Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 18 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 18 Characters relative to the female and male genitalia of specimens sampled in the present analysis: a Isala spiralis comb. nov., dorsal view of the epigynal plate. b Stephanopis armata, dorsal view of the epigynal plate. c Paratobias championi sp. rev., ventral view of the epigynal plate. d Coenypha nodosa comb. nov., ventral view of the epigynal plate. e Stephanopis lata, ventral view of the epigynal plate. f Borboropactus cinerascens, ventral view of the epigynal plate (arrows indicate the epigynal teeth). g Stephanopis flagellata, left palp. h Sidymella bicuspidata, left palp

Fig. 21 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 21 Characters relative to the male genitalia of specimens sampled in the present analysis: a Stephanopis barbipes, left palp. b Isala cambridgei comb. nov., left palp. c Onocolus intermedius, left palp. d Sidymella longispina, left palp. e Paratobias sp. 1, left palp. f Tmarus polyandrus, left palp. g Stephanopis altifrons, left palp (lower arrows indicate the pair of ventral filamentous setae on tibiae). h Stephanopis bicornis, retrolateral view of left palp (detail of the cymbial setae brush)

Fig. 8 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 8 Characters relative to dorsal habitus and prosoma of specimens sampled in the present analysis: a Stephanopis lata, frontal view. b Sidymella excavata, frontal view. c Stephanopis pentacanha, carapace. d Epicadinus trispinosus, carapace. e Tmarus polyandrus, carapace. f Isala arenata comb. nov., dorsal habitus. g Epicadus granulatus, sternum. h Borboropactus nyerere, sternum

Fig. 6 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 6 Character transformations, detailed topology of the relationships between "ditissima clade" (blue) and Sidymella (stricto sensu); emergence of the "pentacantha clade" (purple) as part of the "Epicadus group"

Fig. 13 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 13 Characters relative to carapace and legs of specimens sampled in the present analysis: a Stephanopis pentacantha, prosoma (detail of the procurve posterior eye row). b Paratobias championi sp. rev. (detail of the recurve posterior eye row). c Stephanopis fissifrons, prosoma (detail of the straight posterior eye row). d Stephanopis barbipes, prosoma (arrows indicate MOQ macrosetae). e Borporopactus cinerascens, prosoma (canoeshaped tapetum). f Tmarus elongatus, tibiae I (trichobothria linearly distributed). g Stephanopis pentacantha, tibiae I (clustered trichobothria). h Coenypha edwardsi, leg I (arrows indicate mesial and ectal apophysis on femur)

Fig. 5 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 5 Character transformations and detail of the dichotomy between the Isala and Paratobias gen. rev. based on the topology of the most congruent tree (K = 17.89). Filled squares represent synapomorphies

Fig. 2 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 2 Hypothetical reconstruction of the relationships of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on the strict consensus of the most congruent tree (K = 17.89) obtained after implied weighted analysis. Nodal stability is represented by the "Navajo rugs" along the branches (analysis recovering

Fig. 4 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 4 Character transformations in Stephanopis (stricto sensu) based on the topology of the most congruent tree (K = 17.89). Filled squares represent synapomorphies and those in white are homoplastic

Fig. 3 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 3 Clade supports obtained by relative Bremer index (above the branches) and symmetric resampling analysis (below the branches). A colour scheme is applied to represent the geographical distribution of the clades represented on the working phylogenetic hypothesis

Fig. 1 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 1 Topologic comparison between consensuses trees obtained under equal weighting parsimony (EW) and Bayesian inference (BI)

Fig. 20 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 20 Characters relative to the male genitalia of specimens sampled in the present analysis: a Stephanopis fissifrons, grooved RTA. b Sidymella lucida, nodose RTA. c Isala palliolata comb. nov., smooth RTA. d Epicadus taczanowskii, canoe-shaped RTAbvr. e Sidymella hirsuta, spoon-shaped RTAvbr. f Coenypha ditissima comb. nov., left palp. g Sidymella furcillata, left palp. h Isala spiralis comb. nov., left palp

