Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 3 in Relationship between fish length and otolith dimensions of Yellow striped goatfish, Upeneus vittatus (Forsskal, 1775) along the Indian coast

Fig. 3 — Otolith morphometry of U. vittatus used to study relationship with fish length. (Note: OL: Otolith Length, OH: Otolith width)

Fig. 4 in Relationship between fish length and otolith dimensions of Yellow striped goatfish, Upeneus vittatus (Forsskal, 1775) along the Indian coast

Fig. 4 — Relationship between (a – c: Mumbai): a) total length and otolith weight, b) total length and otolith width and c) total length and otolith length; (d – f: Kakinada): d) total length and otolith weight, e) total length and otolith width and f) total length and otolith length; (g – i: Odisha): g) total length and otolith weight, h) total length and otolith width and i) total length and otolith length; of U. vittatus

Figure 3 in The true identity of the enigmatic scorpion Centruroides subgranosus (Kraepelin, 1898), with some taxonomic comments on Centruroides vittatus (Say, 1821) and Centruroides suffusus Pocock, 1902 (Scorpiones: Buthidae)

Figure 3: Kraepelin's original label of the type series of Centruroides subgranosus (above, broken into two pieces), and its literal transcription (below).

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2004View details →

Fig. 3 in Response of male Centruroides vittatus (Scorpiones: Buthidae) to aerial and substrate-borne chemical signals

Fig. 3: The movement of a male scorpion during a 3-minute trial. Scorpion position was marked by a dot every 5 seconds of the trial. In general, the movement path has more space between dots in the "no-stimulus" side (top) versus the "stimulus" side (bottom). The average distance (+/- standard deviation) traveled between 5 second plots: no-stimulus side = 15.3 +/- 7.8 mm (median = 12.5 mm), stimulus side = 10.8 +/- 5.9 mm (median = 8.0 mm). "BL" indicates occurrence of a backward lunge.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2004View details →

Fig. 1 in Response of male Centruroides vittatus (Scorpiones: Buthidae) to aerial and substrate-borne chemical signals

Fig. 1: Y-shaped arena for Experiments 1, 2, and 3 to test airborne chemical communication in C. vittatus.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2019View details →

Fig. 3 in Molecular characterization and phylogenetic analysis of Trypanosoma spp. detected from striped leaf-nosed bats (Hipposideros vittatus) in Zambia

Fig. 3. Species delimitation of Trypanosoma cruzi clade. Maximum likelihood phylogeny with outgroup (Trypanosoma lewisi) and with Baysian support values presented 17 linages recognized as species for the PTP analysis. Monophyletic groups in red indicated single putative species as well as terminal branches in blue.. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2019View details →

Fig. 1 in Molecular characterization and phylogenetic analysis of Trypanosoma spp. detected from striped leaf-nosed bats (Hipposideros vittatus) in Zambia

Fig. 1. Giemsa staining of Trypanosoma sp. from ZB17–105 in BSK-M medium Representative images of ZB17-105 in the BSK-M medium are displayed at the same magnification (x1000). (a,b) flagellates resembling promastigote forms. (c) possibly epimastigote forms under division. K: kinetoplast, N: nucleus, F: flagellum.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2004View details →

Figure 27. Anelosimus vittatus, female. A–C, prosoma. A, front. B, sternum. C, labium. D in Morphological phylogeny of cobweb spiders and their relatives (Araneae, Araneoidea, Theridiidae)

Figure 27. Anelosimus vittatus, female. A–C, prosoma. A, front. B, sternum. C, labium. D, epigynum; note scape (1-1), here unique to A. vittatus and A. pulchellus, but also present in A. ethicus (pers. observ.). E, spinnerets. F, cheliceral promarginal teeth. G, tarsal organ on palpus, a tarsal organ much larger than setal bases and with broad opening (198-1) is a synapomorphy of theridiids minus Hadrotarsinae and Latrodectinae (enlarged tarsal organ clade). Scale bars: A–D, 100 mm; E–G, 20 mm.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2004View details →

Figure 26. Anelosimus vittatus, male. A–C, palp. A, ventral. B, ectal. C in Morphological phylogeny of cobweb spiders and their relatives (Araneae, Araneoidea, Theridiidae)

Figure 26. Anelosimus vittatus, male. A–C, palp. A, ventral. B, ectal. C, close-up of E, TTA. D, E, male SPR. D, view above the pedicel. E, details of a single row. F, metatarsus I. The sturdy ventral setae are found in many Anelosimus. G, tarsus I ventral. Scale bars: A–D, F, G, 100 mm; E, 20 mm.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2008View details →

Figure 46. Leporellus vittatus, INHS 56128, 78.2 in Phylogenetic relationships within the South American fish family Anostomidae (Teleostei, Ostariophysi, Characiformes)

Figure 46. Leporellus vittatus, INHS 56128, 78.2 mm SL: A, dorsal view of ventral portion of gill arches; B, close up of basibranchials 1 and 2.

Fig. 2 in Relationship between fish length and otolith dimensions of Yellow striped goatfish, Upeneus vittatus (Forsskal, 1775) along the Indian coast

Fig. 2 — Photograph of U. vittatus

Fig. 1 in Relationship between fish length and otolith dimensions of Yellow striped goatfish, Upeneus vittatus (Forsskal, 1775) along the Indian coast

Fig. 1 — Map showing the sampling locations of U. vittatus along the Indian coast.

Figure 6 in The true identity of the enigmatic scorpion Centruroides subgranosus (Kraepelin, 1898), with some taxonomic comments on Centruroides vittatus (Say, 1821) and Centruroides suffusus Pocock, 1902 (Scorpiones: Buthidae)

Figure 6: Stahnke's label of the female paratype of Centruroides suffusus from Ventanas.

Figure 4 in The true identity of the enigmatic scorpion Centruroides subgranosus (Kraepelin, 1898), with some taxonomic comments on Centruroides vittatus (Say, 1821) and Centruroides suffusus Pocock, 1902 (Scorpiones: Buthidae)

Figure 4: Adult male paratype of Centruroides suffusus from Durango, dorsal and ventral views.

Figure 5 in The true identity of the enigmatic scorpion Centruroides subgranosus (Kraepelin, 1898), with some taxonomic comments on Centruroides vittatus (Say, 1821) and Centruroides suffusus Pocock, 1902 (Scorpiones: Buthidae)

Figure 5: Adult female paratype of Centruroides suffusus from Ventanas, dorsal and ventral views.

Figure 1 in The true identity of the enigmatic scorpion Centruroides subgranosus (Kraepelin, 1898), with some taxonomic comments on Centruroides vittatus (Say, 1821) and Centruroides suffusus Pocock, 1902 (Scorpiones: Buthidae)

Figure 1: Adult male lectotype of Centruroides subgranosus, dorsal and ventral views.