Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,543
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
1,543 results for “co2”
Eddy covariance 30-minute CO2 fluxes with accompanying biophysical variables from the GCE-LTER flux tower site from January 2014 to December 2017 for sensor Flux1
Eddy covariance (EC) CO2 fluxes from flux sensor set "Flux1" from January 2014 to December 2017 collected over a Spartina alterniflora marsh located on the western side of Sapelo Island bounded by the Duplin River and Barn Creek. EC fluxes were processed in EddyPro 7. Additional biophysical variables included are air temperature, relative humidity, vapor pressure deficit, and water table height from a nearby tidal creek and the marsh platform.
Eddy covariance 30-minute CO2 fluxes with accompanying biophysical variables from the GCE-LTER flux tower site from January 2014 to December 2022 for sensor Flux2
Eddy covariance (EC) CO2 fluxes from sensor set "Flux2" from January 2014 to December 2022 collected over a Spartina alterniflora marsh located on the western side of Sapelo Island bounded by the Duplin River and Barn Creek. EC fluxes were processed in EddyPro 7. Additional biophysical variables included are air temperature, relative humidity, vapor pressure deficit, and water table height from a nearby tidal creek and the marsh platform.
CO2 Profile at Harvard Forest HEM and LPH Towers since 2009
Carbon dioxide profile measurements are designed to supplement eddy flux measurements in calculating the carbon exchange of a forest. In the case of the Harvard Forest flux towers, the change in CO2 storage between the ground and the height of the eddy flux system during each half hour must be added to the eddy flux measured above the forest to determine the total carbon exchange. The profile measurements are also necessary in order to calculate CO2 movement by advection, or horizontal air transport. The amount of CO2 removed from a particular site by advection is the product of the total CO2 within the air a given range of height above the ground, and the average velocity of airflow parallel to the ground surface within that height range.
Isotopic Composition of Net Ecosystem CO2 Exchange at Harvard Forest EMS Tower since 2011
This archive features long-term measurements of the eddy and storage fluxes of 16O12C16O, 16O13C16O, and 18O12C16O at the Harvard Forest EMS flux tower. Provided are the individual isotopologue fluxes, the total CO2 flux, the δ13C and δ18O isofluxes, and various ancillary flux and environmental data. The data are described in Wehr et al (2013), Long-term eddy covariance measurements of the isotopic composition of the ecosystem–atmosphere exchange of CO2 in a temperate forest, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 181, 69–84. They are also analyzed in Wehr and Saleska (2015), An improved isotopic method for partitioning net ecosystem–atmosphere CO2 exchange, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 214-215, 515–531, as well as in Wehr et al 2016, Seasonality of Temperate Forest Photosynthesis and Daytime Respiration, Nature (in press). The eddy (iso)fluxes were measured by eddy covariance (EC), with a 30- or 35-minute integration period on a 40- or 45-minute duty cycle (the precise duty cycle was changed during the record to accommodate various synergistic measurement campaigns). The storage fluxes were measured as the increase in storage below 29 m during the EC integration period, based on vertical integrations over 7 air sampling heights on the tower (0.2, 1.0, 7.5, 12.7, 18.1, 24.1, 29.0 m, prior to July 3, 2012), or over 6 air sampling heights on the tower (0.2, 1.0, 7.5, 12.7, 18.1, 29.0 m, after July 3, 2012). Some periods are missing at regular intervals because the system was being used for other measurements, not reported here. Corrected and uncorrected versions of the eddy (iso)fluxes are provided; the corrections account for high-frequency signal attenuation, and were made by comparing w-CO2 and w-T cospectra. The precise method is novel and complex and is described, along with all further details of the measurements, in Wehr et al (2013), Long-term eddy covariance measurements of the isotopic composition of the ecosystem–atmosphere exchange of CO2 in a temperat
Physiological Model of CO2 Exchange by Hemlock Forests at Harvard Forest 1996-2000
