Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
34
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
34 results for “behavioral task”
Dataset of behavioral and neurophysiological data of a virtual sailing task published in: "Providing task instructions during motor training enhances performance and modulates attentional brain networks"
<p>Dataset belonging to the behavioral and neurophysiological data of the publication: "Providing task instructions during motor training enhances performance and modulates attentional brain networks". The two uploaded Zip files contain kinematic and electroencephalographic data of 36 participants for the Obstacle and HorizonTask.</p>
raw behavioral data, raw questionnaire data, and raw neuroimaging data for a genuine-and-pretended disgust task
<p>Raw behavioral data, raw questionnaire data, and raw neuroimaging data for a genuine-and-pretended disgust task. Particularly, a document indicating all parameters used in the datasets and file names is attached as well.</p>
Companion for Visual Performance Analysis of Memory Behavior in a Task-Based Runtime on Hybrid Platforms
<p>This is the companion data for the CCGRID2019 submission paper entitled: Visual Performance Analysis of Memory Behavior in a Task-Based Runtime on Hybrid Platforms by Lucas Leandro Nesi, Samuel Thibault, Luka Stanisic and Lucas Mello Schnorr. All the data, source code, and images generation scripts used in the paper are presented here.</p>
Figs 2-6. Agonistic behavior between a in The hard task of a short-tailed mouse opossum (Monodelphis) to prey a harvestman (Arachnida: Opiliones)
Figs 2-6. Agonistic behavior between a harvestman of the family Gonyleptidae and the mouse opossum Monodelphis dimidiata (Wagner, 1847). The interaction starts with the mouse opossum in an attack position, facing the harvestman (Fig. 2), then the marsupial staggers side to side (Fig. 3) and is knocked out (Fig. 4). This sequence of events is repeated two times, until the mouse opossum assumes its third attack position and attacks the harvestman (Fig. 5). The mouse opossum removes the harvestman's legs one by one to then feed on its body (Fig. 6). Image edited in the Inkscape software.
Companion data of Summarizing task-based applications behavior over many nodes through progression clustering
<p>This is the companion data for the paper *Summarizing task-based applications behavior over many nodes through progression clustering* by Lucas Leandro Nesi, Vinícius Garcia Pinto, Lucas Mello Schnorr, and Arnaud Legrand accept for publication in 31st Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed, and Network-Based Processing (<a href="https://www.pdp2023.org/">PDP 2023</a>). The remaining of the companion is at: https://gitlab.com/lnesi/companion-pdp-2023.</p>
Behavioral data associated with "Passive exposure to task-relevant stimuli enhances categorization learning"
<p>Behavioral data associated with Schmid et al. (2023) "<i>Passive exposure to task-relevant stimuli enhances categorization learning</i>", and example code for loading these data. See README.md for details.</p><p> </p>
Normative behavioral data from the novel One Trail Trace escape reaction task (OTTER)
<p><span>We designed a behavioral task where rats learn to associate two temporally distinct but close-in-time events by means of incidental one-trial learning. </span><span>The task takes advantage of two competing motivations - to avoid light places and to avoid painful stimuli (foot shock) predicted by an acoustic signal. Motivation to avoid a bright light is constant throughout the experiment and is manifested by rats preferring a dark compartment in a light/dark shuttle box. Motivation to stay in the dark is overridden (1) during the training session: when foot-shock (US) (preceded by the acoustic stimulus (CS)) is presented; and (2) during the testing session: when CS, that predicts US, is presented. The latter case occurs when rats successfully form an association between CS and US in the training session and the rat escapes into the light compartment ('responders'). The rats that do not escape ('non-responders' appear to lack this memory as even non-specific fear response (freezing) was absent.</span></p> <p><span>Generally, >50% of rats escape into the lit compartments following CS on the testing day. Importantly, rats do not show a contextual association measured by freezing behavior and preference for a light compartment on the testing day. Moreover, we observed that several putative details in the setup affect the probability of the successful formation of a one-trial trace association. </span><span>Compared to similar tasks, the OTTER task tests incidental learning with no requirement for pre-training. Moreover, the memory formed in the OTTER task consists of two events that do not overlap in time: a characteristic of many episodic memories. The OTTER task presents high-throughput means to study neuronal substrates of incidental temporal binding.</span></p> <p><span></span></p>
Task Control Circuit Targets for Obsessive Compulsive Behaviors in Children
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03584945. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Data from: Constructing concepts without feedback: An empirical investigation of how relational information affects multidimensional concept completion behavior in an unsupervised task
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Code and data from: Representational geometry explains puzzling error distributions in behavioral tasks
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Normative behavioral data from the novel One Trail Trace escape reaction task (OTTER)
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Mice adaptively generate choice variability in a deterministic task - behavioral data
<p>========================================<br> This repository contains the data used<br> in the following paper:<br> Belkaid et al. "Mice adaptively <br> generate choice variability in a <br> deterministic task", (2019)<br> preprint: doi.org/10.1101/527580<br> Reference will be updated upon <br> acceptance<br> ========================================</p> <p><br> Directories and file structure<br> ------------------------------</p> <p>./compact_behavioral_data/<br> > data used for Fig1, Supp Fig1, Fig4 and Supp Fig3<br> > columns:<br> label success_rate uturn_rate complexity_non_normalized complexity_normalized</p> <p>./model_simulation_data/<br> > data used for Fig2 and Supp Fig2<br> > columns (continuous):<br> fitness_score <useless> mem tau kappa alpha<br> > columns (session-by-session):<br> fitness_score <useless> mem tau kappa <useless> <useless> <useless> success_rate complexity_normalized<br> > note: fitness scores were computed from success rate and complexity compared to each session</p> <p>./seq_data/<br> > data used for Fig3A, Fig3B and Fig4D<br> > columns:<br> choice left-or-right reward time</p> <p>./seq-stim_data/<br> > data used for Fig3C<br> > columns:<br> choice left-or-right reward time</p>
Data set for: Behavioral traits that define social dominance are the same that reduce social influence in a consensus task
