Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
38
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
38 results for “Striatoandricus”
Fig. 2 in Striatoandricus sanchezi Cuesta-Porta & Melika & Nicholls & Stone & Pujade-Villar 2022, n. sp.
Fig. 2. Holotype of Somniosus (Rhinoscymnus) cheni sp. nov. (EBFSFSX001), pregnant female, 1340 mm total length. Photo by C. Y. Lin.
Fig. 2. A in Striatoandricus cuixarti Cuesta-Porta & Melika & Nicholls & Stone & Pujade-Villar 2022, n. sp.
Fig. 2. A timeline for the first appearance of several groups of fossil diplostracans (circles), as well as for fossil lagerstätten that contain exceptionally preserved fossil clam shrimp (stars).
Fig. 7 in Striatoandricus sanchezi Cuesta-Porta & Melika & Nicholls & Stone & Pujade-Villar 2022, n. sp.
Fig. 7. Embryos of holotype, Somniosus (Rhinoscymnus) cheni sp. nov., individuals of the first column from the left are males, the others are females.
Fig. 3 in Striatoandricus sanchezi Cuesta-Porta & Melika & Nicholls & Stone & Pujade-Villar 2022, n. sp.
Fig. 3. Closeup of head portion of Somniosus (Rhinoscymnus) cheni sp. nov. from the holotype. A, dorsal view. B, ventral view. C, lateral view of right side (reversed laterally). Not to scale.
Fig. 1. A in Striatoandricus cuixarti Cuesta-Porta & Melika & Nicholls & Stone & Pujade-Villar 2022, n. sp.
Fig. 1. A phylogeny of extant Diplostraca, with several scenarios for growth line (incomplete molting) evolution mapped onto it. A and D represent the scenario of a gain (A) and subsequent loss (D) of incomplete molting. B and C represent the scenario of two independent gains of incomplete molting.
Fig. 4 in Striatoandricus sanchezi Cuesta-Porta & Melika & Nicholls & Stone & Pujade-Villar 2022, n. sp.
Fig. 4. Closeup of fins of Somniosus (Rhinoscymnus) cheni sp. nov., from the holotype. A, right pectoral fin, dorsal view. B, right pelvic fin, dorsal view. C, first dorsal fin, left side, lateral view. D, second dorsal fin, left side, lateral view. E, caudal fin, left side, lateral view. Not to scales, anterior to left.
Fig. 6. A in Striatoandricus cuixarti Cuesta-Porta & Melika & Nicholls & Stone & Pujade-Villar 2022, n. sp.
Fig. 6. A time-calibrated phylogeny with polytomies largely resolved by stratigraphic occurrence and branch lengths approximate to generic range. X axis = millions of years.
Fig. 4. A in Striatoandricus cuixarti Cuesta-Porta & Melika & Nicholls & Stone & Pujade-Villar 2022, n. sp.
Fig. 4. A sample of the fossil taxa studied, their diagnosed sexual systems and overlaid mean-shapes of the detected morphotypes (M1 = Morphotype 1; M2 = Morphotype 2).
Fig. 3. A in Striatoandricus cuixarti Cuesta-Porta & Melika & Nicholls & Stone & Pujade-Villar 2022, n. sp.
Fig. 3. A, Cluster analysis of Palaeolimnadia sp. based on informative eigenshapes (ES1 & 2); no discernible major groupings and multiple long branches of similar length interfere with deducing sexual system based on a clear morphotype ratio. B, Cluster analysis of Lioestheria malacaraensis based on informative eigenshapes (ES1 & 2) exhibiting a clear basal dichotomy with branch lengths much larger than any subsequent groupings.
Fig. 2 in Striatoandricus cuixarti Cuesta-Porta & Melika & Nicholls & Stone & Pujade-Villar 2022, n. sp.
Fig. 2. Cluster analyses of a monomorphic (hermaphrodites only) sample of Eulimnadia texana (A) and a dimorphic (males + hermaphrodites) sample (B) based on scores of individuals along the first four eigenshape axes. Note the differing distances along the Y-axes in the two graphs.
Fig. 1. The limnadiid spinicaudatan Calalimnadia mahei. b in Striatoandricus cuixarti Cuesta-Porta & Melika & Nicholls & Stone & Pujade-Villar 2022, n. sp.
Fig. 1. The limnadiid spinicaudatan Calalimnadia mahei. b: Brood chamber with eggs, h: Head, p: Phyllopodous thoracic limbs, t: Telson.
Fig. 5 in Striatoandricus cuixarti Cuesta-Porta & Melika & Nicholls & Stone & Pujade-Villar 2022, n. sp.
Fig. 5. Distribution of predicted sexual systems in fossil taxa analyzed in this study. NA = taxa in which sexual system prediction was impossible (see MATERIALS AND METHODS).
Fig. 7 in Striatoandricus cuixarti Cuesta-Porta & Melika & Nicholls & Stone & Pujade-Villar 2022, n. sp.
