Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

4,432

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.7.1

Reset

Dataset results

4,432 results for “Recovery”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
edi60/100

Hurricane Recovery Plots at Harvard Forest 1937-1991

The New England hurricane of 1938, by destroying many acres of mature and semi-mature forests, initiated new forest associations over a large area. Permanent plots were established across the Harvard Forest in severely damaged stands (many of which were logged subsequent to the hurricane) to assess forest succession. Most of the plots involved successions following the blowdown of white pine on glacial till or outwash soils. From 1940 - 1948, and in 1978 and 1991, tree density and presence/absence of herb and shrub species were tallied. Pioneer species regenerating from seed and advance regeneration of longer-lived species quickly established at the sites; hemlock was the only species successfully regenerating after year 10, and most tree species were present within 2-4 years of the hurricane. By 1978, pioneer species such as gray birch and pin cherry declined or disappeared and red maple, white pine, paper birch and red oak dominated the plots. By 1991, most understory species present before the hurricane had returned, although there was a small group of understory species that apparently were more sensitive to disturbance and did not recover.

openCC0Jan 2024View details →
edi56/100

Long term response of arctic tussock tundra to thermal erosion features: A modeling analysis. Tussock tundra recovery after a thermal erosion event

The Multiple Element Limitation (MEL) model is used to simulate the recovery of Alaskan arctic tussock tundra to thermal erosion features (TEFs) caused by permafrost thaw and mass wasting. TEFs could be significant to regional carbon (C) and nutrient budgets because permafrost soils contain large stocks of soil organic matter (SOM) and TEFs are expected to become more frequent as climate warms. These simulations deal only with recovery following TEF stabilization and do not address initial losses of C and nutrients during TEF formation. To capture the variability among and within TEFs, we simulate a range of post-stabilization conditions by varying the initial size of SOM pools and nutrient supply rates. This file contains the results for 100 years of tussock tundra recovery after a thermal erosion event. Data is presented for day 250 of each year.

openCC (other)Feb 2022View details →
edi56/100

Long term response of arctic tussock tundra to thermal erosion features: A modeling analysis. Tussock tundra recovery after a thermal erosion event: saturating nutrients.

The Multiple Element Limitation (MEL) model is used to simulate the recovery of Alaskan arctic tussock tundra to thermal erosion features (TEFs) caused by permafrost thaw and mass wasting. TEFs could be significant to regional carbon (C) and nutrient budgets because permafrost soils contain large stocks of soil organic matter (SOM) and TEFs are expected to become more frequent as climate warms. These simulations deal only with recovery following TEF stabilization and do not address initial losses of C and nutrients during TEF formation. To capture the variability among and within TEFs, we simulate a range of post-stabilization conditions by varying the initial size of SOM pools and nutrient supply rates. This file contains the results for 100 years of tussock tundra recovery after a thermal erosion event. This simulation is of TEF recovery under saturating nutrient conditions. Data is presented for day 250 of each year.

openCC (other)Feb 2022View details →
edi56/100

MCR LTER: Coral Reef: Dead coral skeletons impair key recovery processes following coral bleaching; data for Kopecky et al., 2024 Global Change Biology

The data included in this data package were collected on the North shore of Moorea, French Polynesia, from 2015-2023 to explore how dead coral skeletons (e.g,, left after coral bleaching events) influence critical processes tied to coral reef resilience. Together, these various datasets were used for analyses in the manuscript entitled "Changing disturbance regimes, material legacies, and stabilizing feedbacks: dead coral skeletons impair key recovery processes following coral bleaching", published in Global Change Biology. These data are in support of a publication Kopecky et al. (2024) Global Change Biology, and were a part of the thesis of K. Kopecky. The manuscript title and author list are as follows: Changing disturbance regimes, material legacies, and stabilizing feedbacks: dead coral skeletons impair key recovery processes following coral bleaching. Kai Kopecky, Russell J. Schmitt, Sally J. Holbrook. This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation under Grant No. OCE 22-24354 (and earlier awards) as well as a generous gift from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. Research was completed under permits issued by the French Polynesian Government (Délégation à la Recherche) and the Haut-commissariat de la République en Polynésie Francaise (DTRT) (Protocole d'Accueil 2005-2024). This work represents a contribution of the Moorea Coral Reef (MCR) LTER Site.

openCC (other)Aug 2024View details →
edi56/100

Seagrass shoot density and benthic chlorophyll density from the Seagrass Recovery Experiment, South Bay, VA 2020-2022

