Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
53
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
53 results for “Regional climate model”
Atmospheric climate model output of the COSMO-CLM2 regional climate model hindcast run over Antarctica (1987-2016)
<p>The dataset contains monthly output of a COSMO-CLM² (COSMO-CLM coupled to the Community Land Model) atmospheric hindcast simulation over Antarctica which is described and evaluated in the following paper: </p> <p>Souverijns, N., Gossart, A., Demuzere, M., Lenaerts, J.T.M., Medley, B., Gorodetskaya, I.V., Vanden Broucke, S., van Lipzig, N.P.M., 2019. A new Regional Climate Model for POLAR-CORDEX: Evaluation of a 30-year Hindcast with COSMO-CLM² over Antarctica. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 124, 1405-1427. (doi:10.1029/2018JD028862)</p> <p>Details of the model simulation:<br> - COSMO-CLM version 5.0_clm6<br> - Community Land Model version 4.5<br> - Horizontal resolution: 0.25°x0.25°<br> - Vertical resolution: 40 levels<br> - Time period: 1987-2016 (excluding 4 years of spin-up)<br> - Driving model: ERA-Interim<br> </p> <p>The data provided here has a monthly time resolution and contains the monthly average of all variables except denoted otherwise below. As such, each file consists of 360 time steps.<br> - AEVAP_S: Surface evaporation [kg m-2] (summed value for each month)<br> - ALB: Surface albedo [-] (only for austral summer months)<br> - ALHFL_S: Surface latent heat flux [W m-2]<br> - ALWD_S: Downward longwave radiation at the surface [W m-2]<br> - ALWU_S: Upward longwave radiation at the surface [W m-2]<br> - ASHFL_S: Surface sensible heat flux [W m-2]<br> - ASOB_S: Surface net downward shortwave radiation [W m-2]<br> - ASWDIFD_S: Diffuse downward shortwave radiation at the surface [W m-2]<br> - ASWDIFU_S: Diffuse upward shortwave radiation at the surface [W m-2]<br> - ASWDIR_S: Direct downward shortwave radiation at the surface [W m-2]<br> - ATHB_S: Surface net downward longwave radiation at the surface [W m-2]<br> - P: Pressure at 40 vertical levels [Pa]<br> - QV: Specific humidity at 40 vertical levels [kg kg-1]<br> - RH2M: Relative humidity at 2 meter [%]<br> - SNOW_GSP: Surface snowfall amount [kg m-2] (summed value for each month)<br> - T2M: Temperature at 2 meter [K]<br> - T: Temperature at 40 vertical levels [K]<br> - WS10M: Wind speed at 10 meter [m s-1]<br> - WS: Wind speed at 40 vertical levels [m s-1]</p>
Statistical characterization of Andalusian wave climate for several combinations of Global Climate Models and Regional Climate Models and periods 2026 - 2045 and 2081 - 2100.
<p>The following text is an extract of the extended abstract entitled "<strong>Parametric Characterization of Wave Climate along the Andalusian Coast for Non-Stationary Stochastic Simulation</strong>" whose authors are Manuel Cobos, Pedro Magaña, Pedro Otiñar and Asunción Baquerizo, and that was included in proceedings of <em>39th IAHR World Congress</em> where this dataset is included.</p> <p><em>Processed data comes from PIMA Adapta Costas project (Ramírez et al., 2019), in particular, from projections of maritime climate for 2026-2045 and 2081-2100. Sea climate contains, among other information, time series of the significant wave height (H<sub>s</sub>) obtained for several combinations of GCM-RCM projections of EUR-11 for the RCP 8.5. GCM-RCM combinations ACCE, CMCC, CNRM, GFDL, HADG, IPSL, MIRO with a 0.1 degrees grid were used for the Atlantic facade while CNRM, HADG, IPSL, MIRO, MEDC, MPIE, ESM2, EART models with 1/11 degrees were used for the Mediterranean one. A total of 210 locations were analyzed, 54 at the Atlantic facade and 156 at the Mediterranean one (Figure 1). The data was bias adjusted using the Empirical Quantile Mapping (Déqué et al., 2007; Michelangeli et al., 2009). Information of the significant wave height and the dependence between the values at a given time with previous values with a VAR(q) model is already available. </em></p> <p><em>At each location, the methodology of Lira-Loarca et al. (2021) was applied, using the software described in Cobos et al. (2022a). More precisely, for every GCM-RCM (hereinafter, model n for n = 1, .., N where N = 7 for Atlantic data and N = 8 for the Mediterranean data), a non-stationary marginal distribution of H<sub>s</sub>, , assuming that the year was the largest periodicity of the climate, was fitted to data using a lognormal model for the central part and two generalized Pareto distribution for the lower and upper tails, as in Solari and Losada (2011). The non- stationarity is considered by assuming a decomposition of the parameters of the distribution and of the percentiles of the common end points of the interval into a trigonometric truncated expansion.</em></p> <p><em>In addition, the coefficients of the matrix, C<sub>n</sub>, of a VAR(q) model with q up to 92 hours were estimated. The ensemble multi-model characteristics of the data were obtained from the compound distributions and the weighted averaged matrix coefficients. </em></p> <p><em>Soon, the results of the peak period (T<sub>p</sub>) and mean incoming wave direction (ϑ<sub>m</sub>) and the coefficients of the multivariate VAR model will also be included.</em></p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
Processed model output of the climate simulation in the study: The effects of diachronous surface uplift of the European Alps on regional climate and the isotopic composition of precipitation (δ18Op) [Boateng et al.]
