Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
9
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
9 results for “Spike trains”
Training dataset: Generation of a spectral library from HEK-Ecoli Spike-in mass spectrometry data
<p>The five raw files serve as a concise but meaningful training data set in the Galaxy training network (https://galaxyproject.github.io/training-material/).</p> <p>HEK and E.coli cell pellets were lysed with 5 % SDS, 50 mM triethylammonium bicarbonate (TEAB), pH 7.55. The obtained protein extracts were reduced by adding f.c. 5 mM TCEP and alkylated by the addition of f.c. 10 mM iodacetamide. Protein digestion and purification was performed on S-Trap columns. To ensure protein binding to the S-Trap columns, samples were acidified to a final concentration of 1.2 % phosphoric acid (~ pH 2). Six times the sample volume S-Trap buffer (90% aqueous methanol containing a final concentration of 100 mM TEAB, pH 7.1) was added to the samples which were then loaded on the columns and washed with S-Trap buffer. Protein digestion was performed with trypsin and LysC for one hour at 47 °C. Peptides were eluted in three steps with (1) 50 mM TEAB, (2) 0.2 % aqueous formic acid and (3) 50 % acetonitrile containing 0.2 % formic acid. Eluted peptides of HEK and E.coli were mixed in the following ratios (amount in µg):</p> <p>Sample HEK E.coli MS method<br> Sample1 2.5 0.00 DDA<br> Sample2 2.5 0.05 DDA<br> Sample3 2.5 0.15 DDA<br> Sample4 2.5 0.40 DDA<br> Sample5 2.5 0.80 DDA</p> <p>Additionally, iRT peptides were added and 1µg of each samples was measured with a Q-Exactive Plus mass spectrometer. Besides the five raw files, we uploaded two fasta files that serve as human and ecoli protein sequence databases, an transition list for the iRT peptides as well as an experimental design for the MaxQuant search.<br> Additionally, we uploaded the Galaxy MaxQuant training result files: protein groups, peptides, mqpar, msms, evidence and PTXQC.</p>
Training dataset: DIA data analysis of a HEK/Ecoli Spike-in dataset using OpenSwathWorkflow
<p>The eight raw files serve as a concise but meaningful training data set in the Galaxy training network (https://galaxyproject.github.io/training-material/).</p> <p>HEK and E.coli cell pellets were lysed with 5 % SDS, 50 mM triethylammonium bicarbonate (TEAB), pH 7.55. The obtained protein extracts were reduced by adding f.c. 5 mM TCEP and alkylated by the addition of f.c. 10 mM iodacetamide. Protein digestion and purification was performed on S-Trap columns. To ensure protein binding to the S-Trap columns, samples were acidified to a final concentration of 1.2 % phosphoric acid (~ pH 2). Six times the sample volume S-Trap buffer (90% aqueous methanol containing a final concentration of 100 mM TEAB, pH 7.1) was added to the samples which were then loaded on the columns and washed with S-Trap buffer. Protein digestion was performed with trypsin and LysC for one hour at 47 °C. Peptides were eluted in three steps with (1) 50 mM TEAB, (2) 0.2 % aqueous formic acid and (3) 50 % acetonitrile containing 0.2 % formic acid. Eluted peptides of HEK and E.coli were mixed in two different ratios and four replicates of each Spike/in ratio were measured:</p> <p>Sample HEK E.coli MS method<br> Sample1 2.5 0.15 DIA<br> Sample2 2.5 0.15 DIA<br> Sample3 2.5 0.15 DIA<br> Sample4 2.5 0.15 DIA<br> Sample5 2.5 0.80 DIA<br> Sample6 2.5 0.80 DIA<br> Sample7 2.5 0.80 DIA<br> Sample8 2.5 0.80 DIA</p> <p>Additionally, iRT peptides were added and 1µg of each samples was measured using data independent acquisition with a Q-Exactive Plus mass spectrometer. Briefly, a scan range from 400-1000 m/Z was first covered by an MS1 scan followed by 25 consecutive MS2 scans (each 24 m/z broad). In the next cycle another MS1 scan was acquired followd by 26 MS2 scans (also 24m/z broad) in which the window centers were shifted by 50% compared to the previous cycle of MS2 scans. The resulting raw files contain overlapping MS2 scans.</p> <p>Besides the eight raw files, we uploaded a spectral library, a transition list for the iRT peptides as well as an sample annotation file.<br> Additionally, we uploaded the Galaxy PyProphet score training result files: PyProphet score report and PyProphet score.</p>
Training dataset: Statistical analysis of a HEK/Ecoli Spike-in DIA dataset using MSstats
<p>The uploaded files serve as a concise but meaningful training data set in the Galaxy training network (https://galaxyproject.github.io/training-material/).</p> <p>HEK and E.coli cell pellets were lysed with 5 % SDS, 50 mM triethylammonium bicarbonate (TEAB), pH 7.55. The obtained protein extracts were reduced by adding f.c. 5 mM TCEP and alkylated by the addition of f.c. 10 mM iodacetamide. Protein digestion and purification was performed on S-Trap columns. To ensure protein binding to the S-Trap columns, samples were acidified to a final concentration of 1.2 % phosphoric acid (~ pH 2). Six times the sample volume S-Trap buffer (90% aqueous methanol containing a final concentration of 100 mM TEAB, pH 7.1) was added to the samples which were then loaded on the columns and washed with S-Trap buffer. Protein digestion was performed with trypsin and LysC for one hour at 47 °C. Peptides were eluted in three steps with (1) 50 mM TEAB, (2) 0.2 % aqueous formic acid and (3) 50 % acetonitrile containing 0.2 % formic acid. Eluted peptides of HEK and E.coli were mixed in two different ratios and four replicates of each Spike/in ratio were measured and analysed using OpenSwathWorkflow in Galaxy. Results were exported using PyProphet and can be used for the statistical analysis and detection of the two different Spike-in Ratios. The Spike-in ratios were the following:</p> <p>Sample HEK E.coli <br> Spike_in_1 2.5 0.15<br> Spike_in_2 2.5 0.80 </p> <p>Besides the two PyProphet export files, we uploaded a sample annotation file as well as a comparison matrix file.<br> Additionally, we uploaded the Galaxy MSstats training result files: MSstats_ComparisonResult_export_tabular and MSstats_ComparisonResult_msstats_input.</p>