A physiological model of carbon (C) exchange for a mature hemlock forest was developed, with separate component models for net photosynthesis (Pn), leaf respiration (Rl) , woody tissue respiration (Rw) and soil respiration (Rs). The model estimated that about 1.2 Mg C/ha was stored above and below ground between November 1, 1997 and October 31, 1998. This was generally a wet year with a wet and cloudy summer, except during August, which probably influenced the model output significantly. The whole-forest C exchange model estimated that most C storage in the forest occurred in spring. Warm temperatures with high soil moisture caused whole-forest respiration to exceed Pn during the summer, leading to a net C loss from the ecosystem. Leaf-level light-saturated Pn reached a maximum at about 20 deg C, then remained stable up to about 30 deg C, but at lower light levels Pn decreased above 20 deg C. This contributed to the lack of carbon storage during the summer, when the warmest days reached 30 to 32 deg C. Soil respiration was estimated at 60 to 75% of total ecosystem respiration, and during summer Rs increased exponentially with soil temperature with a Q10 of 3.8, so that from July through September, monthly Rs alone was 73 to 88% of total canopy Pn (Estimated monthly Rs ranged from 1.14 to 1.68 Mg/ha and estimated monthly Pn was 1.29 to 2.06 Mg/ha in July through September). A second major control on carbon storage by the hemlock forest was daily minimum temperature in spring and fall. There was no measurable Pn after daily minimum temperatures of -5 deg C or lower, although no effect of minimum temperature on Pn was observed for temperatures above 0 deg C.
Greenhouse gas partial pressure (CO2, CH4, N2O) and environmental variables (physical, chemical, and biological) measured in urban ponds of Barcelona during summer and winter (2023-2024)
This dataset provides information on the partial pressure of greenhouse gases (CO₂, CH₄, and N₂O) measured in 41 artificial urban ponds—28 naturalized and 13 non-naturalized—using the headspace technique. Additionally, GPS coordinates, as well as physical, chemical, and biological variables for each pond, are included. Data were collected during the summer and winter seasons, during daytime. Furthermore, a subset of 16 ponds (8 naturalized and 8 non-naturalized) was also sampled at night in both seasons. All samples were taken from the water surface.
Continuous stream CO2 and temperature data and sensor calibration grab samples from five NEON sites (CARI, COMO, KING, MART, WALK), August 2021-April 2024.
This package contains: 1) sensor-based measurements of dissolved CO2 concentration and temperature, and 2) dissolved CO2 concentration from grab samples that were used to calibrate the sensor data, collected at five stream sites in the NEON network (CARI- Caribou Creek, AK; COMO- Como Creek, CO; KING- Kings Creek, KS; MART- Martha Creek, WA; and WALK- Walker Branch, TN) between August 2021 - April 2024. The grab sample dataset contains a combination of samples collected by NEON (DP1.20097.001) and additional samples collected by project personnel. All samples were collected using the headspace equilibration method, and dissolved CO2 concentrations were calculated using the 'neonDissGas' R package (https://github.com/NEONScience/NEON-dissolved-gas). The sensor dataset contains CO2 concentrations measured with an eosGP CO2 gas probe, averaged to 15-minute intervals and corrected to align with grab sample concentrations using a site-specific grab versus sensor regression. Due to inaccuracies in the eosGP temperature data, we instead include the temperature data from NEON that was used to convert CO2 between units of ppmv and umol/L (DP1.20053.001 for CARI, KING, MART, and WALK, and data from the multiparameter sonde for COMO). All NEON data used in this data package references the RELEASE-2025 version of each data product (downloaded February 2025).
CO2 and CH4 fluxes from living and standing dead trees in Howland Research Forest, Maine USA, 2024
Methane (CH4) is the second-largest contributor to human-induced climate change, with significant uncertainties in its terrestrial sources and sinks. Tree stems, both living and dead, play crucial roles in forest ecosystem CH4 and carbon dioxide (CO2) flux dynamics, yet much remains unknown regarding the environmental drivers of fluxes. We measured CH4 and CO2 fluxes from 51 living trees (Picea rubens, Tsuga canadensis, Acer rubrum) along an upland-to-wetland gradient at Howland Research Forest, a net annual sink of CH4, in Maine USA. We also measured CH4 and CO2 fluxes from six standing dead red spruce stems (snags). We measured fluxes every two weeks throughout the growing season (April to November 2024) and at three heights (for a subset of red spruce stems) to capture a range of environmental conditions.