<p>Dominant individuals are often most influential in their social groups, affecting movement, opinion, and performance across species and contexts. Yet behavioral traits like aggression, intimidation, and coercion, which are associated with and in many cases define dominance, can be socially aversive. The traits that make dominant individuals influential in one context may therefore reduce their influence in other contexts. Here we examine this association between dominance and influence using the cichlid fish <i>Astatotilapia burtoni</i>, comparing the influence of dominant and subordinate males during normal social interactions and in a more complex group-consensus association task. We find that phenotypically dominant males are aggressive, socially central, and that these males have a strong influence over normal group movement, whereas subordinate males are passive, socially peripheral, and have little influence over normal movement. However, subordinate males have the greatest influence in generating group-consensus during the association task. Dominant males are spatially distant and have lower signal-to-noise ratios of informative behavior in the association task, potentially interfering with their ability to generate group-consensus. In contrast, subordinate males are physically close to other group members, have a high signal-to-noise ratio of informative behavior, and equivalent visual connectedness to their group as dominant males. The behavioral traits that define effective social influence are thus highly context-specific and can be dissociated with social dominance. Thus, processes of hierarchical ascension in which the most aggressive, competitive, or coercive individuals rise to positions of dominance may be counter-productive in contexts where group-performance is prioritized.</p>
Data from: The rate of transient beta frequency events predicts behavior across tasks and species
Beta oscillations (15-29Hz) are among the most prominent signatures of brain activity. Beta power is predictive of healthy and abnormal behaviors, including perception, attention and motor action. In non-averaged signals, beta can emerge as transient high-power 'events'. As such, functionally relevant differences in averaged power across time and trials can reflect changes in event number, power, duration, and / or frequency span. We show that functionally relevant differences in averaged beta power in primary somatosensory neocortex reflect a difference in the number of high-power beta events per trial, i.e. event rate. Further, beta events occurring close to the stimulus were more likely to impair perception. These results are consistent across detection and attention tasks in human magnetoencephalography, and in local field potentials from mice performing a detection task. These results imply that an increased propensity of beta events predicts the failure to effectively transmit information through specific neocortical representations.
Data from: Behavioral and neural measures of confidence using a novel auditory pitch identification task
<p>Observers can discriminate between correct versus incorrect perceptual decisions with feelings of confidence. The centro-parietal positivity build-up rate (CPP slope) has been suggested as a likely neural signature of accumulated evidence, which may guide both perceptual performance and confidence. However, CPP slope also covaries with reaction time, which also covaries with confidence in previous studies, and performance and confidence typically covary; thus, CPP slope may index signatures of perceptual performance rather than confidence per se. Moreover, perceptual metacognition – including neural correlates – has largely been studied in vision, with few exceptions. Thus, we lack understanding of domain-general neural signatures of perceptual metacognition outside vision. Here we designed a novel auditory pitch identification task and collected behavior with simultaneous 32-channel EEG in healthy adults. Participants saw two tone labels which varied in tonal distance on each trial (e.g., C vs D, C vs F), then heard a single auditory tone; they identified which label was correct and rated confidence. We found that pitch identification confidence varied with tonal distance, but performance, metacognitive sensitivity (trial-by-trial covariation of confidence with accuracy), and reaction time did not. Interestingly, however, while CPP slope covaried with performance and reaction time, it did not significantly covary with confidence. We interpret these results to mean that CPP slope is likely a signature of first-order perceptual processing and not confidence-specific signals or computations in auditory tasks. Our novel pitch identification task offers a valuable method to examine the neural correlates of auditory and domain-general perceptual confidence.</p>
Behavioral responses in an object segmentation task and neural responses during passive viewing
<p>The rodent visual system has attracted great interest in recent years due to its experimental tractability, but the fundamental mechanisms used by the mouse to represent the visual world remain unclear. In the primate, researchers have argued from both behavioral and neural evidence that a key step in visual representation is "figure-ground segmentation," the delineation of figures as distinct from backgrounds [<a href="https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.04.451059v1#ref-1">1</a>–<a href="https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.04.451059v1#ref-4">4</a>]. To determine if mice also show behavioral and neural signatures of figure-ground segmentation, we trained mice on a figure-ground segmentation task where figures were defined by gratings and naturalistic textures moving counterphase to the background. Unlike primates, mice were severely limited in their ability to segment figure from ground using the opponent motion cue, with segmentation behavior strongly dependent on the specific carrier pattern. Remarkably, when mice were forced to localize naturalistic patterns defined by opponent motion, they adopted a strategy of brute force memorization of texture patterns. In contrast, primates, including humans, macaques, and mouse lemurs, could readily segment figures independent of carrier pattern using the opponent motion cue. Consistent with mouse behavior, neural responses to the same stimuli recorded in mouse visual areas V1, RL, and LM also did not support texture-invariant segmentation of figures using opponent motion. Modeling revealed that the texture dependence of both the mouse's behavior and neural responses could be explained by a feedforward neural network lacking explicit segmentation capabilities. These findings reveal a fundamental limitation in the ability of mice to segment visual objects compared to primates.</p>
Data from: Behavioral and neural measures of confidence using a novel auditory pitch identification task
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Behavioral responses in an object segmentation task and neural responses during passive viewing
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: The rate of transient beta frequency events predicts behavior across tasks and species
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data set for: Behavioral traits that define social dominance are the same that reduce social influence in a consensus task
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.