Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

7

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

7 results for “SWAT model”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo44/100

Effect of spatial input data quality on SWAT modelling in the Porijõgi catchment

<p>The Porij&otilde;gi Catchment near Tartu, Estonia is the study area for this research. Four model setups were created using global/regional level data (HWSD soil, CORINE), and local high-resolution spatial data including the new Estonian high-resolution EstSoil-EH soil dataset and the Estonian Topographic Database (ETAK). The study employed statistical criteria to assess SWAT model performance for monthly simulated stream flows from 2007 to 2019.</p> <p>Data deposit in preparation for article:</p> <p>Effect of spatial input data quality on the uncertainty of the<br> SWAT model, submitted 2022</p> <p>Alexander Kmoch, Desalew Meseret Moges, Mahdiyeh Sepehrar, Balaji Narasimhan and Evelyn<br> Uuemaa</p> <p>contact: alexander.kmoch@ut.ee</p>

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2022View details →
zenodo44/100

Updated fruits and vegetable parameters for swat models

<p>Ensuring accurate crop yield simulations in ecohydrological models such as the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) is crucial to improve our understanding of agricultural systems and productivity. This, in turn, can facilitate the development of more sustainable agricultural practices. In this study, we focused on validating the crop growth parameters of the SWAT model for 24 table food fruits and vegetables in Iowa, located in the western Corn Belt region of the United States.</p> <p>To estimate these parameters, we used five primary sources: a) existing parameters in the SWAT crop parameter database, b) alternative parameters in the Environmental Policy Integrated Climate (EPIC) and Agricultural Policy/Environmental eXtender (APEX) crop parameter databases, c) literature, d) PHU fraction for scheduling dates, and e) expert communication among modeling team members. Among the 24 crops tested, 15 initial parameter data sets were already available in the SWAT database, and the remaining crop types were added to this plant.dat file.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2023View details →
zenodo40/100

Training Deep Learning Models to Estimate SWAT Parameters using Streamflow Observations

<p>This folder provides the&nbsp;simulation and observational data</p> <p>Simulation data using SWAT (1000 realz)<br> Train, Val, and Test splits (80/10/10)<br> Observational data for ARW (WY2000-2016)</p>

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2022View details →
zenodo40/100

Simulations for SA and SC of SWAT+ model

<p>This repository contains the simulations run with SWATPlusR to perform the Sensitivity analysis and the Soft calibration for a SWAT+ model constructed for the Upper Tagus River basin.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>In this repository you will find:</p> <p>The raw simulations for the Sensitivity analysis --&gt; SA_runs.rar</p> <p>The files created when extracting the data from the simulations for the Sensitivity analysis --&gt; var_extract.zip</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>The raw simulations for the Soft calibration:</p> <p>For each iteration, the file that contains the entire output from the 1000 simulations is the ronda_X_lsu.rds</p> <p>The file channels_ordered_all.rds contains the streamflow simulated for the evaluated subbasins for the three soft calibration iterations.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>More info and the code used to analyse this data can be found in the GitHub repository (https://github.com/alejandrosgz/https://github.com/alejandrosgz/HSJ_SA_SC_SWATPlus)</p> <p>&nbsp;</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2023View details →
zenodo36/100

SWAT-GL Demo Model Martelltal

<p>Here we provide an example model of SWAT-GL in the Martelltal with updated input files and the latest revisions.&nbsp;</p>

opencc-zeroJun 2023View details →
zenodo36/100

SWAT & MODFLOW Model Components

<p>The dataset contains the input and output data of two different model components. The components are based on the hydrological models SWAT and MODFLOW and integrated in the MINT framework.&nbsp;</p>

opencc-zeroJul 2022View details →
zenodo32/100

Data for Streamflow Prediction: Comparison of SWAT vs. Random Forest Models in Diverse Catchments

<p>This study introduces a time-lag-informed Random Forest (RF) framework for streamflow time series prediction across diverse catchments, and compares its results against SWAT predictions. We found strong evidence of RF's better performance by adding historical flows and time-lags for meteorological values over using only actual meteorological values. On a daily scale, RF demonstrated robust performance (Nash&ndash;Sutcliffe efficiency [<em>NSE</em>] &gt; 0.5), whereas SWAT generally yielded unsatisfactory results (<em>NSE</em> &lt; 0.5) and tended to overestimate daily streamflow by up to 27% (<em>PBIAS</em>). However, SWAT provided better monthly predictions, particularly in catchments with irregular flow patterns. Although both models faced challenges in predicting peak flows in snow-influenced catchments, RF outperformed SWAT in an arid catchment. RF also exhibited a notable advantage over SWAT in terms of computational efficiency. Overall, RF is a good choice for daily predictions with limited data, whereas SWAT is preferable for monthly predictions and understanding hydrological processes in depth.</p> <p>This repository contains the input data used for building the RF and SWAT models and the files describing the modeling results.</p> <p>The corresponding Zenodo code repository is available at <a href="../doi/10.5281/zenodo.11064973" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.11064973</a>.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2024View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record