<p><strong>The geodynamic evolution of the Alps suggests that the Alps did not rise monotonically due to the different post-collisional processes such as slab break-off. However, understanding such subsurface dynamics would require adequate knowledge about its surface uplift history. Stable isotope paleoaltimetry methods are widely used to infer past surface elevation using geologic archives. However, its accurate interpretation relies on attributing the extracted isotopic signal from proxies to surface uplift despite other influences such as climate. To resolve this issue, topographic sensitivity experiments across the Alps are used to investigate the impacts of the diachronous surface uplift on regional climate and δ18Op. The Atmospheric General Circulation Model ECHAM5 with water isotope tracking capabilities (ECHAM5-wiso) is used to simulate the climate with varied topographic scenarios. We present the processed (long-term means) model output of the relevant climate variables (i.e δ18Op, near-surface temperature, precipitation amount, near-surface meridional and zonal winds, mean sea level pressure, and elevation) in response to the changes in topography. The file names are representative of the topographic scenarios used for the simulations. For example, the file “W2E1.nc” is the model output produced by a topographic scenario in which the topography across the west-central Alps was set to 200% of its modern height, and the Eastern Alps were kept at 100%. The “CTL.nc” file contains model output from the control simulation that uses present-day topography. The datasets for instance can be used to select far-field sampling points for the δ-δ paleoaltimetry method that are not significantly affected by the topographic changes.</strong></p>
MARv3.10 outputs: What is the Surface Mass Balance of Antarctica? An Intercomparison of Regional Climate Model Estimates
<p>MARv3.10 outputs used in:</p> <p><em>Mottram, R., Hansen, N., Kittel, C., van Wessem, M., Agosta, C., Amory, C., Boberg, F., van de Berg, W. J., Fettweis, X., Gossart, A., van Lipzig, N. P. M., van Meijgaard, E., Orr, A., Phillips, T., Webster, S., Simonsen, S. B., and Souverijns, N.: What is the Surface Mass Balance of Antarctica? An Intercomparison of Regional Climate Model Estimates, The Cryosphere Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2019-333, accepted, 2020.</em></p> <ul> <li>MARv3.10 forced by ERA-Interim outputs with monthly values of SMB and components (kg m<sup>-2</sup> month<sup>-1</sup>), and (near-) surface temperature (°C) over the Antarctic ice sheet (1981--2018)</li> <li>Grid file used in MAR simulation</li> </ul> <p>Be carreful that the unit metadata in the netcdf files from SMB and its components are uncorrect. <strong>Values are in kg m<sup>-2</sup> month<sup>-1</sup></strong> instead of kg m<sup>-2</sup> day<sup>-1</sup>.<br> <br> If you need other variables or output frequencies from MAR, write me (c2kittel@gmail.com) and I will be glad to help you. I will also be happy to share the scripts I have developed to analyse the outputs and make the figures in this paper if needed. Please cite the paper if you use these MAR outputs. However, note that these outputs are now considered as deprecated since new outputs using a more recent model version (MARv3.11) and forcing (ERA5) have been published (see Kittel et al., 2021: https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/15/1215/2021/).<br> <br> Data usage notice:</p> <p>If you use any of these results, please acknowledge the work of the people involved in producing them. Acknowledgements should have language similar to the below that contained informations related to MAR. In order to document MAR scientific impact and enable ongoing support of the model, users are likely encouraged to contact C. Kittel and C. Agosta to add their works in the list of MAR-related publications. </p> <p>"We thank the MAR team which make available the model outputs, as well agencies (F.R.S - FNRS, CÉCI, and the Walloon Region) that provided computational resources for MAR simulations."</p> <p>You should also refer to and cite the following paper:</p> <p><em>Mottram, R., Hansen, N., Kittel, C., van Wessem, M., Agosta, C., Amory, C., Boberg, F., van de Berg, W. J., Fettweis, X., Gossart, A., van Lipzig, N. P. M., van Meijgaard, E., Orr, A., Phillips, T., Webster, S., Simonsen, S. B., and Souverijns, N.: What is the Surface Mass Balance of Antarctica? An Intercomparison of Regional Climate Model Estimates, The Cryosphere Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2019-333, accepted, 2020.</em></p>
A computationally efficient statistically downscaled 100 m resolution Greenland product from the regional climate model MAR: accompanying dataset
