Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
138
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
138 results for “Plant-pollinator”
Modifications of the plant-pollinator network structure and species' roles along a gradient of urbanization
<p>This file includes data and codes used in the article titled: " Modifications of the plant-pollinator network structure and species’ roles along a gradient of urbanization".</p> <p>Data include plant-pollinator interactions sampled in each site (1-12) at each sampling event (6 events) in the three urbanization classes (low, medium, high). Each row is a single insect pollinator X plant interaction. Full species names and abbreviations used in figures in the Supplementary Information are reported.<br> The data file is .txt with tab-separated values.</p>
A database of plant-pollinator networks
<p>This database assembles different published datasets of observed interaction networks between plants and pollinators, which were extracted from articles, theses and existing online databases.</p> <p>Each row in the data table corresponds to an interaction between a plant and a pollinator species reported at a given site by a given publication.</p>
Seasonal trajectories of plant-pollinator interaction networks differ following phenological mismatches along an urbanization gradient - Data and code
<p>Dataset and code used in the article "Seasonal trajectories of plant-pollinator interaction networks differ following phenological mismatches along an urbanization gradient", by A. Fisogni et al., published in Landscape and Urban Planning (2022, 226:104512, <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016920462200161X?via%3Dihub">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104512</a>)</p>
Warming of experimental plant-pollinator communities advances phenologies, alters traits, reduces interactions, and depresses reproduction
<p>This is the data set supporting the analyses performed in the article entitled "Warming of experimental plant-pollinator communities advances phenologies, alters traits, reduces interactions, and depresses reproduction", by Natasha de Manincor, Alessandro Fisogni, and Nicole E. Rafferty, published in Ecology Letters (2023, 26:323-334, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.14158">https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.14158</a>).</p> <p>The experiment has been performed in the greenhouse facilities at the University of California, Riverside, in 2021.</p> <p>The two treatments analyzed are ambient vs warmed (+ 4 °C), the focal pollinator species is <em>Osmia lignaria</em>, and the three focal plant species are <em>Collinsia heterophylla</em>, <em>Nemophila menziesii</em>, and <em>Phacelia campanularia</em>.</p> <p>Data are tab separated .txt files.</p>
Data for 'Floral color and family drive contrasting plant-pollinator responses to nutrient enrichment' by Rebecca A. Nelson, Elizabeth T. Borer, and Eric W. Seabloom 2025. Collected in California grasslands 2023 and 2024.
Data for analysis of how flower color and family mediate plant-pollinator response to nutrient enrichment. Data on pollinator visitation and flower abundance were collected in three California grasslands in 2023 and 2024 from a factorial experimental in which combinations of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium with micronutrients were applied.
Individual-based plant-pollinator networks are structured by phenotypic and microsite plant traits
<p>Dataset associated with the manuscript "Individual-based plant-pollinator networks are structured by phenotypic and microsite plant traits" (Arroyo-Correa et al. 2020), including plant-pollinator interactions, individual plant attributes and the plant polygon map created with drone flights. </p>
Data and code corresponding to the article "Interaction network structure explains species temporal persistence in empirical plant-pollinator communities"
<p>This upload contains the Datasets and code to generate the results of the article "Interaction network structure explains species temporal persistence in empirical plant-pollinator communities".</p><p>The database comprises two files containing the abundances of plants and pollinators, and one containing the interaction networks among plants and pollinators. </p><p>The code folder contains the code to generate the results, and to generate the figures of the manuscript. </p>
Data from: emergence of structure in plant-pollinator networks: low floral resource constrains network specialisation
<p>Specialisation enhances the efficiency of plant-pollinator networks through the exchange of conspecific pollen transfer for floral resources. Floral resources form the currency of plant-pollinator interactions, but the understanding of how floral resources affect the structure of plant-pollinator networks remains modest. Previous theory predicts that optimally foraging animal species will specialise to improve resource acquisition under high resource availability. Although floral resource availability depends on both the plant production and animal consumption of the resources, previous work has assumed that production and availability to be equivalent. This potentially may have led to erroneous inferences on the effect of resource availability on specialisation. We develop a mutualistic Lotka-Volterra consumer-resource model to investigate the influence of floral resource availability on plant-pollinator network structure. The model incorporates animal adaptive foraging behaviour, floral resource dynamics, and density-dependent dynamics. Specialisation, nestedness and modularity of simulated networks generated from the model under a wide range of parameters were explained using the Generalised Linear Model. We found that the distinction between floral resource dynamics and plant density dynamics was necessary for partial specialisation of plant-pollinator networks. This is because floral resource dynamics constraint animal preference due to its depletion by animal species. Floral resource abundance had a positive effect on network specialisation, but animal density had a negative effect on network specialisation. Floral resource dynamics thus play key roles on the structure of plant-pollinator network, distinctive from plant species density dynamics.</p>