North Temperate Lakes LTER: High Frequency CO2 and YSI AutoProfiler Data - Sparkling Bog North Buoy 2008
The instrumented buoy on Sparkling Bog North is equipped with a CO2 monitor and a YSI AutoProfiler that measures several parameters including dissolved oxygen, water temperature, conductivity, pH, ORP, turbulence and chlorophyll-a. The buoy is also equipped with a thermistor chain and a D-OPTO dissolved oxygen sensor at depth .5 m as well as meteorological sensors that provide fundamental information on lake thermal structure, weather conditions, and lake metabolism. Data are usually collected either at 1 minute or 10 minute intervals. Sampling Frequency: varies for instantaneous sample. Generally 1 minute or 10 minutes. Number of sites: 1
Yearly CO2 emissions from anthropogenic land use change by main driver (2014-2023)
<h3>Background</h3> <p>Human-induced land use change (LUC), driven by activities such as forestry, logging, and the production of agricultural commodities (e.g. fruits, nuts, and meat) significantly impacts the Global Commons, encompassing the climate system, ice sheets, land biosphere, oceans, and the ozone layer. The convertion of natural forests into areas dedicated to these activities lead to disrupted ecosystems (Foley et al. 2005), severely degraded biodiversity (Newbold et al. 2015), and the release of substantial amounts of greenhouse gases (GHGs) into the atmosphere (Hong et al. 2021), further exacerbating climate change and ocean acidification (Doney et al. 2009). The expansion of the agricultural frontier is identified as the predominant direct cause of deforestation globally, with other industries like timber and mining also playing significant roles (Curtis et al. 2018). To achieve global climate targets, forestry, and other land use GHG emissions must decrease along a nonlinear trajectory and reach carbon neutrality by 2050 (Rockström et al. 2017). However, to successfully address this road map, improving our understanding of deforestation drivers is urgently needed.</p> <h3>Summary</h3> <p>This dataset is the result of data processing performed to estimate the extent to which commodities and other agricultural products have replaced forests, while mapping the CO2 emission impact making use of the best available spatially explicit data. Results are reported globally for 52 products at national level, as well as agroecological and thermal zones (FAO & IIASA) and a 50km cell vector grid.</p> <p>In order to detect spatially-explicit deforestation drivers, the current extent of commodities and agricultural products was overlapped with global annual tree cover loss in the 10-year period from 2014 to 2023. Carbon stocks in the deforested areas were then assumed to have been emmited into the atmosphere. Recent, detailed crop and pasture maps for relevant commodities were used whenever available, and coarser resolution datasets were used as supplements when needed. Operations were performed in Google Earth Engine.</p> <h3>Datasets used</h3> <p><em>Forest and biomass carbon distribution</em></p> <p>The <a href="https://earthenginepartners.appspot.com/science-2013-global-forest">Global Forest Change</a> dataset (Hansen et al., 2013) is used to estimate deforestation between 2014 and 2023. This tree cover loss dataset measures the first instance of complete removal of tree cover canopy at a 30-meter resolution for all woody vegetation over 5 meters in height.</p> <p>The <a href="https://data-gis.unep-wcmc.org/portal/home/item.html?id=374a99fc76574f72bb8c71af7b428d0a">WCMC Above and Below Ground Biomass Carbon Density </a>(Soto-Navarro et al., 2020), for reference year 2010 at 300m pixel, is overlapped with resulting deforested areas pixels to dermine the biomass carbon present in the areas before deforestation.</p> <p><em>Generalized deforestation drivers</em></p> <p><a href="https://data.globalforestwatch.org/documents/ff304784a9f04ac4a45a40f60bae5b26/about">Tree cover loss by dominant driver</a> (Curtis et al., 2022) in 2023 is used to determine wide categories of deforestation drivers (commodities, shifting agriculture, forestry, wildfire and urbanization). Pixels indicating deforestation in the Global Forest Change dataset (Hansen et al., 2013) that overlap the commodities and shifting agriculture pixels from this dataset (Curtis et al., 2022) have their drivers further detailed with the data sources listed in the below.</p> <p><a href="http://www.earthstat.org/">EarthStat</a> pasture areas layer (Ramankutty et al., 2008) is used to identify areas for which specific livestock categories are to be defined. The project provides pasture areas for reference year 2000 at ~10km resolution.