Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
862
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
862 results for “Program Evaluation”
Programming Problems Submitted for Evaluation of LLMs GPT-3.5 and Gemini Pro 1.0
<p>Problems extracted from platforms LeetCode and BeeCrowd for evaluation of LLMs GPT3.5 and Gemini Pro 1.0.</p> <p>The data from the plataforms has the following columns and values:</p> <p> </p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td><strong>LeetCode Data</strong></td> <td> </td> <td><strong>BeeCrowd Data</strong></td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>Column</strong></td> <td><strong>Doc</strong></td> <td><strong>Column</strong></td> <td><strong>Doc</strong></td> </tr> <tr> <td>problem_level</td> <td>easy | medium | hard</td> <td>problem_level</td> <td><1...10></td> </tr> <tr> <td>problem_link</td> <td><LeetCode link for the problem></td> <td>problem_link</td> <td><BeeCrowd link for the problem></td> </tr> <tr> <td>prompt</td> <td><text submitted to LLM></td> <td>prompt</td> <td><text submitted to LLM></td> </tr> <tr> <td>response_code</td> <td><code provided by the LLM></td> <td>response_code</td> <td><code provided by the LLM></td> </tr> <tr> <td>response_evaluation</td> <td>True | False</td> <td>response_evaluation</td> <td>True | False</td> </tr> <tr> <td>execution_time_ms</td> <td><time></td> <td>execution_time_ms</td> <td><time></td> </tr> <tr> <td>memory_usage_mb</td> <td><memory></td> <td>error_generated</td> <td>Wrong Answer | Time Limit Exceeded | Memory Limit Exceeded....</td> </tr> <tr> <td>error_generated</td> <td>Wrong Answer | Time Limit Exceeded | Memory Limit Exceeded....</td> <td>attempts_number</td> <td>1 | 2 | 3</td> </tr> <tr> <td>attempts_number</td> <td>1 | 2 | 3</td> <td>author</td> <td><author's name></td> </tr> <tr> <td>contains_image</td> <td>True | False</td> <td>source</td> <td><origin institution></td> </tr> <tr> <td>related_topic_1</td> <td><topic></td> <td>origin_country</td> <td><origin country></td> </tr> <tr> <td>related_topic_2</td> <td><topic></td> <td>contains_image</td> <td>True | False</td> </tr> <tr> <td>related_topic_3</td> <td><topic></td> <td>related_topic_1</td> <td><topic></td> </tr> <tr> <td>related_topic_4</td> <td><topic></td> <td> </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>related_topic_5</td> <td><topic></td> <td> </td> <td> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p>
Dataset and scripts for the paper with title Evaluating Programming Models for the HPC GPU Ecosystem
<p>Dataset and scripts for the paper with title Evaluating Programming Models for the HPC GPU Ecosystem</p>
Simulated dataset (Almeida et al., 2018 - GigaScience) treated with various clustering programs to evaluate ReClustOR efficiency and constitency
<p>ReClustOR is a novel clustering method that overcomes some of the problems associated with classical ‘<em>heuristic’</em>clustering methods and consequently increases the stability and quality of the reconstructed OTUs. Moreover, the OTUs database defined with ReClustOR can be used as reference(s) with gradual enrichment of it, with new studies and samples. In this way, huge datasets like<em> </em>the Earth Microbiome Project can be easily used as references for smaller projects, thereby increasing the quality of comparisons between studies and datasets</p> <p>Here, we propose a new approach called ReClustOR (for RE-CLUSTering method using an Open-Reference approach) to improve OTU consistency (see https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2597402). This new strategy combines two of the previously-described clustering methods. Firstly, a classical clustering<em> </em>method (<em>e.g. </em>SWARM, or VSEARCH) is used to define OTU centroids and create a reference database. Secondly, a closed- or open-reference method (depending on the user’s choice) is computed for all reads which are not considered as OTU centroids. Contrary to the classical clustering methods, each read is compared to all centroids using a distance-based greedy clustering technique (Edgar, 2010; He et al., 2015), and then assigned to the nearest one, thereby fixing the erroneous assignments of reads to OTUs.</p> <p>To highlight the improvements provided by ReClustOR in describing microbial diversity in terms of ecological diversity metrics (<em>e.g. </em>richness, OTU composition, Shannon, 1/Simpson) and taxonomic composition, a simulated dataset was subjected to: (i) ESV definition, (ii) multiple conventional <em>de novo</em> methods (<em>i.e.</em> a homemade <em>de novo </em>clustering close to CRUNCHCLUST, VSEARCH and SWARM), and (iii) ReClustOR computation. This dataset is a simulated one (Almeida et al., 2018), containing a diverse set of <em>genera</em> commonly found in three ecosystems different ecosystems: human gut, ocean and soil. The clustering methods were compared for: (i) their ability to describe microbial richness, (ii) the congruence between OTU assignments and sequences taxonomy, (iii) the robustness of each defined OTU, and (iv) their ability to efficiently describe the microbial community based on OTU composition.</p> <p>Here, the simulated dataset (00_Raw_data) and all steps of analysis are available to resue them to test ReClustOR, and also to have a better understanding of files and data produced by this program. More details are available in the Tree_of_data.tree file.</p>
