Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 18 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 18 Characters relative to the female and male genitalia of specimens sampled in the present analysis: a Isala spiralis comb. nov., dorsal view of the epigynal plate. b Stephanopis armata, dorsal view of the epigynal plate. c Paratobias championi sp. rev., ventral view of the epigynal plate. d Coenypha nodosa comb. nov., ventral view of the epigynal plate. e Stephanopis lata, ventral view of the epigynal plate. f Borboropactus cinerascens, ventral view of the epigynal plate (arrows indicate the epigynal teeth). g Stephanopis flagellata, left palp. h Sidymella bicuspidata, left palp

Fig. 21 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 21 Characters relative to the male genitalia of specimens sampled in the present analysis: a Stephanopis barbipes, left palp. b Isala cambridgei comb. nov., left palp. c Onocolus intermedius, left palp. d Sidymella longispina, left palp. e Paratobias sp. 1, left palp. f Tmarus polyandrus, left palp. g Stephanopis altifrons, left palp (lower arrows indicate the pair of ventral filamentous setae on tibiae). h Stephanopis bicornis, retrolateral view of left palp (detail of the cymbial setae brush)

Fig. 8 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 8 Characters relative to dorsal habitus and prosoma of specimens sampled in the present analysis: a Stephanopis lata, frontal view. b Sidymella excavata, frontal view. c Stephanopis pentacanha, carapace. d Epicadinus trispinosus, carapace. e Tmarus polyandrus, carapace. f Isala arenata comb. nov., dorsal habitus. g Epicadus granulatus, sternum. h Borboropactus nyerere, sternum

Fig. 6 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 6 Character transformations, detailed topology of the relationships between "ditissima clade" (blue) and Sidymella (stricto sensu); emergence of the "pentacantha clade" (purple) as part of the "Epicadus group"

Fig. 13 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 13 Characters relative to carapace and legs of specimens sampled in the present analysis: a Stephanopis pentacantha, prosoma (detail of the procurve posterior eye row). b Paratobias championi sp. rev. (detail of the recurve posterior eye row). c Stephanopis fissifrons, prosoma (detail of the straight posterior eye row). d Stephanopis barbipes, prosoma (arrows indicate MOQ macrosetae). e Borporopactus cinerascens, prosoma (canoeshaped tapetum). f Tmarus elongatus, tibiae I (trichobothria linearly distributed). g Stephanopis pentacantha, tibiae I (clustered trichobothria). h Coenypha edwardsi, leg I (arrows indicate mesial and ectal apophysis on femur)

Fig. 5 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 5 Character transformations and detail of the dichotomy between the Isala and Paratobias gen. rev. based on the topology of the most congruent tree (K = 17.89). Filled squares represent synapomorphies

Fig. 2 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 2 Hypothetical reconstruction of the relationships of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on the strict consensus of the most congruent tree (K = 17.89) obtained after implied weighted analysis. Nodal stability is represented by the "Navajo rugs" along the branches (analysis recovering

Fig. 4 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 4 Character transformations in Stephanopis (stricto sensu) based on the topology of the most congruent tree (K = 17.89). Filled squares represent synapomorphies and those in white are homoplastic

Fig. 3 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 3 Clade supports obtained by relative Bremer index (above the branches) and symmetric resampling analysis (below the branches). A colour scheme is applied to represent the geographical distribution of the clades represented on the working phylogenetic hypothesis

Fig. 1 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 1 Topologic comparison between consensuses trees obtained under equal weighting parsimony (EW) and Bayesian inference (BI)

Fig. 20 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 20 Characters relative to the male genitalia of specimens sampled in the present analysis: a Stephanopis fissifrons, grooved RTA. b Sidymella lucida, nodose RTA. c Isala palliolata comb. nov., smooth RTA. d Epicadus taczanowskii, canoe-shaped RTAbvr. e Sidymella hirsuta, spoon-shaped RTAvbr. f Coenypha ditissima comb. nov., left palp. g Sidymella furcillata, left palp. h Isala spiralis comb. nov., left palp

