Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
67
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
67 results for “Team Effectiveness”
A 31-Year Bibliometric Review of Team Effectiveness Research: Evolution, Trends, and Future Directions (DATA).
<p>This dataset is derived from a comprehensive study of team effectiveness over three decades, utilizing bibliometric techniques to examine scholarly publications across multiple databases. The repository includes bibliometric data from 6,051 publications related to team effectiveness, featuring metadata such as authors, titles, publication years, citations, and keywords.</p> <h3>Repository Structure:</h3> <p>The data shared in this repository is organized as follows:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Bibliometrix database.xlsx:</strong> This excel file contains information on 6051 publications in the field of Team Effectiveness downloaded from the Scopus and Web of Science databases using specific search terms and inclusion criteria detailed in our associated paper (see our publication for more information on the methodology). The file contains the necessary headers for direct use in the Biblioshiny interface of the bibliometrix library for R.</li> <li><strong>List of stop words.txt:</strong> This file contains keywords, separated by commas, that we have decided to eliminate from our analyses due to their potential to introduce bias in the results.</li> <li><strong>List of synonyms.txt:</strong> This file contains groups of semantically synonymous keywords, separated by semicolons. Each line represents a group of synonyms, with the first keyword being the one that Bibliometrix will use to replace all other keywords in that line.</li> <li><strong>Appendix [A-H].pdf:</strong> List of appendices that complement the results of the study carried out.</li> </ul> <h3>Recommended Usage:</h3> <div> <div> <div> <div> <p>This dataset is ideal for researchers interested in conducting new analyses of research trends, co-authorship network analysis, and thematic evolution in the field of team effectiveness. For example, researchers can narrow the scope to focus exclusively on team effectiveness in educational contexts. Our publication provides all the necessary details to replicate or extend our methodology. For any queries related to the data, please contact <strong>Yeray Barrios-Fleitas</strong> at <em><a rel="noreferrer">y.d.c.barriosfleitas@utwente.nl</a></em>.</p> </div> </div> </div> </div> <div> </div> <h3>License and Citation:</h3> <p>The data are distributed under the CC BY license. Please cite any use of this dataset using the following format:<br>Barrios Fleitas, Y., Marcella A.M.G., Eysink, T.H., & Rensink , A. (2025). A 31-Year Bibliometric Review of Team Effectiveness Research: Evolution, Trends, and Future Directions. ZENODO, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12082529" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12082529</a></p>
A Theory of Scrum Team Effectiveness: Dataset and Supplementary Materials
<p>This bundle contains supplementary materials for an upcoming academic publication <em>A Theory of Scrum Team Effectiveness</em>, by Christiaan Verwijs and Daniel Russo. Included in the bundle are the dataset, SPSS syntaxes, and model definitions (AMOS). This replication package is made available by C. Verwijs under a "Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share-Alike 4.0 International"-license (CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0).</p> <p><strong>About the dataset</strong></p> <p>The dataset (SPSS) contains anonymized response data from 4.940 respondents from 1.978 Scrum Teams that participated from the <a href="https://scrumteamsurvey.org">https://scrumteamsurvey.org</a>. Data was gathered between June 3, 2020, and October 13, 2021. We cleaned the individual response data from careless responses and removed all data that could potentially identify teams, individuals, or their parent organizations. Because we wanted to analyze our measures at the team level, we calculated a team level mean for each item in the survey. Such aggregation is only justified when at least 10% of the variance exists at the team level (Hair, 2019), which was the case (ICC = 51%). Because the percentage of missing data was modest, and to prevent list-wise deletion of cases and lose information, we performed EM maximum likelihood imputation in SPSS.</p> <p>The dataset contains question labels and answer option definitions. To conform to the privacy statement of scrumteamsurvey.org, the bundle does not include individual response data from before the team-level aggregation.</p> <p><strong>About the model definitions</strong></p> <p>The bundle includes definitions for Structural Equation Models (SEM) for AMOS. We added the four iterations of the measurement model, four models used to perform a test for common method bias, the final path model, and the model used for mediation testing. Mediation testing was performed with the procedure outlined by Podsakoff (2003). Mediation testing was performed with the <a href="http://statwiki.gaskination.com/index.php?title=CFA">"Indirect Effects" plugin</a> for AMOS by James Gaskin.</p> <p><strong>About the SPSS syntaxes</strong></p> <p>The bundle includes the syntaxes we used to prepare the dataset from the raw import, as well as the syntax we used to generate descriptives. This is mostly there for other researchers to verify our procedure.</p>
The PAtient-Centred Team - Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness Study
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02541474. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 2.