Fig. 15 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 15 Characters relative to legs, claws and opisthosoma of specimens sampled in the present analysis: a Epicadus heterogaster, patella I. b Stephanopis pentacantha, patella I. c Isala cambridgei comb. nov., male tibial brushes. d Epicadus caudatus, trichobothrium and duster-shaped setae. e Tmarus elongatus, tarsal claws of the right leg I (mesial view). f Epicadus taczanowskii, tarsal claws of the right leg I (ectal view). g Epicadus heterogaster, tibia I. h Epicadus trituberculatus, opisthosoma

Fig. 7 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 7 Section of the working phylogenetic hypothesis detailing the character transformations and relationships between the "angularis clade" (orange), Sidymella rubrosginata (red), "trapezia clade" (blue)

Fig. 19 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 19 Characters relative to the male genitalia of specimens sampled in the present analysis: a Epicadus trituberculatus, left palp. b Stephanopis pentacantha, left palp (arrow indicates the prolateral macrosetae). c Geraesta hirta, left palp. d Sidymella lucida, retrolateral view of left palp. e Borboropactus nyerere, left palp. f Isala cambridgei comb. nov., retrolateral view of left palp. g Stephanopis nigra, retrolateral view of left palp. h Stephanopis altifrons, detail of the RTA

Figure 9 from: Machado M, Guzati C, Viecelli R, Molina-Gómez D, Teixeira RA (2019) A taxonomic review of the crab spider genus Sidymella (Araneae, Thomisidae) in the Neotropics. Zoosystematics and Evolution 95(2): 319-344. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.95.34958

Figure 9 Male of Sidymellakolpogastera habitus, dorsal b prosoma, anterior c, e left palp, ventral view d, f left palp, retrolateral view.

Figure 7 from: Machado M, Guzati C, Viecelli R, Molina-Gómez D, Teixeira RA (2019) A taxonomic review of the crab spider genus Sidymella (Araneae, Thomisidae) in the Neotropics. Zoosystematics and Evolution 95(2): 319-344. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.95.34958

Figure 7 Male of Sidymellafurcillataa habitus, dorsal b prosoma, anterior c, e left palp, ventral view d, f left palp, retrolateral view (white arrow indicates the basal branch of the RTA).

Figure 6 from: Machado M, Guzati C, Viecelli R, Molina-Gómez D, Teixeira RA (2019) A taxonomic review of the crab spider genus Sidymella (Araneae, Thomisidae) in the Neotropics. Zoosystematics and Evolution 95(2): 319-344. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.95.34958

Figure 6 Female of Sidymellafurcillataa habitus, dorsal b prosoma, anterior c, e epigynum, ventral d, f epigynum, dorsal.

Figure 3 from: Machado M, Guzati C, Viecelli R, Molina-Gómez D, Teixeira RA (2019) A taxonomic review of the crab spider genus Sidymella (Araneae, Thomisidae) in the Neotropics. Zoosystematics and Evolution 95(2): 319-344. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.95.34958

Figure 3 Habitussen of males, lateral aSidymellalongispinabSidymellafurcillatacSidymellakolpogasterdSidymellaexcavata sp. nov. eSidymellalucida.

Figure 4 from: Machado M, Guzati C, Viecelli R, Molina-Gómez D, Teixeira RA (2019) A taxonomic review of the crab spider genus Sidymella (Araneae, Thomisidae) in the Neotropics. Zoosystematics and Evolution 95(2): 319-344. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.95.34958

Figure 4 Female of Sidymellaexcavata sp. nov. a habitus, dorsal b prosoma, anterior c, e epigynum, ventral d, f epigynum, dorsal.

Figure 2 from: Machado M, Guzati C, Viecelli R, Molina-Gómez D, Teixeira RA (2019) A taxonomic review of the crab spider genus Sidymella (Araneae, Thomisidae) in the Neotropics. Zoosystematics and Evolution 95(2): 319-344. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.95.34958

Figure 2 Habitussen of females, lateral aSidymellalongispinabSidymellafurcillatacSidymellakolpogasterdSidymellaexcavata sp. nov. eSidymellamarmorata sp. nov. fSidymellalucida.