Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
17
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
17 results for “SDGs”
Datasets containing the results from the analysis on SDGS and eHealth inside the Citizen Science Community on Twitter
<p>This datasets contain the results from our analyses of the Citizen Science Community on Twitter. These analyses have been done to better understand the discussion about SDGs, eLearning and eHealth.</p> <p><strong>T</strong>he purpose of sharing these datasets is to provide the basis to reproduce the results reported in the associated deliverable. These files are not raw data, since due to privacy concerns we can not share personal information from Twitter.</p> <p><strong>dominant_topics_anonym.xlsx</strong>: Excel datasheet. This dataset contians the distribution of the most discussed topics inside the SDGs discussion.</p> <p><strong>Edges_Hashtag_connected.csv</strong>: CSV file. This dataset contains the edges to build the network of connected hashtags. This edges can be used to build a network and explore the connections or to statiscally analyse the results.</p> <p><strong>hashtags.csv</strong>: CSV file. This dataset contains the results of the most used hashtags in the analysis about eLearning. <br> </p> <p><strong>hashtags_treemap_health.xlsx</strong>: Excel datasheet. This dataset contains the results of the most frequent hashtags in the eHealth analysis.</p> <p><strong>ldavis_prepared_ieee17.html</strong>: HTML file. This file contains the Intertopic distance map and most salient terms from the topic modelling analysis done in the SDGs conversation study.</p> <p><strong>Most_retweeted_accounts.xlsx</strong>: Excel datasheet. This dataset contains the top 20 users that receive more retweets in the conversation around eHealth. The column called Indegree refers to the topological value calculated from the network of retweets. This indegree is equivalent to the number of retweets received. On the other hand, Outdegree is the opposite, so number of retweets given to others.</p> <p><strong>Most_retweeting_account.xlsx</strong>: Excel datasheet. This dataset presents the opposite part of the previous one, the accounts that retweet the most from the eHealth analysis. The columns contain the same indicators: Indegree and Outdegree.</p> <p><strong>sdgs_count_publish.csv</strong>: CSV file. This dataset contains the number of tweets assigned to the different SDGs from the analysis done on the conversation about these Goals.</p> <p><strong>sdgs_tweets_sdgsaccess.xlsx</strong>: Excel datasheet. Same file as the previous one in other format to ease the handling in Excel.</p> <p><strong>top_hash_health.xlsx</strong>: Excel datasheet. The most used hashtags inside the conversation about eHealth.</p> <p><strong>topics_tweets_sdgsaccess.xlsx</strong>: Excel datasheet. Tweets by topic extracted using Machine Learning in the SDGs analysis.</p> <p> </p> <p>This repository will receive updates in the future in order to present all the data available and publishable from the different analysis that were described.</p>
Survey data of "Mapping Research Output to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)"
<p><strong>This dataset contains information on what papers and concepts researchers find relevant to map domain specific research output to the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).</strong></p> <p><a href="https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdgs">Sustainable Development Goals</a> are the 17 global challenges set by the United Nations. Within each of the goals specific targets and indicators are mentioned to monitor the progress of reaching those goals by 2030. In an effort to capture how research is contributing to move the needle on those challenges, we earlier have made an initial classification model than enables to quickly identify what research output is related to what SDG. (This <a href="https://aurora-network.global/project/sdg-analysis-bibliometrics-relevance/">Aurora SDG dashboard</a> is the initial outcome as proof of practice.)</p> <p>In order to validate our current classification model (on soundness/precision and completeness/recall), and receive input for improvement, a survey has been conducted to<strong> capture expert knowledge from senior researchers in their research domain related to the SDG</strong>. The survey was open to the world, but mainly distributed to researchers from the <a href="https://aurora-network.global/">Aurora Universities Network</a>. <strong>The survey was open from October 2019 till January 2020, and captured data from 244 respondents in Europe and North America.</strong></p> <p>17 surveys were created from a single template, where the content was made specific for each SDG. Content, like a random set of publications, of each survey was ingested by a data provisioning server. That collected research output metadata for each SDG in an earlier stage. It took on average 1 hour for a respondent to complete the survey.<strong> The outcome of the survey data can be used for validating current and optimizing future SDG classification models for mapping research output to the SDGs</strong>.</p> <p><strong>The survey contains the following questions (see inside dataset for exact wording):</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>Are you familiar with this SDG?