Experiment Results: Evaluation of different parallelisation strategies with regard to the performance of parallel program execution
<p><br> Modern processors achieve an increase in performance by adding multiple cores. This means that during software development, care must be taken to parallelise the program sequences. To make predictions about the performance of a software design, there is Palladio. This is very accurate for single core processors.<br> In this bachelor thesis the influence of the chosen parallelization strategy on the performance of software is examined. Different hardware requirements are used for this purpose. They are used to generate individual work packages. These are executed by different parallelization strategies. The used parallelization strategies are: Java Threads, Java ParallelStreams, OpenMp and Akka Actor. Runtime and cache behavior are measured during each execution. In addition, the experiments are performed on different servers. The evaluation is done using acceleration curves and the Cache Miss Rate. The results show that the parallelization strategies differ only slightly in the work packages used.</p>
Cluster randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact on children's linear growth of an unconditional cash transfer program implemented in rural areas of North Togo
<p>A parallel cluster randomized controlled trial was implemented in North Togo. 162 rural landlocked villages were randomized into either an intervention arm (cash transfers + package of community activities, <em>n</em>=82) or a control arm (package of community activities only, <em>n</em>=80). </p> <p>Two different representative samples of children aged 6-29 months and their mothers were surveyed, one before the intervention (2014, <em>n</em>=2,658), the other two years afterwards (2016, <em>n</em>=2,031).</p> <p>You will found here:</p> <ul> <li>Two datasets, fully anonymized (French, CSV files): one for observations on households and the other for observations on mother-child pairs</li> <li>Two dictionaries of variables (French, Excel files): one for the household database and the other for the mother-child pairs database</li> <li>The study protocol as submitted to the Ministry of Health of Togo (French, PDF)</li> <li>The technical and financial proposal (to evaluate the CT program) as submitted to funders (English, PDF)</li> </ul> <p> </p>
IMPLEMENTING AND EVALUATING A PAEDIATRIC EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT TRAINING PROGRAM FOR PRIMARY HEALTHCARE WORKERS IN ZARIA
<p>Nigeria continues to grapple with alarmingly high under-five mortality rates, with approximately 2,300 children dying daily due to preventable and treatable diseases such as pneumonia, malaria, and diarrheal illnesses. This crisis is particularly pronounced in rural areas, where childhood mortality rates are significantly higher than in urban centres. For many rural communities, primary healthcare (PHC) centres serve as the sole access point to medical services, making these centres critical to addressing this public health challenge. Despite their importance, PHC centres often face significant challenges, including inadequate infrastructure, limited access to essential medications, and a shortage of adequately trained health personnel.</p> <p>This study aimed to implement and evaluate a Paediatric Emergency Management Training Program for healthcare workers at PHC centres in Zaria, Kaduna State. The primary objective was to assess the effectiveness of the training in improving the competency of health workers in managing common paediatric emergencies, thereby enhancing the overall quality of care provided at these centres.</p> <p>A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted involving 139 healthcare workers from selected PHC centres in Sabon Gari and Zaria Local Government Areas, utilizing a multi-stage random sampling technique. Data collection was performed using a pre-tested, semi-structured, self-administered questionnaire designed to evaluate the participants' baseline knowledge, followed by an assessment after the training intervention. The data were analysed using SPSS version 21, with chi-square tests employed to examine the associations between variables. Results were presented using tables and charts for clarity.</p> <p>The findings revealed a generally low baseline competency in managing common paediatric emergencies among the healthcare workers. Specifically, 66 (48.5%) of the respondents demonstrated very poor knowledge regarding the causes of common paediatric emergencies, 32 (23.5%) had poor knowledge, 34 (25.0%) had good knowledge, and only 4 (2.9%) of the respondents exhibited excellent knowledge. Similarly, knowledge regarding the treatment of these emergencies was also lacking, with 46.7% of respondents showing very poor understanding, 34.1% having poor knowledge, 16.3% demonstrating good knowledge, and only 3.0% showing excellent knowledge. A statistically significant relationship was observed between academic qualifications and knowledge levels in both causes (p = 0.004) and treatment (p = 0.000) of paediatric emergencies.