Effects of different types of low-intensity management on plant-pollinator interactions in Estonian grasslands
<p>In the face of global pollinator decline, extensively-managed grasslands play an important role in supporting stable pollinator communities. However, different types of extensive management may promote particular plant species and thus particular functional traits. As the functional traits of flowering plant species (e.g. flower size and shape) in a habitat determine the identity and frequency of pollinator visitors, they can also influence the structures of plant-pollinator interaction networks. The aim of this study was to examine how the type of low-intensity traditional management influences plant and pollinator composition, the structure of plant-pollinator interactions, and their mediation by floral and insect functional traits. Specifically, we compared mown wooded meadows to grazed alvar pastures in western Estonia. We found that both management types fostered equal diversity of plants and pollinators, and overlapping, though still distinct, plant and pollinator compositions. Wooded meadows had significantly higher connectance and specialisation, while alvar pastures achieved higher Shannon diversity at a standardised sampling of interactions. Pollinators with small body sizes and short proboscis lengths were more specialised in their preference for particular plant species and the specialisation of individual pollinators was higher in alvar pastures than in wooded meadows. All in all, the two management types promoted diverse plant and pollinator communities, which enabled the development of equally even and nested pollination networks. The same generalist plants and pollinators were important for the pollination networks of both wooded meadows and alvar pastures; however, they were complemented by management-specific species, which accounted for differences in network structure. Therefore, the implementation of both management types in the same landscape helps to maintain high species and interaction diversity.</p>
Stable species and interactions in plant-pollinator networks deviate from core position in fragmented habitats
<p><span>S</span><span>pecies</span><span> and their interactions are more dynamic over time and space</span> <span>in</span><span> fragmented habitats </span><span>than</span><span> in continuous habitats</span><span>.</span> <span>In fragmented habitats,</span><span> the</span> <span>low </span><span>nestedness</span> <span>of </span><span>mutualistic</span><span> networks may be related to the</span> <span>position</span><span> change</span> <span>of stable (high persistence over time/space) species and interactions in </span><span>the</span><span> network</span><span>s.</span><span> Previous studies</span> <span>have shown that </span><span>s</span><span>table species </span><span>and</span><span> interactions tend to </span><span>be in</span><span> the core position </span><span>of</span> <span>mutualistic</span><span> networks</span><span>. </span><span>H</span><span>owever</span><span>, </span><span>in fragmented habitats</span><span>, </span><span>it remains unknown whether </span><span>stable species or interactions still </span><span>tend to </span><span>be in</span><span> the core position.</span><span> </span><span>To address this gap,</span> <span>here</span><span> we evaluated </span><span>the correlation between the position of proximity to the network core and the temporal/spatial stability of </span><span>species and interactions</span><span>, </span><span>using</span> <span>the </span><span>observation of 42 plant-pollinator networks conducted in a fragmented island landscape over 3 years</span><span>.</span> <span>We showed that temporally/spatially </span><span>stable </span><span>species </span><span>and</span><span> interactions </span><span>deviated from the network core</span><span> to varying degrees</span><span>. Temporally stable plants</span><span> were</span> <span>most likely to deviate from the network core, followed by</span> <span>pollinators and</span> <span>interactions</span><span>, while only </span><span>spatially stable </span><span>pollinators</span><span> tend to </span><span>deviate from the network core</span><span>. </span><span>When unstable species (</span><span>present in few time/space points</span><span>, </span><span>typically specialists) and interactions occupy the network core,</span> <span>they cannot interact with most species in the network </span><span>as</span><span> generalists</span> <span>do</span><span>, </span><span>result</span><span>ing</span> <span>in</span> <span>the</span> <span>decrease of network nestedness. Therefore, from the perspective of</span><span> position and stability,</span><span> s</span><span>table species and interactions </span><span>deviate from the network core</span> <span>in</span> <span>fragmented habitats</span><span>, which </span><span>is an important reason for</span><span> the</span><span> decrease of</span><span> nestedness in </span><span>mutualistic</span><span> networks</span><span>.</span><span> </span><span>Our study</span><span> suggests that protecting</span> <span>plants that</span><span> occupy the core in large plant-pollinator networks is </span><span>essential for</span> <span>maintaining the network persistence in fragmented habitats.</span></p>