</p> <p><em>Detailed deforestation drivers</em></p> <p>The <a href="https://earthobservations.org/geoglam.php">Group on Earth Observations Global Agricultural Monitoring</a> (GEOGLAM) commodity distibution layer (Becker-Reshef et al., 2023) is used to identify specific commodities (winter wheat, spring wheat, maize, rice and soybean) to deforestation pixels pertaining to the "commodities" class. The ressource provides commodity distribution mapping at 5km pixel resolution. Values are provided as percentage of pixel area occupied by given crop.</p> <p>The <a href="https://mapspam.info/">Spatial Production Allocation Model (SPAM)</a> physical area layer (You et al., 2014) for reference year 2020 is used to detail drivers pertaining to the "shifting agriculture" class. The dataset covers 46 crops and crop groups at ~9km pixel resolution. Values are provided as percentage of pixel area occupied by given crop or crop group.</p> <p>The <a href="https://www.fao.org/livestock-systems/global-distributions/en/">Gridded Livestock of the World (GLW3)</a> (Gilbert et al., 2022) is used to determine which species (cattle, goat, sheep or horse) of livestock is raised in areas identified as pasture in the EarthStat layer and pertaining to the "commodities" class. The project provides livestock distribution for reference year 2015 at ~9km resolution. Values are provided as number of individuals located within the pixel. Values were converted into percentage of pixel area covered by grazing field for given species based on species density thresholds.</p> <h3>Data processing</h3> <p>Most of data processing takes place in Google Earth Engine, with scripts redacted in javascript. In summary, two strategies were implemented:</p> <p><strong>Proportional driver distribution strategy</strong>: When deforestation pixels (Hansen et al., 2013) overlapped with pixels from at least one of the detailed deforestation drivers data sources, the driver describe in the latter were associated with that deforested area. Whenever more than one of these data sources had non-null pixels overlapping the area, a proportional distribution was assumed (i.e. if SPAM indicated 100% of the area to be covered by cowpea crops, GEOGLAM 100% by maize, and GLW3 100% by cattle grazing fields, the pixel is assumed to have 33.3% of its deforested area associated with each of these drivers).</p> <p><strong>Main driver strategy</strong>: When deforestation pixels did not overlap with any non-null pixels from any of the detailed drivers sources, the pixel is assumed to have the entirety of its deforested area associated with one single main driver resulting from a crop-livestock mosaic. The mosaic is created by taking the highest value from each of the crop or livestock distribution rasters, and then assigning the raster category to be the new pixel value, ultimately creating a category raster layer containing the main crop, crop group or livestock species occupying that pixel area. Null or zero values in this mosaic are filled-in by nearest neighbour analysis, to a limit of 20 pixels expansion. This was enough to ensure that all deforestation pixels had at least one detailed driver with which it could be associated. The logic behind this operation resides in the fact that the deforestation layer (Hansen et al., 2013) has a larger temporal coverage (with the more recent data point being the reference year 2023), while the detailed driver layers can be as old as reference year 2015. This means we're assuming the main deforestation drivers continued to expand their limits to neighbouring areas during the years for which no data is available.</p> <p>Resulting rasters from both strategies are put together and a zonal statistics operation is performed in order to populate the vector grid cells.</p> <h3><strong>Files</strong></h3> <p>This repository contains the following files:</p> <ul> <li><em>deforested_area_by_LUC_driver_2014_2023</em>.CSV contains the deforested area (hectares) and the corresponding driver in each grid cell (idenfied by the id field) in each year, in CSV text format.</li> <li><em>carbon_emissions_by_LUC_driver_2014_2023</em>.CSV contains the carbon emitted (Mg CO2 eq.) and the corresponding driver in each grid cell (idenfied by the id field) in each year, in CSV text format.</li> <li><em>spatial_grid</em>.gpkg contains the raw 50km cell grid, with identification of country (iso3 and name fields), region, and FAO agroecological zone (zone field) and thermal zone (thermal field), in Geopackage format. In order to visualize the data in a map, the user will need to join one of the csv files to this geopackage file by basing the join on the 'id' field.