To understand intra-meadow stability, the Seagrass Recovery Experiment was designed to ask 1) is recovery faster at sites with less thermal stress owing to greater exchange with cooler oceanic water at the meadow edge? 2) what is the shape of recovery? and 3) what are the recovery mechanisms? To conduct this experiment, aboveground seagrass biomass was removed from 28.3 m2 plots within the interior and along an edge of a restored seagrass meadow in South Bay, VA. Sites 1-3 correspond to the meadow interior while sites 4-6 correspond to the northern edge. Each site was comprised of a control (i.e., C) where no seagrass was disturbed and a treatment (i.e., T) where seagrass was removed (n = 12 sites total, e.g., 1C, 1T, 2C...). This dataset includes monthly seagrass shoot counts between June-October 2020, May-October 2021, and April-October 2022. To further characterize differences between the meadow interior and edge, benthic chlorophyll samples were also collected.

openCustomJan 2024View details →
edi56/100

High-frequency water and sediment temperature from the Seagrass Recovery Experiment, South Bay, VA 2020-2022

To understand intra-meadow stability, the Seagrass Recovery Experiment was designed to ask 1) is recovery faster at sites with less thermal stress owing to greater exchange with cooler oceanic water at the meadow edge? 2) what is the shape of recovery? and 3) what are the recovery mechanisms? To conduct this experiment, aboveground seagrass biomass was removed from 28.3 m2 plots within the interior and along an edge of a restored seagrass meadow in South Bay, VA. Sites 1-3 correspond to the meadow interior while sites 4-6 correspond to the northern edge. Each site was comprised of a control (i.e., C) where no seagrass was disturbed and a treatment (i.e., T) where seagrass was removed (n = 12 sites total, e.g., 1C, 1T, 2C...). To further characterize differences between the meadow interior and edge, water and sediment temperatures were collected continuously. Water temperature was monitored at fixed positions 20 cm above the sediment surface at the center of each plot, while sediment temperature was monitored at 5 cm depth at the center of two sites within the central and northern edge South Bay locations.

openCustomJan 2024View details →
edi56/100

Surface water quality from the Seagrass Recovery Experiment, South Bay, VA 2020-2022

To understand intra-meadow stability, the Seagrass Recovery Experiment was designed to ask 1) is recovery faster at sites with less thermal stress owing to greater exchange with cooler oceanic water at the meadow edge? 2) what is the shape of recovery? and 3) what are the recovery mechanisms? To conduct this experiment, aboveground seagrass biomass was removed from 28.3 m2 plots within the interior and along an edge of a restored seagrass meadow in South Bay, VA. Sites 1-3 correspond to the meadow interior while sites 4-6 correspond to the northern edge. Each site was comprised of a control (i.e., C) where no seagrass was disturbed and a treatment (i.e., T) where seagrass was removed (n = 12 sites total, e.g., 1C, 1T, 2C...). To further characterize differences between the meadow interior and edge, surface water quality samples were also collected and include turbidity, total suspended solids (TSS) concentration, TSS ash-free dry weight, TSS percent organic matter, pelagic chlorophyll concentration, dissolved oxygen saturation, dissolved oxygen concentration, salinity, water temperature, and specific conductivity. These discrete samples were collected monthly between June-October 2020, May-October 2021, and April-October 2022 using a 1-L Nalgene bottle and a handheld YSI Pro Plus Multiparameter meter.

openCustomJan 2024View details →
OpenNeuro52/100

The language network reemerges during recovery from severe traumatic brain injury

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

openCC0Jan 2020View details →
zenodo52/100

X-PSI Parameter Recovery for Temperature Map Configurations Inspired by PSR J0030+0451

<p>Posterior sample files associated with the preprint &quot;X-PSI Parameter Recovery for Temperature Map Configurations Inspired by PSR J0030+0451&nbsp;&quot; by Vinciguerra et al. (2023;&nbsp;<a href="https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2209.12840">arXiv</a>; almost&nbsp;submitted to for publication in ApJ) and Jupyter notebook&nbsp;scripts to reproduce the corresponding figures.</p> <p>Also included are examples of&nbsp;model modules in the Python language using the X-PSI framework.</p> <p>Please refer to the READme&nbsp;for detailed information.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2023View details →
edi52/100

Data associated with the 2019 Freshwater Oil Spill Remediation Study (FOReSt) assessing the use of enhanced Monitored Natural Recovery (eMNR) and shoreline washing agent (SWA) of diluted bitumen spills conducted in shoreline enclosures at the IISD Experimental Lakes Area, ON, Canada from 2019 to 2020

The following package includes data from the 2019 Freshwater Oil spill Remediation Study (FOReSt) at the IISD Experimental Lakes Area studying the use of enhanced monitored natural recovery (eMNR) and shoreline washing agent (SWA) as a secondary remediation method for diluted bitumen spills in freshwater shoreline enclosures. This package includes data tables on polycyclic aromatic compound chemistry in water and sediments, basic water quality, nutrient chemistry, and tritium chemistry monitored in the experimental and reference enclosures, and lake reference sites over the duration of the study. Data included in this package was first collected and used in the paper by Palace et al., titled Polycyclic aromatic compounds in freshwater ecosystems following non-invasive remediation of controlled diluted bitumen spills: The Freshwater Oil Spill Remediation Study (FOReSt) at the Experimental Lakes Area, Canada.

