Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

4

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

4 results for “Tree Realization”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo48/100

Prevalent trends in realized probability of occurrence of main European forest tree species for 2000–2020

<p>High resolution maps resulting from a trend analysis conducted for the period 2000&ndash;2020 on the probability of occurrence maps prepared by <a href="https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13728">Bonannella et al. (2022)</a>. For this analysis we selected the realized distribution time series layers at 30m spatial resolution for 6 out of 16 species described in the mentioned publication:</p> <ul> <li>Silver fir (<em>Abies alba </em>Mill.)</li> <li>European beech (<em>Fagus sylvatica </em>L.)</li> <li>Norway spruce (<em>Picea abies </em>L.)</li> <li>Black pine (<em>Pinus nigra </em>J. F. Arnold)</li> <li>Scots pine (<em>Pinus sylvestris </em>L.)</li> <li>Common oak (<em>Quercus robur </em>L.)</li> </ul> <p>The trend analysis was conducted per pixel on each of these species individually. We fitted simple OLS regression models with the probability of occurrence as the dependent variable and time as the independent variable. After the model fitting, we also calculated the t-test statistics to determine the presence of an increasing (positive) or decreasing (negative) trend or no trend at all.</p> <p>By combining the regression slope coefficient (<em>&beta;</em>) and the <em>p</em>-value from the t-test statistics we assigned each pixel to one of three classes:</p> <ul> <li><em>positive</em>: <em>&beta;</em> &gt; 0.25 AND <em>p</em>-value &lt; 0.05</li> <li><em>negative</em>: <em>&beta;</em> &lt; &minus;0.25 AND <em>p</em>-value &lt; 0.05</li> <li><em>no trend / stable</em>: &minus;0.25 &le; <em>&beta;</em> &ge; 0.25 OR <em>p</em>-value &gt; 0.05</li> </ul> <p>We then aggregated the resulting classes at 1km resolution maps to capture the prevalent trend in probability of occurrence over a certain area. Files are named according to the following naming convention, e.g.:</p> <ul> <li>veg_abies.alba_slope_30m_0..0cm_epsg3035_v1.0</li> </ul> <p>with the following fields:</p> <ul> <li>theme: e.g. <strong>veg</strong>,</li> <li>species code: e.g. <strong>abies.alba</strong>,</li> <li>variable name: e.g. <strong>slope</strong>,</li> <li>resolution in meters e.g. <strong>30m</strong>,</li> <li>reference depths (vertical dimension): e.g. <strong>0..0cm</strong>,</li> <li>coordinate system: e.g. <strong>epsg3035</strong>,</li> <li>data set version: e.g. <strong>v1.0</strong>.</li> </ul> <p>For each species here we provide the following layers:</p> <ul> <li>veg_abies.alba_<strong>slope</strong>:<strong> </strong>slope coefficient (scaling factor: 10000)</li> <li>veg_abies.alba_<strong>pvalue</strong>:<strong> </strong><em>p</em>-value (scaling factor: 1000)</li> <li>veg_abies.alba_<strong>pos.trends_30m</strong>: pixels classified as <em>positive </em>on the original maps at 30m resolution (boolean layer with range 0&ndash;100, only the two extremes values are present)</li> <li>veg_abies.alba_<strong>pos.trends_1km</strong>: proportion of pixels of the <em>positive </em>class over a 1&times;1 km area (range 0&ndash;100)</li> <li>veg_abies.alba_<strong>neg.trends_30m</strong>: pixels classified as <em>negative </em>on the original maps at 30m resolution (boolean layer with range 0&ndash;100, only the two extremes values are present)</li> <li>veg_abies.alba_<strong>neg.trends_1km</strong>: proportion of pixels of the <em>negative </em>class over a 1&times;1 km area (range 0&ndash;100)</li> <li>veg_abies.alba_<strong>no.trends_30m</strong>: (pixels classified as <em>no trend / stable </em>on the original maps at 30m resolution (boolean layer with range 0&ndash;100, only the two extremes values are present)</li> <li>veg_abies.alba_<strong>no.trends_1km</strong>:<strong> </strong>proportion of pixels of the <em>no trend / stable </em>class over a 1&times;1 km area (range 0&ndash;100)</li> </ul> <p>Files are provided as GeoTIFFs and projected in the Coordinate Reference System ETRS89 / LAEA Europe (= EPSG code 3035). Styling files are provided in <em>QML</em> format</p> <p>A publication describing, in detail, all processing steps is currently in review. See at:<br> <br> Bonannella, C., Parente, L., de Bruin, S. and Herold, M. (2023). Multi-decadal trend analysis and forest disturbance assessment of European tree species: concerning signs of a subtle shift, PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square [<a href="https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3288937/v1">https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3288937/v1</a>]</p> <p>&nbsp;</p>

