fandanana, near Fandriana; M. griveaudi (FMNH 169712) from near the Andrafiabe Cave, Ankarana; holotype of M. aelleni (FMNH 173067), from the Canyon d'Antsiroandoa, Ankarana; (below, left) holotype of M. brachytragos (FMNH 175840), from the Forêt d'Ambovonomby, Parc National de Namoroka, Forêt d'Ambovonomby; and (below, right) holotype of M. mahafaliensis (FMNH 173197), from near Mitoho Cave, Parc National de Tsimanampetsotsa. (Photograph taken by J. Weinstein, Field Museum image number Z94488_03d.)

Fig. 8 in The Use of Molecular Phylogenetic and Morphological Tools to Identify Cryptic and Paraphyletic Species: Examples from the Diminutive Long-fingered Bats (Chiroptera: Miniopteridae: Miniopterus) on Madagascar

Fig. 8. Dorsal views of skulls of Miniopterus spp. from Madagascar: (above, from left to right) M. manavi (FMNH 194074) from the Grotte de Fandanana, near Fandriana; M. griveaudi (FMNH 169712) from near the Andrafiabe Cave, Ankarana; holotype of M. aelleni (FMNH 173067), from the Canyon d'Antsiroandoa, Ankarana; below, left) holotype of M. brachytragos (FMNH 175840), from the Forêt d'Ambovonomby, Parc National de Namoroka; and (below, right) holotype of M. mahafaliensis (FMNH 173197), from near Mitoho Cave, Parc National de Tsimanampetsotsa. (Photograph taken by J. Weinstein, Field Museum image number Z94488_01d.)

Fig. 7 in The Use of Molecular Phylogenetic and Morphological Tools to Identify Cryptic and Paraphyletic Species: Examples from the Diminutive Long-fingered Bats (Chiroptera: Miniopteridae: Miniopterus) on Madagascar

Fig. 7. Different views of skull and mandible of the holotype of Miniopterus mahafaliensis (FMNH 173197) collected in the Parc National de Tsimanampetsotsa, 6.5 km NE Efoetse, near Mitoho Cave: (above, left) dorsal view of cranium; (above, right) ventral view of cranium; and (below) lateral view of cranium and mandible. (Photograph taken by John Weinstein, Field Museum image number Z94487_05d.)

Fig. 6 in The Use of Molecular Phylogenetic and Morphological Tools to Identify Cryptic and Paraphyletic Species: Examples from the Diminutive Long-fingered Bats (Chiroptera: Miniopteridae: Miniopterus) on Madagascar

Fig. 6. Photograph of living Miniopterus mahafaliensis captured 6.5 km NE Efoetse, near Mitoho Cave, Parc National de Tsimanampetsotsa (FMNH 173191), taken at the same locality as the holotype (FMNH 173197). Note the gray grizzled hair to the ventrum. (Photograph by Harald Schütz.)

Fig. 5 in The Use of Molecular Phylogenetic and Morphological Tools to Identify Cryptic and Paraphyletic Species: Examples from the Diminutive Long-fingered Bats (Chiroptera: Miniopteridae: Miniopterus) on Madagascar

Fig. 5. Different views of skull and mandible of the holotype of Miniopterus brachytragos (FMNH 175840) collected in the Parc National de Namoroka, Forêt d'Ambovonomby, 26 km NW Andranomavo: (above, left) dorsal view of cranium; (above, right) ventral view of cranium; and (below) lateral view of cranium and mandible. (Photograph taken by John Weinstein, Field Museum image number Z94486_05d.)

Fig. 9 in The Use of Molecular Phylogenetic and Morphological Tools to Identify Cryptic and Paraphyletic Species: Examples from the Diminutive Long-fingered Bats (Chiroptera: Miniopteridae: Miniopterus) on Madagascar

Fig. 9. Ventral views of skulls of Miniopterus spp. from Madagascar: (above, from left to right) M. manavi (FMNH 194074) from the Grotte de Fandanana, near Fandriana; M. griveaudi (FMNH 169712) from near the Andrafiabe Cave, Ankarana; holotype of M. aelleni (FMNH 173067), from the Canyon d'Antsiroandoa, Ankarana; (below, left) holotype of M. brachytragos (FMNH 175840), from the Forêt d'Ambovonomby, Parc National de Namoroka, Forêt d'Ambovonomby; and (below, right) holotype of M. mahafaliensis (FMNH 173197), from near Mitoho Cave, Parc National de Tsimanampetsotsa. (Photograph taken by J. Weinstein, Field Museum image number Z94488_02d.)