openCC (other)Jun 2025View details →
edi52/100

Data from: Cascading effects of apex predator recovery on rodent foraging activity and seed predation

This dataset was collected to examine the effects of apex predator presence on post-dispersal seed predation and rodent foraging behavior in Mediterranean ecosystems of southern Spain. The study focused on the Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus) as a top predator capable of altering mesopredator and small mammal communities through cascading interactions. We used the fleshy-fruited tree Pyrus bourgaeana as a model species and conducted a seed predation experiment in two areas with and without lynx presence. A total of 1152 seeds were placed in 144 seed depots across forest and open habitats and three microhabitat types (rock, shrub, and open ground). Rodent activity and foraging behavior were monitored using 36 camera traps installed at a subset of seed depots, and rodent abundance was estimated with live trapping one week later. The dataset includes seed predation counts, camera-trap records of rodent visits, live-trapping results, and vegetation cover estimates. These data allow investigation of how predation risk and habitat structure influence rodent activity and post-dispersal seed predation dynamics in Mediterranean landscapes.

openCC (other)Nov 2025View details →
edi52/100

The 2021 Freshwater Oil Spill Remediation Study (FOReSt), assessing the use of enhanced Monitored Natural Recovery (eMNR) of conventional heavy crude oil spills conducted in freshwater shoreline enclosures at the IISD Experimental Lakes Area, ON, Canada from 2021 to 2022.

The following package includes data from the 2021 Freshwater Oil spill Remediation Study (FOReSt) at the IISD Experimental Lakes Area studying the use of enhanced monitored natural recovery (eMNR) as a secondary remediation method for conventional heavy crude oil spills in freshwater shoreline enclosures. This package includes data tables on polycyclic aromatic compound chemistry in water and sediments, basic water quality, nutrient chemistry monitored in the experimental and reference enclosures, and lake reference sites over the duration of the study. As well as tables detailing enclosure metrics (depth), tritium chemistry, and a treatment key. Data included in this package was first collected and used in the paper by Stanley et al., titled Rapid Chemical Remediation of Freshwater Enclosures Treated with Conventional Heavy Crude Oil Spills Followed by Enhanced Monitored Natural Recovery

openCC (other)Jan 2026View details →
edi52/100

Disturbance and recovery at three headward-eroding creeks on Sapelo Island, Georgia, USA.

We studied the perturbation caused by the movement of headward-eroding creeks onto the marsh platform in southeastern USA salt marshes. Between May and November 2019, we measured the disturbance responses of 19 variables in terms of both magnitude (the difference between perturbed areas and control areas located on the marsh platform) and recovery trajectory (evaluated using a space for time substitution design along a marsh transect that ran the length of the newly-formed creek). Variables measured include stem density, stem height, burrow density, snail density, sediment redox, soil water content, soil salinity, soil organic content, soil pH, soil surface temperature, root biomass, rhizome biomass, concentration of green algae, concentration of cyanobacteria, concentration of diatoms, soil stiffness, light interception by the canopy, marsh soil surface elevation, and number of years since disturbed.

openCC (other)May 2021View details →
edi52/100

Plant Removal Study: Recovery of Vegetation Following Disturbance at the Sevilleta National Wildlife Refuge, New Mexico

In 1995, a removal study was initiated at the Sevilleta LTER to examine the response of vegetation following the removal of dominant species. Five sites were selected that were dominated by either blue grama (site 1), blue and black grama (site 2), black grama (site 3), black grama and creosote (site 4), or creosote (site 5). A sixth site was later added in the blue grama community along the foothills of the Los Pinos Mountains (site 6). At sites 1, 3, 5, and 6, five 3m x 4m plots had all plants of the dominant species removed; five 3m x 4m plots were controls. At site 2, 5 plots had blue grama removed, 5 plots had black grama removed, and 5 plots were controls. At site 4, 5 plots had black grama removed, 5 plots had creosote removed, and 5 plots were controls. Initial cover prior to removal was estimated by species for each plot. Grass was removed using a shovel to collect above-ground biomass and crowns just below the soil surface. Shrubs were removed using large clippers to collect above-ground biomass to the soil surface. All biomass removed was bagged, dried, and weighed. Plot maintenance or removal of the target dominant species is performed annually or as needed. Rain gauges were installed at each site and the corners of the areas containing each set of plots GPS'd. Plot corners are marked by nails and are flagged periodically to aid identification and minimize foot traffic in the plots. Each northeast nail has a metal tag with site and plot number on it. Erosion bridges (1 m long) were installed in plots 1, 3 and 5 (removals and controls) at sites 1-5. Initial measurements were made in 1996.