Neutral processes related to regional bee commonness and dispersal distances are important predictors of plant-pollinator networks along gradients of climate and landscape conditions
<p>Understanding how niche-based and neutral processes contribute to the spatial variation in plant-pollinator interactions is central to designing effective pollination conservation schemes. Such schemes are needed to reverse declines of wild bees and other pollinating insects and to promote pollination services to wild and cultivated plants. We used data on wild bee interactions with plants belonging to the four tribes Loteae, Trifolieae, Anthemideae, and either spring- or summer-flowering Cichorieae, sampled systematically along a 682km latitudinal gradient to build models that allowed us to (a) predict occurrences of pairwise bee-flower interactions across 115 sampling locations, and (b) estimate the contribution of variables hypothesized to be related to niche-based assembly structuring processes (viz. annual mean temperature, landscape diversity, bee sociality, bee phenology, and flower preferences of bees) and neutral processes (viz. regional commonness and dispersal distance to conspecifics). While neutral processes were important predictors of plant-pollinator distributions, niche-based processes were reflected in the contrasting distributions of solitary bee and bumble bees along the temperature gradient, and in the influence of bee flower preferences on the distribution of bee species across plant types. In particular, bee flower preferences separated bees into three main groups, albeit with some overlap: visitors to spring-flowering Cichorieae; visitors to Anthemideae and summer-flowering Cichorieae; and visitors to Trifolieae and Loteae. Our findings suggest that both neutral and niche-based processes are significant contributors to the spatial distribution of plant-pollinator interactions so that conservation actions in our region should be directed towards areas: near high concentrations of known occurrences of regionally rare bees; in mild climatic conditions; and that are surrounded by heterogeneous landscapes. Given the observed niche-based differences, the proportion of functionally distinct plants in flower-mixes could be chosen to target bee species, or guilds, of conservation concern.</p>
JoseBSL/Geonet: Climate mediates pollinator species roles in plant-pollinator networks
<p>Code and data from the article "Climate mediates pollinator species roles in plant-pollinator networks".</p>
Network analysis highlights increased generalisation and evenness of plant-pollinator interactions after conservation measures
<p><strong>DATASET used in the article entitled</strong> “Network analysis highlights increased generalisation and evenness of plant-pollinator interactions after conservation measures”.</p> <p>We supply weighted and binary matrices used for plant-pollinator network analyses, before and after the implementation of conservation measures.</p> <p>We also supply the list of plant and pollinator species recorded in this study.</p>
Data from: Urbanization alters the spatiotemporal dynamics of plant-pollinator networks in a tropical megacity
<p><span>Urbanization is a major driver of biodiversity change but how it interacts with spatial and temporal gradients to influence the dynamics of plant-pollinator networks is poorly understood, especially in tropical urbanization hotspots. Here, we analyzed the drivers of environmental, spatial, and temporal turnover of plant-pollinator interactions (interaction β-diversity) along an urbanization gradient in Bengaluru, a South Indian megacity. The compositional turnover of plant-pollinator interactions differed more between seasons and with local urbanization intensity than with spatial distance, suggesting that seasonality and environmental filtering were more important than dispersal limitation for explaining plant-pollinator interaction β-diversity. Furthermore, urbanization amplified the seasonal dynamics of plant-pollinator interactions, with stronger temporal turnover in urban compared to rural sites, driven by greater turnover of native non-crop plant species (not managed by people). Our study demonstrates that environmental, spatial, and temporal gradients interact to shape the dynamics of plant-pollinator networks and urbanization can strongly amplify these dynamics. </span></p>
Data from: Urbanization alters the spatiotemporal dynamics of plant-pollinator networks in a tropical megacity
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Neutral processes related to regional bee commonness and dispersal distances are important predictors of plant-pollinator networks along gradients of climate and landscape conditions
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Hibiscus bullseyes reveal mechanisms controlling petal pattern proportions that influence plant-pollinator interactions
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Off-target drift of the herbicide dicamba disrupts plant-pollinator interactions via novel pathways
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Effects of different types of low-intensity management on plant-pollinator interactions in Estonian grasslands
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Emergence of structure in plant-pollinator networks: Low floral resource constrains network specialisation
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.