Fig. 15 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 15 Characters relative to legs, claws and opisthosoma of specimens sampled in the present analysis: a Epicadus heterogaster, patella I. b Stephanopis pentacantha, patella I. c Isala cambridgei comb. nov., male tibial brushes. d Epicadus caudatus, trichobothrium and duster-shaped setae. e Tmarus elongatus, tarsal claws of the right leg I (mesial view). f Epicadus taczanowskii, tarsal claws of the right leg I (ectal view). g Epicadus heterogaster, tibia I. h Epicadus trituberculatus, opisthosoma

Fig. 7 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 7 Section of the working phylogenetic hypothesis detailing the character transformations and relationships between the "angularis clade" (orange), Sidymella rubrosginata (red), "trapezia clade" (blue)

Fig. 19 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 19 Characters relative to the male genitalia of specimens sampled in the present analysis: a Epicadus trituberculatus, left palp. b Stephanopis pentacantha, left palp (arrow indicates the prolateral macrosetae). c Geraesta hirta, left palp. d Sidymella lucida, retrolateral view of left palp. e Borboropactus nyerere, left palp. f Isala cambridgei comb. nov., retrolateral view of left palp. g Stephanopis nigra, retrolateral view of left palp. h Stephanopis altifrons, detail of the RTA

Fig. 16 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 16 Characters relative to opisthosoma of specimens sampled in the present analysis: a Stephanopis nana. b Stephanopis monulfi. c Sidymella hirsuta, d Stephanopis altifrons, cuspidate surface. e Tmarus elongatus, mazed-surface. f Isala rufiventris comb. nov., granular surface. g Isala punctata comb. nov., fingerprint surface. h Sidymella hirsuta, needle-shaped and filamentous setae

Fig. 11 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 11 Characters relative to prosoma and mouth parts of specimens sampled in the present analysis: a Stephanopis monulfi, frontal view. b Sidymella sp. 2, frontal view. c Stephanopis quinquetuberculata, lateral view. d Stephanopis pentacantha, e Epicadus taczanowskii, chelicerae (detail of papules). f Stephanopoides simoni, chelicerae. g Phrynarachne ceylonica, chelicerae. h Epicadus trituberculatus, chelicerae

Fig. 10 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 10 Characters relative to prosoma of specimens sampled in the present analysis: a Epicadus caudatus, frontal view. b Epicadus heterogaster, carapace. c Epicadus taczanowskii, frontal view. d Sidymella bicuspidata. e Tmarus elongatus, lateral view. f Epicadus heterogaster, lateral view. g Stephanopis nana, frontal view (black arrows indicate lateral cephalic tubercles; white arrows indicate the not projected lateral margin of the clypeus). h Epicadus rubripes, frontal view (arrows indicate the lateral margins of the clypeus projected laterally)

Fig. 9 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 9 Characters relative to carapace and sternum of specimens sampled in the present analysis: a Sidymella bicuspidata, sternum. b Epicadus caudatus, sternum. c Onocolus intermedius, sternum. d Geraesta hirta (white arrows indicate pointed setae; black arrows indicate filamentous setae). e Sidymella trapezia, sternum. f Phrynarachne ceylonica, sternum. g Stephanopis macrostyla, prosoma. h Isala cambridgei comb. nov., prosoma

Fig. 17 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 17 Characters relative to opisthosoma and female genitalia of specimens sampled in the present analysis: a Stephanopis lata (arrows indicate abdominal setae clusters). b Stephanopis monulfi, barbed setae. c Stephanopis monulfi, ventral view of the epigynal plate. d Coenypha antennata comb. nov., ventral view of the epigynal plate. e Sidymella hirsuta, dorsal view of the epigynal plate (arrows indicate the direction of entry into the copulatory ducts). f Coenypha antennata comb. nov., dorsal view of the epigynal plate (arrows indicate the direction of entry into the copulatory ducts). g Sidymella sp.1, dorsal view of the epigynal plate. h Epicadus trituberculatus, dorsal view of the epigynal plate

Fig. 14 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 14 Characters relative to legs of specimens sampled in the present analysis: a Sidymella kolpogaster (arrows indicate femoral setae). b Sidymella trapezia (arrow indicates femoral setae). c Stephanopis monulfi, leg I. d Stephanopis lata, leg I. e Epicadus heterogaster, femoral setiferous tubercles. f Epicadus caudatus, femoral setiferous tubercles. g Geraesta hirta, leg I. h Stephanopis pentacantha, leg I