</li> <li><em>summary_showcase</em>.png is an image showcasing maps created using the database, as well as a diagram showing the datasets used to create the final dataset.</li> </ul> <h3><strong>How to cite</strong></h3> <p>Iablonovski, G.; Berthet, E. C.; Roberts, S. (2024). Yearly CO2 emissions from anthropogenic land use change by main driver (2014-2023) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.13308514</p> <h3>Authors and contact</h3> <p>Authors: Guilherme Iablonovski*, Etienne Charles Berthet, Sophie Roberts</p> <p>*Corresponding author: Guilherme Iablonovski (guilherme.iablonovski@unsdsn.org)</p>
CoCO2-MOSAIC 1.0: a global mosaic of regional, gridded, fossil and biofuel CO2 emission inventories
<p>CoCO2-MOSAIC 1.0 is a global mosaic of regional bottom-up inventories of anthropogenic CO2 emissions developed in the framework of the CoCO2 project (<a href="https://coco2-project.eu/">https://coco2-project.eu/</a>). CoCO2-MOSAIC 1.0 provides gridded (0.1˚×0.1˚) monthly emissions fluxes of CO2 fossil fuel (CO2ff, long cycle) and CO2 biofuel (CO2bf, short cycle) for the years 2015 to 2018 disaggregated in seven sectors: energy_s (super-emitting sources above 7.9e-6 kg/m2/s), energy_a (average emitters), manufacturing, settlements, transport, aviation land/take-off (LTO) and other. The regional inventories included are CAMS-GHG-REG 5.1 (Europe), DACCIWA 2.0 (Africa), GEAA-AEI 3.0 (Argentina), INEMA 1.0 (Chile), REAS 3.2.1 (South-East Asia) and VULCAN 3.0 (USA). EDGAR 6.0 and CAMS-GLOB-SHIP 3.1 are used for gap-filling missing sectors and regions. CAMS-GLOB-TEMPO 3.1 is used for temporal disaggregation of inventories providing annual emissions. Aviation emissions from climb, descent, and cruise are not covered by regional inventories and are provided as a separate file. Note that 2015 is the only year when all regional inventories are simultaneously available. </p> <p>Compared to global inventories, CoCO2-MOSAIC 1.0 includes all the regional information available without the limitation of providing spatially consistent emissions. Therefore, CoCO2-MOSAIC 1.0 can be used as a global baseline inventory due to the higher level of detail, higher spatial resolution, and country-specific information included by regional inventories. </p> <p>For further details see Urraca et al. 2023 (ESSD submitted). The paper (i) describes the CoCO2-MOSAIC methodology and (ii) uses the mosaic to inter-compare the most widely used global inventories: CAMS-GLOB-ANT 5.3, EDGAR 6.0/7.0, ODIAC v2020b, and CEDS v2020_04_24.</p>
Sparse observations induce large biases in estimates of the global ocean CO2 sink: an ocean model subsampling experiment
<p>Dataset underlying the analysis in Hauck et al., 2023: Sparse observations induce large biases in estimates of the global ocean CO<sub>2</sub> sink - an ocean model subsampling experiment, Philosophical Transactions A</p> <p>Surface ocean partial pressure of CO<sub>2 </sub>(pCO<sub>2</sub>) and air-sea CO<sub>2</sub> flux reconstructions, using two mapping methods (MPI-SOM-FFN, CarboScope) three different sampling masks: SOCAT, SOCAT+SOCCOM, IDEAL (based on bgcArgo, Roemmich et al., 2019).</p> <p>Also, all FESOM-REcoM output fields that were used in the reconstructions are provided.</p> <p>We further provide the three masks that were used for subsampling: SOCAT, SOCAT+SOCCOM, IDEAL (bgcArgo).</p> <p> </p>
New Hampshire Soil Sensor Network: Soil CO2 Fluxes
The goal of the New Hampshire Soil Sensor Network is to examine spatial and temporal changes in soil properties and processes as the climate changes. Data collected can also calibrate and validate models that examine how ecosystems may respond to changing climate and land use. To determine how soil processes are affected by climate change and land management, this soil sensor network measures snow depth, air temperature, soil temperature, soil volumetric water content, and soil electrical conductivity, as well as soil CO2 fluxes. This data package includes air temperature, soil temperature at 5 cm, and soil volumetric water content at 5 cm, and soil CO2 flux at the time of sampling, as well as gap-filled soil CO2 fluxes using non-linear least squares regression. Data were collected at the following sites: BRT = Bartlett Experimental Forest, Bartlett, NH; BDF = Burley-Demmerit Farm, Lee, NH; DCF = Dowst Cate Forest, Deerfield, NH; HUB = Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, Woodstock, NH; SBM = Saddleback Mountain, Deerfield, NH; THF = Thompson Farm, Durham, NH; and Trout Pond Brook, Strafford, NH.
