Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 4. A–E. Uronemita filificum Kahl, 1931. F–I. Uronema marinum Dujardin, 1841. J–N. Pleuronema setigerum Calkins, 1902. A–C, F–H, J–L in Seven scuticociliates (Protozoa, Ciliophora) from Alabama, USA, with descriptions of two parasitic species isolated from a freshwater mussel Potamilus purpuratus

Fig. 4. A–E. Uronemita filificum Kahl, 1931. F–I. Uronema marinum Dujardin, 1841. J–N. Pleuronema setigerum Calkins, 1902. A–C, F–H, J–L. In vivo. D–E, M–N. After silver impregnation. A, F, J. Ventral views of typical individuals. B–C, G–H, K–L. Different individuals, showing variation in body shape, arrow in (B) shows the conspicuous apical plate, arrows in (C, H) mark contractile vacuoles. D, I, M–N. Detailed structures of buccal area, arrow in (M) indicates the ring-like posterior end of M2a, arrowheads in (M) mark preoral kineties. E. Ventral view, arrowheads show somatic kineties. Abbreviations: M1, 2, 3 = membranelle 1, 2 and 3; M2a = the anterior part of membranelle 2; M2b = the posterior part of membranelle 2; Ma = macronucleus; PM = paroral membrane. Scale bars: A–B = 20 μm; F, H, N = 10 μm; G = 5 μm, J–L = 30 μm.

Fig. 3. A–D in Seven scuticociliates (Protozoa, Ciliophora) from Alabama, USA, with descriptions of two parasitic species isolated from a freshwater mussel Potamilus purpuratus

Fig. 3. A–D. Pseudocohnilembus hargisi Evans & Thompson, 1964. E–J. Parauronema cf. longum Song, 1995. A–C, E–I. In vivo. D, J. After silver impregnation. A, E. Ventral views of typical individuals, arrow in (A) shows caudal cilia. B–C, F–G. Different individuals, showing varying body shapes, arrowheads in (F) mark somatic kineties. D, J. Detailed structure of the buccal area. H. Ventral view, arrow refers to dumbbell-shaped crystals. I. Posterior end, arrow marks caudal cilium. Abbreviations: M1, 2, 3 = membranelle 1, 2 and 3; PM = paroral membrane; Sc = scutica. Scale bars: A–B = 15 μm; C, E = 40 μm; G = 60 μm.

Fig. 5. All reported populations for the following species. A. Uronema marinum Dujardin, 1841. B in Seven scuticociliates (Protozoa, Ciliophora) from Alabama, USA, with descriptions of two parasitic species isolated from a freshwater mussel Potamilus purpuratus

Fig. 5. All reported populations for the following species. A. Uronema marinum Dujardin, 1841. B. Pseudocohnilembus hargisi Evans & Thompson, 1964. C. Metanophrys similis Song et al., 2002. D. Pleuronema setigerum Calkins, 1902. E. Uronemita filificum Kahl, 1931.

Fig. 2. A–D in Seven scuticociliates (Protozoa, Ciliophora) from Alabama, USA, with descriptions of two parasitic species isolated from a freshwater mussel Potamilus purpuratus

Fig. 2. A–D. Mesanophrys cf. carcini Small & Lynn in Aescht, 2001. E–G. Metanophrys similis Song et al., 2002. A–C, E–F. In vivo. D, G. After silver impregnation. A, E. Ventral views of typical individuals, arrow in (E) shows caudal cilia. B, F. Different individuals, showing different body shapes. C. Individual in morphogenesis. D, G. Detailed structure of the buccal area. Abbreviations: M1, 2, 3 = membranelle 1, 2 and 3; Ma = macronucleus; PM = paroral membrane. Scale bars: 30 μm.

Fig. 1. Sampling map. A in Seven scuticociliates (Protozoa, Ciliophora) from Alabama, USA, with descriptions of two parasitic species isolated from a freshwater mussel Potamilus purpuratus

Fig. 1. Sampling map. A. Chewacla Creek, Auburn, Alabama (32º36′56″ N, 85º28ʹ58″ E). B. Orange Beach, Alabama (30º16′44″ N, 87º33′35″ E).

