Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

8

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

8 results for “bushmeat”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
dryad36/100

Bushmeat yields, species extinction rates and ecosystem-level impacts of bushmeat harvesting as predicted by the Madingley General Ecosystem Model

<p>The datasets contain data generated using the Madingley General Ecosystem Model for experiments decribed in the paper: "T. Barychka, G.M.Mace and D.W.Purves (2021) The Madingley General Ecosystem Model predicts bushmeat yields, species extinction rates and ecosystem-level impacts of bushmeat harvesting. Oikos."</p> <p>The Madingley General Ecosystem Model was used to generate predictions of bushmeat yields, extinction rates and broader ecosystem impacts for a range of harvesting intensities of duiker-sized endothermic herbivores. Duiker antelope (such as <i>Cephalophus callipygus</i> and <i>Cephalophus dorsalis</i>) are the most heavily hunted species in sub-Saharan Africa, contributing 34%-95% of all bushmeat in the Congo Basin. In the Madingley, the harvested group was described as "Heterotroph – Herbivore – Terrestrial – Mobile – Iteroparous– Endotherm", with adult bodymasses of 13-21 kg and juvenile bodymasses of &gt;100 g. Harvesting period was set at 30 years (<em>n </em>=30).</p> <p>In the first experiment, we used the Madingley model to predict bushmeat yields ("Harvested Biomasses") and extinction rates ("Density") from harvesting duiker-sized herbivores using proportional harvesting strategy, with harvest rates ranging from 0 to 0.90. These were compared to the estimates of bushmeat yields and survival probabilities for two duiker antelope species (<i>Cephalophus callipygus</i> and <i>Cephalophus dorsalis) </i>from conventional single-species Beverton-Holt model. </p> <p>In the second experiment, we used the Madingley model to generate data on the state ("State") of the harvested ecosystem. The datasets contain estimates of biomasses, abundances, adult and juvenile bodymasses, etc. of the harvested duiker-sized herbivores as well as unharvested herbivores, omnivores and carnivores present in the simulated ecosystem. In the paper we focused on abundances; however, other estimates e.g., adult bodymasses can be used to conduct further studies on the effects of harvesting in tropical ecosystems.</p> <p>Main results of the experiments are that: 1) the Madingley model gave estimates for optimal harvesting rate, and extinction rate, that were qualitatively and quantitatively similar to the estimates from conventional single-species Beverton-Holt model; 2) the Madingley model predicted a background local extinction probability for the target species of at least 10%; 3) at medium and high levels of harvesting of duiker-sized herbivores, the Madingley model predicted  statistically significant, but moderate, reductions in the densities of the targeted functional group; increases in small-bodied herbivores; decreases in large-bodied carnivores; and minimal ecosystem-level impacts overall.</p>

opencc-zeroOct 2021View details →
dryad36/100

Data from: Predicting bushmeat biomass from species composition captured by camera traps: implications for locally-based wildlife monitoring

<p>The 'StatAnalysis.zip' contains the data and model files. We used it for the four analyses below.</p> <p>First, we estimated population densities, the mean body mass and camera-trap capture rates of five main bushmeat targets in a rainforest of southeast Cameroon: Peters's duikers (<em>Cephalophus callipygus</em>), bay duikers (<em>C. dorsalis</em>), blue duikers (<em>Philantomba monticola</em>), brush-tailed porcupines (<em>Atherurus africanus</em>) and Emin's pouched rats (<em>Cricetomys emini</em>). Second, on the basis of the density and body mass estimates, we estimated bushmeat biomass—the total biomass of the five bushmeat species—and its spatial variation. Third, we calculated six bushmeat indicators based on the capture rate estimates. Lastly, we examined the correlation between bushmeat biomass and the indicators.</p> <p>The ZIP file consists of 16 R script files, three CSV files (in the 'data' subfolder) and 135 stan files (in the 'stan' subfolders). It also has two empty folders, 'figure' and 'res', where the figures and R objects of model results will be stored following the analyses. Please see the document 'README.txt' before performing the analysis. This text file gives the ZIP file structure and brief descriptions of the files.</p>

opencc-zeroOct 2021View details →
dryad36/100

Bushmeat yields, species extinction rates and ecosystem-level impacts of bushmeat harvesting as predicted by the Madingley General Ecosystem Model

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicOct 2021View details →
dryad36/100

Data from: Predicting bushmeat biomass from species composition captured by camera traps: implications for locally-based wildlife monitoring

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJul 2022View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Drivers of bushmeat hunting and perceptions of zoonoses in Nigerian hunting communities

Bushmeat hunting threatens biodiversity and increases the risk of zoonotic pathogen transmission. Nevertheless, limited information exists on patterns of contact with wildlife in communities that practice bushmeat hunting, especially with respect to social drivers of hunting behavior. We used interview responses from hunters and non-hunters in rural hunting communities in Nigeria to: 1) quantify contact rates with wildlife, 2) identify specific hunting behaviors that increase frequency of contact, 3) identify socioeconomic factors that predispose individuals to hunt, and 4) measure perceptions of risk. Participants engaged in a variety of behaviors that increased contact with wild animals, including: butchering to sell (37%), being injured (14%), using body parts for traditional medicine (19%), collecting carcasses found in forests and/or farms (18%), and keeping as pets (16%). Hunters came into contact with wildlife significantly more than non-hunters, even through non-hunting exposure pathways. Participants reported hunting rodents (95%), ungulates (93%), carnivores (93%), primates (87%), and bats (42%), among other prey. Reported hunting frequencies within taxonomic groups of prey were different for different hunting behaviors. Young age, lower education level, larger household size, having a father who hunts, and cultural group were all associated with becoming a hunter. Fifty-five percent of respondents were aware that they could contract diseases from wild animals, but only 26% of these individuals reported taking protective measures. Overall, hunters in this setting frequently contact a diversity of prey in risky ways, and the decision to become a hunter stems from family tradition, modified by economic necessity. Conservation and public health interventions in such settings may be most efficient when they capitalize on local knowledge and target root socio-economic and cultural drivers that lead to hunting behavior. Importantly, interventions that target consumption alone will not be sufficient; other drivers and modes of interaction with wildlife must also be considered.

opencc-zeroDec 2014View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Drivers of bushmeat hunting and perceptions of zoonoses in Nigerian hunting communities

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMay 2016View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Bushmeat genetics: setting up a reference framework for the DNA-typing of African forest bushmeat

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicSep 2014View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: Bushmeat hunting changes regeneration of African rainforests

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicApr 2013View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

ScienceDex for faculty

Your academic CV and NIH biosketch

Make your CV in your school's format and your NIH biosketch from it, then download both as Word files.