Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
21
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
21 results for “WoS”
Trends in Sustainability Strategies (WoS database, 1988-2024)
<p>Trends in sustainability strategies in scientific literature. Annual number of records in the Web of Science (WoS) database for each year, based on a combined search of '<em>sustainability</em>' and search terms for one of the three <em>sustainability</em> strategies: <em>efficiency</em> (square), <em>consistency</em> (also known as <em>eco-effectiveness</em>, circle), and <em>sufficiency</em> (diamond). Data extracted on November 8, 2024.</p>
WoS and Scopus records for the bibliometric analysis in the output D2.2 Digital transformation of research and innovation roadmap of the reSEArch-EU project
<p>These files represent the exported WoS and Scopus records, used in the output D2.2 Digital transformation of research and innovation roadmap of the Horizont project reSEArch-EU, implemented by the SEA-EU university alliance.</p>
Drivers and Barriers for Open Access Publishing - WoS 2016 Dataset
<p>Answers to a survey on gold Open Access run from July to October 2016. The dataset contains 15,235 unique responses from Web of Science published authors. This survey is part of a PhD thesis from the University of Granada in Spain. More details about the study can be found in the full text document, also available in Zenodo.</p> <p>Following are listed the questions related to the WoS 2016 dataset. Please note that countries with less than 40 answers are listed as "Other" in order to preserve anonymity.</p> <p><strong>* 1. How many years have you been employed in research?</strong></p> <ul> <li>Fewer than 5 years</li> <li>5-14 years</li> <li>15-24 years</li> <li>25 years or longer</li> </ul> <p>Many of the questions that follow concern Open Access publishing. For the purposes of this survey, an article is Open Access if its final, peer-reviewed, version is published online by a journal and is free of charge to all users without restrictions on access or use.</p> <p><strong>* 2. Do any journals in your research field publish Open Access articles?</strong></p> <ul> <li>Yes</li> <li>No</li> <li>I do not know</li> </ul> <p><strong>* 3. Do you think your research field benefits, or would benefit from journals that publish Open Access articles?</strong></p> <ul> <li>Yes</li> <li>No</li> <li>I have no opinion</li> <li>I do not care</li> </ul> <p><strong>* 4. How many peer reviewed research articles (Open Access or not Open Access) have you published in the last five years?</strong></p> <ul> <li>1-5</li> <li>6-10</li> <li>11-20</li> <li>21-50</li> <li>More than 50</li> </ul> <p><strong>* 5. What factors are important to you when selecting a journal to publish in?</strong></p> <p><strong>[Each factor may be rated “Extremely important”, “Important”, “Less important” or “Irrelevant”. The factors are presented in random order.]</strong></p> <ul> <li>Importance of the journal for academic promotion, tenure or assessment</li> <li>Recommendation of the journal by my colleagues</li> <li>Positive experience with publisher/editor(s) of the journal</li> <li>The journal is an Open Access journal</li> <li>Relevance of the journal for my community</li> <li>The journal fits the policy of my organisation</li> <li>Prestige/perceived quality of the journal</li> <li>Likelihood of article acceptance in the journal</li> <li>Absence of journal publication fees (e.g. submission charges, page charges, colour charges)</li> <li>Copyright policy of the journal</li> <li>Journal Impact Factor</li> <li>Speed of publication of the journal</li> </ul> <p><strong>6. Who usually decides which journals your articles are submitted to? (Choose more than one answer if applicable)</strong></p> <ul> <li>The decision is my own</li> <li>A collective decision is made with my fellow authors</li> <li>I am advised where to publish by a senior colleague</li> <li>The organisation that finances my research advises me where to publish</li> <li>Other (please specify) [Text box follows]</li> </ul> <p><strong>7. Approximately how many Open Access articles have you published in the last five years?</strong></p> <ul> <li>0</li> <li>1-5</li> <li>6-10</li> <li>More than 10</li> <li>I do not know</li> </ul> <p>[If the answer is “0”, the survey jumps to Q10.]</p> <p><strong>* 8. What publication fee was charged for the last Open Access article you published?