Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
743
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
743 results for “auditory”
Auditory Gamma Entrainment
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Auditory localization with 7T fMRI
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Modeling an auditory stimulated brain under altered states of consciousness using the generalized ising model
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
EEG, ECG and pupil data from young and older adults: rest and auditory cued reaction time tasks
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
PsPM-AOB: Eye tracker (including pupillometry) measurements from auditory oddball tasks
<p>This dataset includes eye tracker (including pupillometry) measurements from auditory oddball tasks with ITIs of 1, 2, and 3 s (in groups 1, 2, and 3 respectively). Also included are task information, keypress responses, keypress response times and key correctness for each of 66 healthy unmedicated participants (40 females and 26 males aged 24.2+/-3.9 years) participating in auditory oddball tasks. Stimuli consist of sine tones (50-ms length; 10-ms ramp; 440 or 660 Hz).</p>
PsPM-HRM1-2: SCR and ECG measurements in response to white noise sounds and an auditory oddball task
<p>This dataset includes skin conductance response (SCR) and electrocardiogram (ECG) for each of 61 healthy unmedicated participants (28 males, 32 females, 1 unassigned, aged 25.8 +/- 4.6 years) in response to 20 broadband white noise sounds (HRM1) or 10 oddball tones in a oddball task (HRM2). Some participants did not did not complete HRM1 or HRM2 or were excluded from analysis such that there are 56 recordings for HRM1 and 58 recordings for HRM2. White noise sounds in HRM1 were 1 s long with 10 ms on- and offset ramp and presented at ~85 dB. Oddball and standard sounds in HRM2 were 50 ms long, with 10 ms on- and offset ramp, and presented at ~75 dB. Sound frequency was 440 Hz or 460 Hz, randomly balanced per participant to oddballs and standards. SOA between white noise sounds and oddball tones was selected randomly on each trial from 30 s, 35 s or 40 s. All stimuli were presented in one block. There is a marker for each sound onset (including standard tones) in the windaq files.</p>
Accessible Oceans: Auditory Display. Ocean Response to Extratropical Storm Hermine
<p>The twenty-one tracks make up an auditory display of the ocean response to extratropical storm Hermine in 2016. The tracks in the auditory display are comprised of data sonifications and contextual audio supports (dialogue, auditory icons, and music). You may <a href="https://samply.app/p/VGWHypmrFPZ1NqzeqZuM">listen online here</a>.</p> <p>The ocean data comes from the National Science Foundation (NSF) Ocean Observatories Initiative (OOI) and the display is based on the <a href="https://datalab.marine.rutgers.edu/ooi-nuggets/extratropical-storm-hermine/">OOI Nugget</a> developed by Dr. Leslie Smith. Please note that the Ocean Labs data nugget does not include sea wave height as part of its graph that we sonified. Storms also impact sea wave height, and Dr. Leslie Smith acquired this data from the OOI so that we could include it in the sonification and auditory display.</p> <p>The “Accessible Oceans” AISL Pilots and Feasibility study aims to inclusively design auditory displays that support the perception and understanding of ocean data in informal learning environments (ILEs). More can be found on the project website: <a href="https://accessibleoceans.whoi.edu/">https://accessibleoceans.whoi.edu/</a></p>
PsPM-PubFe: Pupil size response in a delay fear conditioning procedure with auditory CS and electrical US.
<p>This dataset includes pupil size response (PSR), skin conductance response (SCR), electrocardiogram (ECG) and respiration measurements. Also included are CS and US information, keypress responses, keypress response times and key correctness for each of 22 healthy unmedicated participants (7 males and 15 females aged 26.4+/-5.2 years) participating in a classical (Pavlovian) discriminant delay fear conditioning task. CS consists of two sine tones with constant frequency (220 Hz or 440 Hz, 50-ms onset and offset ramp). US is a train of electric square pulses delivered with a constant current stimulator (Digitimer DS7A, Digitimer, Welwyn Garden City, UK) on participants' dominant forearm through a pin-cathode/ring-anode configuration. SOA betwen the CS and US is 3.5 s. The ITI is randomly determined on each trial to be 7, 9, or 11 s.</p>
PsPM-SC4B: SCR, ECG, EMG, PSR and respiration measurements in a delay fear conditioning task with auditory CS and electrical US
<p>This dataset includes pupil size response (PSR), skin conductance response (SCR), electrocardiogram (ECG), electromyogram (EMG) and respiration measurements. Also included are CS and US information, keypress responses, keypress response times, key correctness and shock ratings for each of 21 healthy unmedicated participants (10 males and 11 females aged 22.9+/-3.0 years; discrepancies to published studies are due to misprints and exclusion of a subject with incomplete data, which was excluded in all conducted studies as well as here) participating in a classical (Pavlovian) discriminant delay fear conditioning task. Two pairs of CS+ and CS-, either complex or simple, were delivered with headphones (HD518, Sennheiser, Wedemark-Wennebostel, Germany) at about 68 dB. Complex stimuli were a sequence of four rising (400 to 800 Hz) or falling (800 to 400 Hz) sounds lasting 1 s each. Simple stimuli were tones with constant frequency (400 or 800 Hz) presented for 4 s. US consisted of square electric pulses with 0.2-ms duration and 10 Hz frequency, resulting in a total US duration of 0.5 s. SOA betwen the CS and US was 3.5 s. The ITI was randomly determined on each trial to be 7, 9, or 11 s.</p>
PsPM-trSP1: SCR, and heart beat measurement in response to aversive/neutral IAPS pictures while subjected to auditory distractors
<p>This dataset includes skin conductance response (SCR) and pulse time stamp (HB) measurements for each of 60 healthy unmedicated participants (30 males and 30 females aged 23.7 +/- 4.8 years) in response to the 45 most arousing negative, and 45 least arousing neutral IAPS pictures, each presented for 1 s each, while listening to regular or random distractor sounds, as described in Bach et al. (2015). ITI was selected randomly on each trial from 7.65 s, 9 s, or 10.35 s. The experiment was preceded by a 2-minute resting period and divided into 3 blocks, separated by resting periods. Each resting period begins and ends with an event marker in the psychophysiological recordings.</p>
PsPM-LI: SCR, ECG, PSR and respiration measurements in a delay fear conditioning task with auditory CS and electrical US.