Fig. 7. Two possible scenarios of the evolutionary dynamics of hermaphroditic lability in Spinicaudata at the family level. Red branches: lineages with some degree of hermaphroditism present in some taxa. Black branches: lineages devoid of hermaphroditic 'females' in all taxa. Blue boxes: sperm production in females occurring. White boxes: Sperm production lost in hermaphrodites recreating females. † = Extinct group.
Fig. 2. Paralbunea chani n in Fig. 4 in Striatoandricus sanchezi Cuesta-Porta & Melika & Nicholls & Stone & Pujade-Villar 2022, n. sp.
Fig. 2. Paralbunea chani n. sp., holotype intersex specimen, 13.6 mm CL (NTOU A01450). A, habitus. B, ocular peduncles and median frontal margin. C, left maxilliped III. D, right pereopod I. E, left pereopod II dactylus and propodus. F, right pereopod III dactylus and propodus. G, right pereopod IV dactylus and propodus. H, abdominal somite VI, uropods and telson. Scale bars: A = 2 mm; B–H = 1 mm. Habitus photograph courtesy of Tin-Yam Chan.
Fig. 3. Paralbunea chirotheca n in Fig. 4 in Striatoandricus sanchezi Cuesta-Porta & Melika & Nicholls & Stone & Pujade-Villar 2022, n. sp.
Fig. 3. Paralbunea chirotheca n. sp., holotype female (ZRC 2016.0421). A, habitus. B, ocular peduncles and median frontal margin. C, right maxilliped III. D, right pereopod I. E, right pereopod II. F, right pereopod III. G, left pereopod IV. H, abdominal somites, uropods and telson. Scale bars = 1 mm. Habitus photograph courtesy of Tin-Yam Chan.
Fig. 1. A in Fig. 4 in Striatoandricus sanchezi Cuesta-Porta & Melika & Nicholls & Stone & Pujade-Villar 2022, n. sp.
Fig. 1. A, Albunea microps Miers, 1878, male, CL unknown (fragmented when examined) (ZRC 2016.0115). B, Albunea symmysta (Linnaeus, 1758), female, 19.0 mm CL (ZRC 2016.0114). Photographs courtesy of Tin-Yam Chan.
Fig. 2 in Fig. 4 in Striatoandricus sanchezi Cuesta-Porta & Melika & Nicholls & Stone & Pujade-Villar 2022, n. sp.
Fig. 2. (a) Zizina otis and Zizeeria maha roosting gregariously on Tridax procumbens. (b) Zizina otis and Z. maha roosting gregariously on Vernonia cinerea. (c) A Z. otis roosting on a flower of T. procumbens. (d) A Z. otis roosting on a flower of V. cinerea. (e) A Z. maha roosting on a flower of T. procumbens. (f) A Z. otis roosting on the fruits of T. procumbens. (g) A Z. otis roosting on a fruit of V. cinerea (left) and a Z. otis roosting on the receptacle of T. procumbens (right). (h) A Z. otis roosting on a leaf of V. cinerea. (i) Two Z. otis roosting on a leaf of Mimosa pudica. (j) Two Z. otis roosting on a leaf of Imperata cylindrica. (k) A Z. otis roosting on a peduncle of T. procumbens. The red dots in (a) and (b) are the roosting blues.
Fig. 1 in Fig. 4 in Striatoandricus sanchezi Cuesta-Porta & Melika & Nicholls & Stone & Pujade-Villar 2022, n. sp.
Fig. 1. (a) Map of Rongyu Campus, National University of Tainan. White squares indicate the plots for the night roosting surveys of butterflies from November 2015 to March 2016 (n = 10). Red squares (plots a–f) are subsites used for the random patterns test, confirming the non-random distribution of the roosting blues within roosting aggregations, as well as for observation of the social and behavioral interactions among individuals during roost-assembly. (b) A closer look of plots a, b, and c. (c) A closer look of plots d, e, and f.
Fig. 3 in Fig. 4 in Striatoandricus sanchezi Cuesta-Porta & Melika & Nicholls & Stone & Pujade-Villar 2022, n. sp.
Fig. 3. The observed spatial patterns and the grid of the flowers and fruits of Tridax procumbens and blues at three subsites (a, b, c), and the spatial patterns and the grid processed of flowers and fruits of Vernonia cinerea and blues at three subsites (d, e, f).
Fig. 2 in Striatoandricus sanchezi Cuesta-Porta & Melika & Nicholls & Stone & Pujade-Villar 2022, n. sp.
Fig. 2. The video clips from the housing Polaroid CUBE+ and handy cameras. (a) Intraspecific mating pair; (b) two paired chubs spawning nearby; (c) satellites trying to engage with paired chubs; (d) O. evolans mating; (e) Z. platypus mating. Clips (a–c) were captured on the housing camera. Clips (d– e) were captured on handy cameras.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.