</strong></p> <ul> <li>No charge</li> <li>Up to €250 ($275)</li> <li>€251-€500 ($275-$550)</li> <li>€501-€1000 ($551-$1100)</li> <li>€1001-€3000 ($1101-$3300)</li> <li>More than €3000 ($3300)</li> <li>I do not know</li> </ul> <p>[If the answer is “No charge or I don’t know” the survey jumps to Q20. ]</p> <p><strong>* 9. How was this publication fee covered? (Choose more than one answer if applicable)</strong></p> <ul> <li>My research funding includes money for paying such fees</li> <li>I used part of my research funding not specifically intended for paying such fees</li> <li>My institution paid the fees</li> <li>I paid the costs myself</li> <li>Other (please specify) [Text box follows]</li> </ul> <p><strong>* 10. How easy is it to obtain funding if needed for Open Access publishing from your institution or the organisation mainly responsible for financing your research?</strong></p> <ul> <li>Easy</li> <li>Difficult</li> <li>I have not used these sources</li> </ul> <p><strong>* 11. Listed below are a series of statements, both positive and negative, concerning Open Access publishing. Please indicate how strongly you agree/disagree with each statement.</strong></p> <p>[Each statement may be rated “Strongly agree”, “Agree”, “Neither agree nor disagree”, “Disagree” or “Strongly disagree”. The statements are presented in random order.]</p> <ul> <li>Researchers should retain the rights to their published work and allow it to be used by others</li> <li>Open Access publishing undermines the system of peer review</li> <li>Open Access publishing leads to an increase in the publication of poor quality research</li> <li>If authors pay publication fees to make their articles Open Access, there will be less money available for research</li> <li>It is not beneficial for the general public to have access to published scientific and medical articles</li> <li>Open Access unfairly penalises research-intensive institutions with large publication output by making them pay high costs for publication</li> <li>Publicly-funded research should be made available to be read and used without access barrier</li> <li>Open Access publishing is more cost-effective than subscription-based publishing and so will benefit public investment in research</li> <li>Articles that are available by Open Access are likely to be read and cited more often than those not Open Access</li> </ul> <p>This study and its questionnaire are based on the SOAP Project (http://project-soap.eu). An article describing the highlights of the SOAP Survey is available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1101.5260. The dataset of the SOAP survey is available at http://bit.ly/gSmm71. A manual describing the SOAP dataset is available at http://bit.ly/gI8nc.</p>
Search results for scientific production about CRIS (Current Research Information System) in 3 databases: WoS, Scopus and Dimensions (2000-2020)
<p>This datasets is the result of the search for scientific production about CRIS (Current Research Information System) in 3 databases: WoS, Scopus and Dimensions (2000-2020)</p>
Data set of the article: Ranking by relevance and citation counts, a comparative study: Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, WoS and Scopus
<p>Data of investigation published in the article "Ranking by relevance and citation counts, a comparative study: Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, WoS and Scopus".</p> <p>Abstract of the article:</p> <p>Search engine optimization (SEO) constitutes the set of methods designed to increase the visibility of, and the number of visits to, a web page by means of its ranking on the search engine results pages. Recently, SEO has also been applied to academic databases and search engines, in a trend that is in constant growth. This new approach, known as academic SEO (ASEO), has generated a field of study with considerable future growth potential due to the impact of open science. The study reported here forms part of this new field of analysis. The ranking of results is a key aspect in any information system since it determines the way in which these results are presented to the user. The aim of this study is to analyse and compare the relevance ranking algorithms employed by various academic platforms to identify the importance of citations received in their algorithms. Specifically, we