<p>This dataset includes pupil size response (PSR), skin conductance response(SCR), electrocardiogram (ECG) and respiration measurements for each of 20 healthy unmedicated participants (8 males and 12 females aged 22.8+/-3.3 years) participating in a classical (Pavlovian) discriminant delay fear conditioning task. (One additional participant in the initial sample in Korn et al. (2017) - but who did not finish the experiment and was not included into the analysis - is not contained in this dataset.) The acquisition data is separated into two sessions which were recorded consecutively with a break of approximately 5 min. CS consist of two sine tones with constant frequency (220 Hz or 440 Hz, 50-ms onset and offset ramp) and last for 6.5 s. US is a 0.5 s train of electric square pulses delivered with a constant current stimulator (Digitimer DS7A, Digitimer, Welwyn Garden City, UK) on participants' dominant forearm through a pin-cathode/ring-anode configuration. SOA betwen the CS and US is 6 s. The ITI is randomly determined on each trial to be 7, 9, or 11 s.</p>
Visual and auditory brain areas share a representational structure that supports emotion perception: fMRI data
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
PsPM-SCBD: Skin conductance response from a delay fear conditioning task with auditory CS (monophones/triads)
<p>This dataset includes skin conductance response (SCR) measurements for 10 healthy unmedicated participants (5 females and 5 males, age range: 18 - 33 years, mean age: 24.1 +/- 4.7) participating in a classical (Pavlovian) discriminant delay fear conditioning experiment with auditory CS. Also included are CS and US information, and ratings of CS after the experiment. Simple and complex CS were simple sine tones (4 s), and triads in root position or in first inversion, respectively. US was a train of electric square pulses delivered with a constant current stimulator (Digitimer DS7A, Digitimer, Welwyn Garden City, UK) on participants' dominant forearm through a pin-cathode/ring-anode configuration. After the fear conditioning task, participants were first asked to report their subjective estimate of how likely they were to receive a shock after a given CS in the future, on a visual analogue scale of 0-100. Then they were asked to rate pairs of CS sounds with respect to which of the two stimuli they liked less.</p>
Dataset accompanying the publication: Acoustic cues of keyboard mechanics enable auditory localization of upright piano tones
<p>Dataset accompanying the publication: Acoustic cues of keyboard mechanics enable auditory localization of upright piano tones (in J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 2024)</p>
Auditory stimuli suppress contextual fear responses in safety learning independent of a possible safety meaning
<p>This repository stores the raw data that gave rise to the study by Mombelli et al. (2024) (Title: Auditory stimuli suppress contextual fear responses in safety learning independent of a possible safety meaning; DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1415047, Journal: Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience). Below we supply information on the provided metadata files which, in turn, refer to individual raw data files.</p> <p><strong>General structure of the repository:</strong></p> <p>· the raw data is organized in 5 subsets defined by the figures or supplementary figures they contribute to. Each subset is documented by its own metadata file. Raw data files were compressed into ZIP archives, one per subset;</p> <p>· the metadata files listing names of the individual data files are provided in “.csv” format, one per data subset. Field separator: comma;</p> <p>· the dataset is accessible at the following doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13524007</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Description of the non-textual data formats:</strong></p> <p>· video recordings of animal behavior were provided as unmodified ".wmv" files created by the VideoFreeze acquisition software (Med Associates Inc). Video stream parameters: wmv3 codec, color space yuv420p, 320x240 pixels, 30 fps, bitrate 300 kb/s.</p> <p>· movement traces were obtained from the videos, as described in the Methods section (Mombelli et al., 2024).</p>
Two-probe macaque monkey auditory LFP
