Find research datasets worth reusing

Selected data(s) from : Femtosecond direct laser writing of silver clusters in phosphate glasses for x-ray spatially-resolved dosimetry

<p>The data selected is based on the figures below, published in the linked article (see the doi).</p> <p><strong>- Figure 1.</strong> Microscopy fluorescence image of ARGOi glass sample (excitation at 365 nm) of laser-inscribed structures for the different writing irradiances at two different depths: (<strong>a</strong>) structures at 150 &micro;m below the glass front surface, (<strong>b</strong>) structures at 550 &micro;m below the glass front surface, and at 150 &micro;m from the glass rear surface. <strong>(Only picture)</strong></p> <p>- <strong>Figure 2.</strong> (<strong>a</strong>) Transparent color before irradiation (ARGO glass sample), (<strong>b</strong>) yellow color after X-ray irradiation with 222 Gy (ARGO* glass sample). <strong>(Only picture)</strong></p> <p><strong>- </strong> <strong>Figure 3.</strong> (<strong>a</strong>) Absorption spectra of the ARGO and ARGO* glass sample after various X-ray doses and the difference absorption coefficient spectrum for 222 Gy vs. pristine. (<strong>b</strong>) Fit of the radiation-induced spectrum (difference between 222 Gy and pristine) considering Gaussian energy contributions for ARGO and ARGO*. (<strong>c</strong>) Absorption spectra for the GPN and GPN* glasses for X-ray doses from 5 mGy to 3 kGy [<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9040/10/3/110/htm#B39-chemosensors-10-00110">39</a>]. (<strong>d</strong>) The difference absorption coefficient spectra between different doses conditions for GPN and GPN* [<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9040/10/3/110/htm#B39-chemosensors-10-00110">39</a>]. (<strong>Picture, xls datas</strong>)</p> <ol> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure3_2022-03-03_V01. <strong>Figure 3</strong></li> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure3_Datas_2022-03-03_V01. Datas : <strong>wavelength, effective absorption coefficient (cm-1)</strong></li> </ol> <p>- <strong>Figure 4.</strong> Micro-luminescence of GPN* glass performed on the optically polished glass side: (<strong>a</strong>) integrated fluorescence intensity at different depths, (<strong>b</strong>) normalized spectrum evolution with depth for the 500 Gy dose [<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9040/10/3/110/htm#B39-chemosensors-10-00110">39</a>]. (<strong>Picture, xls datas</strong>)</p> <ol> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure4_2022-03-03_V01. Figure 4</li> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure4_Datas_2022-03-03_V01. Datas</li> </ol> <p>- <strong>Figure 5.</strong> Estimated depth-dependent profiles in absolute values of the linear absorption coefficient at 405 nm. (<strong>Picture, xls datas</strong>)</p> <ol> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure5_2022-03-03_V01. Figure 5</li> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure5_Datas_2022-03-03_V01. Datas : <strong>sample depth (mm) ; scaled linear absorption coefficient profile at 405 nm (mm-1)</strong></li> </ol> <p>- <strong>Figure 6.</strong> (<strong>a</strong>) X-ray energy spectra simulated by SpekPy for each irradiation facility, normalized by integral. (<strong>b</strong>) Geant4-simulated dose inside each sample, normalized by the surface dose; filled areas show uncertainties at 95% confidence. (<strong>Picture, xls datas</strong>)</p> <ol> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure6_2022-03-03_V01. Figure 6</li> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure6_Datas_2022-03-03_V01. Datas : <strong>ARGO 100KV_dose ; GPN-20KV_dose ; GPN-32KV_dose</strong></li> </ol> <p>- <strong>Figure 7.</strong> Radio-photoluminescence measurement of the GPNi* glass for the inscribed structure [<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9040/10/3/110/htm#B39-chemosensors-10-00110">39</a>]. (<strong>Picture, xls datas</strong>)</p> <ol> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure7_2022-03-03_V01. Figure 7</li> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure7_Datas_2022-03-03_V01. Datas : <strong>wavelength ; relative intensity a.u.</strong></li> </ol> <p>- <strong>Figure 8.</strong> Normalized RPL spectra excited at 325 nm: (<strong>a</strong>) for the ARGO (pristine&mdash;right axis) and ARGO* (X-ray irradiation at 222 Gy&mdash;left axis) glasses collected around 150 &micro;m below the surface, (<strong>b</strong>,<strong>c</strong>) for the highest DLW irradiance structure for ARGOi and ARGOi* in the front- and the rear-inscribed surfaces, respectively. (<strong>Picture, xls datas</strong>)</p> <ol> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure8_2022-03-03_V01. Figure 8</li> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure8_Datas_2022-03-03_V01. Datas : <strong>inscribed glass...