Species-level estimated abundances and zero counts of nighttime collected female mosquitoes 2014 - 2022 (Derived from NEON Mosquitoes sampled from CO2 traps (DP1.10043.001, RELEASE-2024))
This Level 2 data package contains species level estimated abundances, including zero counts, and estimated mean number of female mosquitoes per trap derived from the NEON Mosquitoes sampled from CO2 traps (DP1.10043.001), RELEASE-2024 Level 0 data (https://doi.org/10.48443/3cyq-6v47). The data set includes mosquito records of traps collecting mosquito samples at night, for up to 24 trap hours, across a total of 20 terrestrial core and 27 terrestrial gradient sites from 2014 to 2022. To ensure high confidence in abundance estimates, records were only included when at least 90% of collected individuals were identified to sex, and 90% of female specimens were identified to species. Information across multiple QC/QA fields within the NEON mosquito data was evaluated to identify and exclude records where confidence in estimated abundances may have been compromised. Species level zero counts were added for all species collected at least once within the sampling year and trap location. Additionally, species level zero counts were included for trap events where only male mosquitoes had been collected or where QC/QA remarks indicated traps were inactive due to cold temperatures. The data set provides an analysis ready time series of estimated abundances across NEON sites and plots. An R Markdown file that contains descriptions of the QC/QA and data filtering steps along with annotated code, as well as data tables used to filter active and inactive trap events based on QC/QA fields, are published with the data package. Any questions about this data package should be directed to Amely Bauer listed under contacts.
CO2 Flux and Temperature Data for Estimating Thermal Acclimation in Ecosystem Respiration
We have compiled an extensive dataset of long-term, hourly CO2 flux measurements from 93 global eddy covariance sites to estimate the thermal response strength in nighttime ecosystem respiration. Flux data was sourced from AmeriFlux (https://ameriflux.lbl.gov/), FluxNet (https://fluxnet.org/), and ICOS (https://www.icos-cp.eu/). The processed data product encompasses five categories. (1) Long-term, directly measured, Ustar-filtered, hourly or subhourly nighttime ecosystem respiration, along with corresponding air temperature, soil temperature, and soil water content at the 93 sites. (2) Long-term gap-filled data, including hourly or subhourly net ecosystem exchange, air temperature, and soil temperature at these sites. (3) Annual topsoil (< 0.1 m) temperature and nighttime ecosystem respiration curves during the growing season, designed for calculating thermal response strength. (4) Estimated thermal response strength across these sites, detailed with geographic, climatic, soil, and vegetation conditions for each site. (5) An R script to calculate thermal response strength using the data product (3).
Dissolved CO2, CH4, and ions in groundwater from five sites in the NEON network (CARI, COMO, KING, MART, WALK), U.S., 2021-2024.