<p>Dataset accompanying paper Klein, N., Siegle, J.H., Teichert, T., Kass, R.E. (2021) "Cross-population coupling of neural activity based on Gaussian process current source densities". </p> <p>Auditory local field potential (LFP) recordings and evoked multi-unit activity (MUA) from two 24-electrode linear probes (V-Probes from Plexon) inserted in primary auditory cortex of a macaque monkey. The probes were arranged parallel to the iso-frequency bands in primary auditory cortex (A1), and had similar tonal response fields with preferred frequencies close to 1000 Hz. The first probe (which we call the lateral probe) was located centrally in A1, while the second probe (which we call the medial probe) was located more medially and closer to the boundary of A1 with the medio-lateral belt. The medial probe had lower response threshold, shorter MUA latencies, and overall stronger current sinks and sources than the lateral probe. The spacing between electrodes on each probe was 100 microns so that the probe spanned 2,300 microns. The treatment of the animals was in accordance with the guidelines set by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (NIH) for the care and use of laboratory animals, and all methods were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Pittsburgh.</p> <p>See README.txt for precise description of data files.</p>
MAD-EEG: an EEG dataset for decoding auditory attention to a target instrument in polyphonic music
<p>The <em><strong>MAD-EEG Dataset</strong></em> is a research corpus for studying EEG-based auditory attention decoding to a target instrument in polyphonic music. </p> <p>The dataset consists of 20-channel EEG responses to music recorded from 8 subjects while attending to a particular instrument in a music mixture. </p> <p>For further details, please refer to the paper: <em><a href="https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02291882/document">MAD-EEG: an EEG dataset for decoding auditory attention to a target instrument in polyphonic music</a>.</em></p> <p>If you use the data in your research, please reference the paper (not just the Zenodo record):</p> <pre><code>@inproceedings{Cantisani2019, author={Giorgia Cantisani and Gabriel Trégoat and Slim Essid and Gaël Richard}, title={{MAD-EEG: an EEG dataset for decoding auditory attention to a target instrument in polyphonic music}}, year=2019, booktitle={Proc. SMM19, Workshop on Speech, Music and Mind 2019}, pages={51--55}, doi={10.21437/SMM.2019-11}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.21437/SMM.2019-11} }</code></pre> <p> </p>
Papers on Google Scholar using "sonification, auditory display, audification, sonify" as search terms
<p>Data set from a Google Scholar search in January 2023 on the terms "sonification, auditory display, audification, sonify" and added abstracts from various online ressources and keywords (automatically extracted from the abstracts only), containing:</p> <ul> <li>their title,</li> <li>a website/URL (as referenced by Google scholar),</li> <li>author(s),</li> <li>publisher information,</li> <li>their google rank in our search,</li> <li>publication year,</li> <li>the number of citations;</li> <li>paper abstracts;</li> <li>keywords generated from abstracts.</li> </ul>
Accessible Oceans: Auditory Display. Zooplankton Daily Vertical Migration Gets Eclipsed!
<p>The nine tracks make up an auditory display of the daily vertical migration of zooplankton off the coast of Oregon. The tracks in the auditory display are comprised of data sonifications and contextual audio supports (dialogue, auditory icons, and music). You may <a href="https://samply.app/p/92HixRBFY6YEyUgjzO1Y">listen online here</a>.</p> <p>The ocean data comes from the National Science Foundation (NSF) Ocean Observatories Initiative (OOI) and the display is based on the <a href="https://datalab.marine.rutgers.edu/ooi-nuggets/zooplankton-eclipse/">OOI Nugget</a> developed by Dr. Leslie Smith and Dr. Lori Garzio. Please note that there is no track 1B in this version. We removed track 1B in order to reduce redundancy in the display. </p> <p>The “Accessible Oceans” AISL Pilots and Feasibility study aims to inclusively design auditory displays that support the perception and understanding of ocean data in informal learning environments (ILEs). More can be found on the project website: <a href="https://accessibleoceans.whoi.edu/">https://accessibleoceans.whoi.edu/</a></p>
Accessible Oceans: Auditory Display. Longterm Axial Seamount Inflation Record
<p>The thirteen tracks make up an auditory display of the Longterm Axial Seamount Inflation Record. The tracks in the auditory display are comprised of data sonifications and contextual audio supports (dialogue, auditory icons, and music). You may <a href="https://samply.app/p/MViV0dJLZjJpFXEHN8EA">listen online here</a>.</p> <p>The display leverages data from NOAA PMEL that extend the record of the National Science Foundation (NSF) Ocean Observatories Initiative (OOI) data back to 1997. This audio display focuses on the long-term pattern observed by bottom pressure recorders where the seafloor inflates (lifts), then an eruption event occurs, and the seafloor drops.</p> <p>The “Accessible Oceans” AISL Pilots and Feasibility study aims to inclusively design auditory displays that support the perception and understanding of ocean data in informal learning environments (ILEs). More can be found on the project website: <a href="https://accessibleoceans.whoi.edu/">https://accessibleoceans.whoi.edu/</a></p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.