<p>Dataset containing surface temperature and surface mass balance datasets generated from the MAR regional climate model over Greenland over two test areas using statistical downscaling tools from 6 km to 100m. The abstract of the accompanying submitted paper follows: </p> <p> </p> <p>The Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) has been contributing directly to sea level rise and this contribution is projected to accelerate over next decades. A crucial tool for studying the evolution surface mass loss (e.g., surface mass balance, SMB) consists of regional climate models (RCMs) which can provide current estimates and future projections of sea level rise associated with such losses. However, one of the main limitations of RCMs is the relatively coarse horizontal spatial resolution at which outputs are currently generated. Here, we report results concerning the statistical downscaling of the SMB modeled by the Modèle Atmosphérique Régional (MAR) RCM from the original spatial resolution of 6 km to 100 m building on the relationship between elevation and mass losses in Greenland. To this goal, we developed a geospatial framework that allows the parallelization of the downscaling process, a crucial aspect to increase the computational efficiency of the algorithm. The results obtained in the case of the SMB, assessed through the comparison of the modeled outputs with in-situ SMB measurements, show a considerable improvement in the case of the downscaled product with respect to the original, coarse output. In the case of the downscaled MAR product, the coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) increases from 0.868 for the original MAR output to 0.935 for the downscaled product. Moreover, the value of the slope and intercept of the linear regression fitting modeled and measured SMB values shifts from 0.865 for the original MAR to 1.015 for the downscaled product in the case of the intercept and from the value -235mm (original) to -57 mm (downscaled) in the case of the slope, considerably improving upon results previously published in the literature.</p>
Datasets related to the study "Spatial variability and future evolution of surface solar radiation over Northern France and Benelux: a regional climate model approach"
<p>This dataset contains the data of the manuscript "Spatial variability and future evolution of surface solar radiation over Northern France and Benelux: a regional climate model approach" under publication in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. <br>It includes CNRM-ALADIN64 simulations of surface solar radiation, cloud fraction, aerosol optical depth and water vapor content. <br>A directory is dedicated to HINDCAST simulations. It includes all datasets involved in the evaluation of CNRM-ALADIN64 simulations, as well as all datasets used for the analysis of the spatial variability of surface solar irradiance over the recent past. <br>Another directory is dedicated to future climate simulations. In this case, several sub directories can be found, representing either the simulations over the historical period (2005-2014, i.e. HIST directory), or simulations at mid (2045-2054, "mid" suffix) and long term (2091-2100, "end" suffix) horizons for SSP1-1.9 and SSP3-7.0. Each set of climate simulations is composed of three members (r1f, r2f, r3f), which were used collectively to increase the statistical significance of our analysis. </p>
Assessment of future wind speed and wind power changes over South Greenland using the MAR regional climate model : MAR ouptuts and KATABATA weather stations timeseries
<p>Daliy MARv3.12 outputs and KATABATA weather stations timeseries used in :</p> <p>Lambin, C., Fettweis, X., Kittel, C., Fonder, M., & Ernst, D. (2022).Assessment of future wind speed and wind power changes over South Greenland using the Modèle Atmosphérique Régional regional climate model. <em>International Journal of Climatology</em>, 43(1),558–574. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7795574 </p> <p> </p>
Variability in Antarctic Surface Climatology Across Regional Climate Models and Reanalysis: Datasets