</strong> <ul> <li>Respondents could only proceed if they were familiar with the targets and indicators of this SDG. Goal of this question was to weed out un knowledgeable respondents and to increase the quality of the survey data.</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Suggest research papers that are relevant for this SDG (upload list)</strong> <ul> <li>This question, to provide a list, was put first to reduce influenced by the other questions. Goal of this question was to measure the completeness/recall of the papers in the result set of our current classification model. (To lower the bar, these lists could be provided by either uploading a file from a reference manager (preferred) in .ris of bibtex format, or by a list of titles. This heterogenous input was processed further on by hand into a uniform format.)</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Select research papers that are relevant for this SDG (radio buttons: accept, reject)</strong> <ul> <li>A randomly selected set of 100 papers was injected in the survey, out of the full list of thousands of papers in the result set of our current classification model. Goal of this question was to measure the soundness/precision of our current classification model.</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Select and Suggest Keywords related to SDG (checkboxes: accept | text field: suggestions)</strong> <ul> <li>The survey was injected with the top 100 most frequent keywords that appeared in the metadata of the papers in the result set of the current classification model. respondents could select relevant keywords we found, and add ones in a blank text field. Goal of this question was to get suggestions for keywords we can use to increase the recall of relevant papers in a new classification model.</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Suggest SDG related glossaries with relevant keywords (text fields: url)</strong> <ul> <li>Open text field to add URL to lists with hundreds of relevant keywords related to this SDG. Goal of this question was to get suggestions for keywords we can use to increase the recall of relevant papers in a new classification model.</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Select and Suggest Journals fully related to SDG (checkboxes: accept | text field: suggestions)</strong> <ul> <li>The survey was injected with the top 100 most frequent journals that appeared in the metadata of the papers in the result set of the current classification model. Respondents could select relevant journals we found, and add ones in a blank text field. Goal of this question was to get suggestions for complete journals we can use to increase the recall of relevant papers in a new classification model.</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Suggest improvements for the current queries (text field: suggestions per target)</strong> <ul> <li>We showed respondents the queries we used in our current classification model next to each of the targets within the goal. Open text fields were presented to change, add, re-order, delete something (keywords, boolean operators, etc. ) in the query to improve it in their opinion. Goal of this question was to get suggestions we can use to increase the recall and precision of relevant papers in a new classification model.</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p><strong>In the dataset root you'll find the following folders and files:</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>/00-survey-input/</strong> <ul> <li>This contains the survey questions for all the individual SDGs. It also contains lists of EIDs categorised to the SDGs we used to make randomized selections from to present to the respondents.</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>/01-raw-data/</strong> <ul> <li>This contains the raw survey output. (Excluding privacy sensitive information for public release.) This data needs to be combined with the data on the provisioning server to make sense.</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>/02-aggregated-data/</strong> <ul> <li>This data is where individual responses are aggregated. Also the survey data is combined with the provisioning server, of all sdg surveys combined, responses are aggregated, and split per question type.</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>/03-scripts/</strong> <ul> <li>This contains scripts to split data, and to add descriptive metadata for text analysis in a later stage.</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>/04-processed-data/</strong> <ul> <li>This is the main final result that can be used for further analysis. Data is split by SDG into subdirectories, in there you'll find files per question type containing the aggregated data of the respondents.</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>/images/</strong> <ul> <li>images of the results used in this README.md.</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>LICENSE.md</strong> <ul> <li>terms and conditions for reusing this data.</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>README.md</strong> <ul> <li>description of the dataset; each subfolders contains a README.md file to futher describe the content of each sub-folder.