analyse two search engines and two bibliographic databases: Google Scholar and Microsoft Academic, on the one hand, and Web of Science and Scopus, on the other. A reverse engineering methodology is employed based on the statistical analysis of Spearman’s correlation coefficients. The results indicate that the ranking algorithms used by Google Scholar and Microsoft are the two that are most heavily influenced by citations received. Indeed, citation counts are clearly the main SEO factor in these academic search engines. An unexpected finding is that, at certain points in time, WoS used citations received as a key ranking factor, despite the fact that WoS support documents claim this factor does not intervene.</p>
Web Of Science (WOS-5736)
<p>Web Of Science (WOS-5736) is a collection of academic articles/journals. 5,736 documents classified in 11 classes.</p> <p>The files:<br> texts.txt: Document set (text). One per line.<br> score.txt: Document class whose index is associated with texts.txt<br> split_<k>.pkl: pandas DataFrame with k-cross validation partition.</p>
Web Of Science (WOS-11967)
<p>Web Of Science (WOS-11967) is a collection of academic articles/journals. WOS-11967, with 11,967 documents partitioned across 33 categories;</p> <p>The files:<br> texts.txt: Document set (text). One per line.<br> score.txt: Document class whose index is associated with texts.txt<br> split_<k>.pkl: pandas DataFrame with k-cross validation partition.</p>
Datos WOS USTA (hasta 2019)
<p>Consolidado de los datos de las publicaciones de autores con filiación USTA (Colombia) en la plataforma WOS. Parte del servicio de vigilancia tecnológica del Observatorio de Cienciometría de la Universidad Santo Tomás.</p> <p>Estrategia de búsqueda:</p> <p>(OO=universidad santo tomas AND CU=COLOMBIA) OR (OO=saint thomas aquinas univer sity AND CU=COLOMBIA) OR (OO=saint thomas university AND CU=COLOMBIA) OR (OO=santo tomás university AND CU=COLOMBIA) OR (OO=santo tomas university AND CU=COLOMBIA) OR (OO= Univ Santo Tomas AND CU=COLOMBIA) NOT ( (OO=Univ Santo Tomas AND CU=Philippines) OR (OO=Univ Santo Tomas Hosp AND CU=Philippines) OR (OO=Univ Santo Tomas AND CU=Chile))</p>
Characterizing Highly Cited Papers in Mass Cytometry through H-Classics: WoS dataset and citation report
<p>Dataset and citation report extracted from Web of Science (WoS) used to characterize highly cited papers in mass cytometry research field from 2010 to 2019.</p>
Base de datos con análisis de abstracts extraídos de WoS, Scopus, y SciELO referentes al tratamiento periodístico de la crisis migratoria entre 2015 y 2018 en la prensa occidental
<p>Base de datos con análisis de abstracts extraídos de WoS, Scopus, y SciELO referentes al tratamiento periodístico de la crisis migratoria entre 2015 y 2018 en la prensa occidental.</p>
Data on technology transfer in WoS (without cleaning)
<p>The project presented has the objective of developing a methodology for technology transfer (TT), based on descriptive research, with a longitudinal design by collecting data over time in an express period to make inferences regarding change, on the characteristics of scientific production on TT. With the trend obtained, the dimensions, variables and indicators, associated with the context, will be determined for the subsequent validation of experts and the use of other resources from the information sciences.</p>
METADADOS EXTRAIDOS DA BASE WOS PARA A PESQUISA TRABALHO DOCENTE NO BRASIL (2008-2023)
<p>TRATA-SE DE UM CONJUNTO COM 286 REGISTROS OBTIDOS NA BASE DE DADOS WEB OF SCIENCE EM 08 SETEMBRO DE 2023 PARA O ESTUDO BIBLIOMÉTRICO EM ANDAMENTO TRABALHO DOCENTE NO BRASIL. </p>
Datos WOS USTA (2004-2018)
<p>Consolidado de los datos de las publicaciones de autores con filiación USTA (Colombia) en la plataforma WOS. Parte del servicio de vigilancia tecnológica del Observatorio de Cienciometría de la Universidad Santo Tomás.</p> <p>Estrategia de búsqueda:</p> <p>(OO=universidad santo tomas AND CU=COLOMBIA) OR (OO=saint thomas aquinas univer sity AND CU=COLOMBIA) OR (OO=saint thomas university AND CU=COLOMBIA) OR (OO=santo tomás university AND CU=COLOMBIA) OR (OO=santo tomas university AND CU=COLOMBIA) OR (OO= Univ Santo Tomas AND CU=COLOMBIA)</p> <p>Análisis: [excluyendo]: AÑOS DE PUBLICACIÓN: (2019)</p>
Tabla. Búsqueda de palabras claves en WOS, Scopus, Scielo
<p>Tabla. Búsqueda de palabras claves en WOS, Scopus, Scielo. Fecha 28/02/2022<br> </p>