Data from: ASSET: analysis of sequences of synchronous events in massively parallel spike trains
With the ability to observe the activity from large numbers of neurons simultaneously using modern recording technologies, the chance to identify sub-networks involved in coordinated processing increases. Sequences of synchronous spike events (SSEs) constitute one type of such coordinated spiking that propagates activity in a temporally precise manner. The synfire chain was proposed as one potential model for such network processing. Previous work introduced a method for visualization of SSEs in massively parallel spike trains, based on an intersection matrix that contains in each entry the degree of overlap of active neurons in two corresponding time bins. Repeated SSEs are reflected in the matrix as diagonal structures of high overlap values. The method as such, however, leaves the task of identifying these diagonal structures to visual inspection rather than to a quantitative analysis. Here we present ASSET (Analysis of Sequences of Synchronous EvenTs), an improved, fully automated method which determines diagonal structures in the intersection matrix by a robust mathematical procedure. The method consists of a sequence of steps that i) assess which entries in the matrix potentially belong to a diagonal structure, ii) cluster these entries into individual diagonal structures and iii) determine the neurons composing the associated SSEs. We employ parallel point processes generated by stochastic simulations as test data to demonstrate the performance of the method under a wide range of realistic scenarios, including different types of non-stationarity of the spiking activity and different correlation structures. Finally, the ability of the method to discover SSEs is demonstrated on complex data from large network simulations with embedded synfire chains. Thus, ASSET represents an effective and efficient tool to analyze massively parallel spike data for temporal sequences of synchronous activity.
Data from: Using matrix and tensor factorizations for the single-trial analysis of population spike trains
Advances in neuronal recording techniques are leading to ever larger numbers of simultaneously monitored neurons. This poses the important analytical challenge of how to capture compactly all sensory information that neural population codes carry in their spatial dimension (differences in stimulus tuning across neurons at different locations), in their temporal dimension (temporal neural response variations), or in their combination (temporally coordinated neural population firing). Here we investigate the utility of tensor factorizations of population spike trains along space and time. These factorizations decompose a dataset of single-trial population spike trains into spatial firing patterns (combinations of neurons firing together), temporal firing patterns (temporal activation of these groups of neurons) and trial-dependent activation coefficients (strength of recruitment of such neural patterns on each trial). We validated various factorization methods on simulated data and on populations of ganglion cells simultaneously recorded in the salamander retina. We found that single-trial tensor space-by-time decompositions provided low-dimensional data-robust representations of spike trains that capture efficiently both their spatial and temporal information about sensory stimuli. Tensor decompositions with orthogonality constraints were the most efficient in extracting sensory information, whereas non-negative tensor decompositions worked well even on non-independent and overlapping spike patterns, and retrieved informative firing patterns expressed by the same population in response to novel stimuli. Our method showed that populations of retinal ganglion cells carried information in their spike timing on the ten-milliseconds-scale about spatial details of natural images. This information could not be recovered from the spike counts of these cells. First-spike latencies carried the majority of information provided by the whole spike train about fine-scale image features, and supplied almost as much information about coarse natural image features as firing rates. Together, these results highlight the importance of spike timing, and particularly of first-spike latencies, in retinal coding.
Spike Trains in PANI--Proteinoid Nanofibers with Different Light Pulse Rates
<p>Origin Pro datasets for the paper ''Spike Trains in PANI--Proteinoid Nanofibers with Different Light Pulse Rates.''</p>
neural recordings - spike trains
SciDraw upload
Data from: Using matrix and tensor factorizations for the single-trial analysis of population spike trains
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: ASSET: analysis of sequences of synchronous events in massively parallel spike trains
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.