Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2020View details →

Figure 2 in Extant because important or important because extant? On the scientific importance and conservation of a genetically pure Sicilian population of the threatened Salmo cettii Rafinesque, 1810

Figure 2. – Individual Salmo cettii from Tellesimo Stream (for the morphological and phenotypical characteristics of Sicilian trout see: Duchi, 1988; Fruciano et al., 2014; Duchi, 2018).

Figure 3. Guettarda speciosa L. A in Katot yan panao: A case study of indigenous botanical nomenclature in the scientific literature

Figure 3. Guettarda speciosa L. A) Common habitus as shrubby tree, Guam (130198175). B) Leaves crowded at branch terminus, Guam (12922175). C) Flowers and buds, Saipan (7100716). D) Fruit, Aitutaki, Cook Islands (163554764). Image numbers from iNaturalist (www.inaturalist.org); photographers: C. Certeza (A), M. Freedman (B), M. Kargul (C), A. Chapman (D); licensing: CC BY-NC (A–C), CC BY-NC-SA (D).

Figure 4. A in Katot yan panao: A case study of indigenous botanical nomenclature in the scientific literature

Figure 4. A) Type specimens of Claoxylon marianum Muell.-Arg. (G 00313924). B) Gaudichaud's field number " 248 " with Chamoru name " Catud Cunau (Catoud Counao) ". C) Field number " 63 " and the Chamoru name " Panao ". D) A note indicating " Ç'est plutôt un Claxylon[sic]! Juss. " E) Gaudichaud ' s signature and date. F–G) Page six of Gaudichaud's inventory of Mariana plants in which he originally listed specimen 63 as " Guettarda ". Images © Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève with permission (A–E) and public domain, courtesy F. Wamprechts (F–G).

Figure 2 in Katot yan panao: A case study of indigenous botanical nomenclature in the scientific literature

Figure 2. Claoxylon marianum Muell.Arg. (Euphorbiaceae), Guam. A) Common habitus as shrubby tree (94524278). B) Toothed leaves crowded at branch terminus (86964495). C) Male flowers and buds (153656635). D) Female flowers and fruit (86964496). Image numbers from iNaturalist (www.inaturalist.org); photographers: N. Sablan (A, C), M. Martinez (B, D); licensing: © the author with permission (A, C), CC BY-NC (B, D).

Figure 1 in Katot yan panao: A case study of indigenous botanical nomenclature in the scientific literature

Figure 1. Dendrocnide latifolia (Gaud.) Chew (Urticaceae). A) Common habitus as shrubby tree, Saipan (104853909). B) Leaves crowded at branch terminus, Rota (12946963). C) Female flowers and leaf abscission scars on branches, Guam (34476422). D) Male flowers, Guam (34476420). Image numbers from iNaturalist (www.inaturalist.org); photographers: H. Rogers (A), M. Freedman (B), PACN Vegetation Program (C–D); licensing: © the author with permission (A), CC BY-NC (B–D).

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2016View details →

Figure 1 in Quantifying scientific significance of a fossil site: the Gogo Fossil sites (Late Devonian, Western Australia) as a case study

Figure 1. Map showing area covering the Gogo Formation site localities (geology taken from Long and Trinajstic, 2010, figure 1).

FIGURE 19 in Designing scientifically-grounded paleoart for augmented reality at La Brea Tar Pits

FIGURE 19. Photogrammetry model of a life sized sculpture of the extinct American mastodon (Mammut americanum) located at La Brea Tar Pits. To view this model in 3D, please see the online version of this article.

FIGURE 18 in Designing scientifically-grounded paleoart for augmented reality at La Brea Tar Pits

FIGURE 18. Low poly reconstruction of the extinct American mastodon (Mammut americanum). To view this model in 3D, please see the online version of this article.

FIGURE 14 in Designing scientifically-grounded paleoart for augmented reality at La Brea Tar Pits

FIGURE 14. Low poly reconstruction of the extinct western horse (Equus occidentalis). To view this model in 3D, please see the online version of this article.

FIGURE 9 in Designing scientifically-grounded paleoart for augmented reality at La Brea Tar Pits

FIGURE 9. Low poly reconstruction of the extinct dire wolf (Aenocyon dirus). To view this model in 3D, please see the online version of this article.

FIGURE 11 in Designing scientifically-grounded paleoart for augmented reality at La Brea Tar Pits

FIGURE 11. Low poly reconstruction of a male extinct American lion (Panthera atrox). To view this model in 3D, please see the online version of this article.

FIGURE 12 in Designing scientifically-grounded paleoart for augmented reality at La Brea Tar Pits

FIGURE 12. Low poly reconstruction of the extinct saber-toothed cat (Smilodon fatalis). To view this model in 3D, please see the online version of this article.

FIGURE 8 in Designing scientifically-grounded paleoart for augmented reality at La Brea Tar Pits

FIGURE 8. Low poly reconstruction of the extinct western camel (Camelops hesternus). To view this model in 3D, please see the online version of this article.

FIGURE 4 in Designing scientifically-grounded paleoart for augmented reality at La Brea Tar Pits

FIGURE 4. Stages in the development of a low poly dire wolf model. A. Mesh showing the overall 3D shape of the model. B. Rigging showing the model's skeleton. Colors represent the "weights" of different bones and joints on the overall model's deformation while moving. C. The 2D texture file. D. The finished, rigged model with texture correctly wrapped around the mesh.

FIGURE 17 in Designing scientifically-grounded paleoart for augmented reality at La Brea Tar Pits

FIGURE 17. Low poly reconstruction of the extinct Columbian mammoth (Mammuthus columbi). To view this model in 3D, please see the online version of this article.

FIGURE 7 in Designing scientifically-grounded paleoart for augmented reality at La Brea Tar Pits

FIGURE 7. Low poly reconstruction of the extinct ancient bison (Bison antiquus). To view this model in 3D, please see the online version of this article.

FIGURE 3. A. Low immersion conditions used a handheld smartphone. B. High immersion conditions used a in Designing scientifically-grounded paleoart for augmented reality at La Brea Tar Pits

FIGURE 3. A. Low immersion conditions used a handheld smartphone. B. High immersion conditions used a smartphone inserted into an inexpensive headset. C. To provide binocular vision in the headset, the smartphone screen is split into two smaller images, greatly reducing available screen space and resolution.

FIGURE 6 in Designing scientifically-grounded paleoart for augmented reality at La Brea Tar Pits

FIGURE 6. Low poly reconstruction of the extinct dwarf pronghorn (Capromeryx minor). To view this model in 3D, please see the online version of this article.

FIGURE 2. A in Designing scientifically-grounded paleoart for augmented reality at La Brea Tar Pits

FIGURE 2. A. Mural of La Brea Tar Pits painted by Charles Knight in 1925. B. Mural of La Brea Tar Pits painted by Mark Hallett in 1988 ©Mark Hallett. The Hallett image is not published under the terms of the CC-BY license of this article. For permission to reuse, please contact Mark Hallett.