Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
34
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
34 results for “business processes”
Evaluation datasets and results for the paper "Enhancing Business Process Simulation Models with Extraneous Activity Delays"
<p>Event-logs and Business Process Simulation Models used in the experimentation of the paper "Enhancing Business Process Simulation Models with Extraneous Activity Delays", where the '<em>inputs</em>' folder contains all the files used as input, and the '<em>output</em>' folder the results of the evaluation.</p> <p> </p> <p><em><strong>Inputs</strong></em>: event-logs, BPS models, and simulation parameters used as input in the experimentation.</p> <ul> <li><em><strong>Real-life</strong></em>: real-life event logs, corresponding to two disjoint subsets of traces from an Academic Credentials' process, and the BPIC 2012 and BPIC 2017 event logs (filtered as explained in the paper), and the BPS model (plus simulation parameters) used as input for each dataset in the presented approach.</li> <li><em><strong>Synthetic</strong></em>: simulated event-logs and corresponding BPS models (plus simulation parameters) for four different processes with 0, 1, 3 and 5 timer events.</li> </ul> <p><em><strong>Outputs</strong></em>: results of the experimentation.</p> <ul> <li><em><strong>Real-life</strong></em>: results corresponding to the evaluation with real-life event logs. Each of the folders is composed by the original and the enhanced BPS models, 10 event logs simulated with each of them, two folders with the best iteration of the two hyperparameter optimization processes, and the values for the injected timers in each case. In addition, a CSV file with the EMD metrics (cycle time and absolute hour event distribution) for each dataset is provided.</li> <li><em><strong>Synthetic</strong></em>: results corresponding to the simulated event-logs. <ul> <li>Before-After: BPS models and discovered timer events for the four synthetic processes, with five timers placed before and after different activity instances.</li> <li>Complete: BPS models and quality measures (precision, recall, and SMAPE of the discovered timers) for the four synthetic processes with zero, one, three, and five timer events.</li> <li>Individual: event logs enhanced with the discovered extraneous delay for each activity instance, for the four synthetic processes with zero, one, three, and five timer events; and SMAPE of the estimations.</li> </ul> </li> </ul>
Evaluation datasets and results of the paper "Efficient Online Computation of Business Process State From Trace Prefixes via N-Gram Indexing"
<p>Event logs, process models, and results corresponding to the paper "Efficient Online Computation of Business Process State From Trace Prefixes via N-Gram Indexing".</p> <p><em><strong>Inputs</strong></em>: preprocessed event logs and discovered process models (and their characteristics) used in the evaluation.</p> <ul> <li><em><strong>Real-life</strong></em>: preprocessed event logs (<em>xes</em> and <em>csv</em>) corresponding to the real-life processes used in the evaluation. Process models (<em>pnml</em>) discovered with the Inductive Miner infrequent for thresholds of 10%, 20%, and 50%. Characteristics (<em>txt</em>) of the event logs and process models. Ongoing cases result from splitting each case in the preprocessed event logs (under folder <em>split</em>).</li> <li><em><strong>Synthetic</strong></em>: simulated event logs (<em>csv</em>) corresponding to the synthetic processes used in the evaluation. Designed process models (<em>bpmn</em> and <em>pnml</em>). Ongoing cases result from splitting each case in the preprocessed event logs (under folder <em>split</em>). Ongoing cases with injected noise as described in the publication (under folders <em>noise_1</em>, <em>noise_2</em>, and <em>noise_3</em>).</li> </ul>
Optimisation of business processes tenant distribution in the Cloud with a genetic algorithm
<p>Used data and obtained results for the paper Optimisation of business processes tenant distribution in the Cloud with a genetic algorithm.</p> <p>The reader can find the following files :</p> <ul> <li>configuration_types.csv contains the cloud resource types (the name is the EC2 instance for database, and for the BPM engine separated by an underscore), their price and their capacity</li> <li>tenants_uni.csv contains the customers and their minimum and maximum BPM task throughput</li> <li>results_[number of tenants]_seg.csv files contain the results for the previous heuristic (segmentation only)</li> <li>results_<em>[number of tenants]</em>_ga_<em>[duration]</em>.csv files contain the results for the genetic algorithm coupled to the iterative heuristic tests</li> <li>solver_<em>[number of tenants]</em>_ga_<em>[duration]</em>.csv files contain the results for the genetic algorithm coupled to the restricted model solved tests</li> </ul>