Fig. 4 in The Use of Molecular Phylogenetic and Morphological Tools to Identify Cryptic and Paraphyletic Species: Examples from the Diminutive Long-fingered Bats (Chiroptera: Miniopteridae: Miniopterus) on Madagascar

Fig. 4. Right ear and tragus of Miniopterus spp. from Madagascar: A, M. brachytragos (FMNH 175840, holotype), from Parc National de Namoroka, Forêt d'Ambovonomby, 26 km NW Andranomavo; B, M. brachytragos (FMNH 172685) from the Forêt de Binara, near Analamazava River, 7.5 km SW Daraina (village); C, M. brachytragos (FMNH 202523) from 1.8 km S Ambanizana, Masoala Peninsula; D, M. mahafaliensis (FMNH 173197, holotype) from Parc National de Tsimanampetsotsa, 6.5 km NE Efoetse, near Mitoho Cave; E, M. mahafaliensis (FMNH 176101) from Parc National de Kirindy-Mite, near village of Betakilotra, 11 km SE Marofihitsa; F, M. griveaudi (FMNH 184055) from Beloboka, grotte n°1, 12.5 km E Mahajanga, Madagascar; G, M. aelleni (FMNH 175842) from the Parc National de Namoroka, Forêt d'Ambovonomby, 26 km NW Andranomavo. The slightly elongated and pointed distal portion of the tragus in FMNH 175840 (A), as compared to FMNH 172685 and FMNH 202523, maybe an anomalous shape in M. brachytragos.

Fig. 1 in The Use of Molecular Phylogenetic and Morphological Tools to Identify Cryptic and Paraphyletic Species: Examples from the Diminutive Long-fingered Bats (Chiroptera: Miniopteridae: Miniopterus) on Madagascar

Fig. 1. Map of Madagascar showing localities mentioned in the text and sites where specimens of Miniopterus brachytragos sp. nov., M. mahafaliensis sp. nov., M. manavi sensu stricto, M. petersoni, M. griveaudi, and M. aelleni have been collected. The latter two species are also known from the Comoro Archipelago (Goodman et al., 2009b). The species symbols for the sites of Namoroka and Bemaraha have been slightly spread out to avoid obscuring information.

Fig. 2 in The Use of Molecular Phylogenetic and Morphological Tools to Identify Cryptic and Paraphyletic Species: Examples from the Diminutive Long-fingered Bats (Chiroptera: Miniopteridae: Miniopterus) on Madagascar

Fig. 2. Phylogenetic position of different Miniopterus spp. Miniopterus fuliginosus was selected as the outgroup. The tree presented was produced using Bayesian analysis. Posterior probabilities (Bayesian

opencc-zeroJan 2020View details →

dryad36/100

Paraphyletic species no more – genomic data resolve a Pleistocene radiation and validate morphological species of the Melanoplus scudderi complex (Insecta: Orthoptera)

<p>Rapid speciation events, with taxa generated over a short time period, are among the most investigated biological phenomena. However, molecular systematics often reveals contradictory results compared with morphological/phenotypical diagnoses of species under scenarios of recent and rapid diversification. In this study, we used molecular data from an average of over 29,000 loci per sample from RADseq to reconstruct the diversification history and delimit the species boundary in a short-winged grasshopper species complex (<i>Melanoplus </i>Scudderi group), where Pleistocene diversification has been hypothesized to generate more than 20 putative species with distinct male genitalic shapes. We found that based on a maximum likelihood molecular phylogeny that each morphological species indeed forms a monophyletic group, contrary to the result from a previous mitochondrial DNA sequence study. By dating the diversification events, the species complex is estimated to have diversified during the Late Pleistocene, supporting the recent radiation hypothesis. Furthermore, coalescent-based species delimitation analyses provide quantitative support for independent genetic lineages, which corresponds with the morphologically-defined species. Our results also showed that male genitalic shape may not be predicted by evolutionary distance among species, indicating that this trait is not only labile, but also implying that selection may play a role in character divergence. Additionally, our findings suggest that the rapid speciation events in this flightless grasshopper complex might be associated primarily with the fragmentation of their grassland habitats during the Late Pleistocene. Collectively, our study highlights the importance of integrating multiple sources of information to delineate species, especially for a species complex that diversified rapidly, and whose divergence may be linked to ecological processes that create geographic isolation (i.e., fragmented habitats), as well as selection acting on characters with direct consequences for reproductive isolation (i.e., genitalic divergence).</p>

zenodo36/100

Fig. 3 in The Use of Molecular Phylogenetic and Morphological Tools to Identify Cryptic and Paraphyletic Species: Examples from the Diminutive Long-fingered Bats (Chiroptera: Miniopteridae: Miniopterus) on Madagascar

