Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
15
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
15 results for “auditory evoked potentials”
Minimal dataset for "Systematic review and meta-analysis of late auditory evoked potentials as a candidate biomarker in the assessment of tinnitus"
<p>This text file contains the minimal dataset necessary to reproduce the results and analyses in the paper: Cardon E et al., "Systematic review and meta-analysis of late auditory evoked potentials as a candidate biomarker in the assessment of tinnitus". Plos One;2020.</p>
Speech-Evoked Auditory Potentials: Multisite Pediatric Evaluation
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07392164. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 2. Publications: 0.
Effects of Two Different Sedation Regimes on Auditory Evoked Potentials and Electroencephalogram (EEG)
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00641563. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 3.
Auditory Evoked Potential Monitoring on Bronchoscopy
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01448811. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Effect of Stuttering Remediation Exercises on Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05473572. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 3.
Long Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials (P300) Outcomes in Patients With Unilateral Cochlear Implants
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03352154. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 0. Publications: 11.
Acupuncture and Auditory Evoked Potentials
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00333606. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Relationship Between the Depth of Anesthesia and Auditory Evoked Potentials (P3a)
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05283018. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Anesthetics and Auditory, Visceral, and Heat Evoked Potentials
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00534586. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
EEG and Auditory Evoked Potentials During Local Anesthesia
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00408941. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Cognitive Auditory Evoked Potential After Cardiac Arrest: Interest of Mismatch negativiTY
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01980446. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Detection of Consciousness by EEG and Auditory Evoked Potentials
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01720615. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
The Normal Standard of Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potential in Adults Using a New Device
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01132092. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Auditory Evoked Potentials and Experimental Pain
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00745472. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.
Cognitive evoked potentials based on auditory presentations of a stimulus
<p>This database contains calculated evoked potentials from EEG data of subjects taking a cognitive test. For each EEG channel of each subject, the evoked potential was calculated separately for all stimulus presentations. For each subject, the corresponding folders contain the calculated evoked potentials for the EEG channels in separate files. Each potential has a duration of 3.4 seconds. A description of the EEG setup, subjects, and experimental design is provided below.</p><p>Data were recorded at 250 Hz sampling rate using the conventional monopolar method of registration with two reference points and N = 21 electrodes, located according to the "10–20" scheme. The adhesive Ag/AgCl electrodes in prewired head caps were used to detect EEG signals. Two reference electrodes, A1 and A2, were located on mastoids, while the ground electrode N was placed above the forehead. The EEG signals were filtered by a band-pass filter with cutoff points at 1.5 Hz (HP) and 35 Hz (LP) and a 50 Hz notch filter.</p><p>Children of middle school age participated as study subjects. The biomedical data were processed honoring the confidentiality and anonymity of the study respondents. Experimental work was carried out in compliance with ethical standards and approved by the local committee on research ethics at Saratov State University (Saratov, RF). Prior to the study, written consent of the parents was obtained for conducting neuropsychological experimental work, the subsequent data processing and publication of the results. The parents were present during all experiments in accordance with the requirements of the Russian Federation legislation.</p><p>The following design of experimental work was employed. All experiments were conducted in the mornings, on a typical school day. One of the classrooms was darkened with blinds. Children sat in comfortable chairs, adjusted to their heights to attain a comfortable stable position, leaning back in the chair. Their feet were flat on the floor. The total experimental work time was approximately 25 minutes for each subject.</p><p>The experiment included three short stages: background state of quiet wakefulness with eyes closed (about 3 minutes), simple cognitive test for counting sound signals (about 20 minutes), and repeated background state of quiet wakefulness with eyes closed (about 2 minutes). During the cognitive test, groups of short sounds were given: one to four per group. During listening, the subject was instructed to determine whether he perceived an even or an odd number of sounds in a single stimulus group. Depending on his assessment, the subject pressed the left or right buttons of a special remote control. Between groups of sound signals there was a silent pause lasting 5 to 11 seconds. Each child was analyzing these sound stimuli for 3 minutes, followed by a rest break lasting about 2 minutes.</p><p>The experimental work involved 4 boys 10 years of age (123,2±5,1 months). All children belonged to the health group I the Order of the Ministry of the Russian Federation Healthcare of March 13, 2019, No. 124n. They had no infectious or other acute illnesses one month prior to the experiment. Additionally, all children had no identified chronic diseases.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.