Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
7
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
7 results for “Testudinoidea”
Figure 6 in Phylogenetic relationships and biogeographical history of the genus Rhinoclemmys Fitzinger, 1835 and the monophyly of the turtle family Geoemydidae (Testudines: Testudinoidea)
Figure 6. Time calibration using the program BEAST. The error bar on each node represents the 95% confidence interval calculated by the program. The column on the right shows the time slice of Isthmian closure (3.5–2.5 Mya; Coates & Obando, 1996). Pli + Ple: Pliocene + Pleistocene.
Figure 4 in Phylogenetic relationships and biogeographical history of the genus Rhinoclemmys Fitzinger, 1835 and the monophyly of the turtle family Geoemydidae (Testudines: Testudinoidea)
Figure 4. Strict consensus of three most parsimonious trees produced from 3373 aligned characters (TL = 3337; CI = 0.43; RI = 0.59) using maximum parsimony. Of these, 2315 are constant characters and 798 are potentially parsimony-informative. Numbers above and below branches are bootstrap (> 50%) and Bremer values, respectively.
Figure 3. A, the single most parsimonious tree derived from 2129 in Phylogenetic relationships and biogeographical history of the genus Rhinoclemmys Fitzinger, 1835 and the monophyly of the turtle family Geoemydidae (Testudines: Testudinoidea)
Figure 3. A, the single most parsimonious tree derived from 2129 aligned characters of mitochondrial genes (12S, 16S, cyt-b) (CI = 0.40; TL = 31; RI = 0.58) using maximum parsimony. Of these, 1229 characters are constant and 708 characters are parsimony-informative. Numbers above branches are bootstrap values and below are Bremer values. B, strict consensus of 96 trees generated from 1244 aligned characters of nuclear genes (Rag1 and Cmos) (CI = 0.82; TL = 205; RI = 0.84) using maximum parsimony. Of these, 1086 characters are constant and 90 are parsimonyinformative. Numbers above branches are bootstrap values and below are Bremer values.
Figure 2 in Phylogenetic relationships and biogeographical history of the genus Rhinoclemmys Fitzinger, 1835 and the monophyly of the turtle family Geoemydidae (Testudines: Testudinoidea)
Figure 2. Previous hypotheses regarding the position of Rhinoclemmys among geoemydids (upper cladograms) and the relationships among the species of the genus (lower cladograms). †Fossil taxon.
Figure 1 in Phylogenetic relationships and biogeographical history of the genus Rhinoclemmys Fitzinger, 1835 and the monophyly of the turtle family Geoemydidae (Testudines: Testudinoidea)
Figure 1. Distribution of the family Geoemydidae (data compiled from Iverson, 1992).
Figure 7 in Phylogenetic relationships and biogeographical history of the genus Rhinoclemmys Fitzinger, 1835 and the monophyly of the turtle family Geoemydidae (Testudines: Testudinoidea)
Figure 7. Areas of endemism and the area cladogram illustrating the relationship among species of Rhinoclemmys. Sources of these areas of endemism are from Savage (2002) (Central America), Cracraft (1985), and Haffer (1985) as assigned to zoographical regions of Stotz, Fitzpatrick & Moskovits (1996) (South America): AL, Atlantic Lowland; AN, Amazon North; AS, Amazon South; CHO, Choco; NSA, Northern South America; NUH, Nuclear Highland; PH, Panamanian Herpetofauna; PL, Pacific Lowland.
Figure 5 in Phylogenetic relationships and biogeographical history of the genus Rhinoclemmys Fitzinger, 1835 and the monophyly of the turtle family Geoemydidae (Testudines: Testudinoidea)
Figure 5. Phylogram generated from ML and Bayesian analysis using the GTR+G+I model of molecular evolution with the following parameters: K = 10; Base frequencies: freqA = 0.2945, freqC = 0.2856, freqG = 0.1962, freqT = 0.2237; rate matrix: A–C = 3.2207, A–G = 12.8698, A–T = 2.6852, C–G = 0.7080, C–T = 37.6846, G–T = 1.0000; proportion of invariable sites (I) = 0.4881; gamma distribution shape parameter = 0.4998. Score of the best tree found in the ML analysis = 18781.70 and total number of rearrangements tried = 9661. Numbers above and below branches are bootstrap values (> 50%) from 100 replicates of the ML analysis and the posterior probability of the Bayesian analysis, respectively.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.