Fig. 3. Photograph of living Miniopterus brachytragos captured near Ambanizana, Masoala Peninsula

publicJan 2020View details →

dryad36/100

Paraphyletic species no more – genomic data resolve a Pleistocene radiation and validate morphological species of the Melanoplus scudderi complex (Insecta: Orthoptera)

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

FIGURE 4 in Paraphyletic Species of Podostemaceae: Cladopus fallax and Polypleurum wallichii

FIGURE 4. Root habits of Polypleurum. Roots are reproductive (with flowers or fruits borne on flanks, indicating root habit; vegetative in A) and exposed in the dry season. A, B, E, F, adhering roots (W type); C, D, floating roots (S type). A−C. P. wallichii (A = P. wallichii-2, Khao Yai National Park, Thailand; B = P. wallichii-3, Meghalaya, India; C = P. wallichii-1, Koh Kong, Cambodia). D, E. P. stylosum (D, E, Kerala, India). F. Dried-up root remains of P. schmidtianum (at top, light brown) with those of Cladopus fallax (at bottom and right, white gray) in Koh Kong, Cambodia.

FIGURE 2 in Paraphyletic Species of Podostemaceae: Cladopus fallax and Polypleurum wallichii

FIGURE 2. Bayes phylogenetic consensus tree deduced from ITS sequences. Numbers above and below branches are Bayesian posterior probabilities (≥0.80) and bootstrap values (≥50 %) of ML (left) and MP (right), respectively. For simplicity, species of Hydrobryum examined are united as 'Hydrobryum species' (see Appendix). The tree is rooted on a branch between a clade of Cladopus, Hanseniella and Hydrobryum and a clade of Polypleurum, Griffithella, Hydrobryopsis, Willisia and Zeylanidium.

FIGURE 3 in Paraphyletic Species of Podostemaceae: Cladopus fallax and Polypleurum wallichii

FIGURE 3. Bayes phylogenetic consensus tree deduced from concatenated matK and ITS sequences. Numbers above and below branches are Bayesian posterior probabilities (≥0.80) and bootstrap values (≥50 %) of ML (left) and MP (right), respectively. For simplicity, the species of Hydrobryum, both matK and ITS sequences of which were examined, are united as 'Hydrobryum species' (Appendix). C. fallax CAM-13a = LC380594 + LC380635; C. fallax CAM-13b = LC380594 + LC380636; C. fallax CAM-13c = LC380594 + LC380637; C. fallax CAM-19a = LC380595 + LC380638; C. fallax CAM-19b = LC380595 + LC380639; C. taiensis CAM-14a = LC380602 + LC380643; C. fallax CAM-14b = LC380602 + LC380644. The tree is rooted on a branch between a clade of Cladopus, Hanseniella and Hydrobryum, and Polypleurum.

FIGURE 1 in Paraphyletic Species of Podostemaceae: Cladopus fallax and Polypleurum wallichii

FIGURE 1. Bayes phylogenetic consensus tree deduced from matK sequences. Numbers above and below branches are Bayesian posterior probabilities (≥0.80) and bootstrap values (≥50 %) of ML (left) and MP (right), respectively. Single asterisk (*) indicates that specimen JK- Manose is followed by additional specimens with the same sequence, JK-02, JK-Yamazaki, JK-Anraku, JP-127, JK-Mawatari, and CH-02. Double asterisk (**) indicates that specimen CP-07 is followed by additional specimens with the same sequence, CP-22, 24, 27, and 29. For simplicity, species of Hanseniella, Hydrobryum, Hydrodiscus and Thawatchaia examined are united as a single clade (for materials see Appendix). The tree is rooted on a branch between a clade of Cladopus, Hanseniella, Hydrobryum, Hydrodiscus, Paracladopus and Thawatchaia, and a clade of Polypleurum, Griffithella, Hydrobryopsis, Willisia and Zeylanidium.