Effectiveness of a Team-Based Learning Intervention on Evidence-Based Practice Competence Among Nursing Students.
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07364994. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 27.
Dataset for the article: A Family of Experiments to Study how Personality may Affect Software Development Effectiveness in Teams
<p>Raw Data of the article named "A Family of Experiments to Study how Personality may Affect Software Development Effectiveness in Teams"</p>
Do Agile Scaling Approaches Make A Difference? An Empirical Comparison of Team Effectiveness Across Popular Scaling Approaches
<p>This bundle contains supplementary materials for an upcoming academic publication <em>Do Agile Scaling Approaches Make A Difference? An Empirical Comparison of Team Effectiveness Across Popular Scaling Approaches?</em>, by Christiaan Verwijs and Daniel Russo. Included in the bundle are the dataset and SPSS syntaxes. This replication package is made available by C. Verwijs under a "Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share-Alike 4.0 International"-license (CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0).</p> <p><strong>About the dataset</strong></p> <p>The dataset (SPSS) contains anonymized response data from 15,078 team members aggregated into 4,013 Agile teams that participated from <a href="https://scrumteamsurvey.org">scrumteamsurvey.org</a>. Stakeholder evaluations of 1,841 stakeholders were also collected for 529 of those teams. Data was gathered between September 2021, and September 2023. We cleaned the individual response data from careless responses and removed all data that could potentially identify teams, individuals, or their parent organizations. Because we wanted to analyze our measures at the team level, we calculated a team-level mean for each item in the survey. Such aggregation is only justified when at least 10% of the variance exists at the team level (Hair, 2019), which was the case (ICC = 35-50%). No data was missing at the team level.</p> <p>Question labels and option labels are provided separately in Questions.csv. To conform to the privacy statement of <a href="https://scrumteamsurvey.org">scrumteamsurvey.org</a>, the bundle does not include response data from before the team-level aggregation.</p> <p><strong>About the SPSS syntaxes</strong></p> <p>The bundle includes the syntaxes we used to prepare the dataset from the raw import, as well as the syntax we used to generate descriptives. This is mostly there for other researchers to verify our procedure.</p>
Trial of the Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of a Specialist Expert Mood Disorder Team for Refractory Unipolar Depressive Disorder
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01047124. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 14.
the Pharmacy Intervention Team Hospital-based (PITH) for People Study: Effect on Clinical and Economic Outcomes
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01906710. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 19.
Effects of Preoperative Multidisciplinary Team Meetings for High-risk, Adult, Noncardiac Surgical Patients
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05703230. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 2.
Cognitive Rehabilitation (Mega Team) and Its Effects on Emotional and Behavioral Regulation in ADHD, ASD, and CHD
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03502239. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 24.
Effectiveness of Team Treatment of Depression in Primary Care
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00012766. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 6.
The Effects of Positive Airway Pressure on the Mucolytic Effects of NAC (TEAM)
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06152653. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 4.
Effectiveness of a Team-based Follow-up Program in General Practice Among People With Chronic Conditions
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04076384. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 2.
Examining the Effects of a Team-based Running Program
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03143582. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 23.
TEAM-Project: Trial on the Effect of Anesthetics on Morbidity and Mortality
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00286585. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 2.
Effectiveness of In-Situ Simulation Training in Adult Non-Trauma Resuscitation: A Comparison of ISS and OSS Team Performance Using the A-C-L-S Model
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07358793. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 21.
The Effect of an Physician-Nurse Supplementary Triage Assistance Team on Emergency Department Patient Wait Times
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00991471. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
The Effect of phoSPHocreatine on mEdical Emergency Team (Met) tREated Patients
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06503016. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 2.
European Quality of Care Pathways Study on the Effect of Care Pathways on Interprofessional Teamwork (EQCP-TEAM)
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01435538. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 3.
Application of Geographical Information System Data in the Emergency Department, Effect on Trauma Team and Medical Emergency Team Wait
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02188966. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.