</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p><strong>In the /04-processed-data/ you'll find in each SDG sub-folder the following files.:</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>SDG-survey-questions.pdf</strong> <ul> <li>This file contains the survey questions</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>SDG-survey-questions.doc</strong> <ul> <li>This file contains the survey questions</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>SDG-survey-respondents-per-sdg.csv</strong> <ul> <li>Basic information about the survey and responses</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>SDG-survey-city-heatmap.csv</strong> <ul> <li>Origin of the respondents per SDG survey</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>SDG-survey-suggested-publications.txt</strong> <ul> <li>Formatted list of research papers researchers have uploaded or listed they want to see back in the result-set for this SDG.</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>SDG-survey-suggested-publications-with-eid-match.csv</strong> <ul> <li>same as above, only matched with an EID. EIDs are matched my Elsevier's internal fuzzy matching algorithm. Only papers with high confidence are show with a match of an EID, referring to a record in Scopus.</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>SDG-survey-selected-publications-accepted.csv</strong> <ul> <li>Based on our previous result set of papers, researchers were presented random samples, they selected papers they believe represent this SDG. (TRUE=accepted)</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>SDG-survey-selected-publications-rejected.csv</strong> <ul> <li>Based on our previous result set of papers, researchers were presented random samples, they selected papers they believe not to represent this SDG. (FALSE=rejected)</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>SDG-survey-selected-keywords.csv</strong> <ul> <li>Based on our previous result set of papers, we presented researchers the keywords that are in the metadata of those papers, they selected keywords they believe represent this SDG.</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>SDG-survey-unselected-keywords.csv</strong> <ul> <li>As "selected-keywords", this is the list of keywords that respondents have not selected to represent this SDG.</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>SDG-survey-suggested-keywords.csv</strong> <ul> <li>List of keywords researchers suggest to use to find papers related to this SDG</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>SDG-survey-glossaries.csv</strong> <ul> <li>List of glossaries, containing keywords, researchers suggest to use to find papers related to this SDG</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>SDG-survey-selected-journals.csv</strong> <ul> <li>Based on our previous result set of papers, we presented researchers the journals that are in the metadata of those papers, they selected journals they believe represent this SDG.</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>SDG-survey-unselected-journals.csv</strong> <ul> <li>As "selected-journals", this is the list of journals that respondents have not selected to represent this SDG.</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>SDG-survey-suggested-journals.csv</strong> <ul> <li>List of journals researchers suggest to use to find papers related to this SDG</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>SDG-survey-suggested-query.csv</strong> <ul> <li>List of query improvements researchers suggest to use to find papers related to this SDG</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p><strong>Cite as:</strong></p> <blockquote> <p><em>Survey data of "Mapping Research output to the SDGs"</em> by Aurora Universities Network (AUR) <a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3798385">doi:10.5281/zenodo.3798385</a></p> </blockquote> <p><strong>Attribute as:</strong></p> <blockquote> <p><em><strong>Survey data of "Mapping Research output to the SDGs</strong>"</em> by Aurora Universities Network (AUR); Alessandro Arienzo (UNA); Roberto Delle Donne (UNA); Ignasi Salvadó Estivill (URV); José Luis González Ugarte (URV); Didier Vercueil (UGA); Nykohla Strong (UAB); Eike Spielberg (UDE); Felix Schmidt (UDE); Linda Hasse (UDE); Ane Sesma (UEA); Baldvin Zarioh (UIC); Friedrich Gaigg (UIN); René Otten (VUA); Nicolien van der Grijp (VUA); Yasin Gunes (VUA); Peter van den Besselaar (VUA); Joeri Both (VUA); Maurice Vanderfeesten (VUA);<strong> is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</strong> <a href="https://aurora-network.global/project/sdg-analysis-bibliometrics-relevance/">https://aurora-network.global/project/sdg-analysis-bibliometrics-relevance/</a></p> </blockquote>
The STRINGS queries to identify documents related to the SDGs (+ country-SDG data)
