Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
7
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
7 results for “Trigger Tool”
Variation in Detected Adverse Events using Trigger Tools: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
<p>Raw data sets for the meta-analysis.</p> <p>Data collection file with all the information extracted from the included studies.</p> <p>QAT file with the information from the quality assessment tool (QAT) for all included studies.</p> <p>ReadMe with information on data sets and updates.</p> <p>Codebooks for both data sets.</p>
Triggering Sustainable Biogas Energy Communities through Social Innovation- ISABEL ---- Social Innovation and Community energy best preactices, methods and tools across Europe ----Semi-structured interviews from communities
<p>Having identified through the literature review various success and failure factors for social innovation applied to community energy projects, ISABEL has further conducted 18 semi-structured interviews of a range of stakeholders. The interviewee sample was a convenience sample of participants in existing projects and thus, inevitably, they are able to speak more to successful than unsuccessful projects and they likely have had less exposure to obstacles to the success of their projects. T The interviews have focused on identifying answers to the questions: <em>What were the key success factors? What obstacles were overcome? How? Participants were also asked to specify the type of renewable energy and community energy model. </em></p>
Paediatric Rapid Sepsis Trigger (PRST) Tool
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04304235. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 2. Publications: 4.
Data from: Experiences with Global Trigger Tool reviews in five Danish hospitals – an implementation study
Objectives: To describe experiences with the implementation of global trigger tool (GTT) reviews in five Danish hospitals and to suggest ways to improve the performance of GTT review teams. Design: Retrospective observational study. Setting: The measurement and monitoring of harms are crucial to campaigns to improve the safety of patients. Increasingly, teams use the GTT to review patient records and measure harms in English and non-English-speaking countries. Meanwhile, it is not clear as to how the method performs in such diverse settings. Participants: Review teams from five Danish pilot hospitals of the national Danish Safer Hospital Programme. Primary and secondary outcome measures: We collected harm rates, background and anecdotal information and reported patient safety incidents (PSIs) from five pilot hospitals currently participating in the Danish Safer Hospital Programme. Experienced reviewers categorised harms by type. We plotted harm rates as run-charts and applied rules for the detection of patterns of non-random variation. Results: The hospitals differed in size but had similar patient populations and activity. PSIs varied between 3 and 12 per 1000 patient-days. The average harm rate for all hospitals was 60 per 1000 patient-days ranging from 34 to 84. The percentage of harmed patients was 25 and ranged from 18 to 33. Overall, 96% of harms were temporary. Infections, pressure ulcers procedure-related and gastrointestinal problems were common. Teams reported differences in training and review procedures such as the role of the secondary reviewer. Conclusions: We found substantial variation in harm rates. Differences in training, review procedures and documentation in patient records probably contributed to these variations. Training reviewers as teams, specifying the roles of the different reviewers, training records and a database for findings of reviews may improve the application of the GTT.
Prospective Clinical Surveillance With Application of Trigger Tools in Critically Ill Patients
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03781713. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 8.
Data from: Experiences with Global Trigger Tool reviews in five Danish hospitals – an implementation study
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Trigger Finger Preference Elicitation Tool
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03909490. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.