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →
zenodo44/100

Potential and realized distribution at 30m for Olive tree (Olea europaea) in Europe for 2000 - 2020

<p>Probability and uncertainty maps showing the potential and realized distribution for the olive tree (<em>Olea europaea, L.</em>) for Europe from the dataset prepared by <a href="http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5818021">Bonannella et al. (2022)</a> and predicted using Ensemble Machine Learning (EML). Potential distribution map cover the period 2018 - 2020; realized distribution cover the period 2000 - 2020, split in the following time periods:</p> <ul> <li>2000 - 2002,</li> <li>2002 - 2006,</li> <li>2006 - 2010,</li> <li>2010 - 2014,</li> <li>2014 - 2018,</li> <li>2018 - 2020.</li> </ul> <p>Files are named according to the following naming convention, e.g:</p> <ul> <li>veg_olea.europaea_anv.eml_md_30m_0..0cm_2000..2002_eumap_epsg3035_v0.3</li> </ul> <p>with the following fields:</p> <ul> <li>theme: e.g. <strong>veg</strong>,</li> <li>species code: e.g. <strong>olea.europaea</strong>,</li> <li>species distribution type: e.g. <strong>anv</strong> (= actual natural vegetation),</li> <li>species estimation method: e.g. <strong>eml</strong>,</li> <li>species estimation type: e.g. <strong>md</strong> ( = model deviation),</li> <li>resolution in meters e.g. <strong>30m</strong>,</li> <li>reference depths (vertical dimension): e.g. <strong>0..0cm</strong>,</li> <li>reference period begin end: e.g. <strong>2000..2002</strong>,</li> <li>reference area: e.g. <strong>eumap</strong>,</li> <li>coordinate system: e.g. <strong>epsg3035</strong>,</li> <li>data set version: e.g. <strong>v0.3</strong>.</li> </ul> <p>For each species is then easy to identify probability and uncertainty distribution maps:</p> <ul> <li>veg_olea.europaea_<strong>anv</strong>.eml_<strong>md</strong>: model uncertainty for realized distribution</li> <li>veg_olea.europaea_<strong>anv</strong>.eml_<strong>p</strong>: probability for realized distribution</li> <li>veg_olea.europaea_<strong>pnv</strong>.eml_<strong>md</strong>: model uncertainty for potential distribution</li> <li>veg_olea.europaea_<strong>pnv</strong>.eml_<strong>p</strong>: probability for potential distribution</li> </ul> <p>Files are provided as <a href="https://gdal.org/drivers/raster/cog.html">Cloud Optimized GeoTIFFs</a> and projected in the Coordinate Reference System ETRS89 / LAEA Europe (= EPSG code 3035). Styling files are provided in both <em>SLD</em> and <em>QML</em> format.</p> <p>If you would like to know more about the creation of the maps and the modeling:</p> <ul> <li><strong>watch</strong> the talk at Open Data Science Workshop 2021 (<a href="https://doi.org/10.5446/55256">TIB AV-PORTAL</a>)</li> <li><strong>access </strong>the repository with our R/Python scripts and follow the instructions (<a href="https://gitlab.com/geoharmonizer_inea/spatial-layers/-/tree/master/veg_mapping">GitLab</a>)</li> <li><strong>access </strong>the repository with the training dataset (<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5818021">Zenodo</a>)</li> <li><strong>read </strong>the tutorial with executable code on our <a href="https://opengeohub.github.io/spatial-prediction-eml/spatiotemporal-ml.html#spatiotemporal-distribution-of-fagus-sylvatica">GitBook</a></li> </ul> <p>A publication describing, in detail, all processing steps, accuracy assessment and general analysis of species distribution maps is available on <a href="https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13728">PeerJ</a>. To suggest any improvement/fix&nbsp;use&nbsp;<a href="https://gitlab.com/geoharmonizer_inea/spatial-layers/-/issues">https://gitlab.com/geoharmonizer_inea/spatial-layers/-/issues</a>.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2021View details →
dryad36/100

Data from: Trees have overlapping potential niches that extend beyond their realized niches

<p>Tree species appear to prefer distinct climatic conditions, but the true nature of these preferences is obscured by species interactions and dispersal, which limit species' ranges. We quantified realized and potential thermal niches of 188 North American tree species to conduct the first continental-scale test of the architecture of niches. We found strong and consistent evidence that species occurring at thermal extremes occupy less than three-quarters of their potential niches and species' thermal niches overlap at a mean annual temperature of approximately 12 °C. These results clarify the breadth of thermal tolerances of temperate tree species and support the centrifugal organization of thermal niches. Accounting for the non-realized components of ecological niches will advance theory and prediction in global change ecology.</p>

opencc-zeroMay 2024View details →
dryad36/100

Data from: Trees have overlapping potential niches that extend beyond their realized niches

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMay 2024View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record