AI_Anesthesia_WoS
<p>Dataset used for a a<strong> </strong>bibliometric network analysis of publications on artificial intelligence in anesthesia</p>
Biblioshiny Report "Technolog* Digital Economy", database WoS (2000-2023)
<p>Bibliometric analysis of the WoS scientometric database data for the query "Technolog* Digital Economy". </p> <p>Filters:</p> <ul> <li>The country of Russia and publications in Russian were excluded.</li> <li>The year 2024 excluded</li> <li>Document types: Article </li> <li>Research areas: Business Economics or Public Administration or Social Sciences (Other topics)</li> <li>open access</li> </ul> <p>via <strong>Biblioshiny app</strong> </p>
Database of research methods in the educational field. Bibliometric analysis: comparative study between Scopus and WoS
<p>Data package on research methods in the educational field in the Web of Science and Scopus databases between 2000 and 2023</p>
Correlation between the availability of supplementary material and raw research data in journals of the Agriculture Multidisciplinary area of WoS
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
DB_WoS_UDC
<p>Database SQLite containing data extracted from Web of Science, prepared, through data scrubbing and data normalizing, for the statistical analysis and bibliometric indicators extraction presented in the master thesis "The Scientific Activity of the University of A Coruña through Bibliometric Indicators (Web of Science, 2010-2014)" - DOI 10.5281/zenodo.153868</p> <p>For the database management use SQLite Manager (Firefox Add-on).</p> <p> </p>
QT_Stakeholder_WoS
<p>In this dataset we present the results obtained by analyzing the 76,724 publications selected from the Web of Science Core Collection utilizing the search query:</p> <p><strong> TS = ("quantum simulation" OR "quantum imaging" OR "quantum sensing" OR "quantum sensor" OR "quantum computation" OR "quantum computing" OR "quantum computer" OR "quantum coding" OR "quantum programming" OR "quantum error correction" OR "quantum error correcting" OR "quantum circuits" OR "quantum algorithm" OR "quantum algorithms" OR "quantum network" OR "quantum networks" OR "quantum channel" OR "quantum channels" OR "quantum cryptology" OR "quantum cryptography" OR "quantum key" OR "quantum teleportation" OR "quantum information" OR "quantum technology" OR "quantum technologies" OR “quantum gates" OR “quantum register" OR “quantum contextuality" OR “quantum decoherence" OR “quantum communication" OR “quantum memory" OR “quantum memories" OR “quantum repeaters" OR “quantum state transfer" OR “quantum zeno dynamics" OR “qubit" OR “qutrit" OR “qudit" OR “quantum correlations" OR “quantum entanglement" OR “quantum discord" OR “quantum noise engineering" OR “quantum state engineering" OR “quantum protocols" OR “quantum annealing” OR “quantum logic gate” OR “quantum internet” OR “quantum repeater” OR “quantum memory” OR “quantum photonics” OR “quantum photonic” OR “quantum biology” OR “quantum machine learning”) </strong></p> <p> </p> <p><strong>OR </strong></p> <p> </p> <p><strong>TI=("quantum simulation" OR "quantum imaging" OR "quantum sensing" OR "quantum sensor" OR "quantum computation" OR "quantum computing" OR "quantum computer" OR "quantum coding" OR "quantum programming" OR "quantum error correction" OR "quantum error correcting" OR "quantum circuits" OR "quantum algorithm" OR "quantum algorithms" OR "quantum network" OR "quantum networks" OR "quantum channel" OR "quantum channels" OR "quantum cryptology" OR "quantum cryptography" OR "quantum key" OR "quantum teleportation" OR "quantum information" OR "quantum technology" OR "quantum technologies" OR “quantum gates" OR “quantum register" OR “quantum contextuality" OR “quantum decoherence" OR “quantum communication" OR “quantum memory" OR “quantum memories" OR “quantum repeaters" OR “quantum state transfer" OR “quantum zeno dynamics" OR “qubit" OR “qutrit" OR “qudit" OR “quantum correlations" OR “quantum entanglement" OR “quantum discord" OR “quantum noise engineering" OR “quantum state engineering" OR “quantum protocols" OR “quantum annealing” OR “quantum logic gate” OR “quantum internet” OR “quantum repeater” OR “quantum memory” OR “quantum photonics” OR “quantum photonic” OR “quantum biology” OR “quantum machine learning”)</strong></p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.