</strong></li> </ol> <p>- <strong>Figure 9.</strong> (<strong>a</strong>) Differential linear absorption coefficient of the laser-inscribed structures (11 TW/cm²) for the two planes after irradiation at 222 Gy X-ray dose in the ARGOi* glass sample. (<strong>b</strong>) Average differential absorption of the inscribed structures for all DLW irradiance (as from <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9040/10/3/110/htm#fig_body_display_chemosensors-10-00110-f009">Figure 9</a>a). (<strong>Picture, xls datas</strong>)</p> <ol> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure9_2022-03-03_V01. Figure 9</li> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure9_Datas_2022-03-03_V01. Datas : <strong>integrated differential linear absoprtion percentage ; irradiance (TW/cm2)</strong></li> </ol> <p>- <strong>Figure 10.</strong> (<strong>a</strong>) Phase image under white light illumination of the laser inscribed structure (11 TW/cm²) before irradiation. (<strong>b</strong>) Optical path difference determined from the phase image. (<strong>c</strong>) The refractive index modification &Delta;<em>n</em> as a function of laser irradiance before/after 222 Gy-dose for the two planes in ARGOi, ARGOi* glass sample. (<strong>Picture, xls datas</strong>)</p> <ol> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure10_2022-03-03_V01. Figure 10</li> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure10_Datas_2022-03-03_V01. Datas : <strong>refractive index modification ; irradiance (TW/cm2), Error bar</strong></li> </ol> <p><strong>- Figure 11.</strong> Comparison between calculated and measured &Delta;<em>n</em>&circ; after irradiation for a decrease in the initial value of <em>N</em><em>&alpha;</em>3 by 0.48%: (<strong>a</strong>,<strong>c</strong>) the real part &Delta;<em>n</em> for the front and rear surfaces, respectively; (<strong>b</strong>,<strong>d</strong>) their imaginary counterparts &Delta;<em>&kappa;</em>, respectively. (<strong>Picture, xls datas</strong>)</p> <ol> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure11_2022-03-03_V01. Figure 11</li> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure11_Datas_2022-03-03_V01. Datas : <strong>rear surface...</strong></li> </ol> <p><strong>- Figure 12.</strong> Integrated measure of the amplitude of fluorescence intensity for the different laser irradiance before and after 222 Gy-dose for the two planes in ARGOi and ARGOi* glass sample. (<strong>Picture, xls datas</strong>)</p> <ol> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure12_2022-03-03_V01. Figure 12</li> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure12_Datas_2022-03-03_V01. Datas : <strong>integrated measure of&nbsp; the amplitude of fluorescence intensity ; Irradiance (TW/cm2) ; Error bar </strong></li> </ol> <p><strong>- Figure 13.</strong> (<strong>a</strong>) Composite FLIM and fluorescence intensity microscopy images of the laser-induced structure (11 TW/cm²) before and after irradiation for an emission at 425 nm from the front surface; the color-code represents the mean lifetime obtained by FAST-FLIM algorithm (color scale from 0 to 31 ns); inset: luminescence intensity only (grey-scale from 0 to 45 counts). (<strong>b</strong>) Same composite FLIM and luminescence intensity images for an emission at 510 nm. (<strong>c</strong>) Luminescence decays in arbitrary units for the emission at 425 nm of the same structure before and after irradiation for the two surfaces, and fitting curves thereof using three exponential decay functions. (<strong>Picture, xls datas</strong>)</p> <ol> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure13_2022-03-03_V01. Figure 13</li> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure13_Datas_2022-03-03_V01. Datas : <strong>fluorescence intensity (arbitrary units) ; time (ms)</strong></li> </ol> <p>- <strong>Figure 14.</strong> Dose-dependent evolution of the amplitude ratio of extracted spectral bands for (<strong>a</strong>) the GPNi* glass sample for DLW irradiance of 13.4 TW/cm² at 160 &micro;m below the glass surface, (<strong>b</strong>) the ARGOi and ARGOi* glass sample for DLW irradiance of 11 TW/cm² at 550 &micro;m below the glass surface (rear surface). (<strong>Picture, xls datas</strong>)</p> <ol> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure14_2022-03-03_V01. Figure 14</li> <li>ANR_ ARCHIFLUO_ICMCB_Article_Chemosensors _Figure14_Datas_2022-03-03_V01. Datas : <strong>ratio of amplitudes of spectral bands ; doses (gy)</strong>.</li> </ol>