</p> <p>The low baseline knowledge underscores the critical need for targeted training interventions. The study highlights the importance of establishing a sustained partnership between the Department of Paediatrics at Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital and the Departments of Primary Health Care in Zaria and Sabon Gari Local Governments. Regular training workshops, held quarterly, are recommended to continuously equip PHC workers with the necessary skills to effectively manage paediatric emergencies, ultimately contributing to a reduction in childhood mortality rates in the region.</p>
MakeCode and CODAL: Intuitive and Efficient Embedded Systems Programming for Education (Artifact Evaluation)
<p>This artifact allows others to reproduce the results seen in this paper for MakeCode and CODAL, using the BBC micro:bit. The artifact contains an offline build environment for CODAL and MakeCode, allowing evaluators to test and build programs locally. In addition, we also provide espruino and micropython virtual machines to further increase repeatability of our results. Evaluators should download the virtual machine containing all pre-requisite tools, and use an oscilloscope to observe wave forms (used for timing) generated by the micro:bit, and a serial terminal to observe results reported from the micro:bit over serial.</p> <p>Full documentation is available at: https://lancaster-university.github.io/lctes-artefact-evaluation/</p>
Collaborative Program Comprehension based on Augmented Reality (Evaluation Results of Master's Thesis)
<p>The dataset contains feedback generated through a survey for an augmented reality approach in the ExplorViz project.</p> <p>The dataset includes the results for a pilot study with two probands and the results for a case study with 20 probands.</p>
Dataset for the article: Evaluating the Predictive Performance of Quick Methods for Estimating Task Difficulty and Student Ability in Automated Computer Programming Assessment
<p>This open access repository houses the dataset utilized in the research article:</p><p>Pankiewicz, M. (2023). Evaluating the Predictive Performance of Quick Methods for Estimating Task Difficulty and Student Ability in Automated Computer Programming Assessment. In T. Bastiaens (Ed.), Proceedings of EdMedia + Innovate Learning (pp. 1413-1418). Vienna, Austria: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/222666</p><p>The repository includes these files:</p><p>"submissions.csv": This data file captures the evaluation results of programming assignments. It is organized by the following columns:</p><p> </p><ul><li>"user_id": The unique identifier for each student who submitted the assignment.</li><li>"task_id": The unique identifier for each task that received submissions.</li><li>"submission_seconds": The number of seconds since the first user accessed the initial task's description within the system.</li><li>"correct": The outcome of the evaluation (1 denotes correct; 0 denotes incorrect).</li><li>"subject": The specific subject matter that the task addresses.</li></ul><p> </p><p>"subjects.csv": This data file comprises the roster of subjects for which tasks have been assigned within the system. It includes these columns:</p><p> </p><ul><li>"subject_id": The unique identifier for each subject.</li><li>"subject": The actual name of the subject.</li></ul><p> </p>
Evaluating the implementation of adult smoking cessation programs in community settings. Protocol for a scoping review
<p>Tables and figures from <em>Evaluating the implementation of adult smoking cessation programs in community settings. Protocol for a scoping review</em><br> </p>
Evaluation Study of the Online High School Media Aware Program
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04035694. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Evaluation of a Mental Health Physician Support Program in Nova Scotia
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01975948. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Replication data for impact evaluation of two large-scale forestry incentive programs in Guatemala
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Marx: Uncovering Class Hierarchies in C++ Programs - (Evaluation Data)