Replication Package for the paper "Conversing with business process-aware Large Language Models: the BPLLM framework"
<p>Replication Package for the research paper "<em>Conversing with business process-aware Large Language Models: the BPLLM framework</em>".</p> <p>The package includes the process models, the questions (and expected answers), the results of the qualitative evaluation, and the Hugging Face links to the fine-tuned versions of Llama 3.1 8B employed in the quantitative evaluation of the framework.</p> <p>In particular, the process models are:</p> <ul> <li>The natural language Directly-follows graph (DFG) of the Food Delivery process: <em>food_delivery_activities.txt</em> for the definition of the activities and <em>food_delivery_flow.txt</em> for the sequence flow.</li> <li>The BPMN model of the Food Delivery, E-commerce, and Reimbursement processes: <em>ecommerce.bpmn</em>, <em>food_delivery.bpmn</em>, and <em>reimbursement.bpmn</em>.</li> </ul> <p>The datasets with the questions and the expected answers are:</p> <ul> <li><em>1_questions_answers_not_refined_for_DFG.csv</em> ;</li> <li><em>1.1_questions_answers_refined_for_DFG.csv</em> ;</li> <li><em>2_questions_answers_not_refined.csv</em> ;</li> <li><em>3_questions_answers_refined.csv</em> ;</li> <li><em>4_questions_answers_different_processes.csv</em> ;</li> <li><em>5_questions_answers_similar_processes.csv</em> ;</li> <li><em>6_questions_answers_refined_ft.csv</em> .</li> </ul> <p>The complete results of the qualitative evaluation are contained in the file <em>qualitative_experiments_results.pdf</em>.</p> <p>The Hugging Face links to the fine-tuned versions of Llama 3.1 8B are reported in <em>hf_links_finetuned_models.pdf</em>.</p>
Simulation data for Doubly Robust Estimation of Business Process Intervention
<p>Event logs of simulated execution of two variants of the same process.</p> <p>A case matrix that contain the outcome, the intervention, and the confounders.</p>
Model Collection of the Business Process Management Academic Initiative
<p>This model collection contains 29,810 models. The collection originates from the BPM Academic Initiative (BPMAI). In 2012, the initial members of this initiative were the following institutions represented by the corresponding professors: Mathias Weske (HPI, University of Potsdam), Marlon Dumas (University of Tartu), Marcello La Rosa (University of Melbourne), Jan Mendling (WU Vienna), Hajo A. Reijers (Utrecht University), Michael Rosemann (Queensland University of Technology, Australia), Jan Recker (University of Cologne, Germany), Wil van der Aalst (RWTH Aachen, Germany), Michael zur Mühlen (Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ) and Frank Leymann (University of Stuttgart), respectively, complemented by Dr. Gero Decker (Signavio GmbH, Berlin). The vendor Signavio provides a <a href="http://www.signavio.com/en/academic.html">free workspace</a> to the members of the BPM Academic Initiative and the models being created are made available for reseach purposes on the Creative Commons licence.</p> <p>The BPM Academic Initiative collection comprises tens of thousands of models, of various process modeling languages, and size. Models of the collection are available in several revisions, which opens a new perspective in researching the way people model.<br> The BPMAI collection is shared in a JSON format. Tools have been developed at HPI, University of Potsdam for efficiently processing these files. See the <a href="https://github.com/tobiashoppe/promnicat">PromniCat project</a>. Note that this project is no longer further developed, so you have to work with the information available there. Various analysis techniques can be applied for these models using the <a href="https://code.google.com/archive/p/jbpt/">jBPT library</a> or <a href="https://code.google.com/archive/p/apromore/">Apromore</a>.</p>
Data-Driven Identification and Analysis of Waiting Times in Business Processes: A Systematic Literature Review
<p>Supplementary Material for Systematic Literature Review titled "Data-Driven Identification and Analysis of Waiting Times in<br> Business Processes: A Systematic Literature Review"</p>
Evaluation datasets and results of the paper "A Framework for Measuring the Quality of Business Process Simulation Models"