<p>This dataset includes output for snowfall, near-surface air temperature and melt from the following regional climate models (RCMs): Met Office Unified Model version 11.1 (MetUMv11.1), the Modèle Atmosphérique Régional version 3.10 (MARv3.10) and the Regional Atmospheric Climate Model version 2.3p2 (RACMOv2.3p2). The data is aggregated to monthly timesteps from initial 3/6hourly data. The code for aggregation is available here: https://github.com/Jez-Carter/Antarctica_Climate_Variability . Data goes from ~1971-2018 and includes two simulations from each RCM: 0.11° (12.25 km) and 0.44° (49 km) resolution simulations from the MetUM; ERA-Interim and ERA5 driven simulations from MAR and RACMO. The data used in the results for 'Variability in Antarctic Surface Climatology Across Regional Climate Models and Reanalysis Datasets' J.Carter et al, is included here and can be generated using the code available here: https://github.com/Jez-Carter/Antarctica_Climate_Variability . </p> <p><strong>Data usage notice:</strong><br> If you use any of these results, please acknowledge the work of the people involved in producing them. Acknowledgements should have language similar to the below.</p> <p>"We thank C. Kittel and the MAR team which make available the model outputs, as well agencies (F.R.S - FNRS, CÉCI, and the Walloon Region) that provided computational resources for MAR simulations."</p> <p>In order to document MAR scientific impact and enable ongoing support of the model, users are encouraged to contact C. Kittel to add their works in the list of MAR-related publications.</p> <p>If you need other variables or output frequencies over Antarctica from: MAR, contact C.Kittel (c2kittel@gmail.com); RACMO, contact J.M. van Wessem; MetUM, contact A.Orr. </p>
RACMO regional climate model data, postprocessed for winter precipitation and winter temperature
<p>This contains statistics of winter precipitation and winter temperature derived from the 16 model ensemble by RACMO2. In addition to the GCM driven runs, also a PGW (pseudo global warming) set is given. Data is used for a paper to be submitted.</p> <p>Reference on the RACMO2 runs: Aalbers EE, Lenderink G, van Meijgaard E, van den Hurk BJJM (2018) Local-scale changes in mean and heavy precipitation in Western Europe, climate change or internal variability? Climate Dynamics 50:4745–4766. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3901-9">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3901-9</a></p>
Random forest climatic modeling of agricultural insurance loss across the inland Pacific Northwest region of the United States
<p>We compared climatic relationships to insurance loss across the inland Pacific Northwest region of the United States, using a design matrix methodology, to identify optimum temporal windows for climate variables by county in relationship to wheat insurance loss due to drought. The results of our temporal window construction for water availability variables (precipitation, temperature, evapotranspiration, and the Palmer drought severity index [PDSI]) identified spatial patterns across the study area that aligned with regional climate patterns, particularly with regards to drought-prone counties of eastern Washington. Using these optimum time-lagged correlational relationships between insurance loss and individual climate variables, along with commodity pricing, we constructed a regression-based random forest model for insurance loss prediction and evaluation of climatic feature importance. Our cross-validated model results indicated that PDSI was the most important factor in predicting total seasonal wheat/drought insurance loss, with wheat pricing and potential evapotranspiration having noted contributions. Our overall regional model had a R<sup>2</sup> of 0.49 and a RMSE of $30.8 million. Model performance typically underestimated annual losses, with moderate spatial variability in terms of performance between counties.</p>
Antarctic surface mass balance with the regional climate model MAR (1979–2015)
<p>Outputs of the regional climate model MAR v3.6.41 for Antarctica, resolution 35km + source code</p> <p>===========================================</p> <p>Cécile Agosta, 23 Jan 2019 </p> <p>cecile.agosta@gmail.com</p> <p>===========================================</p> <p>Grid specifications are given in MAR-ant35km-grid.nc (projection : EPSG 3031).</p> <p>* State variables are averages of daily means:</p> <p> TT > temperature (°C)</p> <p> ZZ > height above sea level (m)</p> <p> UU, VV > x-wind and y-wind in the stereographic grid (m s-1)</p> <p> UV > wind speed (m s-1)</p> <p>State variables ending with z (e.g. UUz) are interpolated on fixed altitude levels above the ground.</p> <p>State variables ending with p (e.g. UUp) are interpolated on fixed pressure levels.</p> <p>* SMB components are summed: kg m-2 month-1 for montly files, kg m-2 year-1 for annual files, kg m-2 year-1 for clim files</p> <p> snf > snowfall</p> <p> rnf > rainfall</p> <p> rof > run-off</p> <p> sbl > sublimation/condensation</p> <p> smb = snf + rnf - sbl - rof</p> <p> mlt > snowmelt</p> <p> rfz > refreezing</p> <p>If you use this data, please cite the final accepted version of this article:</p> <p>Agosta C., Amory C., Kittel C., Orsi A., Favier V., Gallée H., van den Broeke M.R., Lenaerts J.T., van Wessem J.M., & Fettweis X. (in review, 2018). Estimation of the Antarctic surface mass balance using MAR (1979-2015) and identification of dominant processes. <em>The Cryosphere Discussions</em>, 1–22, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2018-76">doi:10.5194/tc-2018-76</a>.</p> <p>Please contact me if you need other outputs (variables/daily or hourly time steps)</p>