<p>Evaluation data of the published paper: "MARX: Uncovering Class Hierarchies in C++ Programs". The paper was published at the Symposium on Network and Distributed System Security (NDSS) 2017.</p> <p>The paper is available at: https://www.syssec.rub.de/research/publications/marx/</p> <p><br> Abstract:</p> <p>Reverse engineering of binary executables is a difficult task which gets more involved by the way compilers translate high-level concepts used in paradigms such as object-oriented programming into native code, as it is the case for C++. Such code is harder to grasp than, e. g., traditional procedural code, since it is generally more verbose and adds complexity through features such as polymorphism or inheritance. Hence, a deep understanding of interactions between instantiated objects, their corresponding classes, and the connection between classes would vastly reduce the time it takes an analyst to understand the application. The growth in complexity in contemporary C++ applications only amplifies the effect.</p> <p>In this paper, we introduce Marx, an analysis framework to reconstruct class hierarchies of C++ programs and resolve virtual callsites. We have evaluated the results on a diverse set of large, real-world applications. Our experimental results show that our approach achieves a high precision (93.2% of the hierarchies reconstructed accurately for Node.js, 88.4% for MySQL Server) while keeping analysis times practical. Furthermore, we show that, despite any imprecision in the analysis, the derived information can be reliably used in classic software security hardening applications without breaking programs. We showcase this property for two applications built on top of the output of our framework: vtable protection and type-safe object reuse. This demonstrates that, in addition to traditional reverse engineering applications, Marx can aid in implementing concrete, valuable tools e. g., in the domain of exploit mitigations.</p>
An Empirical Evaluation of Competitive Programming AI: A Case Study of AlphaCode
<p><strong>Abstract</strong><br> AlphaCode, the code generation system by DeepMind, is an AI technology for assisting software developers in solving competitive programming problems using natural language problem descriptions.<br> However, there is no existing work comparing AlphaCode-generated codes with human codes.<br> In this paper, we conduct an empirical study to find code similarities and performance differences between AlphaCode-generated codes and human codes.<br> We collect 44 generated codes in C++ and Python languages from AlphaCode official website that solve 22 problems on Codeforces.<br> We then retrieve 31,736 human codes by using Codeforces API.<br> The results show that (i) the generated code from AlphaCode and the human code is not similar (i.e., the similarity of 0.26 for both C++ and Python), however, the code fragments in the generated code are comprised of various human codes (i.e., uniqueness of 3.30\% and 8.94\% for C++ and Python respectively) and<br> (ii) the generated code performs on par with or worse than the human code in terms of execution time and memory usage.<br> Moreover, AlphaCode employs excessive nested loops and unnecessary variable declarations (e.g., used \textit{long long} instead of \textit{int}), which causes a low performance regarding our manual investigation.</p>
Evaluation of disjunctive programs in WASP
<p>Benchmark set for the paper "Evaluation of disjunctive programs in WASP" accepted for the International Conference on Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (LPNMR 2019).</p>
Objective evaluation of Nintendo Wii Fit plus balance program training on postural stability in Multiple Sclerosis patients
<p>The use of the Nintendo Wii system has become a common tool for balance rehabilitation in patients with multiple sclerosis, but few studies verified the effectiveness of such an approach using quantitative measures of postural control. We aimed to evaluate the impact of rehabilitation treatment using the Nintendo Wii Fit Plus balance program on objective stabilometric parameters in multiple sclerosis patients. We enrolled 36 multiple sclerosis patients, with mild-moderate disability, referring to the multiple sclerosis Centre of the University of Catania from September 2013 to June 2014. Twenty participants underwent 20 individual sessions of balance exercise using the Nintendo Wii Fit Plus. They were assessed at baseline (T0) and at the end of rehabilitation program (T1) by Neurocom Balance Manager. Functional independence measure, Barthel index, and Berg balance scale were also administered. At T1, we found a significant improvement in total path length-open eyes, sway area-open eyes, and mean sway velocity-open eyes. Patients showed significant improvement in functional independence measure motor score, Barthel index, and in Berg balance scale. No significant differences between T0 and T1 in closed eyes trials were found. A significant correlation between delta values between T0 and T1 of sway area-open eyes and the Berg balance scale (r = -0.76; P < 0.0001) was found. This study confirmed that balance rehabilitation training performed using the Nintendo Wii with balance board significantly reduced some postural sway parameters in multiple sclerosis patients. It could be a good support to standard rehabilitation program in multiple sclerosis patients.</p>