<div>This page contains three documents related to the work the STRINGS team has developed on mapping research related to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): <br>1. A document explaining the methodology used to create search queries for identifying documents related to SDGs 1-16. <br>2. An Excel file containing the search queries themselves. <br>3. An additional Excel file containing country-SDG level data used in the paper "Countries’ research priorities in relation to the Sustainable Development Goals".<br><br>The procedure for creating SDG queries was developed for the STRINGS project. For both the project and the paper, the procedure to identify SDG-related publications does not rely exclusively on search queries. We apply each SDG query to research areas obtained from a publication-level clustering algorithm, based on direct backward and forward citations. This enables us to select research areas related to SDGs and include all the publications contributing to that area. This approach has several advantages, including the ability to include publications that do not use SDG-related language in their abstract or title but still contribute to SDG-related research. <br><br>For further insights, the platform, data, and thresholds used to understand which research areas are associated with an SDG are openly available <a href="https://public.tableau.com/profile/ed.noyons#!/vizhome/UKStringsSDGtocommunities/Dashboard1">here</a>.<br><br>In the <a href="https://strings.org.uk/">STRINGS report</a>, you can explore applications to map and characterize publications and patents related to the SDGs. <br><br>Additionally, the paper "Countries’ research priorities in relation to the Sustainable Development Goals" provides a country-level analysis of the alignment between research priorities and SDG challenges. </div>
Supporting Material: Scientific Literature on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Scopus - May 2022
<p>This is a supplementary dataset for an article analysing the scientific literature related to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) using Scopus-indexed journals. </p> <p>Data were retrieved in May 2022. Scopus was searched in the Title, Abstract, and Keywords fields looking for each of the 17 SDGs (search query example: TITLE-ABS-KEY (“SDG1” or "SDG 1").</p> <p>The dataset includes the following information for each of the 4808 scientific publication:</p> <p>ID: an identificatory alphanumerical number given by the authors</p> <p>Primary SDG: the main SDG the document focus on (MULTIPLE in case of more than one, ALL in case of all the SDGs)</p> <p>Year: Year of publication</p> <p>Title: title of the publication</p> <p>Abstract: abstract of the publication</p> <p>Index keywords: keywords of the publication</p> <p> </p>
SDGs and AquaVitae
<p>Microsoft Form Survey of which Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) that were considered most relevant to AquaVitae members and their work. </p>
Categorization of articles 2017 with authorship of Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, through the SDGs
<p>The dataset comprises a single list of publications exported from Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics) and Scopus (Elsevier) databases, to which a process was applied that eliminated duplicate records. 2,379 scientific publications in English or Spanish of the "Article" type from the year 2017, with authorship associated with the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, were considered.</p> <p>In addition, the classification process carried out by the team of specialists that considered three consecutive milestones is included: establishment of the reading level applied to each publication record; assignment of one of the 18 categories identified in the information analysis, which include the 17 SDGs and the option "Unclassified" and one of the 169 subcategories corresponding to the goals; and, finally, the status of the review process carried out.</p>
Calculation of overlaps between assignments of Research Areas and SDGs
<p>This collection of MS Excel sheets contains tables (matrices) with Jaccard similarity values between research areas (RAs) and sustainable development goals (SDGs) as declared by the United Nations. The underlying taxonomy of RAs is based on one used in Web of Science (WoS).</p> <p>For each pair of RA1 x RA2 or SDG1 x SDG2 or SDG1 x RA1, the corresponding matrix entry is calculated as the quotient of the number of projects that have both items assigend (numerator) and the number of projects that have at least one of the items assigend (denominator). We interpret this Jaccard index as a measure of similarity or "overlap".</p> <p>The assignment of RAs to projects is based on the computational method of ESA ("Explicit Semantic Analysis"). For SDGs, also hand-coded assignments (SDG_Man) are available in addition to automatically calculated ESA-based values.</p> <p>In two versions, the RAs and SDGs included are limited to those that have at least been assigned to 5 projects overall (min5 version) or 10 projects overall (min10 version).</p> <p>The calculations are based on a sample of 208 projects extracted from the CS Track database.</p>
Sample Records. Citizen Science and Citizen Energy Communities: A Systematic Review of Potential Alliances for SDGs
<p>Sample Records. Citizen Science and Citizen Energy Communities: A Systematic Review of Potential Alliances for SDGs</p>
Data from Italian cities for the SDGs
<p>The aggregation of data concerned 103 Italian cities and for each city 45 indicators were considered</p>
Italian data for the SDGs
<p>This dataset shows normalized data related to indicators available on Istat related to Italian regions.</p>
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in English as a Foreign Language (EFL)