openCC0Sep 2025View details →
edi52/100

Literature survey of seagrass disturbance-recovery studies up to May 2022

To provide context for the seagrass recovery experiment (SRE) a literature synthesis was conducted on prior studies of seagrass disturbance and recovery. The synthesis provided evidence that 1) less than half (47%) of all seagrass species have been included, 2) were primarily on monospecific meadows of Zostera, 3) where experimental, mostly done on small spatial scales (median = 0.25 m2), and 4) that there is a positive, non-linear relationship between recovery time and disturbance area. Most meadows had some, if not full recovery during the study period suggesting that seagrass meadows are stable across a broad set of conditions.

openCustomOct 2023View details →
edi52/100

Sediment elevation transects for the Seagrass Recovery Experiment, South Bay, VA 2022

To understand intra-meadow stability, the Seagrass Recovery Experiment was designed to ask 1) is recovery faster at sites with less thermal stress owing to greater exchange with cooler oceanic water at the meadow edge? 2) what is the shape of recovery? and 3) what are the recovery mechanisms? To conduct this experiment, aboveground seagrass biomass was removed from 28.3 m2 plots within the interior and along an edge of a restored seagrass meadow in South Bay, VA. Sites 1-3 correspond to the meadow interior while sites 4-6 correspond to the northern meadow edge. Each site was comprised of a control (i.e., C) where no seagrass was disturbed and a treatment (i.e., T) where seagrass was removed (n = 12 sites total, e.g., 1C, 1T, 2C...). A nor'easter storm moved through the area in early May 2022 producing 59% and 48% of the year's total Gale and Near Gale force winds. After the storm passed, depressions were noticed within the edge treatment sites. To quantify the depression depths a survey of the sediment surface depth was coordinated among all sites in October 2022. Results provide evidence that the edge treatment sites were depressed by 9.4-10.4 cm relative to outside of the treatment plots.

openCustomOct 2023View details →
edi52/100

A grazing crab drives saltmarsh carbon storage and recovery in VA, SC, and GA

Consumers can directly (e.g., consumption) and indirectly (e.g., trophic cascades) influence carbon cycling in blue carbon ecosystems. Previous work found that large grazers have nuanced effects on carbon stocks, yet, small, bioturbating-grazers, which remove plant biomass and alter sediment properties, remain an understudied driver of carbon cycling. We used field-derived and remote sensing data to quantify the grazing effects of the purple marsh crab, Sesarma reticulatum, on carbon stocks, flux, and recovery in salt marshes. Sesarma fronts led to a carbon loss of around 40-70% and Sesarma front migration rates accelerated over time. Despite latitudinal differences, front migration rate had no effect on carbon stocks, flux, or time to replacement. When we included Sesarma disturbance in carbon flux calculations, we found it may take 5-100 years for marshes to replace lost carbon, if at all. Combined, we show that small grazers cause a net loss in carbon stocks as they move through the landscape, and irrespective of migration rate, these grazer-driven impacts persist for decades. This work showcases the significant role of consumers in carbon storage and flux, challenging the classic paradigm of plant-sediment feedbacks as the primary ecogeomorphic driver of carbon cycling in blue carbon ecosystems.

openCustomMay 2024View details →
zenodo48/100

Data and Code for Lowman et al. 2024, Macroscale controls determine the recovery of river ecosystem productivity following flood disturbances

<p>Data and code for analyses in Lowman et al. 2024, Macroscale controls determine the recovery of river ecosystem productivity following flood disturbances.</p> <p>See publication and ReadMe file for analysis description and further details.&nbsp;</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2024View details →
zenodo48/100

Energy recovery by an unbiased gas phase photofuel cell with a nickel foam supported WO3 photoanode decorated with plasmonic gold clusters

<p>Dataset for the article titled "Energy recovery by an unbiased gas phase photofuel cell with a nickel foam supported WO3 photoanode decorated with plasmonic gold clusters".</p> <p>This research was conducted at Antwerp Engineering, Photoelectrochemistry and Sensing (A-PECS) group, University of Antwerp, Belgium.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2024View details →
zenodo48/100

Data for Tradeoff Analysis of Recovery Pathways post Superstorm Sandy: a New Jersey Case Study - v0.1

<p>Data repository for the manuscript titled:&nbsp;<em>Tradeoff Analysis of Recovery Pathways post Superstorm Sandy: a New Jersey Case Study.</em></p> <p>This repository includes all of the input data, processed data, and output data used for the project. This is a working version of our Tradeoff Analysis ready for interested users, peer reviewers, and others to run.&nbsp;</p> <p>README file on GitHub: https://github.com/Laura-Geronimo/Geronimo-etal_2024_NaturalHazardsReview/blob/main/README.md</p> <p>&nbsp;</p>

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2024View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record