# Blocks? Graphs? Why Not Both? Designing and Evaluating a Hybrid Programming Environment for End-users: Replication Package
<p><strong>Blocks? Graphs? Why Not Both? Designing and Evaluating a Hybrid Programming Environment for End-users: Replication Package</strong></p> <p>This repository contains supplementary materials for the paper "Blocks? Graphs? Why Not Both? Designing and Evaluating a Hybrid Programming Environment for End-users". We provide this data for transparency reasons and to support replications of our experiemnts.</p> <p><em>Note: This package is anonymized for peer review purposes. We will provide contact information for the authors at a later date. We also plan to add interactive versions of our tasks and tutorials in an updated version to allow readers easier exploration/experimentation.</em></p> <p><strong>Summary of files contained in this package</strong></p> <p>This package contains two parts:</p> <ul> <li> <p>The <code>data-analysis/</code> folder contains the raw dataset we collected for our experiment in CSV format, as well as scripts we used for our analyses.</p> <ul> <li>Column <code>ID</code> contains a unique 4-digit identifier for each participant that they were assigned throughout our study.</li> <li>Column <code>Group</code> contains the group (Blocks/Graph) that participants were randomly assigned to.</li> <li>Columns <code>Task1Time</code> and <code>Task2Time</code> contain the time participants spent to complete the two programming tasks of our study in minutes.</li> <li>Columns <code>Task1Success</code> and <code>Task2Success</code> contain a boolean value indicating whether the participants successfully completed the given task. Note that participants had unlimited attempts until they timed out after a strict time limit of 30 minutes, so if a participant was unsuccessful the corresponding time value is 30.</li> <li>Columns <code>Task1Tests</code> and <code>Task2Tests</code> contain the number of times a participant executed their code throughout a task, including their final submission if they were successful.</li> <li>Columns <code>LearnTask</code>, <code>ReadTask</code> and <code>WriteTask</code> contain the scores that participants gave to the task editor component of their assigned programming environment. There are 3 scores for the categories "learnability", "readability" and "writability". Scores are on a 5-point scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best).</li> <li>Columns <code>LearnTrig</code>, <code>ReadTrig</code> and <code>WriteTrig</code> contain the scores that participants gave to the trigger editor component of their assigned programming environment. There are 3 scores for the categories "learnability", "readability" and "writability". Scores are on a 5-point scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best).</li> <li>Columns <code>LearnComp</code>, <code>ReadComp</code> and <code>WriteComp</code> contain the scores that participants gave to their assigned assigned programming environment in direct comparison to the other alternative. There are 3 scores for the categories "learnability", "readability" and "writability". Unlike in the paper, where scores are on a scale from -2 to 2, the raw scores here are on a 5-point scale from 1 (strong preference for other environment) to 5 (strong preference for own environment).</li> <li>The script <code>survival.py</code> was used to perform the survival analysis presented in the paper and generate the related figure.</li> <li>The script <code>batplot.py</code> was used to generate the 3x3 grid of ratings used in a figure in the paper.</li> </ul> </li> <li> <p>The <code>materials/</code> folder contains the tutorials and task descriptions we presented to study participants. It also contains the exact wording of pre-screening and post-experiemental survey questions.</p> <ul> <li>The image <code>pre-screening.png</code> shows the three pre-screening questions we used to determine whether our participants could be included in our study.</li> <li>The images <code>tutorial1_instructions.png</code> and <code>tutorial1_sim.png</code> contain the instructions and initial simulator state we provided to participants for the first programming tutorial. This tutorial did not provide starter code and was identical for both participant groups.</li> <li>The images <code>tutorial2_instructions.png</code> and <code>tutorial2_sim.png</code> contain the instructions and initial simulator state we provided to participants for the second programming tutorial. This tutorial was identical for both participant groups and provided participants with starter code, which is shown in the images: <ul> <li><code>tutorial2_code_main.png</code> for the main program in the left canvas</li> <li><code>tutorial2_code_move.png</code> for the definition of "Move box to the right".</li> </ul> </li> <li>The images <code>tutorial3_instructions_blocks.png</code>/<code>tutorial3_instructions_graph.png</code> and <code>tutorial3_sim.png</code> contain the instructions and initial simulator state we provided to participants for the third programming tutorial. This tutorial also provided participants with starter code, which is shown in the images: <ul> <li><code>tutorial3_code_main.png</code> for the main program in the left canvas</li> <li><code>tutorial3_code_pick.png</code> for the definition of "Pick up box"</li> <li><code>tutorial3_code_place.png</code> for the definition of "Place box"</li> </ul> </li> <li>The images <code>task1_instructions.png</code> and <code>task1_sim.png</code> contain the instructions and initial simulator state we provided to participants for the first programming task. The task did not provide starter code and the instructions were identical for both participant groups.