Regional climate model simulations (CCLM 15km) of profiles for the MOSAiC period
<p>The ship-based experiment MOSAiC 2019/2020 was carried out during a full year in the Arctic. The data set includes simulation data of profiles and derived data for the MOSAiC period (Oct. 2019-Sept.2020). The regional climate model CCLM was used in a forecast mode (nested in ERA5) for the whole Arctic with 15 km resolution and is run with different configurations of sea ice data. These include the standard sea ice concentration taken from passive microwave data (AMSR2) with around 6 km resolution, and sea ice concentration from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) thermal infrared data and MODIS sea ice lead data with 1 km resolution for the winter period (Nov. 2019-April 2020). Model output is available every 1h. In the vertical, the model extends up to 22 km with 60 vertical levels. On data below 10km are used. In addition to profiles, integrated water vapour and temperature for the lowest 2km were calculated. Values are grid-box averages at the ship position. Geostrophic wind was computed from the pressure gradient of the four surrounding grid points.</p> <p>Reference: Heinemann, G., Schefczyk, L., Willmes, S., Shupe, M., 2022: Evaluation of simulations of near-surface variables using the regional climate model CCLM for the MOSAiC winter period. Elem. Sci. Anth., 10 (1). DOI: 10.1525/elementa.2022.00033.</p> <p><strong>Project: </strong> Modelling the impact of sea-ice leads on the atmospheric boundary layer during MOSAiC (MISLAM)</p> <p><strong>Funding: </strong>Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), grant 03F0887A</p>
MESMAR v1: A new regional coupled climate model for downscaling, predictability, and data assimilation studies in the Mediterranean region. Article data
<p>Regional coupled and Earth System models are fundamental numerical tools for climate investigations, downscaling of predictions and projections, process-oriented understanding of regional extreme events, and many more applications. Here we introduce a newly developed coupled regional modeling framework for the Mediterranean region, called MESMAR (Mediterranean Earth System model at ISMAR) version 1, which is composed of the WRF atmospheric model, the NEMO oceanic 15 model, and the HD hydrological discharge model, coupled via the OASIS coupler. The model is implemented at moderate resolution (about 1/12° for the ocean and river routing, while twice coarser for the atmosphere) for long-term investigations.</p> <p>The gzipped tarball contains data files contained in the manuscript associated with the MESMARv1 description and submitted to Geoscientific Model Developments:</p> <p>MESMAR v1: A new regional coupled climate model for downscaling, predictability, and data assimilation studies in the Mediterranean region</p> <p>by Andrea Storto, Yassmin Hesham Essa, Vincenzo de Toma, Alessandro Anav, Gianmaria Sannino,<br> Rosalia Santoleri, Chunxue Yang</p>
Climate model experiments of regional-scale tree die-off replaced by shrubs (all monthly data fields): Part 3
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Random forest climatic modeling of agricultural insurance loss across the inland Pacific Northwest region of the United States
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Climate model experiments of regional-scale tree die-off replaced by C3 grass (all monthly data fields): Part 1
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Climate model experiments of regional-scale tree die-off replaced by shrubs (select variables at daily time resolution): Part 4
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Climate model experiments of regional-scale tree die-off replaced by grass (select variables at daily time resolution): Part 2
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Spin-up time and internal variability analysis for overlapping time slices in a regional climate model