This package contains groundwater chemistry measurements collected from groundwater wells between June 2021 – May 2024 at five sites in the U.S. National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON): CARI- Caribou Creek, AK; COMO- Como Creek, CO; KING- Kings Creek, KS; MART- Martha Creek, WA; and WALK- Walker Branch, TN. The dataset includes concentrations of dissolved gases (CO2 and CH4), ions (F, Cl, NO2, Br, NO3, PO4, SO4, Na, NH4, K, Mg, Ca), silica (Si), and nutrients measured by colorimetric methods (NO3, NH4, PO4). When available, we also report measurements of water temperature, specific conductivity (SpC), pH, dissolved O2, and barometric pressure. Sample collection and analysis was conducted across three labs with additional assistance from the NEON Research Support Services program. Whenever possible, we matched our field sampling methods to NEON’s protocols for groundwater sampling to ensure samples would be comparable to preexisting data from these sites. Any deviations from these protocols are described in the methods.
Eight Mile Lake Research Watershed, Carbon in Permafrost Experimental Heating Research (CiPEHR): Half-hourly growing season, chamber-based, CO2 flux data, 2009-2021
The Carbon in Permafrost Experimental Heating Research (CiPEHR) project addresses the following questions: 1) Does ecosystem warming cause a net release of C from the ecosystem to the atmosphere?, 2) Does the decomposition of old C, that comprises the bulk of the soil C pool, influence ecosystem C loss?, and 3) How do winter and summer warming alone, and in combination, affect ecosystem C exchange? We are answering these questions using a combination of field and laboratory experiments to measure ecosystem carbon balance and radiocarbon isotope ratios at a warming experiment located in an upland tundra field site near Healy, Alaska in the foothills of the Alaska Range. This data contains CO2 fluxes measured using an automated chamber system that measures net ecosystem CO2 exchange (NEE). Measurements are made every ~1.5 hours and modeled half-hourly. Half hour ecosystem respiration is modeled using an exponential Q10 relationship when light conditions are low (PAR<5umol/m2/s) and using a hyperbolic light relationship when PAR>5umol/m2/s. GPP is calculated as the difference between NEE and Reco.
Eight Mile Lake Research Watershed, Carbon in Permafrost Experimental Heating and Drying Research (DryPEHR): Growing season, chamber-based, CO2 flux data, 2009-2021
This drying and warming experiment addresses the following questions: 1) Does ecosystem drying, warming and permafrost thaw cause a net release or uptake of C from the ecosystem to the atmosphere?, 2) Does the decomposition of old C that comprises the bulk of the soil C pool influence ecosystem C loss? 3) How do drying and warming affect plant communities and ecosystem properties? We are answering these questions using a combined warming and drying experiment (DryPEHR), which is situated with the Carbon in Permafrost Experimental Heating Research (CiPEHR) project and located in an upland tundra field site near Healy, Alaska in the foothills of the Alaska Range. Warming treatment here refers to growing season air temperature warming (~1C) using open top chambers (OTC) combined with soil 'warming' using snow fences during the snow covered months. Drying is achieved using an automated pumping system that lowers the water table in the dry plots. Soil warming began in 2008; OTCs and drying in 2011. This data set includes measured values of CO2 fluxes during the growing season.
Eddy covariance 30-minute CO2 fluxes with accompanying biophysical variables from the Grand Bay, Mississippi flux tower site from March 2018 to January 2019
Eddy covariance (EC) CO2 fluxes from March 2018 to January 2019 collected over a Juncus roemerianus marsh located in the Grand Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve (NERR) in Mississippi. EC fluxes were processed in EddyPro 7. Additional biophysical variables included are air temperature, relative humidity, vapor pressure deficit, soil temperature, and water table height within the marsh.
Eddy covariance 30-minute CO2 fluxes with accompanying biophysical variables from the GCE-LTER flux tower site from December 2018 to January 2020
Eddy covariance (EC) CO2 fluxes from December 2018 to January 2020 collected over a Spartina alterniflora marsh located on the western side of Sapelo Island bounded by the Duplin River and Barn Creek. EC fluxes were processed in EddyPro 7. Additional biophysical variables included are air temperature, relative humidity, vapor pressure deficit, soil temperature, and water table height from a nearby tidal creek.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.