</li> <li>The images <code>task2_instructions.png</code> and <code>task2_sim.png</code> contain the instructions and initial simulator state we provided to participants for the second programming task. The instructions were identical for both groups. This task also provided participants with starter code, which is shown in the images: <ul> <li><code>task2_code_main.png</code> for the main program in the left canvas</li> <li><code>task2_code_pick_prog.png</code> for the definition of "Pick up block"</li> <li><code>task2_code_load_trig_blocks.png</code>/<code>task2_code_load_trig_graph.png</code> for the definition of the trigger "Ready to load machine"</li> <li><code>task2_code_load_prog.png</code> for the definition of "Load and activate machine"</li> <li><code>task2_code_finished_trig_blocks.png</code>/<code>task2_code_finished_trig_graph.png</code> for the definition of the trigger "Machine finished"</li> <li><code>task2_code_finished_prog1.png</code> for the definition of "Get block from machine"</li> <li><code>task2_code_finished_prog2.png</code> for the definition of "Place block in bin"</li> </ul> </li> <li>The image <code>usability.png</code> shows the usability questions we used to determine a participant's rating of their assigned programming environment. The questions were identical for both participant groups.</li> <li>The images <code>comprehension_blocks_1.png</code> and <code>comprehension_blocks_2.png</code> show the program comprehension questions we used to determine whether participants in the Blocks group could understand more complex triggers.</li> <li>The images <code>comprehension_graph_1.png</code> and <code>comprehension_graph_2.png</code> show the program comprehension questions we used to determine whether participants in the Graph group could understand more complex triggers.</li> <li>The images <code>comparison_blocks.png</code> and <code>comparison_graph.png</code> show the images of triggers in the alternative environment that we showed to our participants before choosing their preferred environment. The questions were identical for both participant groups.</li> <li>The image <code>comparison.png</code> shows the questions we used to determine a participant's preference between the two programming environment alternatives.</li> </ul> </li> </ul>
Input and output data for the paper "Evaluating the German PV auction program: The secrets of individual bids revealed"
<p>Batz Liñeiro, T., Müsgens, F., (2021). Energy Policy</p> <p><a href="http://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112618">doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112618</a></p> <p>ABSTRACT</p> <p>Auctions have become the primary instrument for promoting renewable energy around the world. However, the data published on such auctions are typically limited to aggregated information (e.g., total awarded capacity, average payments). These data constraints hinder the evaluation of realisation rates and other relevant auction dynamics. In this study, we present an algorithm to overcome these data limitations in German renewable energy auction programme by combining publicly available information from four different databases. We apply it to the German solar auction programme and evaluate auctions using quantitative methods. We calculate realisation rates and—using correlation and regression analysis—explore the impact of PV module prices, competition, and project and developer characteristics on project realisation and bid values. Our results confirm that the German auctions were effective. We also found that project realisation took, on average, 1.5 years (with 28% of projects finished late and incurring a financial penalty), nearly half of projects changed location before completion (again, incurring a financial penalty) and small and inexperienced developers could successfully participate in auctions.</p> <p>Description</p> <p>The data package offered in this publication comprises input, processing, and output files, accompanied by the corresponding R-codes used for data processing at different stages. Among the various data outputs, the "Auctions" sheet within the file "2 Auction Realizations Solar-2" holds particular significance for users. Within this sheet, users can identify the realized projects, their respective IDs, and the reported individual bid values. However, it is recommended to refer to the attached publication to gain a comprehensive understanding of the bid-value identification process.</p> <p>For users seeking to update the results, the input files can be easily updated by referring to partner publications that share the same file names. These partner publications include the <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/7945029">UnitRegister</a>, <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/8010410">PaymentRegister</a>, and <a href="https://zenodo.org/record/8013071">TariffRegister </a>datasets.</p>
Implementing and Evaluating a Social-Emotional Learning Program for Refugee Children During the COVID-19 Pandemic
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04931888. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.