<p>The qualitative mixed-method intervention study, grounded in content analysis and comparative methodology, reveals that incorporating SDGs into teacher training programmes is key since there is a significant direct impact on society. The objective was firstly to create an SDG-based didactic proposal including inquiry-based learning as its pedagogical approach for developing critical thinking. Secondly, to study its effect on participants regarding raising awareness of SDGs and their projection to society as future teachers.</p>
Text Analyses of Survey Data on "Mapping Research Output to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)"
<p><strong>This package contains data on five text analysis types (term extraction, contract analysis, topic modeling, network mapping), based on the survey data where researchers selected research output that are related to the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This is used as input to improve the current SDG classification model v4.0 to v5.0</strong></p> <p><a href="https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdgs">Sustainable Development Goals</a> are the 17 global challenges set by the United Nations. Within each of the goals specific targets and indicators are mentioned to monitor the progress of reaching those goals by 2030. In an effort to capture how research is contributing to move the needle on those challenges, we earlier have made an initial classification model than enables to quickly identify what research output is related to what SDG. (This <a href="https://aurora-network.global/project/sdg-analysis-bibliometrics-relevance/">Aurora SDG dashboard</a> is the initial outcome as <em>proof of practice</em>.)</p> <p>The initiative started from the Aurora Universities Network in 2017, in the working group "<a href="https://aurora-network.global/activity/societal-impact-and-relevance-of-research-sirr/">Societal Impact and Relevance of Research</a>", to investigate and to make visible 1. what research is done that are relevant to topics or challenges that live in society (for the proof of practice this has been scoped down to the SDGs), and 2. what the effect or impact is of implementing those research outcomes to those societal challenges (this also have been scoped down to research output being cited in policy documents from national and local governments an NGO's).</p> <p><strong>Context of this dataset | classification model improvement workflow</strong></p> <p>The classification model we have used are 17 different search queries on the Scopus database.</p> <ul> <li>SDG search queries version 4.0 (SQv4) have been created, Published here: <ul> <li><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3817443"><em>Search Queries for "Mapping Research Output to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)" v4.0</em> by Aurora Universities Network (AUR) doi:10.5281/zenodo.3817443</a></li> </ul> </li> <li>A survey has been distributed to senior researchers to test the robustness of SQv4. Published here: <ul> <li><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3798385"><em>Survey data of "Mapping Research output to the Sustainable Development Goals SDGs"</em> by Aurora Universities Network (AUR) doi:10.5281/zenodo.3798385</a></li> </ul> </li> <li>This text analysis has been made as one of the inputs to improve the classification model. Published here: <ul> <li><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3832090"><em>Text Analyses of Survey Data on "Mapping Research Output to the Sustainable Development Goals SDGs"</em> by Aurora Universities Network (AUR) doi:10.5281/zenodo.3832090</a></li> </ul> </li> <li>Improved SDG search queries version 5.0 (SQv5) have been created, Published here: <ul> <li><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3817445"><em>Search Queries for "Mapping Research Output to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)" v5.0</em> by Aurora Universities Network (AUR) doi:10.5281/zenodo.3817445</a></li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p><strong>Methods used to do the text analysis</strong></p> <ol> <li><strong>Term Extraction</strong>: after text normalisation (stemming, etc) we extracted 2 terms in bigrams and trigrams that co-occurred the most per document, in the title, abstract and keyword</li> <li><strong>Contrast analysis</strong>: the co-occurring terms in publications (title, abstract, keywords), of the papers that respondents have indicated relate to this SDG (y-axis: True), and that have been rejected (x-axis: False). In the top left you'll see term co-occurrences that a clearly relate to this SDG. The bottom-right are terms that are appear in papers that have been rejected for this SDG. The top-right terms appear frequently in both and cannot be used to discriminate between the two groups.</li> <li><strong>Network map</strong>: This diagram shows the cluster-network of terms co-occurring in the publications related to this SDG, selected by the respondents (accepted publications only).</li> <li><strong>Topic model</strong>: This diagram shows the topics, and the related terms that make up that topic. The number of topics is related to the number of of targets of this SDG.</li> <li><strong>Contingency matrix</strong>: This diagram shows the top 10 of co-occurring terms that correlate the most.</li> </ol> <p><strong>Software used to do the text analyses</strong></p> <p>CorTexT: The <a href="https://www.cortext.net/">CorTexT Platform</a> is the digital platform of LISIS Unit and a project launched and sustained by IFRIS and INRAE. This platform aims at empowering open research and studies in humanities about the dynamic of science, technology, innovation and knowledge production.