<p>Datasets and files used in the evaluation of the publication entitled "A Framework for Measuring the Quality of Business Process Simulation Models", where:</p> <ul> <li><strong><em>BPS-models/</em></strong>: folder containing the BPS models used in the evaluation (the BPS models discovered by ServiceMiner are not included due to privacy reasons). <ul> <li>The BPS models discovered by SIMOD are composed of <em>i)</em> a BPMN file with the process model structure, and <em>ii)</em> a JSON file with the parameters of the simulation. These files correspond to the format of Prosimos simulation engine (<a href="https://prosimos.cloud.ut.ee/">https://prosimos.cloud.ut.ee/</a>).</li> <li>The BPS models of the Loan Application and Procure to Pay processes are composed of a BPMN file with both the process model structure and parameters, corresponding to the format of the BIMP simulator used in APROMORE (<a href="https://apromore.com/">https://apromore.com/</a>).</li> </ul> </li> <li><em><strong>measures/</strong></em>: folder containing the distance values of each measure reported in the paper.</li> <li><em><strong>original-event-logs/</strong></em>: folder containing the (train and test) event logs used in the evaluation.</li> <li><em><strong>simulated-logs/</strong></em>: folder containing the simulated logs evaluated in the paper (synthetic, SIMOD, and ServiceMiner).</li> <li><em><strong>ComputeLogDistance.py</strong></em>: script to compute the distance measures proposed in the paper.</li> </ul> <p> </p> <p>To evaluate the distance measures of a set of simulated event logs in the folder <em>simulated_logs/</em> against the test log <em>test_event_log.csv.gz</em>, run:<br><em> python ComputeLogDistance.py -cfld test_event_log.csv.gz simulated_logs/</em></p> <p>*The flag <em>-cfld</em> is optional, due to the high computational complexity of the CFLD measure.</p> <p><strong>WARNING</strong>: set the column names of each log accordingly (where <em>log_1_ids</em> are the IDs of the test log, and <em>log_2_ids</em> the IDs of the simulated logs). Examples:</p> <pre><code># Column IDs for the (train/test) real-life logs, and the SIMOD simulated logs. EventLogIDs( case='case_id', activity='activity', start_time='start_time', end_time='end_time', resource='resource' ) # Column IDs for the Loan Application and Procure to Pay simulated logs. EventLogIDs( case='case_id', activity='activity', start_time='Start_Time', end_time='End_Time', resource='resource' ) # Column IDs for the ServiceMiner simulated logs. EventLogIDs( case='case_id', activity='Activity', start_time='start_time', end_time='end_time', resource='Resource' )</code></pre> <p> </p>
Figure 3. Traditional Approach and Process Management System Approach – Effort Percentage Comparison-Business Process Management – A Traditional Approach versus a Knowledge Based Approach
<p>Comparing the results obtained in using the two approaches (Figure 3), it is possible to note<br> a significant reduction in terms of both effort and working hours in correspondence of design and<br> development phases.</p>
Research data, sources and documents for thesis on Exploring Complexity Metrics for Artifact-Centric Business Process Models
<p>Research data, sources and documents for thesis on Exploring Complexity Metrics for Artifact-Centric Business Process Models This repository contains the supplemental material for the <a href="https://pqdtopen.proquest.com/pubnum/10759956.html">thesis "Exploring Complexity Metrics for Artifact-Centric Business Process Models" by Marin, Mike A., Ph.D., University of South Africa (South Africa), 2017.</a></p>
Supplementary material for "Business Process Simulation: A Systematic Literature Review"
<p>This material containing a list of the bibliographical data of the final sample and the sample of 300 publications before excluding publications outside of our focus supplements the following literature review:</p> <p>Rosenthal, Kristina; Ternes, Benjamin; Strecker, Stefan, (2018). “Business Process Simulation: A Systematic Literature Review”. In: Proceedings of the 26th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Portsmouth, UK, June 23–28, 2018.</p>
The adoption of Article Processing Charges as a business model by Brazilian Open Access journals
<p>These are the raw data behind the publication:</p> <p>Appel, A.L.; Albagli, S. The adoption of Article Processing Charges as a business model by Brazilian Open Access journals. <em>Transinformação</em>, 31:e180045, 2019. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0889201931e180045">https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0889201931e180045</a></p> <p>Different funding and business model alternatives for Open Access to scientific publication have been discussed and tried, either by Gold open access journals or by the ‘hybrid’ ones. A growing number of both types of scholarly journals have adopted a publication fee – more specifically an Article Processing Charge – as their open access business model, a procedure that has been the subject of controversies. The objective of this study is to characterize Brazilian open access journals that adopt article processing charges. The main contribution of this study is to audit and support decision making of editorial policies and business models for open access that are being proposed by and for Brazilian journals. We defined a sample of Brazilian open access journals using article processing charges extracted from the Directory of Open Access Journals database in April 2018 along with their classification in the Scimago Journal Ranking, Journal Citation Reports and Qualis Capes system, considered as an indicator of prestige of academic journals. The study reveals that a small number of Brazilian open access journals are currently applying article processing charges, with practices varying mainly according to fields of study, types of organization and classification according to the Qualis system.</p>
WONDERBREAD: A Benchmark + Dataset for Business Process Management (BPM) Tasks
<p><strong>Paper:</strong> <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.13264">WONDERBREAD: A Benchmark for Evaluating Multimodal Foundation Models on Business Process Management Tasks</a></p> <h2><strong>Background</strong></h2> <p>The <em>WONDERBREAD</em> dataset contains <strong>2,928 human demonstrations</strong> of <strong>598 web navigation workflows</strong> across <strong>6 types of BPM tasks</strong>. These tasks measure the ability of a model to generate accurate documentation, assist in knowledge transfer, and improve the efficiency of workflows.</p> <p>Please see our website for more details: <a href="https://wonderbread.stanford.edu/">https://wonderbread.stanford.edu/</a></p> <h2><strong>Quick Start</strong></h2> <p>To start, download <strong>debug_demos.zip</strong> (1 GB). It contains a subset of <strong>24 demonstrations</strong> which can give you a sense of how the dataset is structured.</p> <p>To reproduce the paper, download <strong>gold_demos.zip</strong> (33 GB). It contains <strong>724 demonstrations</strong> corresponding to the 162 "Gold" tasks which were used for all the evaluations in the original paper.</p> <p>To obtain the full dataset, download <strong>demos.zip</strong> (133 GB). This contains all <strong>2,928 demonstrations</strong> and can be used for training, fine-tuning, and evaluating models.</p> <h2><strong>Dataset Structure</strong></h2> <p>The dataset contains several files, defined below.</p> <ol> <li><strong>Raw Data</strong><em> (useful for training/fine-tuning/evaluation)</em> <ol> <li><strong>debug_demos.zip </strong>(1 GB)<strong> -- </strong>a subset of only 24 demonstrations taken from the full dataset. Useful to get a sense of the dataset and for debugging.</li> <li><strong>gold_demos.zip</strong> (22 GB) -- a subset of only 724 demonstrations corresopnding to the 162 "Gold" tasks. This is the dataset that was used for all evaluations in the original <em>WONDERBREAD</em> paper.</li> <li><strong>demos.zip</strong> (133 GB) -- all 2,928 demonstrations across 598 tasks. Useful for training your own models.</li> </ol> </li> <li><strong>Modality-Specific Subsets of Raw Data </strong><em>(useful for specific types of training/fine-tuning/evaluation)</em><br> <ol> <li><strong>All Demos</strong> <ol> <li><strong>demos_sop_only.zip</strong> (4 MB)-- only the SOP <code>.txt</code> files for all 2,928 demonstrations</li> <li><strong>demos_sop_and_trace_only.zip</strong> (770 MB)-- only the SOP <code>.txt</code> files and action trace <code>.json</code> files for all 2,928 demonstrations</li> <li><strong>demos_sop_and_trace_and_screenshots_only.zip</strong> (22 GB)-- only the SOP <code>.txt</code> files and action trace <code>.json</code> files and screenshot images for all 2,928 demonstrations</li> </ol> </li> <li><strong>"Gold" Demos</strong> <ol> <li><strong>gold_demos_sop_only.zip</strong> (1 MB)-- only the SOP <code>.txt</code> files for the 724 demonstrations in the "Gold" tasks.</li> <li><strong>gold_demos_sop_and_trace_only.zip</strong> (190 MB) -- only the SOP <code>.txt</code> files and action trace <code>.json</code> files for the 724 demonstrations in the "Gold" tasks.</li> <li><strong>gold_demos_sop_and_trace_and_screenshots_only.zip </strong>(6 GB) -- only the SOP <code>.txt</code> files and action trace <code>.json</code> files and screenshot images for the 724 demonstrations in the "Gold" tasks</li> </ol> </li> </ol> </li> <li><strong>Evaluation</strong><em> (useful for evaluation)</em> <ol> <li><strong>qa_dataset.csv -- </strong>contains all 120 questions and ground truth answers used in the "Knowlege Transfer" evaluation.<strong><br></strong></li> <li><strong>df_rankings.csv -- </strong>contains the rankings of all "Gold" tasks used in the "SOP Ranking" evaluation.<strong><br></strong></li> </ol> </li> <li><strong>Metadata</strong><em> (can be safely ignored)</em> <ol> <li><strong>Process Mining Task Demonstrations.xlsx --</strong> maps human annotators to specific demonstrations; also contains "Gold" task rankings used in the "SOP Ranking" evaluation.</li> <li><strong>metadata.json -- </strong>maps Google Drive URLs to Google Drive Folder IDs to demonstration names</li> <li><strong>df_valid.csv -- </strong>tracks assets associated with each demonstration</li> </ol> </li> </ol>