Figures 16–18. Edessa leucogramma biology and natural history. 16 in First report of the stinkbug Edessa leucogramma (Perty) (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae: Edessinae) attacking Handroanthus chrysanthus (Jacq.) S.O. Grose (Bignoniaceae), with descriptions of the adult and immatures and notes on associated fungi and protozoa

Figures 16–18. Edessa leucogramma biology and natural history. 16) Flagellate protozoa associated with E. leucogramma. a–c) Different types of flagellate protozoa found in the digestive tract (i.e., salivary glands and ventriculus) of E. leucogramma. Photographs at a magnification of 1000 times the actual size (1000×). 17) Illustration of the digestive system of E. leucogramma: (Amr.) rectal ampulla; (Ec.) esophagus; (Dgs.) salivary gland's duct; (Gacc.) accessory gland; (Ipos) hindgut; (Lan.) anterior lobule of the salivary gland; (Lpo.) posterior lobule of salivary gland; (Rec.) rectum; (Ven 1–4) ventriculus 1–4 (Tmal) Malpighian tubes (Amr) rectal ampulla. 18) Dead adult female of E. leucogramma, mummified presumably by the attack of an entomopathogenic fungus, insert (square, lower right) shows the sporangium and spores of the potential entomopathogenic fungus.

Figures 13–15. Edessa leucogramma biology and natural history. 13 in First report of the stinkbug Edessa leucogramma (Perty) (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae: Edessinae) attacking Handroanthus chrysanthus (Jacq.) S.O. Grose (Bignoniaceae), with descriptions of the adult and immatures and notes on associated fungi and protozoa

Figures 13–15. Edessa leucogramma biology and natural history. 13) Reproductive system of the female of Edessa leucogramma. a) Photograph of female's reproductive system. b) Illustration of the female's reproductive system: (Be.) spermatheca; (CaG.) genital? chamber; (Espa.) spermathecal bulb; (Fl.) lateral filament; (Gop.) gonopore; (Lg.) ovarian ligament; (Oc.) common oviduct (Ola.) lateral oviduct; (Ov.) ovarium; (Ova.) ovarioles. c) Photograph of the spermatheca and associated parts. 14) Damage produced by the feeding of E. leucogramma on H. chrysanthus. 15) Dissection of the salivary glands of E. leucogramma (Organ where the live protozoa were found).

Figures 10–12 in First report of the stinkbug Edessa leucogramma (Perty) (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae: Edessinae) attacking Handroanthus chrysanthus (Jacq.) S.O. Grose (Bignoniaceae), with descriptions of the adult and immatures and notes on associated fungi and protozoa

Figures 10–12. Adults of Edessa leucogramma. 10) Male reproductive system of Edessa leucogramma, aedeagus: a) photograph of the male aedeagus in ventral view, b) illustration of the male aedeagus in ventral view: (Ej.d.) ejaculatory duct, (Lm.f.) medial lobe of the phallus. 11) Dorsal habitus of the female. 12) Photograph of pygidium and external genitalia of the female: (VIII, IX, X) sternites 8, 9, and 10 respectively; (Sp7 and Sp8) spiracles 7 and 8.

Figures 1–3 in First report of the stinkbug Edessa leucogramma (Perty) (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae: Edessinae) attacking Handroanthus chrysanthus (Jacq.) S.O. Grose (Bignoniaceae), with descriptions of the adult and immatures and notes on associated fungi and protozoa

Figures 1–3. Immature stages of Edessa leucogramma. 1) Eggs and oviposition of Edessa leucogramma. a) Number of eggs per clutch. b) Nymphs developed inside the egg. 2) First-instar nymphs of Edessa leucogramma. a) Newly emerged nymphs. b) Nymphs congregating around the egg clutches. c) Clustering nymphs showing dorsal-posterior orange spots on the abdomen. 3) Second-instar nymphs of Edessa leucogramma. a) Dorsal habitus. b) Ventral habitus.

Figures 4–6 in First report of the stinkbug Edessa leucogramma (Perty) (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae: Edessinae) attacking Handroanthus chrysanthus (Jacq.) S.O. Grose (Bignoniaceae), with descriptions of the adult and immatures and notes on associated fungi and protozoa

Figures 4–6. Immature states of Edessa leucogramma. 4) Third-instar nymphs of Edessa leucogramma. a) Dorsal habitus. b) Ventral habitus. 5) Fourth-instar nymphs of Edessa leucogramma. a) Dorsal habitus. b) Ventral habitus. 6) Fifth-instar nymphs of Edessa leucogramma on host.