</p> <p><strong>Resource with interactive visualisations</strong></p> <p>Based on the text analysis data we have created a website that puts all the SDG interactive diagrams together. For you to scrall through. <a href="https://sites.google.com/vu.nl/sdg-survey-analysis-results/">https://sites.google.com/vu.nl/sdg-survey-analysis-results/</a></p> <p><strong>Data set content</strong></p> <p>In the dataset root you'll find the following folders and files:</p> <ul> <li><strong>/sdg01-17/</strong> <ul> <li>This contains the text analysis for all the individual SDG surveys.</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>/methods/</strong> <ul> <li>This contains the step-by-step explanations of the text analysis methods using Cortext.</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>/images/</strong> <ul> <li>images of the results used in this README.md.</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>LICENSE.md</strong> <ul> <li>terms and conditions for reusing this data.</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>README.md</strong> <ul> <li>description of the dataset; each subfolders contains a README.md file to futher describe the content of each sub-folder.</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p>Inside an <strong>/sdg01-17/</strong>-folder you'll find the following:</p> <ul> <li>This contains the step-by-step explanations of the text analysis methods using Cortext.</li> <li><strong>/sdg01-17/sdg04-sdg-survey-selected-publications-combined.db</strong> <ul> <li>his contains the title, abstract, keywords, fo the publications in the survey, including the and accept or rejection status and the number of respondents</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>/sdg01-17/sdg04-sdg-survey-selected-publications-combined-accepted-accepted-custom-filtered.db</strong> <ul> <li>same as above, but only the accepted papers</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>/sdg01-17/extracted-terms-list-top1000.csv</strong> <ul> <li>the aggregated list of co-occuring terms (bigrams and trigrams) extracted per paper.</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>/sdg01-17/contrast-analysis/</strong> <ul> <li>This contains the data and visualisation of the terms appearing in papers that have been accepted (true) and rejected (false) to be relating to this SDG.</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>/sdg01-17/topic-modelling/</strong> <ul> <li>This contains the data and visualisation of the terms clustered in the same number of topics as there are 'targets' within that SDG.</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>/sdg01-17/network-mapping/</strong> <ul> <li>This contains the data and visualisation of the terms clustered in co-occuring proximation of appearance in papers</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>/sdg01-17/contingency-matrix/</strong> <ul> <li>This contains the data and visualisation of the top 10 terms co-occuring</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p>note: the .csv files are actually tab-separated.</p> <p><strong>Contribute and improve the SDG Search Queries</strong></p> <p>We welcome you to join the Github community and to fork, branch, improve and make a pull request to add your improvements to the new version of the SDG queries. <strong><a href="https://github.com/Aurora-Network-Global/sdg-queries">https://github.com/Aurora-Network-Global/sdg-queries</a></strong></p>
SDGs Action Model in Proverty Alleviation in Village Communities
<p>This material has presented on 2nd International Conference on Advance Research in Social and Economic Science in October 25, 2023.</p>
Climate policy and the SDGs agenda: How does near-term action on nexus SDGs influence the achievement of long-term climate goals?
<p><span>The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) represent the global ambition to accelerate sustainable development. Several SDGs are directly related to climate change and policies aiming to mitigate it. This includes, among others, the set of SDGs that directly influence the climate, land, energy, and water (CLEW) nexus (SDGs 2, 6, 7, 13, 15). This study aims at understanding the synergies and trade-offs between climate policy and the SDGs agenda: how does near-term action on SDGs influence long-term climate goals? </span></p>
Supplementary Information - Investment needs to achieve SDGs: an overview
<p>Overview of sources providing investment needs estimates towards SDG achievement</p>
Engagement and social impact in tech-based Citizen Science initiatives for achieving the SDGs : A Systematic Literature Review with a perspective on complex thinking
<p>Data set</p>
Data Set Used for Biblometric Analaysis in "Optimizing Rainfall-Runoff Models Over Three Decades: Progress, Innovations, Challenges, and Insights for Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Based on Bibliometric Analysis"
<p>Data Set Used for Biblometric Analaysis in "Optimizing Rainfall-Runoff Models Over Three Decades: Progress, Innovations, Challenges, and Insights for Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Based on Bibliometric Analysis"</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.