<p>In order to increase computational efficiency, several long-term regional climate simulations were split into overlappings time slices. These overlappings slices were used to explore the relative role of spin-up time and internal variability in the discontinuities that are produced once the slices are joined.</p> <p>This dataset was generated using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model and includes two sets of time slices for the periods 2002-2006 and 2006-2010 over the CORDEX South American domain at 0.44º horizontal resolution (SAM-44), regular on a rotated latitude-longitude projection. The data was forced by the scenario RCP 8.5 and driven by the Canadian Earth System model (CanESM2). The model configuration files are also attached.</p>
Main output data used in "Coupling the regional climate MAR model with the ice sheet model PISM mitigates the melt-elevation positive feedback" (Delhasse et al., 2024)
<p>Outputs used in:</p> <p><em>Delhasse, A., Beckmann, J., Kittel, C., and Fettweis, X.: Coupling MAR (Modèle Atmosphérique Régional) with PISM (Parallel Ice Sheet Model) mitigates the positive melt–elevation feedback, The Cryosphere, 18, 633–651, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-633-2024, 2024.</em></p> <p>MAR-PISM coupling experiments outputs over 1991-2200. The main experiments are:</p> <ul> <li>MAPI-2w: 2-way coupling, consideration <em>online</em> of the melt-elevation feedback (evolving topography in MAR).</li> <li>MAPI-1w: 1-way coupling, consideration of the melt-elevation feedback only with the <em>offline</em> correction (Franco <em>et al.</em>, 2012) of the MAR outputs (fixed topography in MAR).</li> <li>MAPI-0w: 0-way coupling, no consideration of the melt-elevation feedback (fixed topography in MAR and no correction during interpolation).</li> </ul> <p>MAR files contain yearly SMB (surface mass balance) and ST (surface temperature) interpolated (with correction) on the PISM-4.5km grid. Gradients used for the correction of the melt-elevation feedback are also given for both variables. SMB and ST are the two required MAR fields to couple MAR with PISM. </p> <p>PISM files contain yearly ice thickness (THK) and ice mask (MASK) as simulated by PISM for each of the three experiments. </p> <p>The MAR code used in this dataset is tagged as v3.11.3 on https://gitlab.com/Mar-Group/MARv3# (last access: 23 January 2024) (MARTeam, 2024). The PISM code used is tagged as PISMv1.2.2 on <a href="https://github.com/pism/pism/releases/tag/v1.2.2" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://github.com/pism/pism/releases/tag/v1.2.2</a> (last access: 23 January 2024). Other coupling scripts are also available upon request by email (<a href="mailto:alison.delhasse@uliege.be" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">alison.delhasse@uliege.be</a>).</p> <p>If you need other variables from MAR or PISM, send us an email (alison.delhasse@uliege.be, johanna.beckmann@monash.edu) and we will be glad to help you. We will also be happy to share the scripts we have developed to analyse the outputs and make the figures in this paper if needed. Please cite the paper if you use these MAR-PISM outputs.<br><br>Data usage notice:</p> <p>If you use any of these results, please acknowledge the work of the people involved in producing them. Acknowledgments should be similar to the one below that contains information related to MAR and PISM. To document MAR scientific impact and enable ongoing support of the model, users are likely encouraged to contact me to add their works to the list of MAR-related publications. </p> <p>"We thank A. Delhasse and J. Beckmann, as well as the MAR and PISM teams which make available the model outputs. We also thank agencies (F.R.S - FNRS, CÉCI, and the Walloon Region) that provided computational resources for MAR-PISM simulations. "</p> <p>You should also refer to and cite the following paper in its latest version:</p> <p><em>Delhasse, A., Beckmann, J., Kittel, C., and Fettweis, X.: Coupling MAR (Modèle Atmosphérique Régional) with PISM (Parallel Ice Sheet Model) mitigates the positive melt–elevation feedback, The Cryosphere, 18, 633–651, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-633-2024, 2024.</em></p> <p>Reference</p> <p><em>Franco, B., Fettweis, X., Lang, C., and Erpicum, M.: Impact of spatial resolution on the modelling of the Greenland ice sheet surface mass balance between 1990–2010, using the regional climate model MAR, The Cryosphere, 6, 695–711, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-695-2012, 2012.</em></p> <p><em>MARTeam: MARv3.11, GitLab [data set], <a href="https://gitlab.com/Mar-Group/MARv3" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://gitlab.com/Mar-Group/MARv3#</a> (last access: 28 May 2022), 2021.</em></p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.