Figures 7–9 in First report of the stinkbug Edessa leucogramma (Perty) (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae: Edessinae) attacking Handroanthus chrysanthus (Jacq.) S.O. Grose (Bignoniaceae), with descriptions of the adult and immatures and notes on associated fungi and protozoa

Figures 7–9. Adults of Edessa leucogramma. 7) Adult male of Edessa leucogramma. 8) Female external genitalia and sternites. 9) Internal reproductive system of the male. a) Dissected genitalia. b) Illustration of male genitalia: (Be.) ejaculatory bulb; (Dej.) ejaculatory duct; (Dr.) distal region; (GlsAc.) accessory glands; (Vd.) deferent ducts; (Tes.) testis exhibiting four testicular follicles; (Tues.) testicular follicle; (Pr.) proximal region.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2016View details →

Fig. 5 in Detection and characterization of diverse coccidian protozoa shed by California sea lions

Fig. 5. Indirect fluorescence antibody test of California sea lion sporulated oocyst cultures. Zoites derived from cultivated oocysts from animal CSL10089 (A), CSL10092 (B), and CSL10100 (C) were tested using serum from a Sarcocystis neurona-infected horse. Image D shows reactivity of serum from the S. neurona-infected horse to S. neurona culture isolate snUCD-1. Image E shows a lack of seroreactivity of negative control serum from a S. neurona-negative horse to zoite culture from CSL10089. Scale bars are 15 Mm.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2016View details →

Fig. 3 in Detection and characterization of diverse coccidian protozoa shed by California sea lions

Fig. 3. Three California sea lion haul-out sites (red circles) on the central California coast where fecal samples were collected from free-ranging animals. Field sample identifiers for test-positive samples are given (Ãno-, PL- and WR-) at each location. Coccidian parasite genotypes and species amplified in sample DNA are indicated in parentheses: A, Coccidia A; B, Coccidia B; Sn, Sarcocystis neurona-like; unchar, uncharacterized species. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.).

Figure 16 in Deep - water hypoxic meiobenthic Protozoa and Metazoa taxa of the Istanbul Strait's (Bosporus) outlet area of the Black Sea

Figure 16. Proportion of the harpacticoids inhabiting different sediment layers along the depth gradient.

Figure 10 in Deep - water hypoxic meiobenthic Protozoa and Metazoa taxa of the Istanbul Strait's (Bosporus) outlet area of the Black Sea

Figure 10. Proportion of the main Metazoa taxa inhabiting along depth gradient at the Bosporus outlet area of the Black Sea.

Figure 9 in Deep - water hypoxic meiobenthic Protozoa and Metazoa taxa of the Istanbul Strait's (Bosporus) outlet area of the Black Sea

Figure 9. Proportion of soft-shelled foraminifera inhabiting different sediment layers along the depth gradient.

Figure 8 in Deep - water hypoxic meiobenthic Protozoa and Metazoa taxa of the Istanbul Strait's (Bosporus) outlet area of the Black Sea

Figure 8. Proportion of hard-shelled foraminifera inhabiting different sediment layers along the depth gradient.

Figure 7 in Deep - water hypoxic meiobenthic Protozoa and Metazoa taxa of the Istanbul Strait's (Bosporus) outlet area of the Black Sea

Figure 7. Distribution of the Foraminifera (hard-shelled and soft-shelled) abundance (N) along depth gradient at the Bosporus outlet area of the Black Sea.

Figure 6 in Deep - water hypoxic meiobenthic Protozoa and Metazoa taxa of the Istanbul Strait's (Bosporus) outlet area of the Black Sea

Figure 6. Proportion of the Ciliophora inhabiting different sediment layers along the depth gradient at the Bosporus outlet area of the Black Sea.

Figure 1 in Deep - water hypoxic meiobenthic Protozoa and Metazoa taxa of the Istanbul Strait's (Bosporus) outlet area of the Black Sea

Figure 1. Oxygen concentrations in the sediment and the overlying water at Stations 4 –6 (by Sergeeva et al 2013).