Business Process Intelligence Challenge 2019 - Processed
<p>This dataset is the pre-processed version of the BPIC19 dataset. It contains potential confounding features, the treatment indicator, and the cycle time.</p>
Dataset of the survey on the digital transformation of business processes at universities in Germany
<p>In spring 2022, a broad survey was conducted among all 423 German universities on the status and the future of the digitalisation of administrative business processes.</p> <p>During the research survey, participants gave or rejected their consent for the publication of their contribution as open data. Respecting the roughly 30% of participants who declined, we published all remaining data here on Zenodo. The raw version of the dataset contains filtered, but pseudonymised data. The second version of the dataset is modified by the quality control process as described in section 3.3. of the corresponding Data Paper.</p> <p>The published data also includes the catalogue of questions indicating the respective category of time and competency pattern in which the question was used. This catalogue also contains the match with the PDF printout of the web-based questionnaire and the corresponding variables (V1-V1073) of the data records.</p> <p>Finally, the general introduction as well as the proposed letter to the target groups are included in the data files for reference.</p>
Business process models for a ride fulfilment process in a ride-hailing company enabled by an autonomous driving system
<p>The repository contains the business process models of a ride fulfilment process in a ride-hailing company enabled by an autonomous driving system. The models are depicted using BPMN.2.0 language and are extended with annotations for usage in the <a href="https://dpotool.cs.ut.ee/">DPO tool</a>. The models, which contain "Pleak" as a part of the title, are created using PE-BPMN language and some of them are annotated for usage in the <a href="https://pleak.io/">Pleak</a> tool set. </p> <p>The repository also contains two .csv files which contain the results of the simple disclosure analysis ("<em>6_RideFulfillment_PK_SecSharing_combined-Simple-Disclosure-results.csv</em>") and the results of the leak-when analysis ("<em>7_Pleak_RideFulfillment_PK_SecrSharing_BPMN_Leak_When-results.csv</em>") in the ride fulfilment process. Both analyses have been conducted using the <a href="https://pleak.io/">Pleak</a> tool set and the business process models with respective names from this repository.</p>
Screen Capture & Audior Recordings - Empirical Study "Business Process Model Validation Through Virtual Enactment"
<p>Screen captures of task completion and audio recordings of interviews of the empirical study which has been conducted within the context of the master thesis "Business Process Model Validation Through Virtual Enactment"</p>
A literature-based business process meta-model: construction and ontological clarifications
<h1><strong>A literature-based business process meta-model: construction and ontological clarifications</strong></h1> <div> <div> <div> <h3>Greta Adamo, Chiara Di Francescomarino, Chiara Ghidini</h3> </div> </div> </div> <p>This folder contains all the relevant additional documents that have been produced and analysed for this work, e.g. sources, evaluation criteria, and tables, and that have not been included in the paper for a reason of space.</p> <p> </p>
Supplementary material for "Language and User Requirements for Business Process Simulation - A Systematic Literature Review"
<p>This is ment as a supplementary material for the Publication "Language and User Requirements for Business Process Simulation - A Systematic Literature Review". It contains all sources that were used for the creation of the requirements broken down for each one.</p>
Example of Surabaya COPACR Business Process Architecture and Conceptual Data Model
<p>In this repository consist of three diagrams. Two diagrams are part of Surabaya COPACR Business Process Architecture (BPA), they are:</p> <p>1. Fig 1. Shows six value chains that become BPA Level 0 of the Surabaya COPACR. <br> 2. Fig 2. Shows Electronic ID card printing services as PBA Level 5</p> <p>And one diagram, Fig. 3 show Conceptual Data Model for Surabaya COPACR Core Process</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.